双轨道交互干预模式在高血压患者血压控制中的应用效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.13.031

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (13): 1909-1913.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.13.031

双轨道交互干预模式在高血压患者血压控制中的应用效果

赵培培蒋玲李科刘敏

河南省人民医院高血压科，郑州　450000

收稿日期:2022-12-02 出版日期:2023-07-01 发布日期:2023-07-28
通讯作者: 赵培培，Email：zhaopeipei1717@163.com
基金资助:
河南省自然科学基金（面上项目）（202300410454）

Application of dual-track interactive intervention mode in blood pressure control of hypertensive patients

Zhao Peipei, Jiang Ling, Li Ke, Liu Min

Hypertension Department, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, China

Received:2022-12-02 Online:2023-07-01 Published:2023-07-28
Contact: Zhao Peipei, Email: zhaopeipei1717@163.com
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (202300410454)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　研究双轨道交互干预模式在高血压患者血压控制中的应用效果。方法　前瞻性选取2020年6月至2021年6月在河南省人民医院接受治疗的102例高血压患者作为研究对象，根据随机数字表法将其分为两组，对照组有1例患者因问卷填写有误不予接收，研究组有1例患者失访予以剔除。对照组男26例，女24例，年龄（50.23±12.36）岁；研究组男25例，女25例，年龄（49.89±12.29）岁。对照组行常规干预模式，研究组行双轨道交互干预模式，干预时间均为1个月。观察两组患者出院前日、出院后1个月的自我管理能力及血压控制情况。统计学方法采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　出院前日，两组患者的高血压患者自我管理行为测评量表（HPSMBRS）各维度评分及总评分比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；出院后1个月，研究组HPSMBRS各维度评分及总评分与出院前日比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05），对照组HPSMBRS各维度评分及总评分均低于出院前日（均P<0.05），研究组HPSMBRS各维度评分及总评分均高于对照组（均P<0.05）。出院前日，两组患者收缩压、舒张压比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；出院后1个月，研究组收缩压［（140.25±12.56）mmHg比（141.25±10.28）mmHg（1 mmHg=0.133 kPa）］、舒张压［（81.02±3.54）mmHg比（82.29±4.52）mmHg］与出院前日比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05），对照组收缩压［（145.54±10.36）mmHg比（141.36±10.26）mmHg］、舒张压［（83.26±3.26）mmHg比（82.35±4.53）mmHg］与出院前日比较差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）；研究组收缩压、舒张压均低于对照组（均P<0.05）。结论　双轨道交互干预模式可提升高血压患者自我管理水平，利于血压的控制。

关键词:

高血压, 血压控制, 双轨道交互干预模式

Abstract:

Objective　To study the application effect of dual-track interactive intervention mode in blood pressure control of hypertensive patients. Methods　A total of 102 patients with hypertension who received treatment in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected as research objects. They were divided into two groups according to the random number table method. In the control group, 1 patient was not accepted due to incorrect questionnaire filling, and in the study group, 1 patient was excluded due to missing follow-up. There were 26 males and 24 females in the control group, aged (50.23±12.36) years, and there were 25 males and 25 females in the study group, aged (49.89±12.29) years. The control group received routine intervention mode, and the study group received dual-track interactive intervention mode. The self-management abilities and blood pressure control of the two groups were observed on the day before discharge and 1 month after discharge. Statistical methods used were t test and χ² test. Results　On the day before discharge, there were no statistically significant differences in the total score and scores of all dimensions of Hypertension Patients Self-Management Behavior Rating Scale (HPSMBRS) between the two groups (all P>0.05). One month after discharge, the total score and scores of all dimensions of HPSMBRS of the study group had no statistically significant differences compared with those on the day before discharge (all P>0.05); the total score and scores of all dimensions of HPSMBRS of the control group were lower than those on the day before discharge (all P<0.05); the total score and scores of all dimensions of HPSMBRS of the study group were higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05). On the day before discharge, there were no statistically significant differences in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures between the two groups (both P>0.05). One month after discharge, the systolic blood pressure [(140.25±12.56) mmHg vs. (141.25±10.28) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)] and diastolic blood pressure [(81.02±3.54) mmHg vs. (82.29±4.52) mmHg] of the study group had no statistically significant differences compared with those on the day before discharge (both P>0.05); the systolic blood pressure [(145.54±10.36) mmHg vs. (141.36±10.26) mmHg] and diastolic blood pressure [(83.26±3.26) mmHg vs. (82.35±4.53) mmHg] of the control group were significantly different from those on the day before discharge (both P<0.05); the systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure of the study group were lower than those of the control group (both P<0.05). Conclusion　The dual-track interactive intervention mode can improve the self-management level of hypertensive patients and facilitate the control of blood pressure.

Key words:

Hypertension, Blood pressure control, Dual-track interactive intervention mode

赵培培蒋玲李科刘敏.

双轨道交互干预模式在高血压患者血压控制中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(13): 1909-1913.

Zhao Peipei, Jiang Ling, Li Ke, Liu Min.

Application of dual-track interactive intervention mode in blood pressure control of hypertensive patients [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(13): 1909-1913.

