活动义齿和固定义齿在牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中的临床效果对比

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.23.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　对比活动义齿与固定义齿在牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中的临床效果。方法　前瞻性研究，选取2022年3月至2024年2月在南阳市中心医院口腔科治疗的90例牙周病伴牙列缺损患者作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法将其分为参照组与试验组，每组45例。参照组男22例、女23例，年龄（46.52±8.14）岁，病程（3.06±1.05）年，予以活动义齿进行修复治疗；试验组男24例、女21例，年龄（46.81±8.33）岁，病程（3.11±1.12）年，予以固定义齿进行修复治疗。对比两组治疗前后咀嚼功能（最大咬合接触面积、咬合力、咀嚼效率、咬合力不对称指数）、颞下颌功能［临床功能障碍指数（DI）及颞下颌关节紊乱指数（CMI）］、口腔相关功能（口腔疼痛、口腔健康、牙齿松动度、牙龈出血）及治疗有效率。统计学方法采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　治疗前，两组患者咀嚼功能、颞下颌功能、口腔相关功能比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。治疗后，试验组最大咬合接触面积、咬合力均大于参照组［（231.05±21.52）mm²比（205.49±20.03）mm²、（140.05±14.32）Ibs比（131.01±13.92）Ibs］，咀嚼效率高于参照组［（86.72±7.23）%比（80.80±6.81）%］，咬合力不对称指数、DI、CMI及口腔疼痛、口腔健康、牙齿松动度、牙龈出血评分均低于参照组［（14.05±1.32）%比（20.01±2.92）%、（4.21±1.06）分比（5.85±1.56）分、（0.08±0.02）分比（0.14±0.03）分、（3.66±1.01）分比（4.31±1.16）分、（16.08±1.72）分比（22.72±2.23）分、（4.48±1.02）分比（7.31±1.71）分、（1.16±0.51）分比（1.81±0.66）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=5.832、3.036、3.998、12.476、5.833、7.442、2.834、15.816、9.534、5.227，均P<0.05）。试验组治疗总有效率为95.56%（43/45），高于参照组的77.78%（35/45），差异有统计学意义（χ²=6.153，P=0.013）。结论　相较活动义齿，固定义齿在牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中能够有效恢复患者咀嚼功能，提供均衡力量分布，减少对牙周组织损伤，改善颞下颌关节紊乱症状，同时提高口腔舒适度、整体健康状况及临床治疗效果，具有较好推广价值。

关键词:

活动义齿, 固定义齿, 牙周病, 牙列缺损, 修复治疗, 临床效果

Abstract:

Objective　To compare the clinical effects of movable dentures and fixed dentures in the treatment of patients with periodontal disease and dentition defect. Methods　Ninety patients with periodontal disease and dentition defect treated at Department of Stomatology, Nanyang Central Hospital from March 2022 to February 2024 were selected for the randomized controlled trial, and were divided into a reference group and an experimental group by the random number table method, with 45 cases in each group. There were 22 males and 23 females in the reference group; they were (46.52±8.14) years old; their disease course was (3.06±1.05) years. There were 24 males and 21 females in the experimental group; they were (46.81±8.33) years old; their disease course was (3.11±1.12) years. The reference group were treated with movable dentures, while the experimental group with fixed dentures. The masticatory function, temporomandibular function, oral function before and after the treatment and therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups. t and χ² tests were applied. Results　Before the treatment, there were no statistical differences in the masticatory function, temporomandibular function, and oral function between the two groups (all P>0.05). After the treatment, the maximum occlusal contact area, bite force, and masticatory efficiency in the reference group were higher than those in the experimental group [(231.05±21.52) mm² vs. (205.49±20.03) mm², (140.05±14.32) Ibs vs. (131.01±13.92) Ibs, and (86.72±7.23)% vs. (80.80±6.81)%]; the asymmetry index of bite force and scores of clinical dysfunction index, temporamandibular joint disturbance index, oral pain, oral health, tooth mobility, and gingival bleeding in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group [(14.05±1.32)% vs. (20.01±2.92)%, (4.21±1.06) vs. (5.85±1.56), (0.08±0.02) vs. (0.14±0.03), (3.66±1.01) vs. (4.31±1.16), (16.08±1.72) vs. (22.72±2.23), (4.48±1.02) vs. (7.31±1.71), and (1.16±0.51) vs. (1.81±0.66)]; there were statistical differences (t=5.832, 3.036, 3.998, 12.476, 5.833, 7.442, 2.834, 15.816, 9.534, and 5.227; all P<0.05). The effective rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group [95.56% (43/45) vs. 77.78% (35/45)], with a statistical difference (χ²=6.153; P=0.013). Conclusions　In the treatment of patients with periodontal disease and dentition defect, fixed dentures can more effectively restore their chewing function, provide more balanced force distribution, and help reduce periodontal tissue damage. Moreover, fixed dentures are more effective in improving symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders, oral comfort, overall health status, and clinical treatment effect, so it is worth being generalized.

