国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (22): 3853-3860.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20250213-22031

• 护理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于logistic回归与决策树模型的陕西省护理人员肿瘤护理核心能力的影响因素分析

成改平1  谢娟2  赵将2  杨志华2  常利2  樊春秀3  沈红红4  岳勤5  高黎6   

  1. 1陕西省肿瘤医院妇瘤三病区,西安710061;2陕西省肿瘤医院护理部,西安710061;3蒲城县医院护理部,蒲城715500;4汉阴县人民医院护理部,汉阴725100;5府谷县人民医院护理部,府谷719400;6陕西省肿瘤医院内三科,西安710061
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-13 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2025-11-21
  • 通讯作者: 高黎,Email:350809374@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技计划(2022SF-156,2023-YF-YBSF-1036)

Analysis of factors influencing core competence of tumor care in nursing staff in Shaanxi Province based on logistic regression and decision tree models

Cheng Gaiping1, Xie Juan2, Zhao Jiang2, Yang Zhihua2, Chang Li2, Fan Chunxiu3, Shen Honghong4, Yue Qin5, Gao Li6   

  1. 1 Department 3 of Gynecology and Oncology, Shaanxi Cancer Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China; 2 Nursing Department, Shaanxi Cancer Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China; 3 Nursing Department, Pucheng County Hospital, Pucheng 715500, China; 4 Nursing Department, Hanyin County People's Hospital, Hanyin 725100, China; 5 Nursing Department, Fugu County People's Hospital, Fugu 719400, China; 6 Third Department of Internal Medicine, Shaanxi Cancer Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2025-02-13 Online:2025-11-01 Published:2025-11-21
  • Contact: Gao Li, Email: 350809374@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Shaanxi Science and Technology Plan (2022SF-156 and 2023-YF-YBSF-1036)

摘要:

目的 采用logistic回归及决策树交互检测对陕西省护理人员肿瘤护理核心能力的影响因素进行分析,为管理者制定肿瘤护理培训方案及干预策略提供参考依据。方法 选择2022年8至9月陕西省62所医院的1 529例护士为调查对象。其中男26例,女1 503例;职称:护士397例,护师580例,主管护师485例,主任护师67例。采用自行设计一般资料及自制肿瘤护理核心能力调查问卷进行横断面调查。采用χ2检验、logistic回归分析、决策树交互检测,分析比较2种模型结果的差异性。结果 共发放问卷1 650份,回收有效问卷1 529份,有效应答率为92.67%。陕西省护理人员肿瘤护理核心能力总分为(186.24±59.76)分,为中等能力水平。logistic回归模型显示,取得市级以上肿瘤专科证书(OR=0.43,95%CI:0.26~0.73)、参加肿瘤照护培训(OR=2.19,95%CI:1.31~3.60)、在肿瘤科工作(OR=0.51,95%CI:0.37~0.71)是肿瘤护理核心能力的预测因素。决策树模型显示,对护理工作满意是肿瘤护理核心能力的主要因素,其次是取得市级以上肿瘤专科证书、参加肿瘤照护培训、在肿瘤科工作。logistic回归模型ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.745,决策树模型AUC为0.721,两种预测模型预测效率比较差异无统计学意义(Z=1.943,P>0.05)。结论 陕西省护理人员肿瘤护理核心能力处于中等能力水平。对护理工作满意、取得市级以上肿瘤专科证书、参加肿瘤照护培训、肿瘤科是肿瘤护理核心能力的重要影响因素,两种模型分析结果有较高的一致性,建议将logistic回归的量化风险评估与决策树的动态路径解析相结合,提升预测因素的准确性与解释深度。管理者可基于logistic回归筛选关键变量制定基线标准,同时利用决策树识别高风险亚群,构建分层干预策略。

关键词: 护理人员, 核心能力, logistic回归, 决策树, 影响因素

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the factors influencing core competence in oncology nursing among nursing staff in Shaanxi Province using logistic regression and decision tree interaction detection, and to provide some evidences for optimizing training and intervention strategies. Methods A total of 1 529 nurses from 62 hospitals in Shaanxi Province from August to September 2022 were selected as the survey subjects, including 26 males and 1 503 females. There were 397 nurses, 580 senior nurses, 485 nurses-in-charge, and 67 chief nurses. A self-designed general information and core competency questionnaire was used for the cross-sectional survey. χ2 test, logistic regression analysis, and decision tree interaction detection were used to analyze the differences between the results of the two models. Results A total of 1 650 questionnaires were distributed, and 1 529 valid ones were ultimately collected, with an effective response rate of 92.67%. The total core competency score was 186.24±59.76, indicating a moderate proficiency. The logistic regression model showed that obtaining municipal-level oncology certification (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.26-0.73), participating in oncology training (OR=2.19, 95%CI 1.31-3.60), and working in oncology departments (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.37-0.71) were the predictive factors of core competence in oncology nursing. The decision tree analysis prioritized work satisfaction as the primary factor, followed by certification, training, and oncology department affiliation. The area under the ROC (AUC) of the logistic regression model was 0.745, and the AUC of the decision tree model was 0.721. There is no statistical difference in the prediction efficiency between the two prediction models (Z=1.943; P>0.05). Conclusions Core competence in oncology nursing of nursing staff in Shaanxi Province is at a moderate level. Work satisfaction, certification, training, and oncology department affiliation are critical influencing factors. Integrating logistic regression's quantitative risk assessment with decision tree's dynamic pathway analysis enhances prediction accuracy. Managers should adopt dual-model strategies to establish baseline standards and design tiered interventions for high-risk subgroups.

Key words: Nursing staff, Core competence, Logistic regression, Decision tree, Influencing factors