Effects of nursing intervention based on outcome classification on postoperative urinary incontinence and quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.17.030

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effects of nursing intervention based on outcome classification on the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence and quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods　A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 88 male patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TRUP) in Bayannur Hospital from March 2018 to March 2021. They were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the random number table method. Forty-four patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia aged (71.25±7.21) years who received traditional nursing care were assigned to the control group, and 44 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia aged (73.12±6.81) years who received nursing intervention based on outcome classification were assigned to the observation group. The incidence and duration of postoperative urinary incontinence were analyzed. The International Consultation on Incontinent Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) was used to compare the postoperative quality of life between the two groups. The Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to compare the psychological statuses of the two groups. t test and χ² test were used. Results　The incidence of urinary incontinence in the observation group [4.54% (2/44)] was lower than that in the control group [20.45% (9/44)], and the duration of urinary incontinence [(3.25±1.12) d] was shorter than that in the control group [(5.64±1.23) d], with statistically significant differences (χ²=5.090, P=0.024; t=9.530, P<0.001). The scores of social function [(58.64±16.20) points], emotional function [(58.73±6.42) points], role function [(60.67±11.98) points], and physical function [(66.65±13.56) points] in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(50.20±14.80) points, (46.36±21.68) points, (53.56±16.73) points, and (56.13±16.54) points], with statistically significant differences (t=2.551, 3.629, 2.292, and 3.263; all P<0.05). After nursing, the SAS score [(43.25±3.68) points] and SDS score [(42.51±3.26) points] in the observation group were lower than those in the control group [(50.11±6.20) points and (51.27±7.34) points], with statistically significant differences (t=6.311 and 7.235, both P<0.05). Conclusion　For patients undergoing TRUP, nursing intervention based on outcome classification can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence and improve the patients' quality of life, which is worthy of application in daily nursing for TRUP patients.

Key words:

Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Nursing, Outcomes, Urinary incontinence, Quality of life

摘要：

目的　探讨基于结局分类的护理干预对前列腺增生患者术后尿失禁发生率及生活质量的影响。方法　本文为随机对照试验。选取2018年3月至2021年3月在巴彦淖尔市医院行经尿道前列腺电切术的88例前列腺增生患者作为研究对象，按照随机数字表法分为两组，各44例。对照组为采用传统护理的前列腺增生患者，年龄（71.25±7.21）岁；观察组为采用基于结局分类护理干预的前列腺增生患者，年龄（73.12±6.81）岁。统计两组患者术后尿失禁发生率、尿失禁持续时间；采用国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷简表（ICIQ-SF）比较两组患者术后生活质量；采用焦虑自评量表（SAS）、抑郁自评量表（SDS）比较两组患者心理情况。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　观察组术后尿失禁发生率［4.54%（2/44）］低于对照组［20.45%（9/44）］，尿失禁持续时间［（3.25±1.12）d］短于对照组［（5.64±1.23）d］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=5.090，P=0.024；t=9.530，P<0.001）。观察组社会功能［（58.64±16.20）分］、情绪功能［（58.73±6.42）分］、角色功能［（60.67±11.98）分］、躯体功能评分［（66.65±13.56）分］均高于对照组［（50.20±14.80）分、（46.36±21.68）分、（53.56±16.73）分、（56.13±16.54）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.551、3.629、2.292、3.263，均P<0.05）。护理后，观察组SAS评分［（43.25±3.68）分］、SDS评分［（42.51±3.26）分］均低于对照组［（50.11±6.20）分、（51.27±7.34）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=6.311、7.235，均P<0.05）。结论　对前列腺电切术患者，基于结局分类的护理干预能显著减少术后尿失禁发生，改善患者术后生活质量，值得在前列腺增生电切术患者日常护理中应用。

关键词:

前列腺增生, 护理, 结局, 尿失禁, 生活质量

Zhang Li, Xu Chun'e, Jin Xin.

Effects of nursing intervention based on outcome classification on postoperative urinary incontinence and quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(17): 2503-2507.

张莉徐春娥靳欣.

结局分类护理对前列腺增生患者术后尿失禁及生活质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(17): 2503-2507.

