基于主观整体营养评估量表评分的营养干预对结直肠癌患者化疗期营养摄入和生活质量的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20240806-01029

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 136-140.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20240806-01029

基于主观整体营养评估量表评分的营养干预对结直肠癌患者化疗期营养摄入和生活质量的影响

邱换换¹ 葛高琪² 郭瑾¹ 刘建芳¹ 路亚婉¹

¹河南省人民医院郑州大学人民医院肿瘤中心二病区，郑州 450000；²濮阳职业技术学院，濮阳 457000

收稿日期:2024-08-06 出版日期:2025-01-01 发布日期:2025-01-14
通讯作者: 郭瑾，Email：1123978268@qq.com
基金资助:
河南省科技厅科技攻关项目（222102310724）

Effects of nutritional intervention based on Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment score on nutritional intake and quality of life during chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients

Qiu Huanhuan¹, Ge Gaoqi², Guo Jin¹, Liu Jianfang¹, Lu Yawan¹

¹Second Ward, Oncology Centre, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, China; ²Puyang Institute of Vocational Technology, Puyang 457000, China

Received:2024-08-06 Online:2025-01-01 Published:2025-01-14
Contact: Guo Jin, Email: 1123978268@qq.com
Supported by:
Colorectal cancer; Chemotherapy; Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment; Nutritional intake; Quality of life

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探究基于主观整体营养评估量表（PG-SGA）评分的营养干预对结直肠癌患者化疗期营养摄入和生活质量的影响。方法　本研究为随机对照试验。选取2021年4月至2024年4月在河南省人民医院化疗的102例结直肠癌患者作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法，将患者分为对照组（51例）和观察组（51例）。对照组男30例，女21例；年龄（59.62±6.00）岁；肿瘤类型：结肠癌19例，直肠癌31例；临床分期：Ⅰ期12例，Ⅱ期20例，Ⅲ期19例。观察组男28例，女23例；年龄（59.45±6.18）岁；肿瘤类型：结肠癌16例，直肠癌35例；临床分期：Ⅰ期10例，Ⅱ期22例，Ⅲ期19例。对照组采用常规营养干预，观察组采用基于PG-SGA评分的营养干预。两组均干预至化疗周期结束。比较两组干预前后营养摄入情况（能量、蛋白质）、营养状况［血清白蛋白（ALB）、血红蛋白（Hb）、血清前白蛋白（PA）、血清总蛋白（TP）］、生活质量［生活质量综合评定问卷（GQOL-74）］。采用独立样本t检验、配对t检验和χ²检验进行统计学分析。结果　干预后，观察组能量、蛋白质摄入量均高于对照组［（1 110.78±256.90）kcal/d比（1 001.23±231.78）kcal/d、（57.78±10.04）g/d比（43.15±9.26）g/d］（均P<0.05）；观察组ALB、Hb、PA、TP水平均高于对照组［（42.18±3.01）g/L比（39.00±2.89）g/L、（110.89±11.34）g/L比（105.28±11.00）g/L、（0.48±0.09）g/L比（0.33±0.07）g/L、（59.98±4.63）g/L比（55.17±4.38）g/L］（均P<0.05）；观察组GQOL-74中的躯体功能、社会功能、物质生活、心理功能评分均高于对照组［（70.12±6.53）分比（63.44±6.00）分、（67.19±6.82）分比（63.16±6.08）分、（73.22±7.03）分比（61.89±6.27）分、（71.26±7.90）分比（66.01±6.82）分］（均P<0.05）。结论　基于PG-SGA评分的营养干预可增加结直肠癌化疗期患者营养摄入，提高生活质量。

关键词:

