Influence of empathic nursing combined with multidimensional health education guidance on patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.01.033

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the influence of empathic nursing combined with multidimensional health education guidance on the quality of life and bad moods of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods　One hundred and ninety-eight patients with pulmonary tuberculosis treated at Qishan Hospital from May 2017 to September 2019 were selected, and were divided into a conventional group, (44.96±11.08) years old, and an experimental group, (45.14±11.15) years old, by the random number table method, with 99 cases in each group. The conventional group were given multidimensional health education guidance; in addition, the experimental group were given empathic nursing. The scores of the Quality of Life Scale (QOL) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), compliance rates, and incidences of adverse events were compared between the two groups. χ² and t tests were applied. Results　The scores of QOL of the experimental group and the conventional group were (22.85±4.35) and (22.85±4.96) before the nursing intervention, and were (46.95±6.85) and (40.54±5.32) after the nursing intervention; the scores in both groups were lower after than before the treatment; the score in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group after the nursing intervention (t=7.354, P<0.001). The scores of HAMA of the experimental group and the conventional group were (35.82±3.85) and (35.06±3.72) before the nursing intervention, and were (21.10±2.58) and (26.85±3.14) after the nursing intervention; after the nursing intervention, the scores of HAMA in the two groups were lower than those before the nursing intervention; the score of the experimental group was lower than that of the conventional group (t=17.068, P<0.001). One week after the nursing intervention, the compliance rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the conventional group [92.93% (92/99) vs. 80.81% (80/99); χ²=6.373, P=0.012]. The incidence of adverse events in the experimental group was lower than that in the conventional group [3.03% (3/99) vs. 12.12% (12/99); χ²=5.843, P=0.016]. Conclusion　Empathic nursing combined with multidimensional health education guidance for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis can improve their quality of life, adverse moods, and compliance rate, and effectively reduce the occurrence of adverse events during nursing.

Key words:

Tuberculosis, Empathic nursing, Compliance, Quality of life

摘要：

目的　探究共情护理联合多维度健康教育指导对肺结核患者生活质量及不良情绪的影响。方法　选取烟台市奇山医院2017年5月至2019年9月收治的肺结核患者198例，根据随机数字表法将其分为两组。常规组99例，年龄（44.96±11.08）岁，给予多维度健康教育指导；试验组99例，年龄（45.14±11.15）岁，在常规组的基础上实施共情护理。比较两组生活质量量表（QOL）评分、汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）评分、依从率以及不良事件发生率。采用χ²检验、t检验进行统计分析。结果　护理干预前试验组与常规组QOL评分分别为（22.85±4.35）分、（22.85±4.96）分，护理干预后分别为（46.95±6.85）分、（40.54±5.32）分，两组护理后QOL评分均高于护理前，且试验组QOL评分高于常规组（t=7.354，P<0.001）。护理干预前试验组与常规组HAMA评分分别为（35.82±3.85）分、（35.06±3.72）分，护理干预后分别为（21.10±2.58）分、（26.85±2.14）分，护理干预后两组HAMA评分均降低，且试验组生活质量HAMA评分低于常规组（t=17.068，P<0.001）。护理1周后，试验组依从率［92.93%（92/99）］高于常规组［80.81%（80/99）］（χ²=6.373，P=0.012）。试验组不良事件发生率［3.03%（3/99）］低于常规组［12.12%（12/99）］（χ²=5.843，P=0.016）。结论　共情护理联合多维度健康教育指导能够改善肺结核患者的生活质量及不良情绪，提高患者依从率，有效降低护理期间不良事件的发生。

关键词:

肺结核, 共情护理, 依从度, 生活质量

Sun Xiuxiang, He Junning, Wang Pengyan.

Influence of empathic nursing combined with multidimensional health education guidance on patients with pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(1): 160-163.

孙秀香贺军宁王鹏雁.

共情护理联合多维度健康教育指导对肺结核患者的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(1): 160-163.

References

[1] 陈文翰,周强,刘玉美,等.某专科医院723例学生肺结核住院患者诊疗延误情况分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(19):2722-2726.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2022.19.013.
[2] Jaworski J. Fate of tuberculous former medical students treated in 1946-1955[J]. Gruzlica (1926), 1964,32:1073-1079.
[3] Maly w. Excretion of bacilli and drug sensitivity of tubercle bacilli in students treated in the university student sanatorium in zakopane from 1958 to 1962[J]. Gruzlica (1926), 1964, 32:879-886.
[4] Mekonnen A, Collins JM, Aseffa A, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis among students in three eastern Ethiopian universities[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2018,22(10):1210-1215. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0029.
[5] Stogova NA , Chupis ON , Alimova OS .Epidemiological and medical social aspects of tuberculosis incidence among university students[J]. Tuberculosis and lung diseases, 2016,94(4):20-25.DOI:10.21292/2075-1230-2016- 94-4-20-25.
[6] 金瑾,景睿.山东省2013年学生肺结核疫情特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(8):871-874.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2015.08.022.
[7] 杨云斌,陆林,许琳,等.云南省2013年学生肺结核流行特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(6):663-664.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2015.06.027.
[8] 中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等.肺结核基层诊疗指南(2018年)[J].中华全科医师杂志,2019,18(8):709-717.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368. 2019.08.002.
[9] Laohapojanart N, Ratanajamit C, Kawkitinarong K, et al. Efficacy and safety of combined isoniazid- rifampicin- pyrazinamide-levofloxacin dry powder inhaler in treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2021,70:102056. DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102056.
[10] Xia XJ, Liu ZH. Cutaneous hyalophomycosis caused by purpureocillium lilacinum in an autoimmune hemolytic anemia patient with previous pulmonary tuberculosis and cutaneous cryptococcosis infection[J]. Mycopathologia, 2021,186(4):563-564. DOI: 10.1007/s11046-021-00571-z.
[11] Chang J, Sung H, Jo KW, et al. Performance assessment of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampin resistance in a tertiary care hospital in Korea[J]. Jpn J Infect Dis, 2021,74(6):537-542. DOI: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.978.
[12] Dao TL, Hoang VT, Ly TDA, et al. Sputum proteomic analysis for distinguishing between pulmonary tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS): preliminary results[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2021,27(11):1694. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.031.
[13] 谢贝,许婉华,龚兰,等.肺结核治疗过程中IL-6血清表达水平变化分析[J].实用医学杂志,2023,39(19):2434-2439.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.19.004.
[14] 卢美玲.共情护理结合激励式护理对糖尿病伴肺结核患者病耻感及心理弹性的影响[J].中国老年保健医学,2020,18(6):149-151.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2671. 2020.06.050.
[15] 陈春红.基于"鱼骨图"指导的健康教育在难治性肺结核患者中的应用效果[J].中国民康医学,2021,33(23):165-168.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2021.23.057.
[16] 陈巧芳.健康教育对耐多药肺结核患者治疗依从性的影响[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(21):75-77.DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2017.21.039.
[17] 应雪珍,冯秀芝.服药指导和健康教育对肺结核患者的重要性[J].河北医科大学学报,2010,31(12):1498-1500.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2010.12.37.
[18] 王明珍,邓姝萍.肺结核病的健康教育和康复指导[J].中国社区医师(医学专业半月刊),2009,11(5):105.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2009.05.113.
[19] 杨丽珍.肺结核患者的健康教育及服药指导[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(21):5185-5186.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009- 6647. 2007.21.227.
[20] 房海芳.共情护理对初诊肺结核患者生活质量以及负面情绪的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2022,41(11):1990-1993.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200401-00513.