国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (14): 2059-2062.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.14.031

• 护理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

综合护理干预在肺癌晚期患者疼痛及睡眠质量的应用价值

邓小芳  吴莹莹  陈柳霏  潘健婷  郭艳芬   

  1. 南方医科大学第七附属医院呼吸内科,佛山 528244

  • 收稿日期:2023-04-21 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-07-31
  • 通讯作者: 邓小芳,Email:13415599223fang@sina.com

Application value of comprehensive nursing intervention on pain and sleep quality in patients with advanced lung cancer

Deng Xiaofang, Wu Yingying, Chen Liufei, Pan Jianting, Guo Yanfen   

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Seventh Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan 528244, China

  • Received:2023-04-21 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-07-31
  • Contact: Deng Xiaofang,Email:13415599223fang@sina.com

摘要:

目的 探讨综合护理干预对肺癌晚期患者疼痛程度、睡眠质量及生活质量(QOL)的应用价值。方法 选择2020年1月至2022年1月期间南方医科大学第七附属医院收治的98例肺癌晚期患者,随机对照试验分为两组,对照组49例,男29例,女20例,年龄39~79(57.02±7.46)岁,给予常规护理干预;观察组49例,男30例,女19例,年龄40~78(56.87±7.38)岁,给予综合护理干预。两组均干预4周后,比较患者干预前后疼痛程度、睡眠质量及生活质量(QOL)。统计学方法采用t检验。结果 观察组与对照组干预4周后,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分均低于干预前[(1.27±0.45)分比(4.61±1.52)分、(2.49±0.98)分比(4.57±1.48)分],而观察组VAS评分明显的低于对照组[(1.27±0.45)分比(2.49±0.98)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=8.373、4.7438.359,均P<0.05);匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分均低于干预前[(5.19±1.37)分比(7.39±0.61)分、(6.53±1.31)分比(7.42±0.59)分],而观察组PSQI评分明显的低于对照组[(5.19±1.37)分比(6.53±1.31)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=7.935、3.966、4.625,均P<0.05);QOL评分均高于干预前[(8.69±1.31)分比(6.59±1.32)分、(7.42±1.29)分比(6.61±1.28)分],而观察组QOL评分明显高于对照组[(8.69±1.31)分比(7.42±1.29)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=5.631、3.966、3.056,均P<0.05)。结论 对肺癌晚期患者实施综合护理干预可以有效减轻患者疼痛程度、提高睡眠质量,对改善肺癌晚期患者生活质量发挥积极作用。

关键词:

肺癌, 疼痛程度, 睡眠质量, 生活质量, 综合护理干预

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the application value of comprehensive nursing intervention on pain degree, sleep quality, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced lung cancer. Methods A total of 98 patients with advanced lung cancer admitted to Seventh Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected for the randomized controlled trial, and were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 49 cases in each group. There were 29 males and 20 females in the control group; they were 39-79 (57.02±7.46) years old. There were 30 males and 19 females in the observation group; they were 40-78 (56.87±7.38) years old. The control group were given routine nursing intervention, and the observation group comprehensive nursing intervention, for 4 weeks. The pain degrees, sleep quality, and quality of life (QOL) were compared between the two groups. t test was applied. Results After 4 weeks' intervention, the scores of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the observation group and the control group were significantly lower than those before the intervention [(1.27±0.45) vs. (4.61±1.52) and (2.49±0.98) vs. (4.57±1.48)], and the score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group[(1.27±0.45) vs. (2.49±0.98)], with statistical differences (t=8.373, 4.743, and 8.359, all P<0.05). After 4 weeks' intervention, the scores of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in the observation group and the control group were significantly lower than those before the intervention [(5.19±1.37) vs. (7.39±0.61) and (6.53±1.31) vs. (7.42±0.59)], and the score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group[(5.19±1.37) vs. (6.53±1.31)], with statistical differences (t=7.935, 3.966, and 4.625; all P<0.05). After 4 weeks' intervention, the QOL scores of the observation group and the control group were significantly higher than those before intervention [(8.69±1.31) vs. (6.59±1.32) and (7.42±1.29) vs. (6.61±1.28)], and the score of the observation group was significantly higher[(8.69±1.31) vs. (7.42±1.29)], than that of the control group (t=5.6307, 3.9664, and 3.0557; all P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention for patients with advanced lung cancer can effectively reduce their pain degre, and significantly improve their sleep quality and quality of life.

Key words:

Lung cancer, Pain degree, Sleep quality, Quality of life, Comprehensive nursing intervention