精准护理模式对发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的干预效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.04.033

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 674-677.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.04.033

精准护理模式对发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的干预效果

贺军宁¹ 孙秀香² 王鹏雁³

¹烟台市奇山医院消毒供应室，烟台　264000；²烟台市奇山医院呼吸内科，烟台　264000；³烟台市奇山医院科教科，烟台　264000

收稿日期:2023-08-18 出版日期:2024-02-01 发布日期:2024-03-08
通讯作者: 贺军宁，Email：qsyyhjn62@163.com
基金资助:
烟台市科技计划项目（2018YT06000578）

Intervention effect of precision nursing model on patients with fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome

He Junning¹, Sun Xiuxiang², Wang Pengyan³

¹Disinfection and Supply Room, Yantai Qishan Hospital, Yantai 264000, China; ²Department of Respiratory Medicine, Yantai Qishan Hospital, Yantai 264000, China;³Department of Science and Education, Yantai Qishan Hospital, Yantai 264000, China

Received:2023-08-18 Online:2024-02-01 Published:2024-03-08
Contact: He Junning, Email: qsyyhjn62@163.com
Supported by:
Yantai Science and Technology Plan Project (2018YT06000578)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨精准护理模式对发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的干预效果。方法　选取烟台市奇山医院2016年2月至2020年12月收治的发热伴血小板减少综合征患者97例，按随机数字表法分为对照组49例和观察组48例。对照组男性30例、女性19例，年龄（48.12±6.04）岁；观察组男性30例、女性18例，年龄（48.52±6.35）岁。对照组实施认知与行为护理，观察组在对照组基础上进行精准护理模式，护理时间均为2个月。对比两组患者的护理前后知信行认知水平、一般自我效能感量表（GSES）评分、生活质量和护理期间血小板输注次数。采用独立样本t检验、配对t检验、χ²检验。结果　护理后，观察组的知信行认知评分、GSES评分、生活质量评分均高于对照组［（22.71±1.35）分比（21.15±1.21）分、（28.61±1.48）分比（22.60±2.64）分、（87.37±11.55）分比（75.09±10.85）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=5.996、13.791、5.398，均P<0.001）。观察组护理期间血小板输注次数为（2.63±0.24）次，对照组为（3.68±0.52）次，差异有统计学意义（t=12.724，P<0.001）。结论　精准护理模式在发热伴血小板减少综合征患者中，有利于提高知信行认知水平，改善患者自我效能、降低血小板输注次数，还可提高生活质量，值得在临床进行推广与应用。

关键词:

发热, 血小板减少综合征, 精准护理模式, 自我效能, 生活质量

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the intervention effect of precision nursing model on patients with fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Methods　A total of 97 patients with fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome admitted to Yantai Qishan Hospital from February 2016 to December 2020 were selected and were divided into an observation group (48 patients) and a control group (49 patients) with the random number table method. The control group included 30 males and 19 females, aged (48.12±6.04) years. The observation group included 30 males and 18 females, aged (48.52±6.35) years. The control group carried out cognitive and behavioral nursing, and the observation group carried out precise nursing model on the basis of the control group for 2 months. The cognitive levels of knowledge-attitude-practice, the scores of General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the qualities of life before and after nursing and the times of platelet transfusion during nursing were compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test, paired t test, and χ² test were used. Results　After nursing, the cognitive score of knowledge-attitude-practice, GSES score, and score of quality of life in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(22.71±1.35) points vs. (21.15±1.21) points, (28.61±1.48) points vs. (22.60±2.64) points, (87.37±11.55) points vs. (75.09±10.85) points], with statistically significant differences (t=5.996, 13.791, and 5.398, all P<0.001). The times of platelet transfusion was (2.63±0.24) times in the observation group and (3.68±0.52) times in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (t=12.724, P<0.001). Conclusion　In patients with fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, precision nursing model is beneficial to improve the cognitive level of knowledge-attitude-practice, improve the patients' self-efficacy, reduce the times of platelet infusion, and improve the patients' quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Key words:

Fever, Thrombocytopenia syndrome, Precision nursing model, Self-efficacy, Quality of life

贺军宁孙秀香王鹏雁.

精准护理模式对发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的干预效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 674-677.

He Junning, Sun Xiuxiang, Wang Pengyan.

Intervention effect of precision nursing model on patients with fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(4): 674-677.