参考文献

[1] 张梅,吴静,张笑,等. 2018年中国成年居民高血压患病与控制状况研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(10):1780-1789. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210508- 00379.
[2] 马丽媛,王增武,樊静,等. «中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021»关于中国高血压流行和防治现状[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(30):3715-3720. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007- 9572.2022.0502.
[3] 朱瑶瑶,林忠伟. 顽固性高血压的发病机制和治疗进展[J]. 实用医学杂志,2020,36(12):1689-1692. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.12.028.
[4] 王紫艳,徐吉利,王昭军. 顽固性高血压药物与非药物治疗新进展[J]. 岭南心血管病杂志,2020,26(4):476-479. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9688.2020.04.23.
[5] 赵洋,周洁,耿朝辉. 高血压患者认知衰弱评估及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(6):748-752. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.06.003.
[6] 施晓柳,耿桂灵,高晶,等. 老年慢性病患者延续护理中信息延续的研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学,2020,23(4):499-504. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.449.
[7] 宋利英,杨柳,姚尼娜,等. 以社会综合支持为基础的护理干预对社区高血压患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(17):140-142. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2022. 17.045.
[8] 曾于珍,陈世耀. 临床研究结局指标选择与样本量估计[J]. 协和医学杂志,2018,9(1):87-92. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674- 9081.2018.01.016.
[9] 中华医学会,中华医学杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等. 高血压基层诊疗指南(2019年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2019,18(4):301-313. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671- 7368.2019.04.002.
[10] Shrestha B, Dunn L. The declaration of helsinki on medical research involving human subjects: a review of seventh revision[J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2020, 17(4): 548-552. DOI: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.1042.
[11] 赵秋利,刘晓. 高血压病人自我管理行为测评量表的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理,2012,12(11):26-31.
[12] 王永馨,李小菊,井明霞,等. 社区老年高血压患者服药依从性影响因素的路径分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2021,24(4):503-508. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.409.
[13] 史云聪,王立立,郭艺芳. 基因-环境因素相互作用与高血压的关系及其对社区管理的建议[J]. 中国全科医学,2021,24(2):138-142. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020. 00.521.
[14] 魏心源,蒋与刚,黄承钰,等. 中老年高血压人群H型高血压患病程度与认知功能关系分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2021,24(20):2520-2526. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572. 2021.00.558.
[15] 朱平. 老年人高血压的特点及诊疗进展[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2021,23(8):785-787. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2021.08.001.
[16] Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, et al. Resistant hypertension: detection, evaluation, and management: a scientific statement from the american heart association[J]. Hypertension, 2018, 72(5): e53-e90. DOI: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084.
[18] 白艳艳,冯六六,黄红漫,等. 医院-社区-家庭三元联动移动平台对高血压病人慢性病管理质量的影响[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2022,20(9):1630-1634. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2022.09.019.
[19] 杨露思,刘婷,周彩虹,等. 高血压"医院-社区-家庭"一体化全病程管理模式的构建与实证研究[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2022,19(2):252-254. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-016X.2022.02.070.
[20] Dalfó Pibernat E, Camallonga Claveria B, Valle Castiñeiras S, et al. Nursing reflections on the management of hypertension and heart failure[J]. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2021, 32(2): 144-145. DOI: 10.1111/2047-3095.12320.
[21] 王丽,郑亮,罗明. 家庭医生主动健康管理模式对社区原发性高血压合并慢性失眠症的干预效果研究[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版),2022,43(2):235-242. DOI: 10.12289/j.issn.1008-0392.21355.
[22] 毛静飞,俞怡,杨海燕,等. 微信平台对海岛地区难治性高血压患者疗效的影响[J]. 护士进修杂志,2018,33(10):934-936. DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2018.10.022.
[23] 潘妙丹,何峥. 微信平台式健康教育对高血压患者治疗依从性的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2020,39(7):1218-1221. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190103-00375.
[24] 张丽芹,张丽华,陈霞,等. 微信平台健康教育对社区高血压患者治疗依从性和血压控制的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2018,37(18):2540-2542,2549. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2018.18.029.
[25] 张微,郭燕,周小琦,等. 休闲身体活动对社区老年高血压患者认知功能的影响研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(22):2720-2725. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0221.
[26] 陈庆学,孙国锋,赵萍,等. 社区高血压患者心理状况与血生化指标及饮食习惯的相关性[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(24):3834-3837. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2020.24.033.
[27] 李志敏,张会敏,高杰,等. 社区高血压患者社会支持与心理弹性的关系:自我效能的中介效应分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2021,41(7):1507-1511. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005- 9202.2021.07.045.
[28] 祁欢,陈婷,张庆华,等. 社区高血压患者健康素养与自我管理能力的典型相关分析[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2021,30(3):262-266. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371468- 20200526-01407.
[29] 胡康,张幸,朱小柔,等. 基于潜在剖面分析的高血压患者自我管理行为与血压控制的关联研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志,2018,22(9):880-883,911. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz. 2018.09.003.

双轨道交互干预模式在高血压患者血压控制中的应用效果

Application of dual-track interactive intervention mode in blood pressure control of hypertensive patients

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics