国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (19): 3207-3211.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241202-19008

• 心血管专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

PCI术后患者复发风险感知评分及相关因素调查

刘伟平   

  1. 阜外华中心血管病医院冠心病四病区,郑州 450000

  • 收稿日期:2024-12-02 出版日期:2025-10-01 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 通讯作者: Email:18037464743@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    河南省医学科技攻关计划(LHGJ20230150)

Survey of patients' perceived recurrence risk scores and associated factors after PCI

Liu Weiping   

  1. The Fourth Ward of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, China

  • Received:2024-12-02 Online:2025-10-01 Published:2025-10-24
  • Contact: Email:18037464743@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Research Plan(LHGJ20230150)

摘要:

目的 调查经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)术后患者复发风险感知评分及相关因素。方法 本研究为回顾性队列研究。选取2023年1月至2024年6月阜外华中心血管病医院收治的120例冠心病(CHD)患者作为研究对象,男67例,女53例,年龄45~75岁。所有患者均接受PCI治疗,术后3个月,根据复发风险感知评估量表评分,将患者分为高风险感知组(32例)和低风险感知组(88例)。通过医院病历管理系统收集患者一般资料,包括性别、年龄、体重指数、婚姻情况、家庭月收入、文化程度、疾病认知水平(健康教育知识掌握调查表)、饮酒、吸烟、营养状况、合并基础疾病、心功能分级、收缩压、舒张压、支架植入数、手术时间及汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分。采用多因素logistic回归分析CHD患者复发风险感知评分的影响因素。采用独立样本t检验和χ2检验进行统计学分析。结果 低风险感知组年龄低于高风险感知组,低疾病认知水平、合并基础疾病<3个、HAMA评分<7分占比均高于高风险感知组(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄(OR=0.599,95%CI=0.482~0.744)、疾病认知水平(OR=4.714,95%CI=1.972~11.272)、合并基础疾病(OR=3.947,95%CI=1.598~9.753)、HAMA评分(OR=4.472,95%CI=1.847~10.832)均是复发风险感知评分的影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论 年龄、疾病认知水平、合并基础疾病、HAMA评分均是PCI术后CHD患者复发风险感知评分的影响因素,临床应高度重视,尽早采取有效管理措施,加快患者病情康复进程。

关键词:

冠心病, 经皮冠状动脉介入术, 复发风险感知评分, 心功能

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the perceived recurrence risk score and related factors in patients after performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This study is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 120 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who were admitted to Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects. There were 67 male patients and 53 female patients, with ages ranging from 45 to 75 years old. All patients underwent PCI treatment. Three months after the operation, based on the score of the recurrence risk perception assessment scale, the patients were divided into the high-risk-perception group (32 cases) and the low-risk-perception group (88 cases). General patient information was collected through the hospital medical record management system, including gender, age, body mass index, marital status, monthly family income, educational level, disease awareness level (survey questionnaire on health education knowledge), alcohol consumption, smoking, nutritional status, coexisting underlying diseases, cardiac function classification, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, number of stents implanted, operation time, and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the influencing factors of the perceived risk of recurrence in patients with CHD. Independent sample t test, and χ2 test were used for statistical analysis. Results The age of the low-risk-perception group was lower than that of the high-risk-perception group (P<0.05). The proportions of those with low disease awareness level, having <3 underlying diseases, and having a HAMA score of <7 were all higher in the low-risk-perception group than in the high-risk-perception group (all P<0.05). The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR=0.599, 95%CI=0.482-0.744), disease awareness level (OR=4.714, 95%CI=1.972-11.272), presence of underlying diseases (OR=3.947, 95%CI=1.598-9.753), and HAMA score (OR=4.472, 95%CI=1.847-10.832) were all influencing factors of the perceived risk of recurrence (all P<0.05). Conclusions Age, disease awareness level, coexisting underlying diseases, and HAMA score are all factors influencing the perception score of recurrence risk in CHD patients after PCI. Clinicians should attach great importance to this and take effective management measures as soon as possible to accelerate the recovery process of the patients' conditions.

Key words:

Coronary heart disease, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Perceived recurrence risk score, Cardiac function