赋能理论指导的自我管理模式在急性髓系白血病化疗患者中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20240822-05034

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨在急性髓系白血病（AML）化疗患者中采取赋能理论指导的自我管理模式的效果。方法　回顾性分析2021年8月至2023年8月郑州市第三人民医院收治的70例AML患者临床资料，依照护理方法不同将患者分为对照组和观察组，每组35例。对照组男18例，女17例，年龄（40.53±2.36）岁，病程（13.59±3.54）个月；接受常规护理。观察组男17例，女18例，年龄（40.59±2.42）岁，病程（13.62±3.61）个月；接受赋能理论指导的自我管理模式干预。两组均持续护理1个月。比较两组患者护理前后心理状态、自我效能水平、自我管理能力、生活质量及不良反应发生率。采用χ²检验、t检验进行统计分析。结果　护理后，观察组正性负性情绪量表中的积极情感层面评分高于对照组、消极情感层面评分低于对照组［（28.87±2.14）分比（19.82±2.01）分、（13.51±1.37）分比（18.82±1.46）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=18.236、15.691，均P<0.05）；健康促进策略量表中的自我减压、正面态度、自我决策评分分别为（28.98±1.62）分、（41.18±2.37）分、（11.24±1.15）分，均高于对照组的（24.72±1.51）分、（34.84±2.26）分、（8.91±1.13）分，差异均有统计学意义（t=11.380、11.453、8.550，均P<0.05）；自我护理能力测定量表中的健康知识水平、自我概念、自我护理技能、自我责任感评分分别为（26.73±1.51）分、（15.95±1.27）分、（26.64±1.42）分、（16.84±1.52）分，均高于对照组的（19.98±1.46）分、（10.31±1.14）分、（21.41±1.37）分、（13.93±1.46）分，差异均有统计学意义（t=19.012、19.552、15.681、8.168，均P<0.05）；生存质量测定量表简表中的心理健康、周围环境、生理健康、社会关系评分均高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（t=10.868、6.488、9.396、9.306，均P<0.05）。观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组［5.71%（2/35）比22.86%（8/35）］，差异有统计学意义（χ²=4.200，P=0.040）。结论　赋能理论指导的自我管理模式可减轻AML化疗患者的消极心理状态，有效提升患者自我效能水平和自我管理能力，减少不良反应发生风险，进而提升患者生活质量。

关键词:

急性髓系白血病, 化疗, 赋能理论, 自我管理模式, 心理状态, 自我效能, 自我管理能力

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the application effect of self-management model guided by empowerment theory in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing chemotherapy. Methods　The clinical data of 70 patients with AML admitted to Zhengzhou Third People's Hospital from August 2021 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different nursing methods, the patients were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 35 cases in each group. The control group consisted of 18 males and 17 females, aged (40.53±2.36) years, and the course of disease was (13.59±3.54) months. The observation group consisted of 17 males and 18 females, aged (40.59±2.42) years, and the course of disease was (13.62±3.61) months. The control group received routine nursing care, and the observation group received self-management intervention guided by the empowerment theory. Both groups received continuous nursing for 1 month. The psychological state, self-efficacy level, self-management ability, and quality of life before and after nursing and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. χ²test and t test were used for statistical analysis. Results　After nursing, the positive emotion level score of the Positive and Negative Emotion Scale in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the negative emotion level score was lower than that in the control group [(28.87±2.14) points vs. (19.82±2.01) points, (13.51±1.37) points vs. (18.82±1.46) points] (t=18.236 and 15.691, both P<0.05); the scores of self-stress reduction, positive attitude, and self-decision making of the Health Promotion Strategy Scale were (28.98±1.62), (41.18±2.37), and (11.24±1.15) points, which were higher than those in the control group [(24.72±1.51), (34.84±2.26), and (8.91±1.13) points] (t=11.380, 11.453, and 8.550, all P<0.05); the scores of health knowledge level, self-concept, self-care skills, and self-responsibility in the self-care ability scale were (26.73±1.51), (15.95±1.27), (26.64±1.42), and (16.84±1.52) points, which were higher than those in the control group [(19.98±1.46), (10.31±1.14), (21.41±1.37), and (13.93±1.46) points] (t=19.012, 19.552, 15.681, and 8.168, all P<0.05); the scores of mental health, surrounding environment, physical health, and social relations of the WHOQOL-BREF were (79.84±3.52), (82.29±4.62), (80.19±3.80), and (81.75±4.38) points, which were higher than those in the control group [(70.76±3.47), (75.56±4.04), (71.80±3.67), and (72.27±4.14) points] (t=10.868, 6.488, 9.396, and 9.306, all P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group [5.71% (2/35) vs. 22.86% (8/35)], with a statistically significant difference (χ²=4.200, P=0.040). Conclusion　The self-management model guided by the empowerment theory can alleviate the negative psychological state of AML patients undergoing chemotherapy, effectively improve their level of self-efficacy and self-management ability, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, thus improving the quality of life.

