改良Y型纳米骨板在多节段脊髓型颈椎病术中的应用效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.18.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨改良Y型纳米骨板在多节段脊髓型颈椎病（MCSM）术中的应用效果。方法　回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年3月宝鸡市人民医院收治的103例MCSM患者资料，根据内固定材料不同进行分组，对照组51例，研究组52例。对照组男26例，女25例，年龄（54.43±4.12）岁，体重指数（23.28±1.49）kg/m²，病变节段：C₂_～₇ 5例、C₃_～₆ 7例、C₃_～₇ 30例、C₄_～₇ 9例，采用微型钛板内固定联合颈椎单侧肌肉韧带保留治疗；研究组男29例，女23例，年龄（53.01±4.58）岁，体重指数（23.04±1.36）kg/m²，病变节段：C₂_～₇ 6例、C₃_～₆ 8例、C₃_～₇ 33例、C₄_～₇ 5例，采用改良Y型纳米骨板固定联合颈椎单侧肌肉韧带保留治疗。两组患者术后均随访6个月。比较两组手术情况、疼痛情况、颈椎功能、颈椎影像学参数及并发症情况。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　研究组手术时间短于对照组、术中出血量少于对照组［（104.21±15.29）min比（115.98±18.54）min、（131.68±21.01）ml比（145.21±24.16）ml］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.518、P=0.001，t=3.035、P=0.003）。术后3个月，研究组、对照组的视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分比较［（1.41±0.22）分比（1.47±0.21）分］，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后6个月，研究组的日本骨科协会（JOA）评分高于对照组［（21.98±2.03）分比（21.04±2.28）分］，颈部功能障碍指数（NDI）低于对照组［（14.15±2.17）%比（15.26±2.43）%］，颈椎前屈、后伸、左屈、右屈活动度均低于对照组［（40.17±3.24）°比（42.01±3.62）°、（39.24±3.43）°比（41.68±3.75）°、（34.84±2.31）°比（36.05±2.74）°、（35.26±2.51）°比（37.01±2.72）°］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.211、2.446、2.719、3.447、2.425、3.394，均P<0.05）；两组颈椎侧位生理曲度比较［（10.34±1.43）°比（10.18±1.75）°］，差异无统计学意义（t=0.509，P=0.612）。研究组并发症总发生率低于对照组［5.77%（3/52）比21.57%（11/51）］，差异有统计学意义（χ²=5.472，P=0.019）。结论　与微型钛板内固定相比，改良Y型纳米骨板固定联合颈椎单侧肌肉韧带保留用于MCSM术中，可缩短手术时间，减少出血量，在改善患者颈椎功能方面更具优势，且安全性更高。

关键词:

多节段脊髓型颈椎病, 内固定术, Y型纳米骨板, 效果

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the effect of modified Y-shaped nano-bone plate fixation in the operation of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). Methods　The data of 103 patients with MCSM admitted to Baoji People's Hospital from January 2020 to March 2023 were reviewed, including 51 patients (control group) who received micro-titanium plate fixation combined with unilateral cervical muscle ligament preservation, and 52 patients (study group) who received modified Y-shaped nano-bone plate fixation combined with unilateral cervical muscle ligament preservation, and were followed up for 6 months. In the control group, there were 26 males and 25 females, aged (54.43±4.12) years, with a body mass index of (23.28±1.49) kg/m², and the diseased segments were C_2-7 in 5 cases, C_3-6 in 7 cases, C_3-7 in 30 cases, and C_4-7 in 9 cases. In the study group, there were 29 males and 23 females, aged (53.01±4.58) years, with a body mass index of (23.04±1.36) kg/m², and the diseased segments were C_2-7 in 6 cases, C_3-6 in 8 cases, C_3-7 in 33 cases, and C_4-7 in 5 cases. The operation, pain, cervical function, cervical imaging parameters, and complications were compared between the two groups. t test and χ² test were used. Results　The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the study group were lower than those in the control group [(104.21±15.29) min vs. (115.98±18.54) min, (131.68±21.01) ml vs. (145.21±24.16) ml], with statistically significant differences (t=3.518, P=0.001; t=3.035, P=0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score between the study group and the control group 3 months after surgery [(1.41±0.22) points vs. (1.47±0.21) points] (P>0.05). Six months after surgery, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score of the study group was higher than that of the control group [(21.98±2.03) points vs. (21.04±2.28) points], the Neck Dysfunction Index (NDI) was lower than that of the control group [(14.15±2.17)% vs. (15.26±2.43)%], and the ranges of motion of anterior flexion, posterior extension, left flexion, and right flexion were lower than those of the control group [(40.17±3.24)° vs. (42.01±3.62)°, (39.24±3.43)° vs. (41.68±3.75)°, (34.84±2.31)° vs. (36.05±2.74)°, (35.26±2.51)° vs. (37.01±2.72)°], with statistically significant differences (t=2.211, 2.446, 2.719, 3.447, 2.425, and 3.394, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the physiological curvature of the cervical lateral position between the two groups 6 months after surgery [(10.34±1.43)° vs. (10.18±1.75)°] (t=0.509, P=0.612). The total complication rate of the study group was lower than that of the control group [5.77% (3/52) vs. 21.57% (11/51)], with a statistically significant difference (χ²=5.472, P=0.019). Conclusion　Compared with micro-titanium plate internal fixation, modified Y-shaped nano-bone plate fixation combined with unilateral cervical muscle ligament retention for MCSM surgery can reduce the operation time and blood loss, and has more advantages and safety in improving the function of patients' cervical vertebrae.