结直肠癌, 化疗, 主观整体营养评估量表, 营养摄入, 生活质量

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the effects of nutritional intervention based on Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score on nutritional intake and quality of life during chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients. Methods　This study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 102 patients with colorectal cancer who received chemotherapy in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from April 2021 to April 2024 were selected as the study objects. The patients were divided into a control group (51 cases) and an observation group (51 cases) by the random number table method. There were 30 males and 21 females in the control group, aged (59.62±6.00) years; the types of disease were colon cancer in 19 cases and rectal cancer in 31 cases; the clinical stages were stage Ⅰ in 12 cases, stage Ⅱ in 20 cases, and stage Ⅲ in 19 cases. There were 28 males and 23 females in the observation group, aged (59.45±6.18) years; the types of disease were colon cancer in 16 cases and rectal cancer in 35 cases; the clinical stages were stage Ⅰ in 10 cases, stage Ⅱ in 22 cases, stage Ⅲ in 19 cases. The control group received routine nutritional intervention, and the observation group received nutritional intervention based on PG-SGA score. Both groups were intervened until the end of the chemotherapy cycle. Nutritional intake (energy and protein), nutritional status [serum albumin (ALB), hemoglobin (Hb), serum prealbumin (PA), and serum total protein (TP)], and quality of life [Generic Quality of Life Inventory 74 (GQOL-74)] were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Independent sample t test, paired t test, and χ² test were used for statistical analysis. Results　After intervention, the energy intake and protein intake in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(1 110.78±256.90) kcal/d vs. (1 001.23±231.78) kcal/d, (57.78±10.04) g/d vs. (43.15±9.26) g/d] (both P<0.05). The levels of ALB, Hb, PA, and TP in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(42.18±3.01) g/L vs. (39.00±2.89) g/L, (110.89±11.34) g/L vs. (105.28±11.00) g/L, (0.48±0.09) g/L vs. (0.33±0.07) g/L, (59.98±4.63) g/L vs. (55.17±4.38) g/L] (all P<0.05). The scores of physical function, social function, material life, and psychological function of the GQOL-74 in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(70.12±6.53) points vs. (63.44±6.00) points, (67.19±6.82) points vs. (63.16±6.08) points, (73.22±7.03) points vs. (61.89±6.27) points, (71.26±7.90) points vs. (66.01±6.82) points] (all P<0.05). Conclusion　Nutritional intervention based on PG-SGA score can improve the nutritional intake of colorectal cancer patients during chemotherapy, promote the improvement of quality of life, and is worthy of clinical application.

Key words:

Colorectal cancer, Chemotherapy, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, Nutritional intake, Quality of life

邱换换葛高琪郭瑾刘建芳路亚婉.

基于主观整体营养评估量表评分的营养干预对结直肠癌患者化疗期营养摄入和生活质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(1): 136-140.

Qiu Huanhuan, Ge Gaoqi, Guo Jin, Liu Jianfang, Lu Yawan.

Effects of nutritional intervention based on Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment score on nutritional intake and quality of life during chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(1): 136-140.

参考文献

[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
[2] 周静,阮丽平,高梦,等.跟进式赋能教育在结直肠癌化疗患者中的应用效果[J].国际医药卫生导报,2024,30(5):871-875.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.05.034.
[3] 胡斐,杭凌,董志霞.精准营养干预方案改善辅助化疗期胃癌和结直肠癌患者毒性反应、营养摄入和生活质量的效果观察[J].现代临床护理,2021,20(10):27-34.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2021.10.005.
[4] 万鹏夏,沈鸣雁,韩琳秋,等.肝癌经导管动脉化疗栓塞术后胃肠道反应管理的证据总结[J].介入放射学杂志,2024,33(4):438-442.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008- 794X.2024.04.017.
[5] 孟铎,张坤.同步放化疗与序贯放化疗对NSCLC患者临床疗效、肺功能与血液学毒性的影响[J].川北医学院学报,2023,38(4):526-529.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697. 2023.04.021.
[6] 汤权琪,周美玲,徐皖湘.PG-SGA联合生物电阻抗相位角分析技术的个性化营养干预在胃癌化疗中的应用[J].安徽医学,2022,43(7):804-808.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399. 2022.07.014.
[7] 肖雨,高时娟,彭顺仙,等.老年结直肠癌患者化疗期间营养不良的危险因素及其预测模型构建[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2024,23(6):407-410.DOI:10.11915/j.issn.1671- 5403.2024.06.089.
[8] 尹春梅,王继伟,郑喜兰.结直肠癌化疗患者营养评估及治疗研究进展[J/CD].肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志,2023,10(5):690-694.DOI:10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2023.05.020.
[9] 彭姗姗,吕俭霞,周秋琴,等.PG-SGA主导的营养干预对鼻咽癌放化疗患者的效果评价[J].徐州医科大学学报,2022,42(5):326-329.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022. 05.003.
[10] 魏琳琳,段诤诤,石玉君,等.基于PG-SGA评分的多元化护理联合阶段性四肢锻炼在单髁置换术患者中的应用[J].保健医学研究与实践,2023,20(4):99-103.DOI:10.11986/j.issn.1673-873X.2023.04.023.
[11] 屠奕,吴婉英,梁冠冕,等.NRS 2002与PG-SGA在头颈部鳞癌患者围手术期营养评估中的应用比较[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(25):3219-3222.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.25.012.
[12] Provenzale D, Ness RM, Llor X, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: colorectal cancer screening, version 2.2020[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020, 18(10):1312-1320. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0048.
[13] 张作记.行为医学量表手册[M].北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005:83-89.
[14] 国家癌症中心中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南制定专家组.中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2020,北京)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2021,43(1):16-38.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210105-00010.
[15] Iimura Y, Furukawa N, Ishibashi M, et al. Study protocol of a single-arm phase 2 study evaluating the preventive effect of topical hydrocortisone for capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (T-CRACC study)[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2022, 22(1):341. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02411-w.
[16] 吴国豪.晚期胃肠肿瘤患者的营养不良及其治疗[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2024,27(3):215-220.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240103-00005.
[17] 王云晓,潘闻燕,张烨.恶性肿瘤患者营养不良诊断标准研究进展[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2023,32(5):476-480.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20220728-00261.
[18] Álvaro Sanz E, Garrido Siles M, Rey Fernández L, et al. Nutritional risk and malnutrition rates at diagnosis of cancer in patients treated in outpatient settings: early intervention protocol[J]. Nutrition, 2019, 57:148-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.05.021.
[19] Hu WH, Eisenstein S, Parry L, et al. Preoperative malnutrition with mild hypoalbuminemia associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity of colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching study[J]. Nutr J, 2019, 18(1):33. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-019-0458-y.
[20] 唐玲,王炜,郝其艳,等.胃癌化疗患者营养不良的影响因素及风险预测模型构建[J].实用临床医药杂志,2024,28(7):79-84.DOI:10.7619/jcmp.20231795.
[21] 夏爱丹,朱凯铨,朱淼勇.老年肺癌患者化疗期间发生中重度营养不良的影响因素[J].中国老年学杂志,2022,42(12):2896-2899.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2022.12.013.
[22] 张延萍,何志婷,张倩.基于PG-SGA的个体化营养干预对血液透析患者营养状态及磷管理效果的影响[J].海南医学,2023,34(8):1174-1178.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350. 2023.08.023.
[23] 平英英,曹婉莹,卢博.基于PG-SGA营养干预的多层面综合护理在泌尿系结石患者围手术期中的应用[J].保健医学研究与实践,2023,20(2):137-141.DOI:10.11986/j.issn.1673- 873X.2023.02.031.
[24] 赵建兰,王瑞景,程慧.基于自评-主观全面量表的个体化营养干预对妇科肿瘤术后化疗患者营养状态及免疫功能的影响[J].癌症进展,2023,21(2):169-172.DOI:10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2023.21.02.14.
[25] 强利敏,法卫玲,陈黎,等.基于PG-SGA评分的个体化营养干预对食管癌根治术患者的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(14):123-125.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021. 14.047.
[26] 武树箭,田文玲.PG-SGA个性化营养干预对胃癌术后化疗患者免疫功能和胃肠功能的影响[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2020,25(8):1099-1102.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159. 2020.08.026.

