虚拟现实技术联合前庭功能康复在周围性眩晕患者中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241104-10017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨虚拟现实（VR）技术联合前庭功能康复对周围性眩晕患者的影响。方法　采用前瞻性研究，选取2023年1月至2024年4月延安市人民医院收治的100例周围性眩晕患者，按信封抽签法随机分为单一组和联合组。单一组50例，男29例、女21例，年龄（52.33±6.42）岁，伴有高血压13例、冠心病15例。联合组50例，男27例、女23例，年龄（52.28±6.47）岁，伴有高血压16例、冠心病13例。单一组给予前庭功能康复治疗，联合组在单一组的基础上联合VR技术治疗。比较两组治疗后的临床疗效，治疗前后的眩晕改善效果、平衡能力、前庭症状指数（VSI）及焦虑程度。采用t检验、χ2检验进行统计比较。结果　治疗后，联合组的总有效率［96.0%（48/50）］高于单一组［82.0%（41/50）］；联合组眩晕障碍量表中的情感、功能、躯体评分分别为（8.04±0.71、10.85±1.11、9.44±0.82）分，均低于单一组的（12.51±1.38、14.12±1.53、13.03±1.21）分；联合组人体压力中心的最大摆动长度和摆动包络面积分别为（95.72±13.08）mm、（425.38±53.37）mm2，均低于单一组的（121.88±15.17）mm、（622.55±72.56）mm2；联合组VSI中眩晕、恶心、头痛、平衡、头晕、视觉敏感的评分分别为（1.14±0.27、1.08±0.21、1.21±0.27、1.22±0.27、1.33±0.26、1.37±0.26）分，均低于单一组的（3.45±0.45、3.15±0.46、2.86±0.32、3.41±0.40、2.81±0.47、2.90±0.42）分；联合组汉密尔顿焦虑量表、汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分分别为（5.85±0.62、6.37±0.67）分，均低于单一组的（10.63±1.04、11.87±1.21）分；以上指标两组比较，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论　VR技术联合前庭功能康复在周围性眩晕患者治疗中疗效显著。

关键词: 虚拟现实技术； , , 前庭功能康复； , , 周围性眩晕； , , 前庭症状指数； , , 焦虑

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effect of virtual reality (VR) technology combined with vestibular function rehabilitation for patients with peripheral vertigo. Methods　This was a prospective study. One hundred patients with peripheral vertigo treated at Yan'an People's Hospital from January 2023 and April 2024 were divided into a single group and a combined group by envelope lottery, with 50 cases in each group. There were 29 males and 21 females in the single group; they were (52.33±6.42) years old; there were 13 cases of hypertension and 15 cases of coronary heart disease. There were 27 males and 23 females in the combined group; they were (52.28±6.47) years old; there were 16 cases of hypertension and 13 cases of coronary heart disease. The single group received vestibular function rehabilitation therapy, while the combined group received the same therapy augmented with VR technology. The clinical efficacies, improvement in vertigo symptoms, balance abilities, vestibular symptom index (VSI), and anxiety levels before and after the treatment were compared between the two groups. t and χ² tests were used for the statistical comparisons. Results　After the treatment, the clinical efficacy of the combined group was higher than that of the single group [96.0% (48/50) vs. 82.0% (41/50)]; the scores of emotional, functional, and physical domains of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) in the combined group were lower than those in the single group (8.04±0.71 vs. 12.51±1.38, 10.85±1.11 vs. 14.12±1.53, and 9.44±0.82 vs. 13.03±1.21); the maximum oscillation length and oscillation envelope area of the combined group were lower than those of the single group [(95.72±13.08) mm vs. (121.88±15.17) mm and (425.38±53.37) mm² vs. (622.55±72.56) mm²]; the scores of dizziness, nausea, headache, balance, vertigo, and visual sensitivity of VSI in the combined group were lower than those in the single group (1.14±0.27 vs. 3.45±0.45, 1.08±0.21 vs. 3.15±0.46, 1.21±0.27 vs. 2.86±0.32, 1.22±0.27 vs. 3.41±0.40, 1.33±0.26 vs. 2.81±0.47, and 1.37±0.26 vs. 2.90±0.42); the scores of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) in the combined group were lower than those in the single group (5.85±0.62 vs. 10.63±1.04 and 6.37±0.67 vs. 11.87±1.21); there were statistical differences in the above indicators between the two groups (all P<0.05). Conclusion　VR technology combined with vestibular function rehabilitation for patients with peripheral vertigo is effective.

Key words: VR technology, Vestibular function rehabilitation, Peripheral vertigo, Vestibular symptom index, Anxiety

闫娟石昊安丽拓明祥王宏张彩峰何文娟李二乐. 虚拟现实技术联合前庭功能康复在周围性眩晕患者中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(10): 1665-1669.

Yan Juan, Shi Hao, An Li, Tuo Mingxiang, Wang Hong, Zhang Caifeng, He Wenjuan, Li Erle.

VR technology combined with vestibular function rehabilitation for patients with peripheral vertigo [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(10): 1665-1669.

参考文献

[1]Yang TH, Xirasagar S, Cheng YF, et al. Association of cervical spondylosis with peripheral vertigo: a case-control study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2021,131(2):E625-E630. DOI: 10.1002/lary.28715.

