不同时期导尿对先天性小耳畸形耳廓再造患儿的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.02.030

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨不同时期导尿对先天性小耳畸形耳廓再造患儿的影响。方法　本研究为随机对照试验。选取2022年1月至12月期间广东省第二人民医院整形美容激光中心的64例先天性小耳畸形耳廓再造术（皮肤扩张法耳廓再造术1期）患者，纳入研究患者年龄（9.3±2.8）岁，男性44例，女性20例。按随机数字表法将其分为对照组和研究组，每组32例。对照组于常规术前在病房行导尿术，研究组于全麻后在手术室行导尿术。分析比较两种护理模式的应用效果，比较不同时期导尿患者的血压、心率变化以及导尿管成功率、疼痛不适感、焦虑恐惧感、尿道损伤发生例数、麻醉复苏时躁动情况。采用χ²检验、t检验。结果　对照组导尿前、后收缩压［（16.10±1.96）kPa比（18.14±1.83）kPa］、舒张压［（10.10±1.70）kPa比（10.97±1.64）kPa］、心率［（98.09±1.58）次/min比（120.41±3.90）次/min］比较差异均有统计学意义（t=4.303、2.083、30.006，均P<0.05）。研究组导尿前、后收缩压［（16.39±1.80）kPa比（16.66±2.06）kPa］、舒张压［（10.10±1.70）kPa比（10.50±1.57）kPa］、心率［（98.14±1.61）次/min比（98.93±6.43）次/min］比较差异均无统计学意义（t=0.558、0.978、0.674，均P>0.05）。研究组一次性置入导尿管成功、疼痛不适感、焦虑恐惧、麻醉复苏时躁动患者分别为30、0、8、1例，对照组分别为24、26、30、28例，两组比较差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论　对先天性小耳畸形耳廓再造患儿采取全麻后行导尿术的全程护理方式，能减轻患儿的心理负担和并发症，提高导尿舒适度，值得在护理临床中推广及应用。

关键词:

先天性小耳畸形, 小耳再造术, 全麻, 导尿术, 儿童

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effect of catheterization at different stages on children with congenital microtia undergoing auricle reconstruction. Methods　This was a randomized controlled trial. From January to December 2022, 64 patients with congenital microtia undergoing auricular reconstruction (phase 1 auricular reconstruction by skin expansion method) in Plastic and Cosmetic Laser Center of Guangdong Second People's Hospital were selected and were divided into a control group and a study group according to the random number table method, with 32 cases in each group. The included patients were (9.3±2.8) years old, with 44 boys and 20 girls. The control group underwent routine catheterization in the ward before surgery, and the study group underwent catheterization in the operating room after general anesthesia. The application effects of the two nursing models were analyzed and compared, and the changes of blood pressure and heart rate, success rate of catheterization, pain and discomfort, anxiety and fear, number of cases of urethral injury, and agitation during anesthesia resuscitation were compared between the patients with catheterization at different stages. χ² test and t test were used. Results　There were statistically significant differences in the systolic blood pressure [(16.10±1.96) kPa vs. (18.14±1.83) kPa], diastolic blood pressure [(10.10±1.70) kPa vs. (10.97±1.64) kPa], and heart rate [(98.09±1.58) beats/min vs. (120.41±3.90) beats/min] in the control group before and after catheterization (t=4.303, 2.083, and 30.006; all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the systolic blood pressure [(16.39±1.80) kPa vs. (16.66±2.06) kPa], diastolic blood pressure [(10.10±1.70) kPa vs. (10.50±1.57) kPa], or heart rate [(98.14±1.61) beats/min vs. (98.93±6.43) beats/min] in the study group before and after catheterization (t=0.558, 0.978, and 0.674; all P>0.05). In the study group, there were 30, 0, 8, and 1 cases of one-time successful catheterization, pain and discomfort, anxiety and fear, and agitation during anesthesia resuscitation, and there were 24, 26, 30, and 28 cases in the control group, with statistically significant differences between the two groups (all P<0.05). Conclusion　The whole-process nursing method of urethral catheterization after general anesthesia can reduce the psychological burden and complications in children with congenital microtia undergoing auricle reconstruction, and improve the comfort of urethral catheterization, which is worthy of widespread promotion and application in nursing clinic.

Key words:

Congenital microtia, Auricle reconstruction, General anesthesia, Urinary catheterization, Children

伍银李方伟刘菲李明丽李秀妹伍艳群.

不同时期导尿对先天性小耳畸形耳廓再造患儿的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(2): 324-328.

Wu Yin, Li Fangwei, Liu Fei, Li Mingli, Li Xiumei, Wu Yanqun.

Effects of catheterization at different stages on children with congenital microtia undergoing auricle reconstruction [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(2): 324-328.

