缩短AMI患者FMC-to-B时间的集束化管理模式的构建及应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.08.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　构建缩短急性心肌梗死（AMI）患者首次接触医疗到球囊扩张（FMC-to-B）时间的集束化管理模式，并分析其应用价值。方法　通过查阅相关文献、总结临床工作经验，构建缩短FMC-to-B时间的集束化管理模式。采用前瞻性随机对照研究，选取2020年1月至2023年1月商丘市第一人民医院收治的121例AMI患者作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法+密封信法将患者分为对照组与观察组。研究期间对照组未有脱落，共61例；其中男28例，女33例；年龄42～56（50.30±4.50）岁；Killip心功能分级：Ⅰ级32例、Ⅱ级27例；采用常规护理。观察组因延迟实施经皮冠脉介入术（PCI）脱落1例，共59例；其中男35例，女24例；年龄42～56（50.42±4.56）岁；Killip心功能分级：Ⅰ级37例、Ⅱ级24例；在对照组基础上，采用缩短FMC-to-B时间的集束化管理模式干预，其主要内容有构建医护团队、建立缩短FMC-to-B时间模式等。比较两组患者临床指标、救治情况、并发症、经济指标以及护理满意度。采用独立样本t检验、χ²检验和秩和检验。结果　观察组患者确诊AMI时间、FMC-to-B时间及导管室激活时间均短于对照组［（582.61±10.36）s比（602.67±10.07）s、（110.61±9.48）min比（125.77±11.81）min、（19.85±3.94）min比（28.39±5.82）min］，差异均有统计学意义（t=10.758、7.737、9.386，均P<0.05）。观察组梗死血管再通率、存活率均高于对照组［94.92%（56/59）比83.61%（51/61）、93.22%（55/59）比80.33%（49/61）］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=3.971、4.314，均P<0.05）。两组患者并发症总发生率比较［13.56%（8/59）比18.03%（11/61）］，差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.450，P>0.05）。观察组住院时间短于对照组、住院费用低于对照组［（8.95±1.84）d比（10.95±1.51）d、（39 503.25±600.36）元比（43 981.22±586.37）元］，差异均有统计学意义（t=6.519、41.335，均P<0.05）。观察组护理满意度高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（Z=2.003，P<0.05）。结论　缩短AMI患者FMC-to-B时间的集束化管理模式的构建及应用可以有效缩短确诊AMI时间、FMC-to-B时间、导管室激活时间及住院时间，提高血管再通率与存活率，减少住院费用，且能提高患者的护理满意度。

关键词:

急性心肌梗死, 集束化管理, 首次接触医疗到球囊扩张时间

Abstract:

Objective　To construct a cluster management model that shortens the time from first medical contact to balloon (FMC-to-B) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and analyze its application value. Methods　By consulting relevant literatures and summarizing clinical work experiences, a cluster management model for shortening FMC-to-B time was constructed. A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted, selecting 121 AMI patients in Shangqiu First People's Hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 as the study subjects. The patients were divided into a control group and an observation group using the random number table method + sealed letter method. During the study period, the control group did not fall off, a total of 61 cases. There were 28 males and 33 females, aged 42-56 (50.30±4.50) years, Killip cardiac function classification: 32 cases of grade I and 27 cases of grade II, and routine nursing was used. In the observation group, 1 case fell off due to delayed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a total of 59 cases. There were 35 males and 24 females, aged 42-56 (50.42±4.56) years, Killip cardiac function classification: 37 cases of grade I and 24 cases of grade II. On the basis of the control group, the cluster management mode of shortening FMC-to-B time was used to intervene, the main contents were to build a medical team and establish a shortening FMC-to-B time model. The clinical indicators, treatment, complications, economic indicators and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test, χ² test, and rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. Results　The AMI diagnosis time, FMC-to-B time, and catheter room activation time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group [(582.61±10.36) s vs. (602.67±10.07) s, (110.61±9.48) min vs. (125.77±11.81) min, (19.85±3.94) min vs. (28.39±5.82) min], with statistically significant differences (t=10.758, 7.737, and 9.386, all P<0.05). The revascularization rate of infarction and survival rate in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [94.92% (56/59) vs. 83.61% (51/61), 93.22% (55/59) vs. 80.33% (49/61)], with statistically significant differences (χ²=3.971 and 4.314, both P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups [13.56% (8/59) vs. 18.03% (11/61)] (χ²=0.450, P>0.05). The hospitalization time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, and the hospitalization cost was lower than that of the control group [(8.95±1.84) d vs. (10.95±1.51) d, (39 503.25±600.36) yuan vs. (43 981.22±586.37) yuan], with statistically significant differences (t=6.519 and 41.335, both P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (Z=2.003, P<0.05). Conclusion　The construction and application of a cluster management model for shortening the FMC-to-B time of AMI patients can effectively shorten the AMI diagnosis time, FMC-to-B time, catheter room activation time, and hospitalization time, improve the vascular recanalization and survival rates, reduce the hospitalization costs, and improve the patients' nursing satisfaction.

Key words:

Acute myocardial infarction, Cluster management, First medical contact to balloon time

陈贝金爱莲.

缩短AMI患者FMC-to-B时间的集束化管理模式的构建及应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(8): 1286-1290.

