基于健康行为改变整合理论的移动健康干预在PCI术后患者中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.22.032

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (22): 3847-3851.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.22.032

基于健康行为改变整合理论的移动健康干预在PCI术后患者中的应用

林海英¹ 陈海红¹ 蹇祥玉² 张震洪³

¹佛山市第二人民医院心内一科，佛山　528000；²佛山市第二人民医院心脏康复中心，佛山　528000；³佛山市第二人民医院心血管内科，佛山　528000

收稿日期:2024-04-09 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-11-20
通讯作者: 林海英，Email：2478053079@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省医学科研基金（B2023089）；佛山市卫生健康局医学科研项目（20230166）

Application of mobile health intervention based on integrated theory of health behavior change in patients after PCI

Lin Haiying¹, Chen Haihong¹, Jian Xiangyu², Zhang Zhenhong³

¹First Department of Cardiology, The Second People's Hospital of Foshan City, Foshan 528000, China; ²Heart Rehabilitation Center, The Second People's Hospital of Foshan City, Foshan 528000, China; ³Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Foshan City, Foshan 528000, China

Received:2024-04-09 Online:2024-11-15 Published:2024-11-20
Contact: Lin Haiying, Email: 2478053079@qq.com
Supported by:
Guangdong Medical Research Foundation (B2023089); Medical Research Project of Foshan Health Bureau (20230166)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨基于健康行为改变整合理论（ITHBC）的移动健康干预在经皮冠状动脉介入（PCI）术后患者中的应用效果。方法　前瞻性选取2022年10月至2023年8月在佛山市第二人民医院住院行PCI治疗的112例冠心病患者作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法，将患者分为对照组（56例）和观察组（56例）。对照组男36例，女20例；年龄（65.84±9.71）岁；支架植入数量：1个28例，2个25例，3个3例。观察组男38例，女18例；年龄（64.45±9.55）岁；支架植入数量：1个26例，2个25例，3个5例。对照组采用术后常规护理干预，观察组在对照组基础上采用基于ITHBC的移动健康干预。两组均干预至出院后3个月。比较两组干预前后自我管理效能［一般自我效能感量表（GSES）］、自我管理能力［冠心病自我管理量表（CSMS）］、生活质量［西雅图心绞痛量表（SAQ）］，干预期间心血管不良事件发生情况。采用独立样本t检验、秩和检验和χ²检验。结果　干预后，观察组GSES和CSMS评分均高于对照组［（31.27±3.52）分比（27.45±3.69）分、（100.68±8.43）分比（91.71±7.55）分］（均P<0.05）；观察组SAQ各维度评分均高于对照组［（81.64±5.89）分比（76.25±6.76）分、（78.43±5.23）分比（73.82±6.69）分、（82.05±4.63）分比（77.21±5.69）分、（82.29±4.87）分比（76.80±7.71）分、（91.05±6.22）分比（86.27±6.95）分］（均P<0.05）。干预期间，观察组心血管不良事件总发生率低于对照组［3.6%（2/56）比16.1%（9/56）］（P<0.05）。结论　基于ITHBC的移动健康干预可改善PCI术后患者自我效能和自我管理能力，提高生活质量，降低心血管不良事件发生率。

关键词:

经皮冠状动脉介入术, 冠心病, 移动健康干预, 健康行为改变整合理论, 自我管理

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the application effect of mobile health intervention based on the integrated theory of health behavior change (ITHBC) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods　A total of 112 patients with coronary heart disease who underwent PCI in the Second People's Hospital of Foshan City from October 2022 to August 2023 were prospectively selected as the study objects. The patients were divided into a control group (56 cases) and an observation group (56 cases) by the random number table method. In the control group, there were 36 males and 20 females, aged (65.84±9.71) years, and the number of stents implanted was 1 in 28 cases, 2 in 25 cases, and 3 in 3 cases. There were 38 males and 18 females in the observation group, aged (64.45±9.55) years, and the number of stents implanted was 1 in 26 cases, 2 in 25 cases, and 3 in 5 cases. The control group received routine postoperative care, and the observation group received mobile health interventions based on ITHBC on the basis of the control group. Both groups were intervened until 3 months after discharge. The self-management efficacy [General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)], self-management ability [Coronary Heart Disease Self-Management Scale (CSMS)], and quality of life [Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)] before and after intervention and incidence of cardiovascular adverse events were compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test, rank sum test, and χ² test were used. Results　After intervention, the GSES and CSMS scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group [(31.27±3.52) points vs. (27.45±3.69) points, (100.68±8.43) points vs. (91.71±7.55) points] (both P<0.05). The scores of all dimensions of the SAQ in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(81.64±5.89) points vs. (76.25±6.76) points, (78.43±5.23) points vs. (73.82±6.69) points, (82.05±4.63) points vs. (77.21±5.69) points, (82.29±4.87) points vs. (76.80±7.71) points, (91.05±6.22) points vs. (86.27±6.95) points] (all P<0.05). During intervention, the total incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in the observation group was lower than that in the control group [3.6% (2/56) vs. 16.1% (9/56)] (P<0.05). Conclusion　Implementing mobile health interventions based on ITHBC for patients after PCI can improve their self-efficacy and self-management ability, improve their quality of life, and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events.

