基于TTM的早期心脏康复护理用于PCI治疗AMI患者的价值

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20240411-05033

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　研究基于跨理论模型（TTM）的早期心脏康复护理用于经皮冠状动脉介入（PCI）治疗急性心肌梗死（AMI）患者的价值。方法　本研究为随机对照试验。选取2021年3月至2023年3月商丘市第一人民医院行PCI治疗的82例AMI患者作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法，将患者分为常规组（41例）和TTM组（41例）。TTM组男18例，女23例；年龄48～85（60.23±3.86）岁；发病至手术时间2～12（6.41±1.26）h；病变血管：左前降支19例，右回旋支5例，右冠状动脉17例。常规组男16例，女25例；年龄47～85（59.98±3.72）岁；发病至手术时间2～12（6.38±1.32）h；病变血管：左前降支16例，右回旋支7例，右冠状动脉18例。常规组采用常规早期心脏康复护理，TTM组在常规组基础上采用基于TTM的早期心脏康复护理。两组均干预至出院后6个月。比较两组依从性，干预前后心功能［左心室射血分数（LVEF）、左心室收缩末期内径（LVESD）、左心室舒张末内径（LVEDD）］、健康信念水平［冠心病健康信念量表（CADHBS）］、自我管理能力［冠心病自我管理量表（CSMS）］，干预期间心脏不良事件发生情况。采用独立样本t检验和χ²检验进行统计学分析。结果　TTM组总依从率［97.56%（40/41）］高于常规组［80.49%（33/41）］（P<0.05）。干预后，TTM组LVEF高于常规组［（61.69±3.58）%比（55.06±3.15）%］，LVESD、LVEDD均低于常规组［（34.16±2.13）mm比（39.74±2.61）mm、（52.47±2.35）mm比（61.85±3.27）mm］（均P<0.05）；TTM组CADHBS和CSMS评分均高于常规组［（69.85±4.59）分比（51.38±4.12）分、（98.76±6.89）分比（87.41±5.02）分］（均P<0.05）。干预期间，TTM组心脏不良事件总发生率［4.88%（2/41）］低于常规组［24.39%（10/41）］（P<0.05）。结论　基于TTM的早期心脏康复护理用于PCI治疗AMI患者中，可提高患者依从性、健康信念水平和自我管理能力，改善心功能，降低心脏不良事件发生率。

关键词:

急性心肌梗死, 经皮冠状动脉介入, 早期心脏康复护理, 跨理论模型

Abstract:

Objective　To study the value of trans-theoretical model (TTM)-based early cardiac rehabilitation nursing in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods　This study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 82 patients with AMI who underwent PCI in Shangqiu First People's Hospital from March 2021 to March 2023 were selected as the study objects, and the patients were divided into a routine group (41 cases) and a TTM group (41 cases) by the random number table method. There were 18 males and 23 females in the TTM group, aged 48-85 (60.23±3.86) years, the time from onset to operation was 2-12 (6.41±1.26) h, and the diseased vessels were left anterior descending branch in 19 cases, right circumflex branch in 5 cases, and right coronary artery in 17 cases. In the routine group, there were 16 males and 25 females, aged 47-85 (59.98±3.72) years, the time from onset to operation was 2-12 (6.38±1.32) h, and the diseased vessels were left anterior descending branch in 16 cases, right circumflex branch in 7 cases, and right coronary artery in 18 cases. The routine group received routine early cardiac rehabilitation nursing, and the TTM group received TTM-based early cardiac rehabilitation nursing based on the routine group. Both groups were intervened until 6 months after discharge. The compliance, cardiac function [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)], health belief level [Coronary Artery Disease Health Belief Scale (CADHBS)], self-management ability [Coronary Heart Disease Self-management Scale (CSMS)] before and after intervention, and incidence of cardiac adverse events were compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test and χ² test were used. Results　The total compliance rate in the TTM group [97.56% (40/41)] was higher than that in the routine group [80.49% (33/41)] (P<0.05). After intervention, the LVEF in the TTM group was higher than that in the routine group [(61.69±3.58)% vs. (55.06±3.15)%], but the LVESD and LVEDD were lower than those in the routine group [(34.16±2.13) mm vs. (39.74±2.61) mm, (52.47±2.35) mm vs. (61.85±3.27) mm] (all P<0.05). The scores of CADHBS and CSMS in the TTM group were higher than those in the routine group [(69.85±4.59) points vs. (51.38±4.12) points, (98.76±6.89) points vs. (87.41±5.02) points] (both P<0.05). During the intervention period, the total incidence of cardiac adverse events in the TTM group [4.88% (2/41)] was lower than that in the routine group [24.39% (10/41)] (P<0.05). Conclusion　TTM-based early cardiac rehabilitation nursing in AMI patients undergoing PCI can improve the patients' compliance and self-management ability, improve their cardiac function, and reduce the incidence of cardiac adverse events.

Key words:

Acute myocardial infarction, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Early cardiac rehabilitation nursing, Trans-theoretical model

童晶.

基于TTM的早期心脏康复护理用于PCI治疗AMI患者的价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(5): 865-869.

Tong Jing.

