Effect of multidisciplinary collaborative intervention on wound healing and quality of life in patients with chronic wounds

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.12.030

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To explore multidisciplinary collaborative intervention strategies for patients with chronic wounds, in order to improve their wound healing effect and quality of life. Methods　A prospective study method was used to select 72 patients with chronic wounds admitted to Wound Repair Department, The Fourth People's Hospital of Nanhai District, Foshan City from April 2022 to March 2023, and they were divided into a control group and an observation group with 36 cases in each group by the random number table method. There were 19 males and 17 females in the control group, aged (61.14±8.69) years, with the duration of ulcer of (51.69±14.89) d, and they received routine intervention for chronic wounds. There were 21 males and 15 females in the observation group, aged (60.53±7.28) years, with the duration of ulcer of (52.94±13.39) d, and they adopted multidisciplinary collaborative intervention model on the basis of the control group. Both groups were intervened until wound healing or 4 weeks after discharge.The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) and Chinese version of Wound Quality of Life Scale (Wound QoL) were used to evaluate the patients' wound healing status and quality of life, and the patients' wound healing rate and healing time were recorded. Independent sample t test was used for the measurement data and χ² test was used for the count data. Results　The wound healing rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group [94.4% (34/36) vs. 77.8% (28/36)], and the wound healing time was shorter than that of the control group [(43.39±12.86) d vs. (52.94±15.07) d], with statistically significant differences (χ²=4.181, t=2.894, both P<0.05). At the 4th week of intervention and after wound healing or 8 weeks after discharge, the BWAT scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group [(17.53±5.68) points vs. (23.64±7.74) points, (13.33±1.41) points vs. (15.42±4.98) points], with statistically significant differences (t=3.818 and 2.414, both P<0.05). After wound healing or 8 weeks after discharge, the total score of Wound QoL of the observation group was lower than that of the control group [(29.44±4.69) points vs. (39.28±5.64) points], with a statistically significant difference (t=8.046, P<0.05). Conclusion　The multidisciplinary collaborative intervention model can improve the wound healing in patients with chronic wounds, shorten the wound healing time, and improve the quality of life.

Key words:

Chronic wounds, Wound healing, Quality of Life, Multidisciplinary collaboration

摘要：

目的　探讨慢性伤口患者的多学科协作干预策略，以提高患者伤口愈合效果和生活质量。方法　采用前瞻性研究方法，选取2022年4月至2023年3月佛山市南海区第四人民医院创面修复科收治的72例慢性伤口患者，采用随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组各36例。对照组男19例，女17例，年龄（61.14±8.69）岁，溃疡病程（51.69±14.89）d，给予慢性伤口常规干预；观察组男21例，女15例，年龄（60.53±7.28）岁，溃疡病程（52.94±13.39）d，在对照组基础上进行多学科协作干预。两组均干预至伤口愈合或出院后4周。运用Bates-Jensen伤口评估与效果评价量表（BWAT）和中文版慢性伤口患者生活质量量表（Wound-QoL）评价患者的伤口愈合情况和生活质量，同时记录患者的伤口愈合率和愈合时间。计量资料行独立样本t检验，计数资料行χ²检验。结果　观察组的伤口愈合率高于对照组［94.4%（34/36）比77.8%（28/36）］，愈合时间短于对照组［（43.39±12.86）d比（52.94±15.07）d］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=4.181，t=2.894，均P<0.05）。干预第4周、伤口愈合后或出院后8周，观察组的BWAT评分均低于对照组［（17.53±5.68）分比（23.64±7.74）分、（13.33±1.41）分比（15.42±4.98）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.818、2.414，均P<0.05）。伤口愈合后或出院后8周，观察组的Wound-QoL总分低于对照组［（29.44±4.69）分比（39.28±5.64）分］，差异有统计学意义（t=8.046，P<0.05）。结论　多学科协作干预可促进慢性伤口患者的伤口愈合，缩短伤口愈合时间，提高生活质量。

关键词:

慢性伤口, 伤口愈合, 生活质量, 多学科协作

Tan Shaomei, Yao Jingbin, Mo Huixin.

Effect of multidisciplinary collaborative intervention on wound healing and quality of life in patients with chronic wounds [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(12): 2078-2082.

谭少梅姚靖斌莫卉欣.

多学科协作干预对慢性伤口患者伤口愈合及生活质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(12): 2078-2082.

