人工智能技术在膝单髁置换术前规划中的应用分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241008-09024

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1532-1537.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241008-09024

人工智能技术在膝单髁置换术前规划中的应用分析

潘希安¹^，² 张远金¹ 张国富¹ 李俊¹ 孙法瑞¹ 刘炳霞²^，³

¹黄石市中心医院湖北理工学院附属医院骨科，黄石 435000；²肾脏疾病发生与干预湖北省重点实验室，黄石 435000；³黄石市中心医院湖北理工学院附属医院超声影像科，黄石 435000

收稿日期:2024-10-08 出版日期:2025-05-01 发布日期:2025-05-20
通讯作者: 刘炳霞，Email：670269096@qq.com
基金资助:
湖北省自然科学基金（2023AFB1071）

Application of AI technology in preplanning of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Pan Xi'an^1,2, Zhang Yuanjin¹, Zhang Guofu¹, Li Jun¹, Sun Farui¹, Liu Bingxia^2,3

¹Department of Orthopaedics, Huangshi Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi 435000, China; ²Hubei Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Huangshi 435000, China; ³Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Huangshi Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi 435000, China

Received:2024-10-08 Online:2025-05-01 Published:2025-05-20
Contact: Liu Bingxia, Email :670269096@qq.com
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Hubei (2023AFB1071)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探索人工智能（AI）技术在膝单髁置换术前规划中的临床应用价值。方法　本研究为回顾性对照分析。选取2021年7月至2023年7月在黄石市中心医院行膝单髁置换术的35例患者，根据术前规划的方法不同分为试验组和对照组。试验组14例患者中男6例，女8例，年龄（62.43±3.55）岁，应用AI技术进行术前规划。对照组21例患者中男7例，女14例，年龄（62.10±2.86）岁，按照传统X线片方法进行术前规划。记录并比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、假体符合率（术前预测假体、垫片的大小型号与术中使用完全一致）以及术后3个月、1年美国特种外科医院（HHS）膝关节评分、视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分、膝关节活动度改善情况。采用χ2检验、t检验进行对比分析。结果　试验组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量分别为（59.07±3.36）min、（107.29±10.16）ml、（78.93±10.95）ml，对照组分别为（69.57±2.11）min、（123.38±7.65）ml、（95.19±12.49）ml，差异均有统计学意义（t=11.378、5.347、3.958，均P<0.001）。术后3个月、1年，试验组的HHS膝关节评分和膝关节活动度均高对照组［（79.93±1.14）分比（76.81±1.54）分和（119.57±4.62）°比（111.76±6.25）°、（92.36±1.87）分比（90.48±1.25）分和（130.29±4.60）°比（120.57±4.98）°］，VAS评分均低于对照组［（1.71±0.47）分比（2.43±0.68）分、（1.14±0.36）分比（1.86±0.48）分］，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。试验组的股骨侧、胫骨侧、垫片符合率均高于对照组［92.86%（13/14）比42.86%（9/21）、92.86%（13/14）比38.10%（8/21）、85.71%（12/14）比33.33%（7/21），均P<0.05］。结论　应用AI技术进行膝单髁置换术前规划，可精准预测股骨侧、胫骨侧假体型号及垫片大小，提高假体符合率，减少术中出血及术后引流量，改善患者术后膝关节疼痛症状，提高膝关节活动度，具有临床指导意义。

