多酶预处理溶液联合超声清洗对人流吸管清洗效果评价

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.13.032

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (13): 1914-1916.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.13.032

多酶预处理溶液联合超声清洗对人流吸管清洗效果评价

谭洁贞蔡荟

深圳市南山区妇幼保健院妇科，深圳　518000

收稿日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-07-01 发布日期:2023-07-28
通讯作者: 谭洁贞，Email：2483072774@qq.com

Evaluation on the cleaning effect of multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with ultrasonic cleaning on straw of gynecological abortion

Tan Jiezhen, Cai Hui

Department of Gynecology, Shenzhen Nanshan District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, China

Received:2023-01-03 Online:2023-07-01 Published:2023-07-28
Contact: Tan Jiezhen, Email: 2483072774@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　评价多酶预处理溶液联合超声清洗对人流吸管的清洗效果。方法　本研究为实验性研究。选取2022年1月至6月深圳市南山区妇幼保健院消毒供应中心收取的1 200支人流吸管作为研究对象，随机分为两组，分别用多酶预处理溶液联合人工清洗（对照组）和多酶预处理溶液联合超声清洗（实验组）处理，采用目测观察法及三磷酸腺苷（ATP）生物荧光检测法比较两组人流吸管清洗合格率。采用χ²检验。结果　通过目测观察法发现，实验组人流吸管的清洗合格率为93.67%（562/600），对照组人流吸管的清洗合格率为73.33%（440/600），差异有统计学意义（χ²=90.026，P<0.001）。通过ATP生物荧光检测法发现，实验组人流吸管的清洗合格率为87.16%（523/600），对照组人流吸管的清洗合格率为68.67%（412/600），差异有统计学意义（χ²=59.672，P<0.001）。结论　多酶预处理溶液联合超声清洗相较于多酶预处理溶液联合人工清洗对于人流吸管清洗效果更佳。

关键词:

人流吸管, 多酶预处理溶液, 超声清洗, 清洗质量

Abstract:

Objective　To evaluate the cleaning effect of multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with ultrasonic cleaning on straw of gynecological abortion. Methods　It was a experimental study. A total of 1 200 straws of gynecological abortion in central sterile supply department of Shenzhen Nanshan District Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January to June 2022 were selected and were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was given multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with manual cleaning, while the experimental group was given multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with ultrasonic cleaning. The visual observation method and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) biofluorescence detection method were used to compare the qualified rate of cleaning between the two groups. χ² test was used. Results　By the visual observation method, it was found that the qualified rate of straw cleaning in the experimental group was 93.67% (562/600) and that in the control group was 73.33% (440/600), with a statistically significant difference (χ²=90.026, P<0.001). By the ATP biofluorescence detection method, it was found that the qualified rate of straw cleaning in the experimental group was 87.16% (523/600) and that in the control group was 68.67% (412/600), with a statistically significant difference (χ²=59.672, P<0.001). Conclusion　The cleaning effect of multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with ultrasonic cleaning is better than that of multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with manual cleaning.

Key words:

Straw of gynecological abortion, Multi-enzyme pretreatment solution, Ultrasonic cleaning, Cleaning quality

谭洁贞蔡荟.

多酶预处理溶液联合超声清洗对人流吸管清洗效果评价 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(13): 1914-1916.

Tan Jiezhen, Cai Hui.

Evaluation on the cleaning effect of multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with ultrasonic cleaning on straw of gynecological abortion [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(13): 1914-1916.

参考文献

[1] 蒋丹丹.重复人工流产患者生殖健康状况及其影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(14):2666-2669. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.14.040.
[2] 王虹,段美芹,王建平.自制电动旋转式清洗刷应用在宫吸管清洗中的效果观察[J].中国消毒学杂志,2022,39(7):542-544. DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2022.07.018.
[3] 吴小凌,江妙玲,杨婵萍,等.电子质量追溯系统在消毒供应室的应用效果评价[J].国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(8):1253-1255. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021. 08.037.
[4] 孙宝奇.多酶溶液加超声清洗在腹腔镜器械中的维护效果分析[J].中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(17):182-183. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2021.17.080.
[5] 陈娟,郭三兰,杜习金.多酶预处理溶液联合超声对口腔内科器械的清洗效果评价[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2021,37(2):115-117. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2021.02.014.
[6] 沈茹,高爱东,马哲红,等.ATP生物荧光检测法在软式内镜清洗质量监测中的应用研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2022,13(13):182-185. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2022. 13.044.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生部. WS/T 367-2012医疗机构消毒技术规范[S/OL]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/s9496/201204/54510.shtml.
[8] Gruber JV, Riemer J. Examining skin recovery after a 3% aqueous hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) treatment using ATP biofluorescence[J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 2022, 15:929-937. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S363723.
[9] 黄茜玲.超声震荡联合多酶液对口腔器械的清洗效果分析[J].安徽卫生职业技术学院学报,2021,20(1):148-149.
[10] 彭慧丽.多酶清洗液+超声对腹腔镜器械的清洗效果评价[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(22):3728-3729. DOI:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2019.22.078.
[11] 范小兰,王慧敏,张和平,等.消毒供应中心系列器械清洗装载架在临床口腔器械清洗中的效果观察[J].中国消毒学杂志,2020,37(11):863-865. DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001- 7658.2020.11.020.
[12] 朱亭亭,李涛,沈瑾,等.一种多泡型多酶清洗剂预处理效果实验研究[J].中国消毒学杂志,2017,34(1):15-17,20. DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2017.01.006.
[13] 王金玲.不同清洗方式在腹腔镜手术器械清洗和灭菌中的应用价值[J].中国医疗器械信息,2022,28(1):172-174. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2022.01.054.
[14] 林洁,刘帆.基于多酶清洗剂控制的口腔专科器械清洗消毒模式的探索[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2022,49(3):324-327. DOI:10.7518/gjkq.2022052.

多酶预处理溶液联合超声清洗对人流吸管清洗效果评价

Evaluation on the cleaning effect of multi-enzyme pretreatment solution combined with ultrasonic cleaning on straw of gynecological abortion

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics