超声指导下的护理方案预防ECMO运转期患儿压疮的效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.04.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　评估将不同护理方案，即传统防压疮护理干预、超声指导下的护理方案联合传统防压疮护理干预，分别予以体外膜肺氧合（extracorporeal membrane oxygenation，ECMO）运转期患儿后，对其各观察指标的影响。方法　郑州大学附属儿童医院2020年6月至2022年6月收治的ECMO运转期患儿60例，通过随机分组得到对照组、观察组，每组均包含30例患儿。对照组中，男、女患儿例数分别为18、12；年龄5～14岁（10.74±1.63）岁；心血管疾病7例，呼吸系统疾病5例，胃肠系统疾病4例，外科疾病8例，其他病症6例。观察组中，男、女患儿例数分别为16、14；年龄5～13（10.72±1.55）岁；心血管疾病8例，呼吸系统疾病6例，胃肠系统疾病3例，外科疾病9例，其他病症4例。入组后，对照组予以传统防压疮护理干预，观察组予以超声指导下的护理方案联合传统防压疮护理干预。护理至出院，通过观察指标的数据评估对比不同护理干预方案的护理效果。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　观察组压疮发生率6.67%（2/30）低于对照组26.67%（8/30），住院时间［（14.71±2.59）d］、血管活性药物使用时间［（15.34±2.38）h］、ECMO支持时间［（8.91±2.51）d］均短于对照组［（20.38±3.39）d、（23.55±2.45）h，（12.05±3.54）d］，组间比较差异均有统计学意义（χ²=4.320，t=7.280、13.165、3.963，均P<0.05）。护理至出院，观察组生活质量调查表（Short Form 36，SF-36）评分（社会功能、躯体功能、心理功能、角色功能）分别为（86.64±5.48）分、（82.28±5.41）分、（82.54±5.51）分、（84.17±5.48）分，均高于对照组［（74.35±5.61）分、（73.59±5.37）分、（71.41±5.48）分、（70.21±5.53）分］，组间比较差异均有统计学意义（t=5.584、5.584、7.845、9.821，均P<0.05）。护理至出院，对照组、观察组抑郁自评量表（Self-Rating Depression Scale，SDS）、焦虑自评量表（Self-Rating Anxiety Scale，SAS）评分［（48.27±4.64）分和（41.28±3.51）分，（42.10±4.79）分和（33.59±3.57）分］相比于护理前［（52.49±4.33）分和（49.35±2.61）分，（51.67±4.29）分和（48.64±2.48）分］均降低，且观察组低于对照组（均P<0.05）。护理至出院，观察组患儿家属满意度评分（健康宣教、环境舒适、护士态度、护理操作及治疗效果）分别为（16.22±2.47）分、（17.28±2.45）分、（16.48±2.72）分、（18.36±1.12）分、（18.01±1.51）分，高于对照组［（14.18±2.58）分、（15.66±2.51）分、（13.56±2.59）分、（12.28±2.33）分、（13.40±2.61）分］，组间比较差异均有统计学意义（t=3.128、2.530、4.258、12.882、8.374，均P<0.05）。观察组治疗依从性高于对照组［90.00%（27/30）比73.33%（22/30）］，差异有统计学意义（χ²=4.320，P=0.038）。结论　ECMO运转期患儿采用超声指导下的护理方案能够缩短恢复时间，改善心理状态，提高生活质量，增加治疗依从性及家属满意度，避免压疮发生。

关键词:

体外膜肺氧合, 压疮, 预防, 超声, 护理干预, 生活质量

Abstract:

