荔湾社区无症状颈动脉狭窄患者脑血管功能评估及干预的研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.23.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　对荔湾社区无症状中重度颈动脉狭窄患者进行脑血管功能评估及危险因素干预，探讨无症状中重度颈动脉狭窄患者脑血管储备能力变化与脑血管事件的关系。方法　本文为前瞻性研究。选取2020年1月至2021年12月广州市荔湾社区中慢性病患者2 315例，其中无症状中重度颈动脉狭窄患者262例［中度狭窄175例、重度狭窄87例］，有5例无症状重度颈动脉狭窄患者考虑颈动脉手术转诊到神经介入科，余257例［男153例、女104例，年龄（75.08±2.88）岁］无症状中重度颈动脉狭窄患者入组观察。入组患者均进行脑血管功能评估、危险因素干预、抗血小板聚集及降脂治疗。记录1年后患者脑血管储备能力变化及脑缺血事件发病率。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　入组无症状中重度颈动脉狭窄患者共有4例发生缺血性事件，次年发病率为1.5%（4/257）。出现脑缺血事件患者年龄［（78.50±2.88）岁］、吸烟率［100.0%（4/4）］、高脂血症患病率［100.0%（4/4）］均高于无脑缺血事件患者［（75.02±2.85）岁、44.3%（112/253）、45.5%（115/253）］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.413，χ²=4.939、4.712；均P<0.05）。出现脑缺血事件患者入组时脑血管储备能力［（17.09±0.69）%］、入组1年后脑血管储备能力［（17.89±0.37）%］及脑血管储备能力增加值［（0.80±0.57）%］均低于无脑缺血事件患者［（21.99±2.04）%、（25.38±2.02）%、（3.39±2.15）%］，差异均有统计学意义（t=4.790、7.372、2.397，均P<0.05）。无症状重度颈动脉狭窄患者男性比例［69.5%（57/82）］、吸烟率［54.9%（45/82）］、糖尿病患病率［51.2%（42/82）］、年龄［（76.58±2.03）岁］、低密度脂蛋白［（4.11±0.71）mmol/L］均高于无症状中度颈动脉狭窄患者［54.9%（96/175）、40.6%（71/175）、37.1%（65/175）、（74.37±2.95）岁、（3.55±1.07）mmol/L］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=4.978、4.615、4.553，t=6.118、4.264；均P<0.05）。治疗1年后，中度狭窄组患者脑血管储备能力增加值［（3.68±2.25）%］显著高于重度狭窄组［（2.64±1.74）%］，差异有统计学意义（t=3.689，P<0.05）。入组时及1年后，中度狭窄组患者吸入CO₂前血流平均速度、吸入CO₂后血流平均速度、脑血管储备能力均高于重度狭窄组［（64.68±3.42）cm/s比（60.76±5.19）cm/s、（79.21±4.78）cm/s比（73.40±6.09）cm/s、（22.43±2.08）%比（20.80±1.72）%、（65.41±3.05）cm/s比（60.86±3.86）cm/s、（82.50±4.16）cm/s比（75.12±4.62）cm/s、（26.12±1.95）%比（23.44±1.54）%］，差异均有统计学意义（t=7.173、8.294、6.185、10.201、12.799、10.925，均P<0.05）。结论　脑血管储备能力改变与无症状中重度颈动脉狭窄患者发生缺血性事件风险之间相关。通过一级预防来改善脑血管储备能力，可以减少脑血管事件发生。

关键词:

脑梗死, 无症状颈动脉狭窄, 危险因素, 脑血管储备能力

Abstract:

Objective　To evaluate the cerebrovascular function and intervene with risk factors in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis in Liwan community, and to explore the relationship between change in cerebrovascular reserve capacity and cerebrovascular events in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis. Methods　It was a prospective study. A total of 2 315 chronic disease patients were screened from Liwan District, Guangzhou City from January 2020 to December 2021, including 262 asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis (175 patients with moderate stenosis and 87 patients with severe stenosis). Among them, 5 asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis were referred to the neurointerventional department for carotid artery surgery, and the other 257 asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis [153 males and 104 females, aged (75.08±2.88) years] were enrolled. The enrolled patients undergo cerebrovascular function assessment, risk factor intervention, antiplatelet aggregation, and lipid-lowering treatment. The change of cerebrovascular reserve capacity and incidence of cerebral ischemic events were recorded one year later. t test and χ² test were used. Results　A total of 4 asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis had ischemic events, with an incidence of 1.5% (4/257) in the next year. The age [(78.50±2.88) years old], smoking rate [100.0% (4/4)], and prevalence rate of hyperlipidemia [100.0% (4/4)] in the patients with cerebral ischemic events were higher than those in the patients without cerebral ischemic events [(75.02±2.85) years old, 44.3% (112/253), and 45.5% (115/253)], with statistically significant differences (t=2.413, χ²=4.939 and 4.712; all P<0.05). The cerebrovascular reserve capacity at enrollment [(17.09±0.69)%], the cerebrovascular reserve capacity 1 year after enrollment [(17.89±0.37)%], and the increase of cerebrovascular reserve capacity [(0.80±0.57)%] of the patients with cerebral ischemic events were lower than those of the patients without cerebral ischemic events [(21.99±2.04)%, (25.38±2.02)%, and (3.39±2.15)%], with statistically significant differences (t=4.790, 7.372, and 2.397, all P<0.05). The proportion of males [69.5% (57/82)], smoking rate [54.9% (45/82)], diabetes rate [51.2% (42/82)], age [(76.58±2.03) years old], and low density lipoprotein [(4.11±0.71)mmol/L] in the asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis were all higher than those in the asymptomatic patients with moderate carotid artery stenosis [54.9% (96/175), 40.6% (71/175), 37.1% (65/175), (74.37±2.95) years old, and (3.55±1.07)mmol/L], with statistically significant differences (χ²=4.978, 4.615, and 4.553, t=6.118 and 4.264; all P<0.05). After 1 year of treatment, the increase of cerebrovascular reserve capacity in the moderate stenosis group [(3.68±2.25)%] was significantly higher than that in the severe stenosis group [(2.64±1.74)%], with a statistically significant difference (t=3.689, P<0.05). At enrollment and 1 year later, the mean blood flow velocity before CO₂ inhalation, the mean blood flow velocity after CO₂ inhalation, and the cerebrovascular reserve capacity in the moderate stenosis group were higher than those in the severe stenosis group [(64.68±3.42) cm/s vs. (60.76±5.19) cm/s, (79.21±4.78) cm/s vs. (73.40±6.09) cm/s, (22.43±2.08)% vs. (20.80±1.72)%, (65.41±3.05) cm/s vs. (60.86±3.86) cm/s, (82.50±4.16) cm/s vs. (75.12±4.62) cm/s, (26.12±1.95)% vs. (23.44±1.54)%], with statistically significant differences (t=7.173, 8.294, 6.185, 10.201, 12.799, and 10.925, all P<0.05). Conclusions　There is a correlation between change in cerebrovascular reserve capacity and the risk of ischemic events in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis. Improving cerebrovascular reserve capacity through primary prevention can reduce the occurrence of cerebrovascular events.

