国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (22): 3140-3143.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.22.007

• 科研课题专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

注射用艾普拉唑钠对消化性溃疡伴出血的临床治疗效果

王艳超   

  1. 平顶山市第二人民医院消化内科,平顶山 467000
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-19 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-11-18
  • 通讯作者: Email: wangyanchaoiu@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省医疗科技攻关项目(201900612)

Clinical effect of ilaprazole injection on peptic ulcer with hemorrhage

Wang Yanchao   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Pingdingshan Second People's Hospital, Pingdingshan 467000, China
  • Received:2022-07-19 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-11-18
  • Contact: Email: wangyanchaoiu@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Medical Science and Technology Project of Henan Province (201900612)

摘要: 目的 对注射用艾普拉唑钠治疗消化性溃疡伴出血的临床疗效进行观察分析。方法 回顾性研究,在2020年7月至2022年1月期间平顶山市第二人民医院收治的消化性溃疡伴出血患者中随机抽取135例,分析患者病历资料后,根据当时治疗方案不同,将患者分为研究组68例和对照组67例。研究组男36例、女32例,年龄(50.45±2.31)岁,采用艾普拉唑辅助治疗;对照组男37例、女30例,年龄(50.16±2.72)岁,采用内镜下止血+基础用药。比较两组治疗有效率,溃疡愈合时间,腹痛、发热症状缓解时间,止血成功率,再出血率,不良反应发生率。计量资料采用独立样本t检验,计数资料χ2检验。结果 治疗后,研究组治疗有效率为95.59%(65/68),高于对照组85.07%(57/67),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.287,P=0.038)。治疗后,两组止血时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组溃疡愈合时间、退热时间、止痛时间[(2.21±0.35)d、(1.45±0.16)d、(1.17±0.26)d]均短于对照组[(3.44±0.72)d、(2.05±0.33)d、(1.92±0.33)d],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。研究组止血成功率91.18%(62/68)高于对照组77.61%(52/67)(χ2=6.991,P=0.008)、再出血率3.23%(2/62)低于对照组19.23%(10/52)(χ2=12.840,P<0.001)。治疗后,两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 注射用艾普拉唑钠在消化性溃疡伴出血患者接受常规止血、基础用药后可起到较好辅助效果,可快速止血、促进溃疡愈合,对实现彻底止血、降低再出血风险均有积极作用,此药未导致患者出现严重不良反应,安全性高,值得推广。

关键词: 消化性溃疡伴出血, 注射用艾普拉唑钠, 炎性反应, 血液指标, 免疫功能, 药物不良反应

Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical effect of ilaprazole injection on peptic ulcer patients with hemorrhage. Methods It was a retrospective study. The study randomly selected 135 patients with peptic ulcer and hemorrhage from Pingdingshan Second People's Hospital from July 2020 to January 2022. After analyzing the patients' medical records, the patients were divided into a study group [68 cases, 36 males and 32 females, aged (50.45±2.31) years, ilaprazole adjuvant treatment] and a control group [67 cases, 37 males and 30 females, aged (50.16±2.72) years, endoscopic hemostasis + basic drugs]. The treatment efficiencies, ulcer healing time, abdominal pain and fever symptom relief time, hemostasis success rates, re-bleeding rates, and adverse reaction rates of the two groups were compared. Independent sample t test was used for the measurement data, and χ2 test was used for the count data. Results After treatment, the effective rate of the study group was 95.59% (65/68), which was higher than that of the control group [85.07% (57/67)], with a statistically significant difference (χ2=4.287, P=0.038). After treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the hemostatic time between the two groups (P>0.05); the ulcer healing time, antipyretic time, and abdominal pain relief time in the study group [(2.21±0.35) d, (1.45±0.16) d, and (1.17±0.26) d] were lower than those in the control group [(3.44±0.72) d, (2.05±0.33) d, and (1.92±0.33) d], with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The success rate of hemostasis in the study group was 91.18% (62/68), which was higher than that in the control group [77.61% (52/67)] (χ2=6.991, P=0.008), and the re-bleeding rate was 3.23% (2/62), which was lower than that in the control group [19.23% (10/52)] (χ2=12.840, P<0.001). After treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Ilaprazole sodium for injection can play a good auxiliary effect in patients with peptic ulcer and hemorrhage after receiving routine hemostasis and basic medication, and it can achieve the rapid hemostasis, promote the ulcer healing, achieve the complete hemostasis, and reduce the risk of re-bleeding. This drug has no serious adverse reactions in patients, with high safety, which is worthy of promotion.

Key words: Peptic ulcer with hemorrhage, Ilaprazole injection, Inflammatory reaction, Blood indexes, Immunity, Adverse drug reactions