Key words:

Removable dentures, Fixed dentures, Periodontal disease, Dentition defect, Repair therapy, Clinical effect

夏冰冰周峰徐衫邢亚丽叶红强.

活动义齿和固定义齿在牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中的临床效果对比 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(23): 3886-3890.

Xia Bingbing, Zhou Feng, Xu Shan, Xing Yali, Ye Hongqiang.

Clinical effects of movable dentures versus fixed dentures in repair for patients with periodontal disease and dental defect [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(23): 3886-3890.

参考文献

[1] 李雪莲,徐超,吴亮颖. 3D打印技术在牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中的应用研究[J]. 现代科学仪器,2024,41(1):65-69.
[2] 熊亚茸,李颖,姚丽,等. 牙周病导致牙列缺损/缺失老年患者种植固定修复临床观察[J]. 空军医学杂志,2021,37(3):248-250,265.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-3402.2021.03.017.
[3] Li M, Yu Y, Shi Y, et al. Decreased osteogenic ability of periodontal ligament stem cells leading to impaired periodontal tissue repair in BRONJ patients[J].Stem Cells Dev,2020,29(3):156-168.DOI:10.1089/scd.2019.0151.
[4] Pan J, Deng J, Luo Y, et al. Thermosensitive hydrogel delivery of human periodontal stem cells overexpressing platelet-derived growth factor-BB enhances alveolar bone defect repair[J].Stem Cells Dev,2019,28(24):1620-1631.DOI:10.1089/scd.2019.0184.
[5] 全泉. 活动和固定义齿在牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中的临床疗效[J]. 中国医药指南,2021,19(25):26-27. DOI:10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2021.25.012.
[6] 朱玉. 固定义齿与活动义齿用于牙周病修复治疗的临床效果[J]. 世界复合医学,2024,10(2):40-42,46.DOI:10.11966/j.issn.2095-994X.2024.10.02.10.
[7] 聂淑娟,许美琴,邱兵. 活动义齿与固定义齿修复牙列缺损的效果及对咀嚼功能的影响[J]. 吉林医学,2023,44(11):3082-3084.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0412.2023.11.023.
[8] 中华口腔医学会牙周病学专业委员会. 重度牙周炎诊断标准及特殊人群牙周病治疗原则的中国专家共识[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2017,52(2):67-71.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.02.002.
[9] Gousopoulou E, Bakopoulou A, Laskaris D, et al. Characterization of the soft-tissue wall lining residual periodontal pockets and implications in periodontal wound healing[J].Clin Oral Investig,2023,27(9):5031-5040.DOI:10.1007/s00784-023-05122-y.
[10] Sam YH, Nibali L, Ghuman M. Periodontal granulation tissue - to remove or not to remove, that is the question[J].J Periodontal Res,2024,59(4):636-646.DOI:10.1111/jre.13261.
[11] 徐晗,李小慧,江月梅. 固定义齿修复对牙列缺损患者口腔健康状况及咀嚼功能的影响[J]. 临床医学工程,2023,30(12):1703-1704.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2023. 12.1703.
[12] 万庆. 固定-活动义齿联合修复对老年牙周病伴牙列缺损患者修复效果、咬合力及咀嚼功能的影响[J]. 中华养生保健,2022,40(23):56-58.
[13] 刘琼,刘子辉. 探讨牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中活动义齿、固定义齿的应用价值[J]. 四川生理科学杂志,2021,43(10):1768-1770.
[14] 刘明达,高士军,迟艳侠,等.口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的疗效探讨[J].中国全科医学,2020,23(S2):154-156.
[15] 林晶,陈爱萍. 牙周病伴牙列缺损经固定—活动义齿修复对牙齿松动度、语言功能的影响分析[J]. 医学理论与实践,2023,36(12):2057-2059.DOI:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585. 2023.12.029.
[16] 姜备燕,姜实燕,毛和章. 固定-活动义齿咬合重建修复牙列缺损对患者咬合功能及颞下颌功能的影响[J]. 现代实用医学,2022,34(7):959-961.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800. 2022.07.050.
