不同评分系统在老年卒中相关性肺炎患者中的应用价值

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.11.035

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨院前合并症、意识水平、年龄和神经功能缺损（PLAN）评分及洛桑卒中量表（ASTRAL）评分在神经内科老年卒中相关性肺炎（SAP）护理中的应用价值。方法　回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年1月在江南大学附属中心医院神经内科治疗的老年SAP患者210例，其中男102例、女108例，年龄（70.85±8.32）岁。根据患者3个月后的生存情况，分为预后良好组（168例）和预后不良组（42例）。对比两组患者临床资料及PLAN、ASTRAL评分差异；采用logistic回归分析老年SAP患者预后不良的危险因素；采用受试者操作特征曲线（ROC）分析PLAN、ASTRAL评分对老年SAP患者预后价值。统计学方法使用t检验、χ²检验、秩和检验。结果　两组患者性别、房颤、高血压、糖尿病、冠心病及脑卒中类型比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；预后良好组患者年龄低于预后不良组［（68.58±5.70）岁比（73.33±10.38）岁］，差异有统计学意义（t=-4.002，P<0.05）。预后良好组患者PLAN及ASTRAL评分均低于预后不良组患者［11.2（8.3，13.1）分比16.3（14.4，20.6）分、20.0（17.2，23.1）分比28.1（25.2，32.1）分］，差异均有统计学意义（Z=-5.536、-5.576，均P<0.05）。logistic回归分析结果显示，PLAN及ASTRAL评分越高，年龄越大是老年SAP患者预后不良的独立危险因素（均P<0.05）。采用ROC评估PLAN及ASTRAL评分单独使用与二者联合使用在预测老年SAP患者预后不良方面的价值，发现AUC值分别为0.728、0.680、0.800，结果表明，PLAN及ASTRAL评分以及联合应用在预测老年SAP患者预后不良方面具有一定的预测价值（均P<0.05）。结论　PLAN及ASTRAL评分对老年SAP患者预后不良方面具有一定的预测价值，二者联合预测，价值更高。

关键词:

卒中相关性肺炎, 评分系统, 老年人, 护理, 预后

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the values of applying the PLAN (problem, location, autonomy, number) and ASTRAL (age, sex, type of admission, risk factors, acuity of admission, length of stay) scoring systems in neurological nursing care for elderly patients with stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). Methods　Two hundred and ten patients with SAP treated at Department of Neurology, Central Hospital Affiliated to Jiangnan University from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 102 males and 108 females. They were (70.85±8.32) years old. According to their survival status three months later, the patients were divided into a good prognosis group (168 cases) and a poor prognosis group (42 cases). The clinical data and scores of PLAN and ASTRAL were compared between these two groups. The risk factors of poor prognosis in the patients were analyzed by the logistic regression analysis. The values of the PLAN and ASTRAL scoring systems in the evaluation of the patients' prognosis were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). t, χ², and rank sum tests were applied. Results　There were statistical differences in gender, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and type of stroke between the two groups (all P>0.05). The good prognosis group were younger than the poor prognosis group [(68.58±5.70) years vs. (73.33±10.38) years], with a statistical difference (t=-4.002; P<0.05). The scores of PLAN and ASTRAL in the good prognosis group were lower than those in the poor prognosis group [11.2 (8.3, 13.1) vs. 16.3 (14.4, 20.6) and 20.0 (17.2, 23.1) vs. 28.1 (25.2, 32.1)], with statistical differences (Z=-5.536 and -5.576; both P<0.05). The logistic regression analysis results showed that the high scores of PLAN and ASTRAL and the old age were independent risk factors of poor prognosis in the elderly patients with SAP (all P<0.05). ROC was used to explore the values of the scores of PLAN and ASTRAL and their combination in the prediction of poor prognosis in the patients, and it found that their AUC's were 0.728, 0.680, and 0.800, respectively. The scores of PLAN and ASTRAL and their combination had certain values in predicting poor prognosis in the patients (all P<0.05). Conclusion　The PLAN and ASTRAL scoring systems have certain predictive value for the poor prognosis of elderly patients with SAP, and their combination has higher predictive value.

Key words:

Stroke-associated pneumonia, Scoring system, The elderly, Nursing, Prognosis

濮怀芳王海燕.

不同评分系统在老年卒中相关性肺炎患者中的应用价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(11): 1933-1936.

Pu Huaifang, Wang Haiyan.

Application of different scoring systems in elderly patients with stroke-associated pneumonia [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(11): 1933-1936.

