肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标的构建

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.09.034

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 1559-1564.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.09.034

肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标的构建

张思思¹ 江淑贤¹ 范晨萌² 陈妙霞³ 李莉莉¹

¹中山大学附属第三医院感染科，广州　510630；²中山大学附属第三医院护理部，广州　510630；³中山大学附属第三医院护理教研室，广州　510630

收稿日期:2024-02-20 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-05-31
通讯作者: 李莉莉，Email：22017377@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省医学科学技术研究基金（A2021300）；中山大学护理青年人才培育基金（N2020Y04）

Construction of sensitive indicators for quality of nursing care in internal medicine treatment for liver failure

Zhang Sisi¹, Jiang Shuxian¹, Fan Chenmeng², Chen Miaoxia³, Li Lili¹

¹Department of Infectious Diseases, Third Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China; ²Nursing Department, Third Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China; ³Department of Nursing Teaching and Research, Third Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China

Received:2024-02-20 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-05-31
Contact: Li Lili, Email: 22017377@qq.com
Supported by:
Research Fund of Medical Science and Technology in Guangdong (A2021300); Fund for Cultivating Young Nursing Talents of Sun Yat-sen University (N2020Y04)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　构建肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标体系。方法　研究者于2022年3月通过文献回顾（检索JBI、PubMed、EBSCO、中国知网和万方数据库，检索时限为建库至2020年12月30日。）结合专家访谈，根据结构-过程-结果模式，初步构建肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标。再通过德尔菲法进行两轮专家函询，根据专家意见进行修订及评价，构建最佳质量评价指标体系。采用SPSS 26.0软件进行统计分析，采用频数、构成比、均数标准差（）对专家一般资料进行统计描述，专家的积极系数通过函询问卷的回收率来表示，专家权威系数和权威程度由专家咨询的权威系数表示，通过重要性赋分来衡量各指标的重要程度。结果　专家咨询的应答率均为100%，第1轮专家权威系数为0.958，第2轮专家权威系数为0.943，均大于0.700；肯德尔协调系数为0.089～0.237（P<0.05）。最终构建了肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标，包括3项一级指标、13项二级指标和29项三级指标。结论　本研究构建的肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标有较好的可靠性、科学性及一定的专科敏感度，能够为肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量的评估提供一定依据。

关键词:

肝衰竭, 内科治疗, 护理质量, 敏感指标, 构建

Abstract:

Objective　To construct a sensitive indicator system for the quality of nursing care in internal medicine treatment for liver failure. Methods　The researchers reviewed the literatures in March 2022. By combining evidence-based literatures with expert interviews, and based on the structure-process-outcome model, a preliminary construction of nursing quality sensitive indicators of internal medicine treatment for liver failure was carried out. Two rounds of expert inquiries using the Delphi method were conducted; the indicators were revised and evaluated based on the experts' opinions; the best quality evaluation index system was constructed. The SPSS 26.0 software was used for the statistical analysis. The experts' general data were statistically described by frequency, proportion, and (). The experts' positive coefficient was expressed by the questionnaire recover rate. The experts' authority coefficient and degree were expressed as authority coefficient. The importance degree was weighed by importance scoring. Results　The response rates for expert consultations were all 100%, with the expert authority coefficients for the first round being 0.958 and the second round 0.943, both over 0.700. The Kendall coordination coefficient ranged from 0.089 to 0.237 (P<0.05). Finally, the sensitive indicators for the quality of nursing in internal medicine treatment for liver failure were constructed, including 3 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 29 tertiary indicators. Conclusion　The sensitive indicators for the quality of nursing in internal medicine treatment for liver failure constructed in this study have good reliability, scientificity, and a certain degree of specialized sensitivity, which can provide certain basis for the evaluation of the quality of medical treatment and nursing for liver failure.

Key words:

Liver failure, Internal medicine treatment, Nursing quality, Sensitive indicators, Construction

张思思江淑贤范晨萌陈妙霞李莉莉.

肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标的构建 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(9): 1559-1564.

Zhang Sisi, Jiang Shuxian, Fan Chenmeng, Chen Miaoxia, Li Lili.

Construction of sensitive indicators for quality of nursing care in internal medicine treatment for liver failure [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(9): 1559-1564.