[2]Kim H, Lee S, Kim J. Risk of injury after emergency department visit for acute peripheral vertigo: a matched-cohort study[J]. Clin Exp Emerg Med, 2020,7(3):176-182. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.19.064.

[3]赵雅楠,陈钢钢,潘乐,等.虚拟现实技术在前庭康复训练中的应用进展[J].中华耳科学杂志,2023,21(4):539-544. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2023.04.017.

[4]赵东,姜子刚.前庭神经炎患者虚拟现实辅助主观垂直水平视觉研究[J].中华耳科学杂志,2021,19(2):236-239. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2021.02.011.

[5]杨秋,刘美连,邰明霞,等.虚拟现实技术在国内外护理领域中应用的研究进展[J].护士进修杂志,2023,38(7):620-623,635. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2023.07.008.

[6]中华医学会神经病学分会,中华神经科杂志编辑委员会.眩晕诊治专家共识[J].中华神经科杂志,2010,43(5):369-374. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2010.05.016.

[7]邹曙光,毛秋月,彭安全,等.视频头脉冲试验、冷热试验和眩晕障碍程度评定量表诊断听神经瘤的价值[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2022,36(8):613-616. DOI:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.08.009.

[8]徐金凤,魏辰鸿,汪毅明,等.前庭康复训练法治疗中重度持续性姿势-感知性头晕的临床疗效分析[J].中国临床神经科学,2023,31(1):43-48.

[9]袁艳,杨福霞,曾卫珊,等.重复经颅磁刺激对产后轻中度抑郁患者脑血流动力学及初级运动区激活的影响[J].中国现代医学杂志,2023,33(22):12-18. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2023.22.003.

[10]贺方,宋红静,张欣,等.优势认知行为治疗改善青少年抑郁症患者希望感的随机对照试验[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2023,37(9):758-763. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2023.09.005.

[11]Temirbekov D, Sakallı E. Effects of peripheral vertigo on inflammatory and immunologic laboratory markers[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2020,99(7):470-474. DOI: 10.1177/0145561320920149.

[12]谢姣,李亚敏,樊晓颖,等.前庭康复训练对梅尼埃病患者术后功能恢复的效果研究[J].中华耳科学杂志,2023,21(4):464-469. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2023.04.004.

[13]张恒瑞,孟昭莉,崔配,等.不同头戴式虚拟现实对人体平衡与姿势控制的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2023,29(11):1359-1364. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.11.015.

[14]董立萍,杨静,黄瑞.虚拟现实技术在神经内科眩晕患者平衡训练中的效果观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2020,24(18):10-12. DOI:10.7619/jcmp.202018003.

[15]刘妍,胡碧皓,尹欢欢,等.虚拟现实(VR)沉浸式环境如何实现深度取向的学习投入?——复杂任务情境中的学习效果研究[J].远程教育杂志,2021,39(4):72-82. DOI:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2021.04.008.

[16]高凤,于书剑,张瑶,等.虚拟现实技术辅助前庭康复训练在伴眩晕的突发性耳聋患者中的应用效果[J].中华实验外科杂志,2024,41(10):2378-2379.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421213-20240313-01044.

[17]Zaidi SFM, Shafiabady N, Beilby J.Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness interventions—an embodied insight on the use virtual reality for technologists[J].Electronics (2079-9292), 2022, 11(1):142.DOI:10.3390/electronics11010142.

[18]Kober SE, Wood G, Berger LM. Controlling virtual reality with brain signals: state of the art of using VR-based feedback in neurofeedback applications[J]. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10484-024-09677-8.

[19]Choi SY, Choi JH, Oh EH, et al. Effect of vestibular exercise and optokinetic stimulation using virtual reality in persistent postural-perceptual dizziness[J]. Sci Rep, 2021,11(1):14437. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93940-z.

[20]Aharoni MMH, Lubetzky AV, Arie L, et al. Factors associated with dynamic balance in people with Persistent Postural Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD): a cross-sectional study using a virtual-reality four square step test[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021,18(1):55. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00852-0.

[21]焦粤农,林颖,张欣睿,等.沉浸式虚拟现实系统辅助前庭功能康复的应用[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2020,34(5):447-451. DOI:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.015.

[22]赵雅楠,韩世范,李莹,等.虚拟现实前庭康复训练对突发性聋伴眩晕患者的治疗效果:一项随机对照试验[J].中国全科医学,2024,27(14):1672-1677,1684. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0272.

[23]Kanyılmaz T, Topuz O, Ardıç FN, et al. Effectiveness of conventional versus virtual reality-based vestibular rehabilitation exercises in elderly patients with dizziness: a randomized controlled study with 6-month follow-up[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2022,88 Suppl 3:S41-S49. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.010.

[24]Mandour AE, El-Gharib AM, Emara AA, et al. Virtual reality versus optokinetic stimulation in visual vertigo rehabilitation[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022,279(3):1609-1614. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07091-y.

[25]Shah SHH, Karlsen AST, Solberg M, et al. A social VR-based collaborative exergame for rehabilitation: codesign, development and user study[J]. Virtual Real, 2022,28:1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10055-022-00721-8.