-
Exploring the systematic error of radiotherapy equipment in intensity-modulated
radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer
- Fang Yongwen, Liu Biaoshui, Xiao Liangjie, Wang Yuliu, Yao Wenyan, Lin Xiaosheng, Lin Chengguang, Fang Jianlan
-
2022, 28(2):
150-153.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.02.001
-
Asbtract
(
)
-
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
Objective To analyze the systematic and random errors of different
treatment linear accelerators in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with cervical
cancer. Methods From October 2019 to November 2021, 320 cervical cancer patients who were
32-75 years old and received IMRT with Varian Vital_Beam accelerator and Elekta Versa_HD
accelerator in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were selected. After the design of the
radiotherapy plan was completed, we performed the X-ray simulation positioning machine reset verification according to the bed moving parameters of the treatment plan for each patient, and used
the cone beam CT (CBCT) for body position verification during the treatment, including 960 CBCT
positioning error data. The body position error data after CBCT calibration were recorded and
analyzed by paired t-test. Results The positioning errors of the Varian Vital_Beam and Elekta
Versa_HD linear accelerators in the superior-inferior (SI), left-right (LR), and anterior-post (AP)
translation directions were (0.00±0.32) cm, (0.00±0.25) cm, (0.04±0.24) cm and (0.08±0.40) cm,
(0.02±0.33) cm, (0.04±0.25) cm; there were statistically significant differences in the SI and AP
directions (both P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in the LR direction (P>
0.05). The positioning errors of the Varian Vital_Beam and Elekta Versa_HD linear accelerators in the
RTN, Pitch, and Roll rotation directions were (0.12±1.00)°, (0.81±1.33)°, (0.32±0.64)° and (0.24±
0.73)°, (0.28±1.64)°, (0.01±0.80)°; there were statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The
total systematic error errors of Varian Vital_Beam linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP, RTN, Pitch, and
Roll directions were 0.29 cm, 0.22 cm, 0.22 cm, 0.81°, 1.46°, and 0.63°; the total systematic error
errors of Elekta Versa_HD linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP, RTN, Pitch, and Roll directions were
0.37 cm, 0.30 cm, 0.23 cm, 0.69°, 1.44°, and 0.72°. The total random errors of Varian Vital_Beam
linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP, RTN, Pitch, and Roll directions were 0.23 cm, 0.18 cm, 0.14 cm,
0.98°, 0.87°, and 0.55°; the total random errors of Elekta Versa_HD linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP,
RTN, Pitch, and Roll directions were 0.28 cm, 0.23 cm, 0.15 cm, 0.54°, 1.02°, and 0.56°. Conclusions The systematic errors of different radiotherapy equipment are different. In the SI, LR, AP, and Roll
directions, the systematic error of Varian Vital_Beam is smaller than that of Elekta Versa_HD; while
in the RTN and Pitch directions, the systematic error of Varian Vital_Beam is greater than that of
Elekta Versa_HD.