Objective To investigate the factors influencing enhanced recovery after lumbar fusion surgery. Methods Using the method of prospective cohort study, 147 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who were diagnosed and treated in Jieyang People's Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the research objects. Using the randomized grouping method of block randomization, they were divided into 70 patients in the ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) group and 77 patients in the non-ERAS group. There were 32 males and 38 females in the ERAS group, aged (69.45±6.25) years; there were 35 males and 42 females in the non-ERAS group, aged (69.27±6.35) years. All patients received lumbar fusion surgery. The demographic characteristics, complications, surgical data, and postoperative recovery parameters of the two groups were analyzed. Clinical outcomes included the length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score]. t test and χ2 test were used, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of hospital stay and postoperative complications. Results The length of hospital stay in the ERAS group [(13.6±4.0) d] was shorter than that in the non-ERAS group [(15.6±3.9) d], with a statistically significant difference (t=3.068, P=0.003). The incidence of complications in the ERAS group [7.1% (5/70)] was lower than that in the non-ERAS group [18.2% (14/77)], and the proportions of early ground walking [70.0% (49/70)], early oral feeding [88.6% (62/70)], early removal of bladder catheter [80.0% (56/70)], and nutritional support [45.7% (32/70)] were higher than those in the non-ERAS group [11.7% (9/77), 7.8% (6/77), 16.9% (13/77), and 20.8% (16/77)], with statistically significant differences (χ2=3.970, 52.191, 96.243, 58.648, and 10.367; all P<0.05). On day 1, day 2, and day 3 after surgery, the VAS scores (low back pain and leg pain) in the ERAS group were lower than those in the non-ERAS group [(3.8±1.7) points vs. (5.7±2.3) points, (3.6±1.9) points vs. (4.5±2.2) points, (3.1±1.2) points vs. (3.8±1.7) points, (3.2±1.5) points vs. (3.8±1.7) points, (2.5±1.6) points vs. (3.5±1.2) points, (2.0±1.3) points vs. (2.5±0.9) points], with statistically significant differences (t=5.649, 2.642, 2.858, 2.260, 4.311, and 2.731; all P<0.05). On day 4 after surgery, the VAS score (low back pain) in the ERAS group was lower than that in the non-ERAS group [(2.7±0.5) points vs. (3.2±0.9) points], with a statistically significant difference (t=4.107, P<0.05); there was no statistically significant difference in the VAS score (leg pain) between the ERAS group and the non-ERAS group [(1.8±0.8) points vs. (2.0±1.0) points] (t=1.330, P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the length of hospital stay was correlated with ERAS program and preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (both P<0.05), but was not related to age, body mass index (BMI), operative segments ≥3, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≥3, or operative time (all P>0.05); implementation of ERAS program was associated with a decrease in complications (P<0.05). Conclusion ERAS after lumbar fusion may be related to early normal activities (including early walking, early removal of bladder catheter, and early oral feeding), multimodal analgesia, and other factors.