Key words:

Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary heart disease, Mobile health intervention, Integrated theory of health behavior change, Self management

林海英陈海红蹇祥玉张震洪.

基于健康行为改变整合理论的移动健康干预在PCI术后患者中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(22): 3847-3851.

Lin Haiying, Chen Haihong, Jian Xiangyu, Zhang Zhenhong.

Application of mobile health intervention based on integrated theory of health behavior change in patients after PCI [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(22): 3847-3851.

参考文献

[1] 王展展,高学琴,林平,等.PCI患者家庭心脏康复干预方案的构建[J].中国实用护理杂志,2022,38(22):1735-1740.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20211105-03055.
[2] 陈晨,彭德荣,杨芬红,等.上海市某社区冠心病患者自我管理与自我效能的相关性及其影响因素[J].中华全科医师杂志,2020,19(11):1020-1024.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20200723-00849.
[3] 蔡婵纯,唐嘉吕,林斌,等.延续性健康教育对PCI术后患者自我管理水平及预后的影响[J].浙江医学,2023,45(16):1767-1770.DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2023.45.16. 2023-1277.
[4] 黄兰青,邱小芩,黄彩献,等.移动健康干预在慢性心力衰竭患者居家容量管理中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(16):111-114.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.16.111.
[5] 贾燕瑞,师晨曦,董亮,等.健康行为改变整合理论在老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2023,29(22):3038-3042.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682- 20230220-00592.
[6] 中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组,中华医学会心血管病学分会动脉粥样硬化与冠心病学组,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会,等.稳定性冠心病诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2018,46(9):680-694.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.09.004.
[7] 王才康,胡中锋,刘勇.一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007.
[8] 任洪艳,唐萍,赵庆华.冠心病自我管理量表的开发和评价[J].第三军医大学学报,2009,31(11):1087-1090.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-5404.2009.11.026.
[9] 李静,常改.西雅图量表测量冠心病患者生活质量的评价[J].中国公共卫生,2004,20(5):594.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2004.05.044.
[10] Jiang W, Feng M, Gao C, et al. Effect of a nurse-led individualized self-management program for Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2020, 19(4):320-329. DOI: 10.1177/1474515119889197.
[11] 刘静,张彩丽,王静,等.基于感恩拓延-建构理论的院外护理对中青年PCI术后患者自我管理效能的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2023,29(13):1778-1781.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20220728-03675.
[12] 孙海荣,冯思利,王春丽,等.基于正强化理论的个案护理对急性心肌梗死PCI术后康复的促进作用[J].国际护理学杂志,2022,41(11):2086-2090.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20201230-00538.
[13] Bao Y, Wang C, Xu H, et al. Effects of an mHealth intervention for pulmonary tuberculosis self-management based on the integrated theory of health behavior change: randomized controlled trial[J]. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 2022, 8(7):e34277. DOI: 10.2196/34277.
[14] Shen A, Wu P, Qiang W, et al. Predicting lymphedema self-management behaviours in breast cancer patients: a structural equation model with the Integrated theory of health behaviour change[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2023, 79(12):4778-4790. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15759.
[15] 邬小琼,吕薇,易亚奇,等.基于IMCHB的移动健康干预在血液透析患者中的运用[J].国际医药卫生导报,2023,29(16):2328-2332.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023. 16.026.
[16] 马翠,解红文.基于健康行为改变整合理论的移动健康干预对孕妇体重管理的影响[J].广西医学,2020,42(4):505-508.DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2020.04.32.
[17] Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, et al. Quality of life after fractional flow reserve-guided PCI compared with coronary bypass surgery[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(22):1655-1662. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122. 060049.
[18] 易世清,张秀霞,彭林.急诊PCI术后病人生活质量影响因素分析[J].全科护理,2022,20(32):4597-4599.DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2022.32.036.
[19] 刘芳,周建伟.经皮冠状动脉介入术后冠心病患者自我管理行为现状与生活质量的相关性及影响因素[J].中国医药科学,2023,13(18):128-131.DOI:10.20116/j.issn2095-0616. 2023.18.30.
[20] 刘云娥,王菁.基于微信平台延续护理干预对冠心病患者PCI术后负性情绪、自我效能及生活质量的影响[J].西部中医药,2022,35(2):122-125.DOI:10.12174/j.issn.2096- 9600.2022.02.31.
[21] 谢贵华,成忠莎,万艳平,等.基于健康行为改变整合理论的健康教育在心脏机械瓣膜置换术后患者延续护理中的应用[J].护士进修杂志,2023,38(1):73-76.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2023.01.016.
[22] 翁文超,杨道玲,陈静婉.二维斑点追踪技术预测急性心肌梗死患者PCI后1年发生主要心脏不良事件的价值[J].温州医科大学学报,2023,53(1):49-54.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2023.01.008.
[23] 刘英,胡格,马秋红,等.基于互动达标模式的护理干预在心肌梗死PCI术后病人中的应用[J].护理研究,2023,37(2):371-373.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.02.038.
[24] 窦峥峥.基于微信平台的二级预防措施对预防冠心病PCI术后不良事件的效果[J].当代护士(上旬刊),2021,28(1):57-59.DOI:10.19791/j.cnki.1006-6411.2021.01.020.
[25] 方林林,张阿慧,王珊.基于信息—动机—行为技巧模型的分阶段护理对冠心病患者健康行为和疾病感知的影响[J].黑龙江医学,2023,47(13):1638-1641.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5775.2023.13.030.
[26] 陈洁,孟庆童,麦爱欢,等.基于5A策略的延续护理对急性心肌梗死患者出院后自我管理能力的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(11):1644-1647.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021.11.016.