Key words:

Cerebral infarction, Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, Risk factors, Cerebrovascular reserve capacity

许璇祁风余科刘祖佑梁晓君冯丽娟.

荔湾社区无症状颈动脉狭窄患者脑血管功能评估及干预的研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(23): 3355-3359.

Xu Xuan, Qi Feng, Yu Ke, Liu Zuyou, Liang Xiaojun, Feng Lijuan.

Evaluation and intervention of cerebrovascular function in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in Liwan community [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(23): 3355-3359.

参考文献

[1] 冯莹. 2型糖尿病患者血清miR-26a与IMT和颈动脉粥样硬化斑块之间的关系[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(24):3775-3778. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2020. 24.016.
[2] 黄仪,袁德智,李晋芳. 急性脑梗死的性别差异及相关因素分析[J]. 中国临床神经科学,2022,30(5):526-535.
[3] 宋建华,季燕,包元飞. 大面积脑梗死患者临床特征分析[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建,2021,16(9):529-531.DOI:10.16780/j.cnki.sjssgncj.20200944.
[4] Abbott A. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and stroke risk[J].Lancet Neurol,2021,20(9):698-699.DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00199-X.
[5] Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Antignani PL, et al. Optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in 2021: the jury is still out. An international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement[J].Int Angiol,2022,41(2):158-169.DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04825-2.
[6] Guirguis-Blake JM, Webber EM, Coppola EL. Screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force[J].JAMA,2021,325(5):487-489.DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.20364.
[7] Abbott AL. Management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis may need to Be individualized: a multidisciplinary call for action[J].J Stroke,2022,24(1):160-162.DOI:10.5853/jos.2021.03034.
[8] Abbott AL, Brunser AM, Giannoukas A, et al. Misconceptions regarding the adequacy of best medical intervention alone for asymptomatic carotid stenosis[J].J Vasc Surg,2020,71(1):257-269.DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.490.
[9] Müller MD, Lyrer P, Brown MM, et al. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2020,2(2):CD000515.DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
[10] Portegies ML, de Bruijn RF, Hofman A, et al. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity and risk of mortality: the rotterdam study[J].Stroke,2014,45(1):42-47.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002348.
[11] Chang RW, Tucker LY, Rothenberg KA, et al. Incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis without surgical intervention[J].JAMA,2022,327(20):1974-1982.DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.4835.
[12] Weiner S, Benton MH, Guraziu B, et al. High stroke rate in patients with medically managed asymptomatic carotid stenosis at an academic center in the Southeastern United States[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2022,85:418-423.DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.029.
[13] Reiff T, Eckstein HH, Mansmann U, et al. Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: one-year interim results of SPACE-2[J].Int J Stroke,2019,15(6):1747493019833017.DOI:10.1177/1747493019833017.
[14] Gupta A, Chazen JL, Hartman M, et al. Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Stroke,2012,43(11):2884-2891.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663716.
[15] 张琪,张军龙,伏兵,等. 脑血管二氧化碳反应性监测的临床意义及其影响因素[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2021,23(12):1342-1344.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2021. 12.030.
[16] Pandya A, Gupta A, Kamel H, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of assessment of cerebrovascular reserve to guide treatment of asymptomatic patients[J].Radiology,2015,274(2):455-463.DOI:10.1148/radiol. 14140501.
[17] Ju K, Zhong L, Ni X, et al. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity predicts the development of acute stroke in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis[J].Neurol Neurochir Pol,2018,52(3):374-378.DOI:10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.12.015.
[18] 祁风,徐恩,陆雪芬,等. 缺血性卒中大脑中动脉狭窄患者脑血管反应能力的研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2004,13(6):470-471.DOI:10.3760/j.issn:1004-4477.2004.06.019.
[19] Howard DPJ, Gaziano L, Rothwell PM, et al. Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Neurol,2021,20(3):193-202. DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30484-1.
[20] 黄晓红,王涛. 脑血管储备功能对频繁短暂性脑缺血发作患者继发脑卒中风险的评估价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2021,25(7):47-50.DOI:10.7619/jcmp.20201645.
[21] Spence JD. Management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis[J].Ann Transl Med,2020,8(19):1262.DOI:10.21037/atm-20-975.