颈部牵伸训练在颈动脉内膜切除术后患者居家康复中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.19.033

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (19): 2819-2823.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.19.033

• 护理研究 • 上一篇

颈部牵伸训练在颈动脉内膜切除术后患者居家康复中的应用

方耿娜¹ 卢丽冰² 谢梦娜² 谢漫³ 黄琼珊³ 林楚东⁴ 王育胜¹ 林芳¹

¹揭阳市人民医院神经外科三区，揭阳　522000；²揭阳市人民医院神经外科一区，揭阳　522000；³揭阳市人民医院护理部，揭阳　522000；⁴揭阳市人民医院科教科，揭阳　522000

收稿日期:2023-07-21 出版日期:2023-10-01 发布日期:2023-11-06
通讯作者: 方耿娜，Email：245531580@qq.com
基金资助:
2021年揭阳市科技计划项目（ylxm076）

Application of neck stretching training in home rehabilitation after carotid endarterectomy

Fang Gengna¹, Lu Libing², Xie Mengna², Xie Man³, Huang Qiongshan³, Lin Chudong⁴, Wang Yusheng¹, Lin Fang¹

¹Neurosurgery Zone 3, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China; ²Neurosurgery Zone 1, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China; ³Nursing Department, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China; ⁴Science and Education Section, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China

Received:2023-07-21 Online:2023-10-01 Published:2023-11-06
Contact: Fang Gengna, Email: 245531580@qq.com
Supported by:
Science and Technology Plan Project of Jieyang City in 2021 (ylxm076)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　研讨颈部牵伸训练在颈动脉内膜切除术后患者居家康复中的应用。方法　采用前后对比研究方法，选取在揭阳市人民医院神经外科三区由同一组医生行颈动脉内膜切除术（carotid endarterectomy，CEA）的患者作为研究对象，2018年12月至2021年6月CEA术后出院患者20例为对照组，2021年8月至2023年6月CEA术后出院患者20例为观察组。对照组女9例、男11例，年龄（70.15±9.49）岁，采用常规出院前健康教育和出院后常规颈部活动及随访；观察组女7例、男13例，年龄（70.22±9.55）岁，在对照组基础上采用颈部牵伸训练居家康复进行干预。收集并比较两组患者颈部功能障碍指数、疼痛评分、满意度、依从性的差异。统计学方法采用χ²检验、独立样本t检验。结果　观察组患者训练第30天颈部功能障碍指数低于对照组［（4.28±3.37）比（8.73±4.97）］，差异有统计学意义（t=3.314，P=0.002）；观察组患者训练第30天疼痛评分低于对照组［（2.13±0.31）分比（4.85±0.64）分］，差异有统计学意义（t=17.016，P<0.001）；观察组护理满意度显著高于对照组［100.00%（20/20）比60.00%（12/20）］，差异有统计学意义（χ²=10.286，P=0.006）；观察组依从性显著高于对照组［100.00%（20/20）比70.00%（14/20）］，差异有统计学意义（χ²=7.222，P=0.027）。结论　颈部牵伸训练在颈动脉内膜切除术后患者居家康复中具有显著应用价值，可推广。

关键词:

颈动脉内膜切除术, 颈部牵伸训练, 居家康复, 应用价值

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the application of neck stretching training in home rehabilitation after carotid endarterectomy. Methods　A comparative study method was used to select patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by the same group of doctors in Neurosurgery Zone 3, Jieyang People's Hospital as the study subjects. From December 2018 to June 2021, 20 patients discharged after CEA were included in the control group, and from August 2021 to June 2023, 20 patients discharged after CEA were included in the observation group. The control group [9 females and 11 males, aged (70.15±9.49) years] received routine health education before discharge and routine neck activity and follow-up after discharge, and the observation group [7 females and 13 males, aged (70.22±9.55) years] received home rehabilitation intervention of neck stretching training on the basis of control group. The differences in neck dysfunction index, pain score, satisfaction, and compliance between the two groups were collected and compared. Statistical methods were χ² test and independent sample t test. Results　On the 30th day of training, the neck dysfunction index of the observation group was lower than that of the control group [(4.28±3.37) vs. (8.73±4.97)], with a statistically significant difference (t=3.314, P=0.002); the pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group [(2.13±0.31) vs. (4.85±0.64)], with a statistically significant difference (t=17.016, P<0.001). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group [100.00% (20/20) vs. 60.00% (12/20)], with a statistically significant difference (χ²=10.286, P=0.006). The compliance of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group [100.00% (20/20) vs. 70.00% (14/20)], with a statistically significant difference (χ²=7.222, P=0.027). Conclusion　Neck stretching training has significant application value in home rehabilitation after CEA, which can be promoted.

Key words:

Carotid endarterectomy, Neck stretching training, Home rehabilitation, Application value

方耿娜卢丽冰谢梦娜谢漫黄琼珊林楚东王育胜林芳.

颈部牵伸训练在颈动脉内膜切除术后患者居家康复中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(19): 2819-2823.

Fang Gengna, Lu Libing, Xie Mengna, Xie Man, Huang Qiongshan, Lin Chudong, Wang Yusheng, Lin Fang.