参考文献

[1] 叶森,毛红宇,张桐. 虚拟现实训练对脑卒中恢复质量及血清炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2023,29(15):2124-2128.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2023.15.012.
[2] Zawiah M, Hayat Khan A, Abu Farha R, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in stroke-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Curr Med Res Opin,2023,39(3):475-482.DOI:10.1080/03007995.2023.2174327.
[3] Tinker RJ, Smith CJ, Heal C, et al. Predictors of mortality and disability in stroke-associated pneumonia[J].Acta Neurol Belg,2021,121(2):379-385.DOI:10.1007/s13760-019-01148-w.
[4] 王娜,李培兰,刘芦姗,等. 不同评分系统预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者的短期和长期死亡风险比较[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2021,27(3):256-260.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771. 2021.03.002.
[5] 陈云霞,许梦敏,孟晓冰,等. 3种评分系统对ICU老年脑卒中患者卒中相关性肺炎及预后的预测价值研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(27):3669-3675.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210206-00615.
[6] 王娜,刘慧珍,商娜,等. 简易量表在急性缺血性脑卒中患者1年预后评估中的应用[J]. 临床急诊杂志,2021,22(10):682-687.DOI:10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.10.009.
[7] Du W, Zhao X, Wang Y, et al. The PLAN score can predict poor outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Ann Transl Med,2020,8(1):14.DOI:10.21037/atm.2019.11.88.
[8] 中国卒中学会急救医学分会,中华医学会急诊医学分会卒中学组,中国老年医学学会急诊医学分会,等. 卒中相关性肺炎诊治中国专家共识(2019更新版)[J]. 中国急救医学,2019,39(12):1135-1143.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949. 2019.12.002.
[9] 田蕊,王宇,张润华,等. PLAN评分预测中国缺血性卒中相关性肺炎[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2018,13(1):29-34.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2018.01.007.
[10] Świtońska M, Słomka A, Piekuś-Słomka N, et al. Does ASTRAL score at hospital admission predict symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation in acute ischaemic stroke after revascularisation? A pilot single-centre study[J].Neurol Neurochir Pol,2022,56(2):171-177.DOI:10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0018.
[11] Gradek-Kwinta E, Slowik A, Dziedzic T. The use of anticholinergic medication is associated with an increased risk of stroke-associated pneumonia[J].Aging Clin Exp Res,2022,34(8):1935-1938.DOI:10.1007/s40520-022-02123-x.
[12] Dylla L, Herson PS, Poisson SN, et al. Association between chronic inflammatory diseases and stroke-associated pneumonia - an epidemiological study[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2021,30(4):105605.DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105605.
[13] 冯启敏,余小碧,黄丽君,等. 程序化管理模式结合NRS2002评估对急性重症脑卒中患者HAMD、NIHSS评分及并发症的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2021,40(14):2624-2626.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190904- 00748.
[14] Sluis WM, Westendorp WF, van de Beek D, et al. Preventive ceftriaxone in patients at high risk of stroke-associated pneumonia. A post-hoc analysis of the PASS trial[J].PLoS One,2022,17(12):e0279700.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0279700.
[15] 饶利,吴海燕,敬仁芝. 预见性护理模式对老年卒中后胃食管反流患者的干预效果观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2021,18(2):77-79.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2021.02.022.
[16] Matsumoto K, Nohara Y, Soejima H, et al. Stroke prognostic scores and data-driven prediction of clinical outcomes after acute ischemic stroke[J].Stroke,2020,51(5):1477-1483.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027300.
[17] 杨佳蕾,陈思玎,孟霞,等. 卒中预后量表对前、后循环缺血性卒中短期预后不良的预测价值研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2022,17(6):616-621.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765. 2022. 06.011.
[18] 孙龙,董致郅,王革生,等. 凉血散瘀汤对高血压脑出血微创术后患者中医症候积分、神经功能缺损评分的影响[J]. 陕西中医,2023,44(8):1061-1064.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2023.08.014.
[19] Eltringham SA, Kilner K, Gee M, et al. Factors associated with risk of stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with dysphagia: a systematic review[J].Dysphagia,2020,35(5):735-744.DOI:10.1007/s00455-019-10061-6.
[20] Maslias E, Puccinelli F, Nannoni S, et al. Predictors of endovascular treatment procedural complications in acute ischemic stroke: a single-center cohort study[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2022,43(12):1743-1748.DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A7705.
[21] 高素颖,秦一凡,张会玲,等. 年龄与急性脑梗死患者1年预后的关系研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2021,16(8):810-815.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2021.08.010.
[22] 谷强,余孝君,张津. 高龄与中低龄老年轻型缺血性脑卒中临床特点及预后分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报,2022,43(3):474-479.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2022.03.023.
[23] 曹丽丽,黄玉芬,李佳欢,等. 去骨瓣减压术对脑出血患儿颅内血肿体积神经功能缺损评分及血清金属基质蛋白酶-9水平的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2023,38(3):458-461.DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2023.03.019.
[24] 李姝雅,赵性泉,刘丽萍,等. 3种评分工具对缺血性卒中伴心房颤动患者1年死亡风险评估的验证[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2018,13(8):818-822.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765. 2018.08.012.
[25] 崔艳萍,杨源瑞,林秀,等. 血浆BNP和D-二聚体与老年脑梗死患者神经功能缺损评分及预后的关系[J]. 西部医学,2023,35(6):858-862.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511. 2023.06.014.
[26] Wang WY, Sang WW, Jin D, et al. The prognostic value of the iscore, the PLAN score, and the ASTRAL score in acute ischemic stroke[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2017,26(6):1233-1238.DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis. 2017.01.013.
[27] 李彩霞,汪晓凯,秦良飞,等. 替罗非班对进展性脑梗死神经功能缺损及血清S100B蛋白和NSE的影响[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志,2023,26(8):963-967.DOI:10.12083/SYSJ.230395.
[28] Reid JM, Dai D, Delmonte S, et al. Simple prediction scores predict good and devastating outcomes after stroke more accurately than physicians[J].Age Ageing,2017,46(3):421-426.DOI:10.1093/ageing/afw197.
[29] Maulucci F, Disanto G, Bianco G, et al. Endovascular therapy outcome in isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion strokes: a multicenter analysis of the Swiss stroke registry[J].Eur Stroke J,2023,8(2):575-580.DOI:10.1177/23969873221150125.
[30] 王永红,潘伟,杜维. ASTRAL评分、iScore评分对静脉溶栓治疗的急性脑梗死短期预后预测价值[J]. 系统医学,2020,5(14):68-70.DOI:10.19368/j.cnki.2096-1782.2020. 14.068.
[31] Nannoni S, Scherz-Moussa Youma A, Amiguet M, et al. Acute ischaemic stroke in the absence of established vascular risk factors: patient characteristics, stroke mechanism and long-term outcome[J].Eur J Neurol,2021,28(4):1275-1283.DOI:10.1111/ene.14667.