Objective　To assess the effects of different nursing programs, namely traditional pressure ulcer prevention interventions and ultrasound-guided nursing program combined with traditional pressure ulcer prevention interventions, on observed indicators in children during the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) operation period. Methods　Sixty children during the ECMO operation period admitted to Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from June 2020 to June 2022 were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 30 cases in each group. In the control group, there were 18 boys and 12 girls; the age was 5-14 (10.74±1.63) years old; there were 7 cases of cardiovascular diseases, 5 cases of respiratory diseases, 4 cases of gastrointestinal diseases, 8 cases of surgical diseases, and 6 cases of other diseases. In the observation group, there were 16 boys and 14 girls; the age was 5-13 (10.72±1.55) years old; there were 8 cases of cardiovascular diseases, 6 cases of respiratory diseases, 3 cases of gastrointestinal diseases, 9 cases of surgical diseases, and 4 cases of other diseases. After enrollment, the control group received traditional pressure ulcer prevention interventions, while the observation group received ultrasound-guided nursing program combined with traditional pressure ulcer prevention interventions. Nursing till discharge, the nursing effects of different nursing intervention schemes were compared by observing the data of indicators. t test and χ² test were used. Results　The incidence of pressure ulcers in the observation group [6.67% (2/30)] was lower than that in the control group [26.67% (8/30)], and the length of hospital stay [(14.71±2.59) d], the use time of vasoactive drugs [(15.34±2.38) h], and the ECMO support time [(8.91±2.51) d] were shorter than those in the control group [(20.38±3.39) d, (23.55±2.45) h, and (12.05±3.54) d], with statistically significant differences between the two groups (χ²=4.320, t=7.280, 13.165, and 3.963; all P<0.05). Nursing till discharge, the Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores (social function, physical function, psychological function, and role function) of the observation group were (86.64±5.48) points, (82.28±5.41) points, (82.54±5.51) points, and (84.17±5.48) points, which were higher than those of the control group [(74.35±5.61) points, (73.59±5.37) points, (71.41±5.48) points, and (70.21±5.53) points], with statistically significant differences between the two groups (t=5.584, 5.584, 7.845, and 9.821, all P<0.05). Nursing till discharge, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores of the control group and the observation group [(48.27±4.64) and (41.28±3.51) points, (42.10±4.79) and (33.59±3.57) points] were decreased compared with those before nursing [(52.49±4.33) and (49.35±2.61) points, (51.67±4.29) and (48.64±2.48) points], and those of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (all P<0.05). Nursing till discharge, the satisfaction scores (health education, environmental comfort, nurses' attitude, nursing operation, and treatment effect) of family members of the observation group were (16.22±2.47) points, (17.28±2.45) points, (16.48±2.72) points, (18.36±1.12) points, and (18.01±1.51) points, which were higher than those of the control group [(14.18±2.58) points, (15.66±2.51) points, (13.56±2.59) points, (12.28±2.33) points, and (13.40±2.61) points], with statistically significant differences between the two groups (t=3.128, 2.530, 4.258, 12.882, and 8.374, all P<0.05). The treatment compliance of the observation group was higher than that of the control group [90.00% (27/30) vs. 73.33% (22/30)], with a statistically significant difference (χ²=4.320, P=0.038). Conclusion　The use of ultrasound-guided nursing program in children during the ECMO operation period can shorten the recovery time, improve the psychological status, enhance the quality of life, increase the treatment compliance and family satisfaction, and prevent the pressure ulcers.

Key words:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Pressure ulcers, Prevention, Ultrasound, Nursing intervention, Quality of life

李丹丹王欢欢姬响华蔻香草罗冷孙羽燕.

超声指导下的护理方案预防ECMO运转期患儿压疮的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 559-563.

Li Dandan, Wang Huanhuan, Ji Xianghua, Kou Xiangcao, Luo Leng, Sun Yuyan.

Effect of ultrasound-guided nursing program in preventing pressure ulcers in children during the ECMO operation period [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(4): 559-563.