基于健康行为改变整合理论的移动健康干预在PCI术后患者中的应用

Application of mobile health intervention based on integrated theory of health behavior change in patients after PCI

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨星王秋茹周雪. 脂蛋白a和载脂蛋白B联合维生素D检测对冠心病严重程度及短期预后的评估价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(8): 1238-1242.
[2]	宋云红刘亚楠张宗丽. 老年高血压患者合并冠心病的危险因素分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(8): 1253-1258.
[3]	尹夏孟东方袁冬李倩汪喆. 心理弹性在颈型颈椎病患者自我管理能力与生活质量间的中介效应 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(8): 1392-1397.
[4]	王静聂巧莉陶远. 认知信念行为模式对青光眼患者生存质量及自我管理的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(7): 1226-1232.
[5]	闫荣胡广翠逄红风于杰. 平板运动试验与静息心电图联合评估对冠心病的诊断价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 619-622.
[6]	张展李杏莫琳勤苏严琳孙艳彬. 结局引导的双心服务在冠心病不稳定型心绞痛患者PCI围手术期中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 641-646.
[7]	刘玉芹李宁石凡英寇明捷樊学英. 基于互联网平台的5A护理模式在妊娠糖尿病患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 682-687.
[8]	翟留群郑滑李瑜付海尔李蒙赵媛媛王陆巡任梦媛. 药学强化干预社区高血压患者的效果及预测卒中发病风险 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(3): 419-424.
[9]	杨天芬李磊张娜娜. 老年冠心病患者PCI治疗相关造影剂肾病的预测模型建立及验证 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(22): 3779-3785.
[10]	陈山霞张俊梅谢赫男. 基于行为改变轮理论的护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者容量管理效果的研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(22): 3852-3856.
[11]	焦艳艳刘荣荣陈冰高聪聪杨红星. ITHBC理论下康复方案对乳腺癌术后上肢功能障碍患者的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(21): 3680-3684.
[12]	张乐常小琪. Teach-back联合叙事护理在老年冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后的效果分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(19): 3337-3342.
[13]	蒋蓓刘晓荣李曼史欣. 改良开天门联合五音疗法对冠心病患者介入术后康复效果的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(14): 2337-2342.
[14]	王英孙亚平陈启凤林德艳徐凤美. 思维导图式健康宣教在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期中的护理效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(13): 2273-2278.
[15]	沈沽灼陈艳丽李秀芬. 增强型体外反搏在心脏康复中的研究进展 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(12): 1937-1941.