Value of trans-theoretical model-based early cardiac rehabilitation nursing in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(5): 865-869.

参考文献

[1] 高光华,高春城,裘淼涵,等.围术期心率对接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死患者预后影响[J].临床军医杂志,2021,49(11):1176-1179.DOI:10.16680/j.1671- 3826.2021.11.02.
[2] Saito Y, Oyama K, Tsujita K, et al. Treatment strategies of acute myocardial infarction: updates on revascularization, pharmacological therapy, and beyond[J]. J Cardiol, 2023, 81(2):168-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.07.003.
[3] 张庆荣.基于跨理论模型的健康教育对急性心肌梗死PCI术后患者知信行水平及生活质量的影响[J].医学临床研究,2019,36(4):824-826.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171. 2019.04.076.
[4] 中国医师协会中西医结合医师分会,中国中西医结合学会心血管病专业委员会,中国中西医结合学会重症医学专业委员会,等.急性心肌梗死中西医结合诊疗指南[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2018,38(3):272-284.DOI:10.7661/j.cjim.20180119.038.
[5] 陈倩萍,时光.基于跨理论模型的动机性访谈对PCI 术后病人自觉健康控制行为的影响[J].护理研究,2015,(18):2236-2238.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10096493.2015.18.021.
[6] 张萌,王彦鑫,金昌德.冠心病健康信念量表的编制与信效度研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2014,30(29):40-43.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2014.29.013.
[7] 任洪艳,唐萍,赵庆华.冠心病自我管理量表的开发和评价[J].第三军医大学学报,2009,31(11):1087-1090.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-5404.2009.11.026.
[8] 矫晓伟,张晓芳,宋娣.院后护理干预在急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的应用[J].中国伤残医学,2016,24(6):122-123.DOI:10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2016. 06.091.
[9] 吴秀娟,杜春玲,孙琳琳.循证护理结合运动康复在急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的应用效果[J].青岛医药卫生,2023,55(5):383-387.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5571. 2023.05.016.
[10] 韦婷丽.医护一体化临床护理路径在急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者围术期护理中的应用效果[J].反射疗法与康复医学,2023,4(17):128-131.
[11] 康洪彬.1例急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入术中并发心脏压塞的护理[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(8):943-944.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.08.008.
[12] 李红梅,刘娟,王焱.急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围术期临床路径的护理效果观察[J].贵州医药,2019,43(12):1993-1994.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000- 744X.2019.12.074.
[13] 顾炎,张婧婧,胡丹丽.院前急救链式流程与家庭时机理论在急性心肌梗死中的应用[J].国际医药卫生导报,2023,29(2):292-296.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2023. 02.035.
[14] 李春芳.整体护理干预对经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗急性心肌梗死患者应用效果及生活质量的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2019,38(15):2457-2460.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2019.15.050.
[15] 周力,朱超,王福财,等.药物涂层球囊在急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入术中的应用[J].首都医科大学学报,2023,44(4):669-675.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795. 2023.04.025.
[16] 王培濯,蔡腾飞,田俊,等.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对高血压并发急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后心肌重构、心肌受损的治疗效果[J].中国医刊,2023,58(2):148-152.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2023.02.009.
[17] 徐进芳,韩亚岩,陈娟,等.急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入术后应用基于远程心电监控指导下Ⅱ期心脏康复的效果[J].中国临床医生杂志,2023,51(10):1167-1169.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2023.10.011.
[18] 闫歌.早期心脏康复护理对急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后运动耐力及预后的影响[J].黑龙江医学,2022,46(4):465-467.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5775.2022. 04.029.
[19] 于小香,赵艳芳.介入治疗后急性心肌梗死患者早期心脏康复护理的临床疗效[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2023,18(2):244-249.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966. 2023.02.027.
[20] 石建克,樊相南.早期心脏康复护理干预对急性心肌梗死PCI术后患者心功能及运动耐力的影响[J].临床医学工程,2024,31(2):213-214.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659. 2024.02.0213.
[21] 彭海英.早期心脏康复护理联合网络延续指导对急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后运动耐力及日常生活能力的影响[J].实用临床医学,2023,24(2):75-77.DOI:10.13764/j.cnki.lcsy.2023.02.021.
[22] 薛璐.基于跨理论模型的早期心脏康复护理对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者术后康复的影响[J].临床与病理杂志,2023,43(3):587-596.DOI:10.11817/j.issn.2095-6959.2023.221830.
[23] 王静.基于跨理论模型的协同护理对老年冠心病患者PCI术后心脏早期康复的影响[J].护士进修杂志,2021,36(12):1138-1141.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.12.017.
[24] 田苗艳,徐丹,宋炜,等.黄芪桂枝五物汤对急性心肌梗死病人心室重塑及血清miR-21、miR-126水平的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2024,22(4):686-690.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2024.04.020.
[25] 师甜甜.智谋理论联合聚焦解决模式在急性心肌梗死PCI术患者中应用及对心功能的影响[J].航空航天医学杂志,2024,35(2):215-217.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1434. 2024.02.030.
[26] 刘冰杰.基于跨理论模型的协同护理对老年冠心病患者PCI术后心脏早期康复的影响[J].临床研究,2021,29(12):146-149.