关键词: 膝单髁置换术, , , 膝骨关节炎, , , 术前规划, , , 可视化, , , 人工智能

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the clinical application value of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology in preoperative planning of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Methods　This study is a retrospective controlled analysis. A total of 35 patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at Huangshi Central Hospital from July 2021 to July 2023 were selected and divided into an experimental group and a control group based on the preoperative planning method used. Among the 14 patients in the experimental group, 6 were male and 8 were female, the age was (62.43±3.55) years old, AI technology was used for preoperative planning. In the control group, there were 7 males and 14 females in 21 patients, the age was (62.10±2.86) years old, Preoperative planning was performed according to the traditional X-ray method. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, prosthesis conformity rate (the preoperatively predicted sizes and models of the prosthesis and spacer matching exactly with those used intraoperatively), as well as the American Hospital Specialty (HHS) knee scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and improvement in knee range of motion at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively were recorded and compared. The χ² test and t test were used for statistical analysis. Results　The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume in the experimental group were (59.07±3.36) minutes, (107.29±10.16) ml, and (78.93±10.95) ml, The control group were (69.57±2.11) minutes, (123.38±7.65) ml, and (95.19±12.49) ml, with all differences being statistically significant (t=11.378, 5.347,and 3.958, all P<0.001). At 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, the HHS knee scores and the range of motion of the knee was greater in the experimental group[(79.93±1.14) points vs. (76.81±1.54) points,(119.57±4.62)° vs. (111.76±6.25)°,(92.36±1.87) points vs. (90.48±1.25) points,(130.29±4.60)° vs. (120.57±4.98)°], and VAS scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group [(1.71±0.47) points vs. (2.43±0.68) points, (1.14±0.36) points vs. (1.86±0.48) points], with all differences being statistically significant (all P<0.05). The conformity rates for the femoral side, tibial side, and spacer in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group [92.86% (13/14) vs. 42.86% (9/21), 92.86% (13/14) vs. 38.10% (8/21), 85.71% (12/14) vs. 33.33% (7/21), all P<0.05]. Conclusion　The application of AI technology in preoperative planning for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the model of the femoral and tibial prostheses as well as the size of the spacer, improve prosthesis conformity rates, reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume, alleviate postoperative knee pain symptoms, and enhance knee range of motion, demonstrating significant clinical guidance value.

Key words: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, , Knee osteoarthritis, , Preoperative planning, , Visualization, , Artificial intelligence

潘希安张远金张国富李俊孙法瑞刘炳霞. 人工智能技术在膝单髁置换术前规划中的应用分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1532-1537.

Pan Xi'an, Zhang Yuanjin, Zhang Guofu, Li Jun, Sun Farui, Liu Bingxia.

Application of AI technology in preplanning of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(9): 1532-1537.

参考文献

[1] Hanreich C, Martelanz L, Koller U, et al. Sport and physical activity following primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(8): 2274-2285. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020. 04.013.

[2] Calderón-Pérez L, Llauradó E, Companys J, et al. Acute effects of turmeric extracts on knee joint pain: a pilot, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Med Food, 2021, 24(4): 436-440. DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2020.0074.

[3] Tucker JD, Goetz LL, Duncan MB, et al. Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Analysis of the Knee Synovial Environment Following Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis[J]. PM R, 2021, 13(7): 707-719. DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12561.

[4]李子怡,宋为群,杜巨豹,等. 骨科康复一体化模式下膝关节单髁置换术后1年内膝关节功能康复转归的临床研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2023,38(4):459-465,471. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2023.04.004.

[5] Jennings JM, Kleeman-Forsthuber LT, Bolognesi MP. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2019, 27(5): 166-176. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00690.

[6] Slaven SE, Cody JP, Sershon RA, et al. The impact of coronal alignment on revision in medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(2): 353-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.038.

[7] Bono JV. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86-A Suppl 2: 118-122. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200412002-00016.

[8] Eggli S, Pisan M, Müller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998, 80(3):382-390. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.7764.

[9] Fuchs M, Effenberger B, Märdian S, et al. Mid-term survival of total knee arthroplasty in patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2018, 85(5): 319-324.

[10]杜明昌,柳椰,翟良全,等. 定制3D打印截骨导板辅助双膝关节同期置换的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):18-23. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn. 1674-134X.2018.01.004.

[11]中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组. 骨关节炎诊疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2018,38(12):705-715. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2018.12.001.

[12]王熠军,郑恺,张连方,等. 导航辅助全膝关节置换应用功能学对线恢复患者固有生理力线和关节线倾角[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2025,29(27):5810-5818. DOI:10.12307/2025.825.

[13]潘希安,张远金,张国富,等. AI可视化技术在复杂全髋关节置换术患者术前规划中的临床应用[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2024,30(22):3769-3774. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1007-1245.2024.22.016.

[14]董庆元,朱晓彬,杨志强,等. 3D打印联合骨科手术机器人辅助股骨截骨矫形术1例报告[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版),2025,46(1):99-103. DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8852. 2024.0037.