References

[1] 任利生. 经尿道前列腺汽化电切术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生的临床疗效比较[J]. 中国实用医刊,2017,44(4):107-109.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-4756.2017. 04.036.
[2] 孙思,陈明. 慢性炎症在前列腺增生进展中作用的研究进展[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版),2019,38(6):1082-1086.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6264.2019.06.031.
[3] 刘世云,杨博宇,夏术阶,等. 前列腺增生症外科治疗优化与并发症的关系[J]. 中华医学杂志,2020,100(26):2009-2011.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191023- 02303.
[4] 公洪伟,孙正钦,高锐. PAE联合TURP与单纯TURP治疗体积≥80 ml的良性前列腺增生症的效果对比及对术后性功能的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(9):1391-1396.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021.09.030.
[5] 朱永超. 良性前列腺增生215例药物治疗分析[J]. 上海医药,2021,42(5):31-34.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1533. 2021.05.012.
[6] 曹德宏,刘定邦,彭磊,等. 睾酮和睾酮替代治疗与良性前列腺增生的研究进展[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2022,27(12):1064-1068.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2022.12.017.
[7] 吴业泽,刘李玟韬,裴军,等. 前列腺增生症合并慢性前列腺炎手术治疗的效果评价[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2022,13(22):114-118.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2022. 22.024.
[8] 茅锡芳,诸冷凌,马丹,等. 前列腺增生患者反刍思维现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2018,24(23):2757-2761.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018. 23.007.
[9] 张翠红,许方蕾,益伟清,等. 以护理结局分类系统为导向构建老年直肠癌患者围手术期尿失禁护理方案[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(5):565-569.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.05.009.
[10] 沈丽琼,金晓燕,王攀峰,等. 尿失禁症状评估工具的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志,2017,32(1):107-110.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.01.107.
[11] 李晓英,钟惠梅,郑秀春. 院前院内一体化急救护理在车祸外伤患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(14):21-23.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2018.14.007.
[12] 陈燕娣,蒋晓春,黄婷婷,等. 脑外伤感染病原菌及治疗后巴士指数和SAS及SDS评分分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(13):1989-1992.DOI:10.11816/cn.ni.2019- 181893.
[13] 陈弘,谢立平. 良性前列腺增生手术的创新、思考与展望[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2023,28(1):1-4,36.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2023.01.001.
[14] 李妹,郭梦瑶,张君. 延续性护理对前列腺增生电切术后患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(6):95-97.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.06.037.
[15] 李东章,陈永良,何建松. 经尿道前列腺电切剜除术治疗大体积前列腺增生的疗效及优势评估[J]. 浙江创伤外科,2019,24(1):23-24.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7147.2019. 01.009.
[16] 黄新凯,蒋学文,赖海标,等. 针刺配合盆底肌训练治疗前列腺增生术后暂时性尿失禁临床疗效的回顾性分析[J]. 西部中医药,2022,35(11):136-139.DOI:10.12174/j.issn.2096- 9600.2022.11.28.
[17] 秦朝霞,沈桂琴,高珍珍,等. 家庭自我管理提醒表对前列腺增生术后患者院外生活质量的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2018,37(22):3041-3043.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673- 4351.2018.22.005.
[18] 赵斯花,付慧,郭加甜,等. 叙事护理干预防治前列腺术后急迫性尿失禁的效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2021,40(1):129-132.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190617-00039.
[19] 林荔芬. 前列腺术后患者尿失禁的护理干预评价[J]. 中外医学研究,2019,17(19):99-100.DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2019.19.044.
[20] 金宗兰,陈萍萍,李慎,等. 分体式膀胱冲洗引流液容器在前列腺增生症术后患者中的应用[J]. 护士进修杂志,2023,38(1):52-56.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2023.01.011.
[21] 赵雯涛,万繁,奉先琴. TUCBDP与TURP治疗小体积前列腺增生患者疗效及对围手术期指标排尿功能的影响[J]. 安徽医学,2023,44(1):53-57.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399. 2023.01.011.
[22] 钟玫,李秋燕,刘日升. 强化盆底肌训练对前列腺增生行电切术术后尿失禁患者的影响[J]. 广东医科大学学报,2022,40(4):433-435.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4057.2022. 04.018.
[23] 吕宪宝. 电针阴部神经刺激疗法联合盆底肌康复训练在良性前列腺增生电切术后尿失禁患者中的应用效果[J].反射疗法与康复医学,2022,3(10):25-27,41.
[24] 哈姆,雪艳,喻定钢,等. 影响经前列腺切除术后尿失禁的危险因素分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(3):174-176. DOI:10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2019.03.075.
[25] 周永红,钱胡燕,宗雪方. 良性前列腺增生老年患者电切术后排尿相关并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 中国性科学,2022,31(9):32-35.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2022.09.009.
[26] 颜学槐. 补肾益气通淋方联合神阙穴隔盐灸对良性前列腺增生症术后排尿功能障碍患者逼尿肌功能及尿动力学的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志,2021,30(6):650-653.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2021.06.019.
[27] 刘林,王洋. 前列腺切除术后尿失禁的评估与管理[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志,2018,38(4):662-666.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4416.2018.04.040.
[28] 简雪丽,辛月. 强化盆底肌训练对经尿道前列腺电切术的老年病人暂时性尿失禁的影响[J]. 全科护理,2020,18(22):2876-2878.DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2020.22.030.
[29] 洪媚,宋双临,谢玺,等. 针灸配合盆底肌功能训练治疗良性前列腺增生术后压力性尿失禁疗效观察[J]. 上海针灸杂志,2020,39(2):206-211.DOI:10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957. 2020.02.0206.
[30] 潘宝环,程凤芹,尤毅敏,等. 前列腺电切术前盆底肌功能训练对预防患者术后尿失禁的作用[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2014(4):891-893.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351. 2014.04.084.
[31] 李传会,魏利军,吴永珍,等. 盆底肌训练预防前列腺切除术后尿失禁效果观察[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(20):9-10.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2016.20.005.