参考文献

[1] 于淙,欧阳天佐,周培. 预测发热伴血小板减少综合征致死相关危险因素的meta分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(14):2054-2063. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007- 1245. 2020.14.019.
[2] Strzelczyk A, Schwab C, Knake S, et al. Reply to: "All patients with epilepsy, whether at high or low risk of SUDEP, should have access to individually tailored SUDEP information" by Oliver Henning, Karl O. Nakken, and Morten I. Lossius[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2022, 127:108534. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108534.
[3] Sato R, Ohmori K, Umetsu M, et al. An atlas of the quantitative protein expression of anti-epileptic-drug transporters, metabolizing enzymes and tight junctions at the blood–brain barrier in epileptic patients[J]. Pharmaceutics, 2021, 13(12): 2122. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122122.
[4] Ji Z, Yin L, Li Y, et al. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method with triple stage fragmentation to determine levetiracetam in epileptic patient serum and its application in therapeutic drug monitoring[J]. J Sep Sci, 2021, 44(23): 4255-4263. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100639.
[5] Cines DB, Liebman H, Stasi R. Pathobiology of secondary immune thrombocytopenia[J]. Semin Hematol, 2009, 46(1 Suppl 2):S2-S14. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol. 2008.12.005.
[6] Kohli R, Chaturvedi S. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of immune thrombocytopenia[J]. Hamostaseologie, 2019, 39(3): 238-249. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683416.
[7] Herrera-Espejo S, Santos-Zorrozua B, Álvarez-González P, et al. A systematic review of microrna expression as biomarker of late-onset Alzheimer's disease [J]. Mol Neurobiol, 2019, 56(12): 8376-8391. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-019-01676-9.
[8] Organista-Juárez D, Jiménez A, Rocha L, et al. Differential expression of miR-34a, 449, 1260, 1275 and 1298 in the neocortex of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy [J]. Epilepsy Res, 2019, 157(3): 106188. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106188.
[9] Lyttle MD, Rainford NEA, Gamble C, et al. Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for second-line treatment of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus (EcLiPSE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(1): 2125-2134. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30724-X.
[10] 申继亮,唐丹. 一般自我效能感量表(GSES)在老年人中的使用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(4): 342-344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2004.04.004.
[11] 任晓琳,梁平,刘雪琴. 癫痫患者生活质量量表-31(中文版)的翻译及修订[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2003,20(4): 99-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2003.04.065.
[12] 张鹏,杨菁菁,李晗郡. 血小板抗体筛查在DIC中的应用价值分析[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床,2019,26(6):1000-1003. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2019.06.025.
[13] 郭凯,王笑欢,王孟键,等. 血小板减少患儿血小板抗体筛查及分析[J]. 中国输血杂志,2019,32(2): 99-102. DOI: 10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2019.02.001.
[14] 谭茜茜,魏习薇,巩天祥,等. 血小板抗体筛查及交叉配型的临床应用[J]. 中国输血杂志,2021,34(4): 382-385. DOI: 10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2021.04.014.
[15] 陆乐,李平,刘婷婷,等. 不同性别、临床科室患者血小板抗体筛查结果分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2021,42(3): 263-265,269. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2021. 03.002.
[16] 李春晶,刘庆华,全传松,等. 重症发热伴血小板减少综合征临床特征研究[J]. 医学信息,2023,36(6): 172-175. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.06.039.
[17] 陈广,陈韬,舒赛男,等. 重症发热伴血小板减少综合征诊治专家共识[J]. 传染病信息,2022,35(5): 385-393. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8134.2022.05.001.
[18] 苏学芳,靳爱华,宋红娥. 乐陵市2013-2020年发热伴血小板减少综合征的流行病学特点分析[J]. 临床医学,2022,42(3): 1-3. DOI: 10.19528/j.issn.1003-3548.2022.03.001.
[19] 严佳敏. 发热伴血小板减少综合征病毒感染宿主细胞的转录组学分析及诱导细胞自噬机制的研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2022. DOI: 10.27379/d.cnki.gwhdu.2021.000919.
[20] 王永梅,郝淑卿,王鹏雁. 精准护理模式对发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(15): 88-91. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2020.15.029.

精准护理模式对发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的干预效果

Intervention effect of precision nursing model on patients with fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	温俊萍周艳颜彭晓辉. 5E护理模式在糖尿病肾病患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 793-796.
[2]	周静阮丽平高梦崔菲. 跟进式赋能教育在结直肠癌化疗患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 871-875.
[3]	李丹丹王欢欢姬响华蔻香草罗冷孙羽燕. 超声指导下的护理方案预防ECMO运转期患儿压疮的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 559-563.
[4]	郑治锦张莉苏静. 医疗团队资源管理模式在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(3): 434-438.
[5]	杨静刘阳子. 失效模式与效应分析在骨折患者术后护理中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(3): 460-464.
[6]	李正田媛王少华. 动机行为指导的干预策略在人工膝关节置换术患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(2): 223-227.
[7]	李挺孔敏李利民. 全麻显微镜支撑喉镜激光烧灼术在声带息肉治疗中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(2): 275-279.
[8]	张苗苗吴坤英. 三种不同术式治疗中重度盆腔器官脱垂患者的临床效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(1): 86-90.
[9]	张春晓孙晓萍. 尊严疗法临终护理对晚期肺癌患者希望水平的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(1): 155-159.
[10]	孙秀香贺军宁王鹏雁. 共情护理联合多维度健康教育指导对肺结核患者的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(1): 160-163.
[11]	卢宇婷张茹钰季福欣. 家属协同管理模式联合抗阻运动训练对类风湿关节炎患儿生活质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(1): 169-173.
[12]	莫希平萍傅伊菲. 专业医护人员引导下的一体化管理在老年重症肺炎患者中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(8): 1166-1170.
[13]	于丰源刘聪阮佳朋. 祛瘀生新针法联合康复疗法对脑梗死患者的疗效 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(7): 987-990.
[14]	冯双吴玉卓. 基于跨理论模型指导的健康教育对肺结核患者自我管理行为及生活质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(7): 1020-1024.
[15]	钟洁敏邵蕾王艳芳. 基于互联网的同伴支持结合认知教育对面部重度痤疮患者心理状况及生活质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(6): 881-885.