参考文献

[1] Bly RA, Bhrany AD, Murakami CS, et al. Microtia reconstruction[J]. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2016, 24(4): 577-591. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.06.011.
[2] Fafaj A, Lo Menzo E, Rosen MJ. Intraoperative urinary catheter use and risk of postoperative urinary retention -reply[J]. JAMA Surg, 2023, 158(1):106. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5160.
[3] 张群秀,黄颢,黄雪莲,等. 全麻手术患者两种不同时机导尿的舒适性研究[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2007,13(18):1-2. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2007.18.001.
[4] 何海燕,李润梅,刘素林. 全身麻醉前后留置导尿管对患者的不同影响[J]. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版),2013, 30(6): 79-80,82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1492. 2013. 06.023.
[5] Gilbert B, Naidoo TL, Redwig F. Ins and outs of urinary catheters[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2018, 47(3): 132-136. DOI: 10.31128/AFP-10-17-4362.
[6] Andrews J, Kopacz AA, Hohman MH. Ear Microtia[M]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2023.
[7] 刘慧琳. 穴位贴敷联合捏脊疗法在小儿应变性鼻炎患儿中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(9):74-76. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2019.09.025.
[8] 饶德玲. 全麻患者进行无痛导尿时机选择[J]. 临床合理用药杂志,2011,4(26):82-83. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3296. 2011.26.066.
[9] Vallée M, Robert G, Rigaud J, et al. Technique and management of urinary catheterization in men[J]. Prog Urol, 2018, 28(14): 783-789. DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018. 07.282.
[10] 徐璐,苏迎春.小儿导尿术的临床体会[J].大家健康(学术版),2013,7(11):74.
[11] Totsila D, Kontrafouri A, Sinopidis X. An approximation method for the prevention of knot formation during catheterization in children[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2023, 19(1): 138-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.10.004.
[12] 郁君静. 无痛导尿的手术室护理[J]. 中国实用医药,2008,3(32):108-109. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7555.2008. 32.093.
[13] 刘露.小儿手术患者行术前导尿的护理[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2015(11):53-54.
[14] 叶子翔,李军文,童禹浩,等. 围术期导尿时机对全麻患者苏醒期躁动影响的Meta分析[J]. 基层医学论坛,2021,25(10):1333-1337. DOI:10.19435/j.1672-1721.2021.10.001.
[15] Turmel N, Hentzen C, Miget G, et al. Urethral pain during clean intermittent self catheterization: retrospective analysis of 77 patients[J]. Prog Urol, 2019, 29(7): 360-365. DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.04.005.
[16] 陈信玉,陈余粮,李建华. 盐酸达克罗宁胶浆用于行全麻手术老年男性患者留置导尿粘膜表面麻醉的临床观察[J]. 当代医学,2016,22(35):154-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009- 4393.2016.35.100.
[17] Zugail AS, Pinar U, Irani J. Evaluation of pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort relative to balloon volumes of indwelling urinary catheters: a prospective study[J]. Investig Clin Urol, 2019, 60(1): 35-39. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.1.35.
[18] Luquetti DV, Heike CL, Hing AV, et al. Microtia: epidemiology and genetics[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2012, 158A(1): 124-139. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34352.
[19] 薄芬芬,刘阳. 留置尿管尿道疼痛的原因分析及护理干预[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(A4):330.
[20] Cartwright A. Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: standardising practice[J]. Br J Nurs, 2018, 27(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.1.7.
[21] Chenoweth CE. Urinary tract infections: 2021 update[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2021, 35(4):857-870. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.08.003.
[22] 周会丽. 不同麻醉方式在剖宫产手术患者中的镇痛效果观察[J]. 糖尿病天地,2019,16(3):115-116. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7851.2019.03.133.
[23] Brouwer TA, van Roon EN, Rosier PFWM, et al. Postoperative urinary retention: risk factors, bladder filling rate and time to catheterization: an observational study as part of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Perioper Med (Lond), 2021, 10(1):2. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-020- 00167-z.
[24] Zheng W, Zhang X, Zheng X, et al. Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for postoperative urinary retention in lung cancer patients[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2022, 2022:2227629. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2227629.
[25] 黄月好,温水群. 留置导尿管并发症的预防及护理[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2004, 10(6):109-110.
[26] Hayami S, Ueno M, Kawai M, et al. Optimal timing of removal of epidural and urethral catheters to avoid postoperative urinary retention undergoing abdominal surgery[J]. Dig Surg, 2019, 36(3): 261-265. DOI: 10.1159/000490199.
[27] Murakami T, Kayo R, Kajita I, et al. A case of latex allergy induced by indwelt Foley catheter[J]. Masui, 2004, 53(6): 675-678.
[28] Liao X, Liu Y, Liang S, et al. Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2022, 54(7): 1461-1470. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03172-x.
[29] Barken KB, Vaabengaard R. A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention[J]. BMC Urol, 2022, 22(1):153. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01102-8.
[30] Dong Z, Qu X, Zhang L, et al. Efficacy and safety of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride gel in alleviating pain during male urethral catheterization: a single-center randomized controlled study[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2022, 2022: 5734387. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5734387.
[31] 周会丽. 不同麻醉方式在剖宫产手术患者中的镇痛效果观察[J]. 糖尿病天地,2019,16(3): 115-116. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7851.2019.03.133.
[32] 李书红,李爱花,付绒利,等. 先天性小耳畸形耳廓再造成形术围手术期的护理[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2011,15(4):82-83,92. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2011.04.035.