Chen Bei, Jin Ailian.

Construction and application of a cluster management model for shortening FMC-to-B time in patients with acute myocardial infarction [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(8): 1286-1290.

参考文献

[1] 王哲,赵海滨,汪国梁,等.完全血运重建治疗急性心肌梗死合并多支血管病变效果的系统评价再评价[J].中国全科医学,2023,26(2):142-153.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572. 2022.0428.
[2] 张沫,孙筱璐,吴桂鑫,等.不同类型的非梗阻性肥厚型心肌病患者的临床及遗传学特征[J].中华心血管病杂志,2021,49(6):593-600.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210118- 00056.
[3] 赵冬,杨丽霞,赵绮旎.急性心梗流行病学特征及危险因素的调查分析[J].实用预防医学,2022,29(9):1124-1126.
[4] 梁允兰,史海波,王志翔,等.急性心肌梗死病人直接和择期PCI术后室性期前收缩Lown分级的对比研究[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2021,19(6):983-985.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2021.06.023.
[5] 张俊峰.不同时机经皮冠状动脉介入术对急性心肌梗死患者的影响比较[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2017,25(10):130-132.
[6] Moser DK, Kimble LP, Alberts MJ, et al. Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Stroke Council[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2007, 22(4):326-343. DOI: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000278963. 28619.4a.
[7] 李鹏兰,张智霞.集束化护理在老年病人血管活性药物使用管理中的应用[J].护理研究,2023,37(6):1107-1109.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.06.034.
[8] 夏欣华,张紫君,王宇霞,等.预防呼吸机相关性肺炎集束化护理方案的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(3):353-359.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.03.006.
[9] 急性ST段抬高心肌梗死溶栓治疗中国专家共识组.急性ST段抬高心肌梗死溶栓治疗的中国专家共识(修订版)[J].中华内科杂志,2008,47(2):170-174.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0578-1426.2008.02.034.
[10] Damluji AA, van Diepen S, Katz JN, et al. Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2021, 144(2):e16-e35. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000985.
[11] 顾炎,张婧婧,胡丹丽.院前急救链式流程与家庭时机理论在急性心肌梗死中的应用[J].国际医药卫生导报,2023,29(2):292-296.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023. 02.035.
[12] 董扬,张芬,王文标,等.老年急性心肌梗死患者PCI和非PCI治疗预后比较[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(4):721-723.DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.04.053.
[13] 高东方,梁岩,蔺亚晖,等.高敏肌钙蛋白I浓度及其变化诊断急性心肌梗死的效能分析[J].中华医学杂志,2022,102(43):3463-3468.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220526- 01163.
[14] 韩培天,杜彬彬,张津宁,等.心肌缺血时间对急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后血清sCD40L、sP-sel及心肌重构的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2022,21(2):114-118.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2022.02.002.
[15] 张胜,张全慧,康忠俊.不同时机经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死临床疗效及对心功能、心肌受损指标的影响[J].解放军医药杂志,2021,33(4):49-53.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-140X.2021.04.011.
[16] 曹艳君,林晓非.集束化护理预防溶栓后急性心肌梗死患者院内泌尿系感染的效果[J].解放军护理杂志,2012,29(20):30-31,35.
[17] 王小琴,梁红梅,裴传凤,等.急性心肌梗死心源性休克患者渐进式早期康复训练[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(23):72-74.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.23.072.
[18] 周晓敏,高翠霞,王琴丽,等.集束化护理干预对急性心肌梗死患者焦虑的效果分析[J].国际精神病学杂志,2016,43(5):901-903,919.DOI:10.13479/j.cnki.jip.2016.05.039.
[19] 赵蓓,刘佩林,陈辉,等.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死首次医疗接触至球囊扩张再灌注时间延迟分析[J].临床军医杂志,2016,44(5):510-513.DOI:10.16680/j.1671-3826. 2016. 05.15.
[20] 付丽,王楠,杨柳,等.首次医疗接触至球囊扩张时间对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者心功能的影响[J].中国医药,2018,13(5):667-670.DOI:10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777. 2018.05.008.
[21] 安莹波,马银皎,田艳丽,等.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进门-球囊扩张时间影响因素分析[J].国际老年医学杂志,2021,42(5):264-267.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7593. 2021.05.003.
[22] 曹梦珠,乔增勇.区域协同救治体系对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治效率和短期预后的影响[J].中国全科医学,2020,23(7):784-788.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572. 2019.00.784.
[23] 李莉.集束化护理在急性心肌梗死患者72h内对患者预后效果的影响[J].护士进修杂志,2015,30(8):742-744.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2015.08.027.
[24] 陈莹,郭松奇.表格式管理集束化护理对急性心肌梗死患者焦虑抑郁情绪及预后的影响[J].中国病案,2019,20(12):92-95.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2019.12.033.
[25] 王佐圣,徐养平,许万鹏,等.区块化管控急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死急救绿色通道的效果分析[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2021,28(2):147-149.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691. 2021.02.005.
[26] 胡昊,吴佳纬,李丹,等.合并心原性休克的急性心肌梗死患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后1年内死亡预测因素分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2022,30(3):161-165.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2022.03.001.