国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 430-433.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.03.016

• 脑血管病 • 上一篇    下一篇

综合护理对脑血管介入术患者康复的影响

龙晓霞   

  1. 云浮市中医院脑病科,云浮 527300

  • 收稿日期:2023-08-11 出版日期:2024-02-01 发布日期:2024-03-06
  • 通讯作者: Email:657580952@qq.com

Influence of comprehensive nursing on rehabilitation of patients undergoing cerebrovascular intervention

Long Xiaoxia   

  1. Department of Brain Diseases, Yunfu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yunfu 527300, China

  • Received:2023-08-11 Online:2024-02-01 Published:2024-03-06
  • Contact: Email: 657580952@qq.com

摘要:

目的 探讨综合护理对脑血管介入术治疗患者康复的影响。方法 选取2021年1月至2022年7月在云浮市中医院行脑血管介入术治疗的患者68例进行随机对照试验,采用随机数字表法分成对照组与观察组。对照组34例,男19例,女15例,年龄(59.34±5.50)岁;观察组34例,男18例,女16例,年龄(60.02±4.19)岁。对照组进行常规护理,观察组在常规护理的基础上重点加强预防性护理与心理护理(即综合护理)。比较两组患者术后并发症发生率、临床指标情况、焦虑与抑郁自评量表评分及护理满意度。采用tχ2检验进行统计分析。结果 观察组术后并发症发生率为11.76%(4/34),对照组为41.18%(14/34),两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.556,P=0.006)。对照组患者插管时长为(6.72±1.64)d、禁食时长为(5.93±1.34)d、卧床时长为(6.80±2.04)d、出院时长为(13.05±3.60)d,观察组分别为(4.81±0.89)d、(5.01±1.21)d、(4.15±1.21)d、(9.89±2.75)d,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分为(46.42±10.31)分,抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分为(44.67±9.53)分,观察组分别为(34.73±10.98)分、(35.98±8.64)分,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组患者总体满意率为88.24%(30/34),观察组为97.06%(33/34),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 综合护理模式有助于脑血管介入术治疗患者的病程康复。

关键词:

综合护理, 脑血管介入术, 康复

Abstract:

Objective To study the effect of comprehensive nursing on the rehabilitation of patients undergoing cerebrovascular intervention. Methods Sixty-eight patients who took cerebrovascular intervention in Yunfu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to July 2022 were selected for the randomized controlled trial. They were divided into a control group and an observation group by the random number table method, with 34 cases in each group. There were 19 males and 15 females in the control group; they were (59.34±5.50) years old. There were 18 males and 16 females in the observation group; they were (60.02±4.19) years old. The control group took routine nursing care; in addition, the observation group strengthened preventive and psychological care (comprehensive care). The incidences of postoperative complications, clinical indicators, scores of self-evaluation anxiety and depression scales, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. t and χ2 tests were applied. Results The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group [11.76% (4/34) vs. 41.18% (14/34)], with a statistical difference between the two groups (χ2=7.556, P=0.006). There were statistical differences in intubation duration, fasting duration, time staying in bed, and hospital stay between the control group and the observation group [(6.72±1.64) d vs. (4.81±0.89) d, (5.93±1.34) d vs. (5.01±1.21) d, (6.80±2.04) d vs. (4.15±1.21) d, and (13.05±3.60) d vs. (9.89±2.75) d; all P<0.05]. The scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) in the control group were higher than those in the observation group [(46.42±10.31) vs. (34.73±10.98) and (44.67±9.53) vs. (35.98±8.64)], with statistical differences between the two groups (both P<0.05). The overall satisfaction rate in the control group was lower than that in the observation group [88.24% (30/34) vs. 97.06% (33/34)], with no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The comprehensive nursing mode is conducive to the rehabilitation of patients undergoing cerebrovascular intervention.

Key words:

Comprehensive nursing, Cerebrovascular intervention, Rehabilitation