[15]郑诗俊,陈欣杰,沈计荣. 全膝关节置换术后早期康复配合CPM机锻炼对膝关节功能恢复的影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(4):380-381. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006- 9771.2007.04.029.

[16]郑诗俊. 人工全膝关节置换术后早期康复功能锻炼配合CPM机锻炼对膝关节功能恢复的影响[D]. 南京:南京中医药大学,2006. DOI:10.7666/d.y1008839.

[17] Xue YY, Shi JN, Zhang K, et al. The effects of total knee arthroplasty on knee proprioception of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 17(1): 258. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03142-0.

[18] Yang Y, Wang J, Zhang XY, et al. The effect of continuous passive motion in patients treated with total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2021, 100(12):1160-1169. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001718.

[19] Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, et al. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales[J]. Lancet, 2014, 384(9952): 1437-1445. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0.

[20] Wada K, Hamada D, Takasago T, et al. Native rotational knee kinematics is restored after lateral UKA but not after medial UKA[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(11): 3438-3443. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018- 4919-1.

[21] Huo J, Huang G, Han D, et al. Value of 3D preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on artificial intelligence technology[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 156. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02294-9.

[22] Crawford DA, Berend KR, Thienpont E. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: US and global perspectives[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2020, 51(2): 147-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.11.010.

[23]俞颖豪,赵继军,刘冬铖,等. 数字图像术前规划辅助单髁置换对固定平台假体摆位的临床指导意义[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2021,25(21):3324-3331.

[24] Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, et al. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016, 98(8): 627-635. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00664.

[25] Hansen DC, Kusuma SK, Palmer RM, et al. Robotic guidance does not improve component position or short-term outcome in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(9): 1784-1789. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.012.

人工智能技术在膝单髁置换术前规划中的应用分析

Application of AI technology in preplanning of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵洲刘为朋李宗睿王睿智胡宝光. 高血压大鼠模型的研究现状 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1465-1470.
[2]	吴亚莉付小平丁大为徐宁安周源源. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍相关危险因素及预测模型构建 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1489-1494.
[3]	汪青园方元龙王智琴黄蓉田松原丽科葛午平朱小春肖尚杰周佳亮. 新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎保守治疗后继发肠狭窄诊治分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1495-1498.
[4]	邓巧妮常亚娜周晓玉康华. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气撤机失败的预警模型构建 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1499-1505.
[5]	张森山蔡美孙锋. 新生儿ABO溶血病中血清总胆红素、脐血胆红素水平及网织红细胞计数对神经系统损害的预测价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1506-1510.
[6]	张珂刘景刚吴瑞荣冯慧. 局部枸橼酸钠联合小剂量肝素钠抗凝在脓毒症并急性肾损伤患者CRRT中的应用价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1516-1520.
[7]	臧柯靓班芳张秋梅张恒亮. 香丹注射液联合酒石酸美托洛尔对冠心病心绞痛患者临床症状及氧化应激反应的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1520-1524.
[8]	江正发王立友张晓徐宏勇. 药物涂层球囊成形术后冠心病患者靶血管再狭窄的危险因素研究及预测模型分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1525-1531.
[9]	张婷郭淋张驰付瑞崔治权康晓刚. 青少年双相情感障碍患者血脂水平与区域性脑结构的相关性研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1538-1543.
[10]	李岩赵丽敏曲姗姗. 帕罗西汀联合茴拉西坦治疗老年抑郁症的疗效分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1544-1548.
[11]	杨玉凤卢立军邓倩陈士东王慧颖. 艾司西酞普兰联合舒肝解郁胶囊对老年抑郁症伴失眠的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1549-1553.
[12]	潘祁喻莉张安生. 铸瓷嵌体冠在短基牙后牙修复患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1554-1558.
[13]	陈春桃区秀丽李彩霞刘彩玲曾娜芬杜真萍蔡少娜米谦符霞. 维持性血液透析患者自体动静脉内瘘瘤样扩张防治不足影响因素的质性研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1559-1564.
[14]	陈娟娟. 中线导管在住院病区患者静脉治疗中的应用现状 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1565-1568.
[15]	魏欣妍魏文娟可易弘钱海兵. 基于授权赋能理论的健康教育在类风湿性关节炎患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(9): 1569-1573.