References

[1] 蒋琪霞,朱玉玲,刘国帧,等.负压伤口治疗结合局部氧疗用于慢性伤口的抑菌及愈合效果研究[J].中国护理管理,2023,23(4):491-496. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756. 2023.04.003.
[2] Tehrany PM, Rahmanian P, Rezaee A, et al. Multifunctional and theranostic hydrogels for wound healing acceleration: an emphasis on diabetic-related chronic wounds[J]. Environ Res, 2023, 238(Pt 1):117087. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117087.
[3] 黄瑶,倪鹏文,谢挺,等.慢性伤口病人无能为力感与生活质量的相关性分析[J].护理研究,2020,34(2):232-235. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.02.010.
[4] 张明明,葛乃航.老年慢性创面患者536例流行病学分析[J].中国基层医药,2023,30(6):890-894. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20221123-00937.
[5] Graves N, Phillips CJ, Harding K. A narrative review of the epidemiology and economics of chronic wounds[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2022, 187(2):141-148. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20692.
[6] Graves N, Ganesan G, Tan KB, et al. Chronic wounds in a multiethnic Asian population: a cost of illness study[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(9):e065692. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen- 2022-065692.
[7] 魏惠燕,潘红英,黄晨,等.医院社区多学科联动慢性伤口居家护理云平台的构建及实施[J].护理学杂志,2022,37(21):86-89. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.21.086.
[8] 董敏,殷学利,黄素群,等.基于专科联盟的慢性伤口管理模式构建及实施[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(1):7-10. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.01.007.
[9] 黄馥桦,陈文专,廖莉莉,等.负压创面治疗技术治疗慢性创面效果的meta分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(1):70-74. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021.01.018.
[10] 李孟玲,李向华,丁立荣,等.常规伤口护理与综合性评估+个体化治疗在糖尿病慢性伤口中的应用效果[J].河北医药,2021,43(13):2074-2076,2080. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002- 7386.2021.13.039.
[11] 董炜,肖玉瑞,吴敏洁,等.中国慢性难愈性创面诊疗思路及原则[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(12):868-873. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.010.
[12] 徐袁丁,董训忠,宋晓红,等.伤口评估三角联合负压封闭引流技术在慢性难愈性创面治疗中的应用[J].护理研究,2021,35(14):2582-2584. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009- 6493.2021.14.027.
[13] 孙柯,郑惠灵,陈惠,等.慢性伤口标准化干预体系的建立及临床实践分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(17):2302-2307. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20201012- 05702.
[14] 陈宪,王清燕,刘燕萍,等.伤口造口专科小组应用湿性愈合理论在慢性难愈合伤口的临床研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(14):1997-2000. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007- 1245.2022.14.016.
[15] 张龙,陈朗,王雷,等.PRP凝胶与rhGM-CSF凝胶治疗慢性难愈性创面的效果及对创面修复因子的影响[J].广西医学,2023,45(4):403-407. DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304. 2023.04.06.
[16] 丁立荣,张丽,李向华,等.综合性评估护理模式对糖尿病慢性伤口感染患者自我管理能力及伤口愈合的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2021,30(6):666-669. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2021.06.023.
[17] 张云飞,侯静文,马晓君.MEBT/MEBO与PRP治疗糖尿病慢性溃疡的疗效对比分析[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2023,35(4):258-261. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0726.2023.04.002.
[18] 蒋琪霞,刘国帧,王雅婧,等.便携式局部微氧治疗用于创伤性慢性伤口的方法及效果:一项随机对照研究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治,2023,36(3):296-301. DOI:10.16571/j.cnki.2097-2768.2023.03.014.
[19] 吴倩.慢性伤口患者生活质量量表(Wound-QoL)汉化及信效度检验[D].南宁:广西中医药大学,2022.
[20] 凌霓,王莺,胡莉芸.基于多学科合作在创建下肢慢性溃疡伤口规范化治疗的应用[J].成都医学院学报,2021,16(3):355-359. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2257.2021.03.019.
[21] 郑弘宇,朱杨阳,李晶.糖尿病患者伤口愈合不良的影响因素及护理对策[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2023,9(6):73-75. DOI:10.11997/nitcwm.202306019.
[22] 刘彤,郭锦丽,刘宏,等.以伤口治疗师需求为导向的慢性伤口居家护理管理小程序的构建[J].护理研究,2023,37(7):1152-1157. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.07.005.
[23] 骆金铠,孙萌,张晨,等.基于专科护理工作室对癌性伤口患者管理路径的探索与实践[J].中国护理管理,2022,22(8):1147-1151. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.08.006.
[24] 张颖嘉,李跃荣.TeamSTEPPS在患者安全中的应用与思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(9):30-33. DOI:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.09.07.
[25] 黄森,孙好杰,许龙,等.多学科诊疗模式对糖尿病足溃疡创面修复疗效及预后的影响[J].黑龙江医学,2022,46(13):1541-1543. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5775.2022.13.001.
[26] 李惠东,石伟玲,李书慧.以造口治疗师主导的多学科协作诊疗对肿瘤伤口患者生活质量的影响[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2020,26(4):131-133,173. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672- 187X.2020.04.034.
[27] Soares Dantas J, Silva CCM, Nogueira WP, et al. Health-related quality of life predictors in people with chronic wounds[J]. J Tissue Viability, 2022, 31(4):741-745. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.07.017.
[28] 董毓敏,袁亚翠,郑婉君,等.慢性伤口患者负性情绪与生活质量的相关性及其影响因素分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(19):48-51. DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413. 202319012.
[29] 顾炜,顾玉宇,牟旭红,等.区域医联体网格化护理模式对慢性伤口患者生活质量与照顾行为的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2023,42(10):1899-1902. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20221201-00465.
[30] 刘安康,杨巧红,王延峰,等.慢性伤口评估的最佳证据总结[J].护士进修杂志,2023,38(18):1694-1699. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2023.18.013.
[31] 林涧,张天浩,吕叶辉,等.老年共病患者下肢慢性糖尿病创面的治疗方法及效果[J].中华整形外科杂志,2023,39(12):1284-1293. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20230605- 00122.