IKAP理论协同舒适护理结合A-DIVA量表在无偿献血采血中的应用效果分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20250507-21032

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (21): 3682-3687.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20250507-21032

IKAP理论协同舒适护理结合A-DIVA量表在无偿献血采血中的应用效果分析

苏玮邓雅雯何颖梁瀚文蔡嘉映谢晓萍刘杏黄晓斌戚艳萍

广州血液中心广州市医学重点实验室血液安全重点实验室，广州 510095

收稿日期:2025-05-07 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2025-11-19
通讯作者: 戚艳萍，Email：371534292@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省医学科学技术研究基金（B2024302）；广州市医学重点学科（2025-2027）

Application of collaborative comfort care model based on IKAP theory and incorporating a modified A-DIVA scale in blood collection for voluntary blood donation

Su Wei, Deng Yawen, He Ying, Liang Hanwen, Cai Jiaying, Xie Xiaoping, Liu Xing, Huang Xiaobin, Qi Yanping

Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Medicine, Key Laboratory of Blood Safety, Guangzhou 510095, China

Received:2025-05-07 Online:2025-11-01 Published:2025-11-19
Contact: Qi Yanping, Email: 371534292@qq.com
Supported by:
Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (B2024302); Key Medical Disciplines and Specialties Program in Guangzhou (2025-2027)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　验证基于信息-知识-信念-行为（IKAP）理论协同舒适护理模式结合改良A-DIVA量表在无偿献血采血中的应用效果和护理策略适用性。方法　本研究为前瞻性随机对照研究，采用随机抽样法，选取2024年6至10月在广州血液中心捐献全血的1 074名献血者，按随机抽样法分为对照组（534例）和试验组（540例）。对照组中男372例（69.66%），女162例（30.34%），年龄（31.35±5.16）岁；试验组男361例（66.85%），女179例（33.15%），年龄（31.19±5.33）岁。对照组接受常规护理，试验组基于IKAP理论协同舒适护理模式结合改良A-DIVA量表作为献血者风险评估工具，实施分层级精准护理干预。统计学方法采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　试验组首次穿刺成功率为96.67%（522/540），显著高于对照组的92.32%（493/534）（χ²=10.235，P<0.05）；试验组静脉穿刺疼痛评分为（0.41±0.07）分，低于对照组的（0.78±0.14）分（t=54.869，P<0.05）；试验组 DRVR 发生率为 2.59%（14/540），显著低于对照组的 5.99%（32/534）（χ²=8.421，P<0.05）；试验组A-DIVA评分高于对照组，采血时间、穿刺次数均低于对照组（均P<0.05）。结论　基于IKAP理论协同舒适护理模式结合改良的A-DIVA量表在无偿献血采血中能有效识别存在静脉通路困难风险的献血者，提升首次静脉穿刺成功率，缓解穿刺疼痛，减少发生以DRVR为主的献血不良反应。

关键词: IKAP理论, 舒适护理, 困难静脉通路, 评估工具, 无偿献血, 静脉穿刺, 献血相关血管迷走神经反应

Abstract: Objective　To verify the application effect and nursing strategy applicability of the collaborative comfort care model based on the IKAP theory and incorporating a modified A-DIVA (adult-difficult intravenous access) scale in the voluntary blood donation. Methods　A total of 1 074 donors who donated whole blood at Guangzhou Blood Center from June to October 2024 were selected by the random sampling method for the randomized controlled trial, and were divided into a control group (534 cases) and an experimental group (540 cases) by the participants were divided method. In the control group, there were 372 males (69.66%) and 162 females (30.34%), with an age of (31.35±5.16) years. In the experimental group, there were 361 males (66.85%) and 179 females (33.15%), with an age of (31.19±5.33) years. The control group received routine care, while the experimental group implemented hierarchical precision nursing intervention based on the IKAP theory and comfortable nursing mode, with the improved A-DIVA scale as the risk assessment tool for the blood donors. t and χ² tests were used as the statistical methods. Results　The first puncture success rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group [96.67% (522/540) vs. 92.32% (493/534); χ²=10.235; P<0.05]. The score of venous puncture pain in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (0.41±0.07 vs. 0.78±0.14; t=54.869; P<0.05). The incidence rate of DRVR in the the experimental group was lower than that in the control group [2.59% (14/540) vs. 5.99% (32/534);χ²=8.421; P<0.05]. The score of A-DIVA in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, and the blood collection time and the number of punctures were both shorter (all P<0.05). Conclusion　The collaborative comfort care model based on the IKAP theory and incorporating a modified A-DIVA scale can effectively identify blood donors who are at risk of having difficulties with venous access. It also enhances the success rate of the first venous puncture, alleviates the puncture pain, and reduces the incidence of adverse reactions, primarily DRVR.