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会感染病学分会肝衰竭与人工肝学组,中华医学会肝病学分会重型肝病与人工肝学组. 肝衰竭诊治指南(2018年版)[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2019,22(2):164-171. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2019.02.004.
[2] 陈姣艳,陈斌,曹冬容,等. 慢性乙型肝炎并发肝衰竭死亡危险因素的研究[J]. 肝脏,2021,26(9):994-997. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2021.09.014.
[3] 邓婷婷,李莉,关瀛,等. 炎性相关标志物判断HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭预后的研究进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2022,38(10):2346-2351. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256. 2022.10.028.
[4] Burston S, Chaboyer W, Gillespie B. Nurse-sensitive indicators suitable to reflect nursing care quality: a review and discussion of issues[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2014,23(13-14):1785-95. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12337.
[5] Kavanagh PL, Adams WG, Wang CJ. Quality indicators and quality assessment in child health[J]. Arch Dis Child, 2009,94(6):458-63. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.137893.
[6] 郑彩霞,冯志仙. 肝移植围手术期护理质量敏感性指标的构建[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2018,34(27):2120-2126. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.27.009.
[7] 卫生部.综合医院分级管理标准(试行草案).(1989-11) [2022-04-01]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ca1adb42336c1eb91a375d6c.html.
[8] 北京协和医院.临床基础护理技术操作规范[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014.
[9] 全国护理质量促进联盟.护理质量过程管控工具包.(2018-09) [2022-04-01].https://max.book118.com/html/2021/1113/6101022053004050.shtm.
[10] 谢咏湘,李映兰,石莲桂,等. 急诊预检分诊护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中国护理管理,2018,18(5):641-646. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.05.014.
[11] 刘智群,陈华丽,文辉,等. 呼吸专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 护理管理杂志,2019,19(6):394-397. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2019.06.004.
[12] 李晶晶,袁征,苏伟,等. 医院感染防控专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2023,33(24):3816-3821. DOI:10.11816/cn.ni.2023-230821.
[13] 肖烨,王晓霞,彭山玲,等. 器官移植专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华护理杂志,2019,54(4):532-537. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.04.011.
[14] 李月仪,陈伟菊. 德尔菲法在护理管理学中的应用现状[J]. 护理研究,2018,32(21):3339-3341. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.21.006.
[15] 付志鹏,郑盛,杨涓. 肝硬化患者营养评价方法研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2023,29(23):3341-3344. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.23.005.
[16] 国家卫生健康委员会.医务人员手卫生规范WS/T313-2019[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2020,19(1):93-98. DOI:10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20205360.
[17] 张静,周新民. 肝衰竭前期的人工肝治疗[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2024,40(2):229-232. DOI:10.12449/JCH240202.
[18] 陈宇航,姜梓萌,张志娇,等. 不同指南诊断标准对人工肝治疗慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后的影响[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2023,39(11):2629-2634. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001- 5256. 2023.11.017.
[19] 项晓刚,尚大宝,张金铭. 慢加急性肝衰竭的疾病定义及发病机制[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2023,39(10):2281-2287. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.10.003.
[20] 徐华谦,李春燕,汤善宏.肝硬化与肝衰竭临床分类的相关性研究进展[J/OL].解放军医学杂志:1-9[2024-04-16].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1056.R.20231016. 0923.002.html.
[21] 中国中西医结合学会,中华中医药学会,中华医学会. 慢加急性肝衰竭中西医结合诊疗指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2023,39(7):1547-1552. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256. 2023.07.006.
[22] 孙睿. 慢加急性肝衰竭感染存在风险诊断模型的建立与验证[D].济南:山东大学,2024.DOI:10.27272/d.cnki.gshdu.2023.002545.
[23] 尹僖.一种新型慢加急性肝衰竭短期预后预测模型的建立[D].兰州:兰州大学,2023.DOI:10.27204/d.cnki.glzhu. 2023.002936.
[24] 李荣,曹晶晶,李晶,等. 慢加急性/亚急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者发病诱因及影响临床转归因素分析∗[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2022,25(6):832-835. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069. 2022.06.019.
[25] 中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会消化病学分会. 终末期肝病临床营养指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2019,35(6):1222-1230. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.06.010.
[26] 于红卫,侯维,时淑云,等.不同营养评价方法在肝病病人中的比较及适宜肝病营养评价的方法[J].肠外与肠内营养,2016,23(2):82-86.DOI:10.16151/j.1007- 810x. 2016.02.005.
[27] 高飞,张贤贤,卢喜玲,等. 慢性肝衰竭患者基于营养风险等级的多学科营养管理[J]. 护理学杂志,2022,37(8):7-11. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.08.007.
[28] 郭欣,陈赟,施雁. 基于Donabedian质量理论构建的护理质量评价标准之间影响关系的研究现状[J]. 护理学杂志,2014,29(9):92-94. DOI:10.3870/hlxzz.2014.09.092.
[29] 陈静,王艾红,魏晓旭,等. 血液肿瘤患者呼吸道感染预防及管理护理质量敏感指标的构建[J]. 中国护理管理,2022,22(9):1320-1324. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756. 2022.09.010.
[30] 孔雨欣. 基于结构—过程—结果理论的胫骨平台骨折护理敏感质量指标的构建及应用[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古医科大学,2023.DOI:10.27231/d.cnki.gnmyc.2023.000762.

肝衰竭内科治疗护理质量敏感指标的构建

Construction of sensitive indicators for quality of nursing care in internal medicine treatment for liver failure

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王瑞瑞邱冬侠崔二平马淑焕. 全面护理模式对输入性疟疾患者的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(4): 518-522.
[2]	邱霞资青兰冯小红彭三王洁琼谢克基. 基于循证的神经源性膀胱管理方案的构建和应用研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(23): 3474-3478.
[3]	杨芳肖辉魏亚琼. 以循证理念为基础构建早期康复敏感指标对急性脑卒中患者吞咽功能的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(18): 2631-2635.
[4]	蔡姣芝, 肖舒静, 杨敏菲, 李娟. “医院-社区-家庭”三元联动癌痛医养结合模式的构建及实施[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(11): 1533-1538.