[17] 翟燕.可摘义齿及固定义齿对牙周病伴牙列缺损患者口腔健康状况及咀嚼功能的影响[J].中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)医药卫生,2022(11):60-63.
[18] 吕灏,何福明. 5条目口腔健康影响程度量表中文版的信度和效度研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志,2020,38(2):145-148.DOI:10.7518/hxkq.2020.02.006.
[19] 谢庆军,李明亮,方玉. 西帕依固龈液联合培氟沙星对慢性牙周炎患者治疗效果、疼痛程度及GI、PLI、SBI的影响[J]. 中国医学创新,2023,20(29):115-118. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2023.29.027.
[20] 杨甜甜,赵蛟. 活动义齿修复和固定义齿修复在牙周病修复中的应用对比[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46(2):279-280.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2022.02.066.
[21] Rasperini G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, et al. Interproximal attachment gain: the challenge of periodontal regeneration[J].J Periodontol,2021,92(7):931-946.DOI:10.1002/JPER.20-0587.
[22] Dubuc A, Planat-Bénard V, Marty M, et al. Periodontal cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Adv Exp Med Biol,2022,1373:377-397.DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-96881-6_20.
[23] Hu J, Ou-Yang ZY, Zhao YQ, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of stem cells therapy in the periodontal regeneration: a meta-analysis and mendelian randomization study[J].Stem Cell Rev Rep,2024,20(4):980-995.DOI:10.1007/s12015-024-10690-x.
[24] 张淑蓉. 牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中活动义齿和固定义齿的应用效果分析[J]. 婚育与健康,2022,28(14):125-127.
[25] 黄东元,李光壮,何新芸,等. 可摘义齿和固定义齿在牙周病伴牙列缺损患者修复治疗中的应用效果[J]. 医疗装备,2022,35(4):92-94.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376. 2022.04.035.
[26] 卫敏英. 牙周病伴牙列缺损修复治疗中固定义齿的应用价值分析[J]. 中国药物与临床,2021,21(1):94-95.DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2021.01.043.
[27] Abushahba F, Algahawi A, Areid N, et al. Bioactive glasses in periodontal regeneration: a systematic review[J].Tissue Eng Part C Methods,2023,29(5):183-196.DOI:10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0036.
[28] Carbone AC, Joly JC, Botelho J, et al. Long-term stability of gingival margin and periodontal soft-tissue phenotype achieved after mucogingival therapy: a systematic review[J].J Clin Periodontol,2024,51(2):177-195.DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13900.
[29] 冯娟,刘康康. 固定义齿修复与牙合垫式可摘局部义齿修复在牙齿重度磨损伴牙列缺损中的应用效果比较[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2022,7(2):24-27.DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202202007.
[30] Zhao B, Chen Q, Zhao L, et al. Periodontal ligament stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles embedded in matrigel enhance bone repair through the adenosine receptor signaling pathway[J].Int J Nanomedicine,2022,17:519-536.DOI:10.2147/IJN.S346755.
[31] Apatzidou DA, Bakopoulou AA, Kouzi-Koliakou K, et al. A tissue-engineered biocomplex for periodontal reconstruction. A proof-of-principle randomized clinical study[J].J Clin Periodontol,2021,48(8):1111-1125.DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13474.
[32] 梁光明,王盟,张姝锴. 固定—活动义齿联合修复对老年牙周病伴牙列缺损患者SBI变化及OHIP-14评分的影响[J]. 临床研究,2021,29(7):44-45.
[33] 丁洁,任宏宇,白宇航,等. 固定-活动义齿联合修复对牙列缺损患者咀嚼功能和OHIP-14评分及龈沟液炎症因子表达的影响[J]. 中国美容医学,2022,31(3):133-138.DOI:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.004971.