Application of neck stretching training in home rehabilitation after carotid endarterectomy [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(19): 2819-2823.

参考文献

[1] 宋希涛,刘暴,刘昌伟,等.下肢动脉硬化闭塞症合并无症状颈动脉狭窄发生率及危险因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(2):126-128. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491. 2016.02.011.
[2] 姜忠滨,刘志刚,王红梅.冠状动脉造影的人群中颈动脉狭窄的发生率[J].临床荟萃,2004,19(17):989-990. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2004.17.010.
[3] 张鹏飞,赵立文,汪子文,等.内膜斑块剥脱术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的Meta分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,21(8):455-457. DOI:10.13798/j.issn.1009- 153X.2016.08.003.
[4] 曲乐丰,柏骏,Dieter Raithel,等.颈动脉内膜切除手术技巧及围手术期处理:多中心临床经验总结[J].中华神经外科杂志,2014,30(11):1104-1107. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2014.11.007.
[5] 宋平,陈晓斌,杜浩,等.内膜斑块剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,21(9):527-529. DOI:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2016.09.006.
[6] 梁向明,赖彩玉.延续性护理对颈内动脉剥脱术患者出院后生活质量疗效的影响分析[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(2):98-102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2017.02.025.
[7] 田野,黄晓晴,孙鹏举,等.老年患者颈动脉重度狭窄颈动脉内膜剥脱术与支架置入术的预后比较[J].黑龙江医药科学,2022,45(3):17-19,22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0104. 2022.03.008.
[8] 肖特,张东,喻乐宝,等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术后颈部神经损伤的危险因素分析[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2021,26(2):193-196. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200522- 00168.
[9] Chabowski M, Grzebien A, Ziomek A, et al. Quality of life after carotid endarterectomy: a review of the literature[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2017, 117(4):829-835. DOI: 10.1007/s13760-017-0811-x.
[10] 司俊臣,于凯,林凯,等.颈动脉内膜切除术治疗高分叉颈动脉狭窄的疗效分析[J].中华神经医学杂志,2022,21(2):139-144. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20211125- 00769.
[11] 高燕,王国琴.围术期循证护理在颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄中的效果分析[J/CD].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(22):30,39.
[12] 曾而明,徐春华,陈超,等.颈内动脉内膜剥脱术治疗症状性颈内动脉狭窄临床研究[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2015,42(4):338-341.
[13] 叶建忠,张宏伟,王守利,等.颈内动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉硬化狭窄后早期并发症的疗效分析[J].系统医学,2019,4(5):93-94,103. DOI:10.19368/j.cnki.2096-1782.2019. 05.093.
[14] Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity[J]. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1991, 14(7):409-415.
[15] Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2011, 41(6):1073-1093. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
[16] 刘翔宇,谌永毅,周钰娟,等.住院患者护理服务满意度评价指标体系的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2015,50(1):18-21. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2015.01.004.
[17] 刘延锦,蔡立柏,徐秋露,等.慢性疼痛患者恐动症的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(2):234-239. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.02.025.
[18] McLean S, Holden MA, Potia T, et al. Quality and acceptability of measures of exercise adherence in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2017, 56(3):426-438. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew422.
[19] 石继荣.关于"视频终端综合征、干眼症、沙眼"探究[J/CD].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(43):8407. DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2095-8242.2017.43.067.
[20] 尹萍,孙萍,沈杰.甲状腺术前颈部体位训练对缓解不适感的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2016,2(8):42-44,47. DOI:10.11997/nitcwm.201608014.
[21] 王华,杨丽平.颈动脉内膜剥脱术术前及术后的护理[J].当代护士(学术版),2011,(9):38-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6411.2011.09.021.
[22] 刘双,匡雪春.早期颈部运动改善甲状腺术后综合征的临床研究[J].中国处方药,2020,18(6):171-173. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-945X.2020.06.098.
[23] 林舒娜,张柔华,努尔夏提·尼加提,等.高校学生颈椎病康复治疗与预防[J].当代体育科技,2012,2(34):21-22. DOI:10.16655/j.cnki.2095-2813.2012.34.001.

颈部牵伸训练在颈动脉内膜切除术后患者居家康复中的应用

Application of neck stretching training in home rehabilitation after carotid endarterectomy

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	莫琳勤李杏张展苏严琳孙艳彬. 以格林模式为框架的强化护理模式在冠心病不稳定型心绞痛患者中的实践研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(8): 1160-1166.
[2]	陈香荣黄冉冉安波于国政. 链式护理对预防CT增强扫描造影剂外渗的应用价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(12): 1760-1763.
[3]	胡卫, 刘良进. DCE-MRI结合DWI评估肝癌介入治疗疗效的应用价值[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(5): 719-724.
[4]	颜陶, 杨敏霞, 陶志允, 廖沛娜, 严美洁. 无创高频振荡通气在足月儿轻度急性呼吸窘迫综合征救治过程中的应用价值[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(10): 1381-1384.
[5]	张小芳魏玉磊. 17-OHP、ATCH联合血清睾酮在CAH新生儿早期筛查中的应用[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(1): 53-56.