基于主观整体营养评估量表评分的营养干预对结直肠癌患者化疗期营养摄入和生活质量的影响

Effects of nutritional intervention based on Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment score on nutritional intake and quality of life during chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王荣荣张进. 三一照护管理模式对2型糖尿病患者血糖、自我管理水平及生活质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(2): 198-202.
[2]	李亚辉李彩蝶赵翔. 分阶段肺康复锻炼在成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的应用效果观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(1): 127-131.
[3]	钟细芳曾彩玲钟秋明陈荟. IKAP模式为指导的家长教育课堂在儿童特应性皮炎防治管理中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(1): 159-162.
[4]	常利谢娟高黎赵将孙秀娥何莉樊春秀岳勤沈红红王雁. 陕西省农村老年癌症患者生活质量及影响因素分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(1): 169-174.
[5]	尹夏孟东方袁冬李倩汪喆. 心理弹性在颈型颈椎病患者自我管理能力与生活质量间的中介效应 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(8): 1392-1397.
[6]	齐向娟刘宏侠李熳张颖. 情感适应理论反馈式护理对功能性消化不良患者不良情绪的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(7): 1207-1211.
[7]	欧阳月仙吴海蓉彭姣周立德. 自体富血小板血浆在慢性难愈合创面治疗中的效果分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(6): 1013-1017.
[8]	梁志乐陈国成潘林平王小艳唐灿洪赖满刘王媛媛. 中药苍薏饮治疗痰湿体质高血压患者的临床研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(6): 1020-1024.
[9]	张国坤张天佑张景畅李素新. 原发性肝癌患者TACE预后不良的因素分析：基于PSM法 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 747-753.
[10]	路晓雯刘梓洋. 增强CT联合超声造影在HCC患者TACE疗效评估中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 754-758.
[11]	温俊萍周艳颜彭晓辉. 5E护理模式在糖尿病肾病患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 793-796.
[12]	周静阮丽平高梦崔菲. 跟进式赋能教育在结直肠癌化疗患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 871-875.
[13]	李丹丹王欢欢姬响华蔻香草罗冷孙羽燕. 超声指导下的护理方案预防ECMO运转期患儿压疮的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 559-563.
[14]	高永昌姚庆娟. 难治性局部晚期三阴性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后肿瘤异质性1例 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 632-634.
[15]	黄敏清庄文行王影邱丽欢王方. 肿瘤科护士化疗相关性恶心呕吐知信行现状的调查研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 657-661.