Key words:

Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy, Internal fixation, Y-shaped nano-bone plate, Effect

拓万宝葛郁龙张彦祥梁冠文宋启春.

改良Y型纳米骨板在多节段脊髓型颈椎病术中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(18): 3003-3007.

Tuo Wanbao, Ge Yulong, Zhang Yanxiang, Liang Guanwen, Song Qichun.

Application of modified Y-shaped nano-bone plate in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(18): 3003-3007.

参考文献

[1] Zhou M, Xu X, Chen H, et al. Comparing two surgical approaches for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur Spine J, 2023, 32(10):3485-3496. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07790-6.
[2] Li H, Ma Z, Wang X, et al. Comparative study of preoperative sagittal alignment between patients with multisegment cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Spine J, 2023, 23(11):1667-1673. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.390.
[3] Nguyen TY, Nguyen KH, Tran QD, et al. Results of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and posterior fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2023, 85(10):4830-4834. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001278.
[4] 王理想,李春根,尹辛成,等. 颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术对患者术后颈椎矢状面平衡的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版),2023,49(5):1318-1324. DOI:10.13481/j.1671-587X.20230527.
[5] 王之锦,李经坤,韩文哲,等. 两种后路减压术治疗脊髓型颈椎病比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2023,31(17):1549-1554. DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2023.17.03.
[6] 米浩杰,刘杰,程其辉,等. 单开门椎管扩大成形术中保留单侧肌肉韧带复合体对临床疗效影响的Meta分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2021,31(9):794-802. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2021.09.03.
[7] 罗金峰,秋曙祎,王志民,等. 颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形跳跃式与连续性微型钛板固定治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的Meta分析[J]. 中医正骨,2023,35(10):31-36. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2023.10.007.
[8] 任杭岭,宋娜,徐大霞,等. 不同融合装置对脊髓型颈椎病前路椎管减压融合后颈椎矢状位参数的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2024,33(33):5375-5381. DOI:10.12307/2024.669.
[9] 陈金财,曾文添,朱文清,等. Y型纳米骨板单开门椎管成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报(医学版),2017,38(4):617-621. DOI:10.7652/jdyxb201704030.
[10] 中国中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会,莫文,袁文. 脊髓型颈椎病中西医结合诊疗指南(2023)[J]. 中国骨伤,2024,37(1):103-110. DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034. 20230767.
[11] Machado L, Thompson LM, Brett CHR. Visual analogue mood scale scores in healthy young versus older adults[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2019, 31(3):417-424. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610218000996.
[12] Ando W, Sakai T, Fukushima W, et al. Japanese orthopaedic association 2019 guidelines for osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2021, 26(1):46-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.06.013.
[13] 伍少玲,马超,伍时玲,等. 颈椎功能障碍指数量表的效度与信度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2008,23(7):625-628. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2008.07.017.
[14] Lisitsky IY, Lychagin AV, Zarov AY, et al. Skip corpectomy in surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko, 2023, 87(2):41-47. DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238702141.
[15] 赵豪,高山,蔡猛. 短节段侧块螺钉联合"锚定法"行后路单开门手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病合并椎间失稳[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2023,44(1):141-142. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005- 7234.2023.01.046.
[16] 申远,宇洪浩,原泉. 不同手术方式对多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者治疗效果和预后的影响[J]. 河北医学,2023,29(6):1026-1032. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2023.06.028.
[17] 陈双辉,段伟利,邓松旺,等. 多节段脊髓型颈椎病行颈后路单开门椎板成形其开门角度与疗效及术后轴性症状的相关性[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2023,44(2):245-247. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2023.02.028.
[18] 赵晓东,贺斌. 六经手法点穴推拿联合缪刺"挫闪穴"治疗腰椎间盘突出症的价值[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(3):333-336. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022. 03.009.
[19] Nguyen-Van T, Hoang GD, Nguyen-Le BT, et al. Prognostic factors for surgical outcomes among patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2022, 26(17):6242-6250. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202209_29647.
[20] Chan AK, Shaffrey CI, Gottfried ON, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better?[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2022, 38(1):42-55. DOI: 10.3171/2022.6.SPINE22110.
[21] 董征,未东兴,段大波. 多节段脊髓型颈椎病单开门椎管扩大成形术纳米骨板固定的疗效和影响因素[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2024,45(2):315-319. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234. 2024.02.025.
[22] 黄伟,杨寿志,周炳华,等. 改良颈后路单开门椎板成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的效果[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2023,44(6):982-985. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2023.06.020.
[23] 冯浩,白瑞飞,李伟,等. 多节段脊髓型颈椎病前路与后路减压比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2023,31(15):1357-1362. DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2023.15.03.
[24] Zhang Z, Hu BW, Wang L, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes between the n-HA/PA66 cage and the PEEK cage used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a matched-pair case control study[J]. Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(1):152-161. DOI: 10.1111/os.13593.
[25] Zeng Z, Zhu C, Deng Z, et al. A novel nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage for reducing the subsidence rate after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative study of 7-year follow-up[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2023, 18(1):54. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03521-1.
[26] 周育巧,陈金财,张秀芳,等. 微型钛板和改良Y型纳米骨板在多节段脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗中的应用效果比较[J]. 山东医药,2020,60(20):80-83. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2020.20.022.
[27] Zong C, Du J, Lu S, et al. Investigation of titanium mesh and nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 bone graft in cervical reconstruction of spondylosis after sub-total vertebral body resection[J]. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2022, 18(4):1187-1195. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2022.3316.