Key words: IKAP theory, Collaborative comfort care, Difficult intravenous access, Assessment tools, Voluntary blood donation, Venous puncture, Donation related vasovagal reaction

苏玮邓雅雯何颖梁瀚文蔡嘉映谢晓萍刘杏黄晓斌戚艳萍. IKAP理论协同舒适护理结合A-DIVA量表在无偿献血采血中的应用效果分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(21): 3682-3687.

Su Wei, Deng Yawen, He Ying, Liang Hanwen, Cai Jiaying, Xie Xiaoping, Liu Xing, Huang Xiaobin, Qi Yanping. Application of collaborative comfort care model based on IKAP theory and incorporating a modified A-DIVA scale in blood collection for voluntary blood donation[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(21): 3682-3687.

参考文献

[1] 刘佃雨,傅雪梅,李文,等. 成渝地区采供血信息系统互联互通探索[J]. 中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(1):77-79. DOI:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.1.18.
[2] 王永嘉,陈诗妤,蒋晓波,等. 采供血机构采购管理体系化建设的探索[J]. 临床输血与检验,2024,26(4):549-555. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2024.04.020.
[3] 黄娟,姬宏娟,姬宏利. 彩色多普勒超声结合塞丁格技术引导在经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管置管中的临床应用[J]. 肿瘤基础与临床,2025,38(1):130-132. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5412.2025.01.039.
[4] 段百杰,邓小英. 彩色多普勒超声实时导向技术在经皮深静脉穿刺置管术中的临床应用观察[J]. 贵州医药,2024,48(3):406-408. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2024.03.024.
[5] 赵丽琴,张海龙,程灏. 住院医师颈内静脉穿刺置管教学中引入超声引导技术的探讨[J]. 卫生职业教育,2024,42(6):75-78. DOI:10.20037/j.issn.1671-1246.2024.06.23.
[6] 康菊梅,王瑞娟. 集束化护理在早产儿经外周静脉穿刺的中心静脉导管中的应用[J]. 妇儿健康导刊,2025,4(1):123-127. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-115X.2025.01.026.
[7] Stagg PL. The adult difficult intravenous access (DIVA) cognitive aid: an evidence-based cognitive aid prototype for difficult peripheral venous access[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(4):e37135. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37135.
[8] Taşkın O, Günay İsmailoğlu E. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Difficult Intravenous Access Scale for adult patients[J]. J Res Nurs, 2024, 29(1):21-29. DOI: 10.1177/17449871241226586.
[9] van Loon FHJ, van Hooff LWE, de Boer HD,et al. The modified A-DIVA scale as a predictive tool for prospective identification of adult patients at risk of a difficult intravenous access: a multicenter validation study[J]. J Clin Med, 2019, 8(2):144. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020144.
[10] Bodenham Chair A, Babu S, Bennett J,et al. Association of anaesthetists of great britain and ireland: safe vascular access 2016[J]. Anaesthesia, 2016, 71(5):573-585. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13360.
[11] Gorski LA. The 2016 infusion therapy standards of practice[J]. Home Healthc Now, 2017, 35(1):10-18. DOI: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000481.
[12] 黄伯泉,贾双双,温机智,等. 广州地区RhD阴性献血者Del表型及基因型分析[J]. 中国输血杂志,2024,37(8):859-865. DOI:10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2024.08.003.
[13] 王胜,解京泉,亓霏. 中国大学生无偿献血参与率的Meta分析[J]. 中国输血杂志,2025,38(3):431-441. DOI:10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2025.03.020.
[14] 夏祝天,范小伊,曾芬,等. 加强单采血小板静脉穿刺细节管理对关爱和保留献血者的效果评价[J]. 中国输血杂志,2021,34(7):773-775. DOI:10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2021.07.026.
[15] Salleras-Duran L, Fuentes-Pumarola C, Fontova-Almató A, et al. Pain and satisfaction perceptions of ultrasound-guided versus conventional peripheral intravenous catheterization: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2024, 25(1):e37-e44. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2023.07.010.
[16] 崔贤芬. 舒适护理对门诊抽血患者不良情绪、采血配合度及标本合格率的作用研究[J]. 母婴世界,2021(13):3.
[17] 王珺,赵英,肖明,等. 舒适护理在机采血小板捐献者中的应用研究[J]. 中外医药研究,2024,3(12):106-108. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-6229.2024.12.036.
[18] Burton SO, Donovan JK, Jones SL, et al. Use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) by intensive care paramedics to achieve peripheral intravenous access in patients predicted to be difficult: an out-of-hospital pilot study[J]. Australas Emerg Care, 2023, 26(2):164-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.003.
[19] Monteiro DAT, Loon FHJV, Torre-Montero JC, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and metric analysis of the adult difficult intravenous access scale for use in Brazil[J]. Rev Gaucha Enferm, 2025, 45(spe1):e20230263. DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230263.en.
[20] Min J, Chen YY, Wang QM, et al. Effect of perioperative "internet + rehabilitation guidance" based on IKAP theory on short-term prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2024, 28(6):2329-2339. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202403_35738.
[21] 黄曼. 舒适护理干预对门诊采血室患者不良反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2022,9(45):95-97,107[2025-04-07].https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChVQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJMjAyNTA2MjISGlFLQkpCRDIwMjIyMDIzMTIyOTAwMDAyMTc0GghkZXVtNWlvMQ%3D%3D.
[22] 杜彩凤,李华. 认知行为疗法对深Ⅱ度烧伤患者心理状态、疼痛及并发症的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志,2021,29(7):978-983. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2021.07.005.
[23] Teixeira TO, Hansel LA, Ceratti RDN, et al. Midline catheter (10 cm) versus long peripheral intravenous catheter (6.4 cm): randomized clinical trial protocol with economic analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2025, 20(4):e0319587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319587.
[24] Slosse C, Manneville F, Ricci L, et al. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for peripheral venous catheter placement (ALCOV): protocol for a quasi-experimental study[J]. BMJ Open, 2024, 14(6):e078002. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078002.
[25] 刘晓通,罗放灵,蒋玲,等.困难静脉通路评分在儿科外周静脉穿刺中的应用研究[J].昆明医科大学学报,2023,44(11):183-187.DOI: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231128.