Key words:

Acute myeloid leukemia, Chemotherapy, Empowerment theory, Self-management model, Mental state, Self-efficacy, Self-management ability

杜露露朱趁红刘瑞莹孙静.

赋能理论指导的自我管理模式在急性髓系白血病化疗患者中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(5): 870-874.

Du Lulu, Zhu Chenhong, Liu Ruiying, Sun Jing.

Application of self-management model guided by empowerment theory in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing chemotherapy [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(5): 870-874.

参考文献

[1] 赵寅,万阳阳.系统性护理干预在降低成人急性髓系白血病化疗期间口腔黏膜炎发生率中的应用[J].川北医学院学报,2022,37(2):262-265. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697. 2022.02.032.
[2] 彭于娇,万阳阳,饶治嫦.分阶段改变理论的匹配护理模式在老年急性髓系白血病患者中的临床应用[J].老年医学与保健,2023,29(2):314-318,341.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008- 8296.2023.02.028.
[3] 朱振芳,李晓梅,张欣.PDCA护理管理模式在急性白血病患者化疗中的应用效果分析[J].贵州医药,2021,45(11):1841-1842.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2021.11.096.
[4] 方丹丹,许玉霞.赋能理论指导的自我管理模式在老年脑卒中患者中的应用[J].临床医学工程,2023,30(3):399-400.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2023.03.0399.
[5] 中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组.成人急性髓系白血病(非急性早幼粒细胞白血病)中国诊疗指南(2017年版)[J].中华血液学杂志,2017,38(3):177-182.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.03.001.
[6] 刘延锦,余溯源,郭丽娜,等.汉化修正版自我护理能力评估量表用于成年人群中的信效度研究[J].重庆医学,2018,47(33):4266-4269.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2018. 33.017.
[7] 郑泓,李玲艳,李诗晨,等.中文版正性负性情绪量表在乳腺癌患者中的信度和效度[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(4):671-674,670.DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611. 2016.04.022.
[8] 周英华,钱会娟,袁长蓉.中文版癌症自我管理效能量表在肺癌人群中的信、效度研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2013,30(7):31-33.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2013.07.008.
[9] 徐迪,端琼丽,潘玲,等. WHOQOL-BREF用于评价HIV感染者生活质量的信、效度研究[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2022,26(5):576-582.DOI:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2022.05.015.
[10] 张辉,张利博,宁彤彤.多元化护理预防初诊急性白血病患者感染的临床效果观察[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2021,28(1):118-120. DOI:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2021.01.30.
[11] 李东梅,史健,齐欣欣. 措施分类护理模式在急性髓系白血病缓解后化疗患者中的应用效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2023,29(9):1313-1317. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007- 1245.2023.09.029.
[12] 丁宁,蒋凤云,储菲.AIDET沟通模式对急性白血病化疗患者负性情绪、依从性的影响[J].皖南医学院学报,2023,42(4):397-400.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0217.2023.04.025.
[13] 刘天,吴秋琳.以患者和家庭为中心的干预措施结合持续营养治疗对急性髓系白血病疗效、营养及生存质量评分的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2021,40(21):3958-3961. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200705-01115.
[14] 景婷,吴霜,彭杨.医护一体化风险管理模式在急性白血病经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管置管患者中的应用研究[J].成都医学院学报,2022,17(1):124-127.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2257.2022.01.027.
[15] 李伟芳,李兰花,续鲁静,等.医疗失效模式与效应分析在降低急性白血病患者化疗后肛周感染中的应用研究[J].护士进修杂志,2021,36(17):1605-1609.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.17.015.
[16] Heuser M, Fernandez C, Hauch O, et al. Therapies for acute myeloid leukemia in patients ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy: a systematic review[J]. Future Oncol, 2023, 19(11):789-810. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022- 1286.
[17] 杨书环,杨贵芳,田桂荣,等.集束化护理降低急性白血病化疗患者肺部感染发病率的效果研究[J].中国感染控制杂志,2023,22(4):435-441. DOI:10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638. 20233226.
[18] 田金满,张婧婧,史楠,等.叙事护理联合思维场疗法在首诊急性白血病患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(21):2883-2887. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682- 20210305-00978.
[19] 邢香芹,唐若莹,王二洁,等.基于感染风险评估分层的针对性护理对急性白血病化疗病人感染预防及生活质量的影响[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2023,48(9):1282-1285. DOI:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.09.024.
[20] 王少平. AIDET沟通模式护理对急性白血病化疗患者心理状态、依从性及行为方式的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2022,41(10):1778-1781. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370- 20200815-00459.
[21] 段婷婷,吕娅,潘蕊,等.集束化护理方案在预防急性白血病化疗所致口腔黏膜炎中的效果[J].昆明医科大学学报,2021,42(1):167-172. DOI:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210108.