参考文献

[1] 李呈龙,侯晓彤,黑飞龙,等.2018中国体外生命支持情况调查分析[J].中华医学杂志,2019,99(24):1911-1915. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.24.014.
[2] 解蓓蓓,王金柱,杨晓波,等.护理目标管理策略预防VV-ECMO并发症效果观察[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(12):45-47. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2018.12.020.
[3] 陈凤珍,陈凤霞.彩色多普勒超声在深部组织损伤压疮及其患者预后评估中的应用[J].广州医科大学学报,2019,47(3):87-89,93. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9664.2019.03.21.
[4] 杨小湜,王阳,李秀君,等.SF-36量表的信度和效度评价[J].解剖科学进展,2009,15(4):383-385. DOI:10.16695/j.cnki.1006-2947.2009.04.002.
[5] 段泉泉,胜利.焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(9):676-679. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.09.007.
[6] 郑可欣,曹淼,徐禹,等.泡沫敷料联合3 M液体敷料对ECMO患者股静脉置管处皮肤保护的效果研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2020,29(10):1123-1125. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2020.10.025.
[7] 侯杰绮,吴文娟,陶迎坤,等.基于超声评估的压疮护理管理策略在ICU患者中的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理,2022,13(12):179-182. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2022. 12.043.
[8] 孙延玲,李立新,尹建.超声早期诊断深部组织损伤及预测压疮预后应用[J].影像技术,2020,32(4):53-55. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0270.2020.04.18.
[9] 吴燕萍,俞云.1例多发伤并发重度ARDS病人行V-V ECMO及俯卧位通气治疗的护理[J].全科护理,2023,21(24):3451-3453. DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2023.24.038.
[10] 白雪洁,甄莉,朱木兰,等."互联网+工作坊"培训模式在压疮联络员中的应用效果评价[J].全科护理,2023,21(23):3295-3297. DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2023.23.034.
[11] 慕丽连,梁靖,潘碧,等.1 例危重症VAV-ECMO 支持病人陆地救护车超长途转运的护理[J].全科护理,2023,21(19):2726-2728. DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2023.19.033.
[12] 翁晓丽,王彩虹,杨燕红.综合护理干预在ECMO联合CRRT治疗重症爆发性心肌炎中的应用效果[J].中外医疗,2023,42(17):162-165. DOI:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2023. 17.162.
[13] 黄文辉,柳颖,杜杨,等.1例重症胎粪吸入综合征患儿行ECMO联合CRRT及NO治疗的护理[J].护理学报,2023,30(11):71-73. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023. 11.071.
[14] 邓猛,张星星,魏金荣,等.心肺衰竭病人行ECMO治疗院际转运护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J].护理研究,2023,37(10):1749-1753. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493. 2023.10.011.
[15] 苏浩明,廖晓南.1例急危重型新型冠状病毒肺炎行ECMO联合俯卧位通气治疗患者的护理体会[J].当代护士,2023,30(9):137-139. DOI:10.19793/j.cnki.1006-6411.2023. 09.037.
[16] 李艺,邓钰玫,张丽随.应用ECMO成功救治2例突发电风暴心脏病患者的护理体会[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2023,28(1):71-72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-301X.2023.01.026.
[17] 赵琳,吴荣,黄雨佳,等.成年心脏术后病人ECMO相关医院感染研究进展[J].护理研究,2023,37(2):273-276. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.02.016.
[18] 罗灯梅,程捷,陆丽娟.1例急性心肌梗死反复心搏骤停患者联合应用ECMO+IABP+CRRT的护理[J].当代护士,2023,30(2):156-159. DOI:10.19792/j.cnki.1006-6411.2023. 02.041.
[19] 刘灵芳,吴长蓉,史磊,等.应用ECMO救治一例吸入硫化氢气体中毒患者的护理体会[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2022,40(6):738-740,746. DOI:10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326. 2022.06.023.
[20] 李芳琴,吴莉,任贞,等.基于循证的集束化护理对ECMO患者营养状态及压力性损伤的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2022,26(36):148-150. DOI:10.19435/j.1672-1721.2022. 36.048.
[21] 郑雪姣,张安然.程序化路径护理对ECMO患儿的应用效果分析[J].临床研究,2022,30(12):143-146. DOI:10.12385/j.issn.2096-1278(2022)12-0143-04.
[22] 柳巧丽,李传圣.非体外循环冠脉旁路移植术后心肺功能衰竭患者ECMO治疗与护理[J].护理学杂志,2022,37(22):48-50. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.22.048.
[23] Paquay L, Wouters R, Defloor T, et al. Adherence to pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in home care: a survey of current practice[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2008, 17(5):627-636. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02109.x.
[24] Lee TT, Yeh CH, Ho LH. Application of a computerized nursing care plan system in one hospital: experiences of ICU nurses in Taiwan[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2002, 39(1):61-67. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02242.x.
[25] Khojastehfar S, Najafi Ghezeljeh T, Haghani S. Factors related to knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses in intensive care unit in the area of pressure ulcer prevention: a multicenter study[J]. J Tissue Viability, 2020, 29(2):76-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.02.002.
[26] 倪群.失效模式与效应分析在预防神经外科手术压疮的应用及效果分析[J/CD].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(30):82-83. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-2479.2018.30.067.
[27] 彭静,古满平.不同转运设备在降低危重患者长途转诊中压力性损伤的比较研究[J].医疗卫生装备,2017,38(8):62-64,71. DOI:10.7687/j.issn1003-8868.2017.08.062.
[28] 李妍.对30例地震中多发性创伤伤员转运的护理安全管理[J].护理管理杂志,2008,8(10):53-54. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-315X.2008.10.023.