IKAP理论协同舒适护理结合A-DIVA量表在无偿献血采血中的应用效果分析

Application of collaborative comfort care model based on IKAP theory and incorporating a modified A-DIVA scale in blood collection for voluntary blood donation

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张婷陈锦艳谭咏恩黄健华吴岚何彦霖郑晓晓. 广州地区大学生无偿献血感知风险的影响因素研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(12): 2078-2082.
[2]	刘婷柴晓雲黄娜. 舒适护理联合正念疗法对肝硬化患者肝功能及心理状态的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(12): 2103-2108.
[3]	岳逸骆英王霞英王文玲. 改良心电导引定位技术对人类免疫缺陷病毒患者PICC的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(13): 2283-2287.
[4]	龙玲美刘伟旺伍媛. 骨质疏松及骨折风险危险因素和评估工具的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(16): 2230-2234.
[5]	梁木兰乌云塔娜. PDCA护理对降低老年肿瘤患者PICC相关性感染的作用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(16): 2348-2352.
[6]	曹晓娟. 大中专学生参与无偿献血影响因素调查研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(14): 2063-2065.
[7]	赵洋, 周洁, 耿朝辉. 高血压患者认知衰弱评估及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(6): 748-752.
[8]	林洁衡林洁涛曹洋. 肿瘤科股静脉穿刺置管术临床带教方式探讨[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(23): 3369-.
[9]	代玉, 郭佳, 殷崇望, 毛霞, 刘阳春. 糖尿病患者并发症恐惧评估工具的研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(2): 280-283.