多拉司琼对肺癌根治术后恶心呕吐的效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.07.012

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 940-943.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.07.012

多拉司琼对肺癌根治术后恶心呕吐的效果

刘运慧杨秋敏林春丽

商丘市第一人民医院耳鼻喉肿瘤二科，商丘　476000

收稿日期:2022-11-10 出版日期:2023-04-01 发布日期:2023-04-28
通讯作者: 刘运慧，Email：liuyunhuire@126.com
基金资助:
河南省医学科技攻关项目（LHGJ2021001341）

Effect of dolasetron in the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting after radical resection of lung cancer

Liu Yunhui, Yang Qiumin, Lin Chunli

No.2 Department of Otolaryngological Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City, Shangqiu 476000, China

Received:2022-11-10 Online:2023-04-01 Published:2023-04-28
Contact: Liu Yunhui, Email: liuyunhuire@126.com
Supported by:
Medical Science and Technology Project of Henan Province (LHGJ2021001341)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　观察多拉司琼对肺癌根治术后恶心呕吐的防治效果及作用机制。方法　本文为随机对照试验。选取2019年5月至2021年8月商丘市第一人民医院行根治术治疗的肺癌患者125例为研究对象，采用抽签法将患者随机分为治疗组（63例）和常规组（62例）。治疗组男40例、女23例，年龄（55.25±5.15）岁，采用多拉司琼防治术后恶心呕吐；常规组男42例、女20例，年龄（55.46±5.23）岁，实施常规止吐措施治疗。比较两组患者术后6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h呕吐频率、恶心呕吐干呕症状评估量表（INVR）评分、Kolcaba舒适状况量表（GCQ）评分以及呕吐症状严重程度，术后开展为期1年远期随访，对比两组患者生存情况。采用χ²检验、t检验。结果　术后6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h，治疗组呕吐频率［3.17%（2/63）、4.76%（3/63）、3.17%（2/63）、0.00%（0/63）］及INVR评分［（20.25±5.41）分、（17.24±3.31）分、（15.25±2.33）分、（13.11±1.25）分］均低于常规组［16.13%（10/62）、17.74%（11/62）、14.52%（9/62）、8.06%（5/62）及（23.58±5.86）分、（20.55±3.81）分、（16.83±2.88）分、（14.92±1.86）分］，GCQ评分［（73.85±5.83）分、（75.72±3.82）分、（80.75±2.81）分、（85.88±1.86）分］均高于常规组［（70.52±5.31）分、（72.41±3.16）分、（79.39±2.25）分、（81.52±1.32）分］，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。治疗组恶心呕吐比例［11.11%（7/63）］低于常规组［53.23%（33/62）］，差异有统计学意义（χ²=25.470，P<0.001）。随访期间，治疗组功能状态（KPS）评分［（73.35±5.17）分］、生活质量（QOL）评分［（43.71±5.85）分］均高于常规组［（70.66±5.28）分、（40.25±5.62）分］，体力状况（ZPS）评分［（2.55±0.33）分］低于常规组［（2.92±0.85）分］，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论　在肺癌根治术麻醉诱导前采用多拉司琼进行预处理可有效降低术后恶心呕吐发生风险，对促进患者术后相关症状改善、提升患者舒适度及远期生存质量均有积极作用，其作用机制体现在对中枢、外周迷走神经递质受体阻断方面。

关键词:

肺癌根治术, 术后恶心呕吐, 多拉司琼, 防治效果, 生存质量

Abstract:

Objective　To observe the effect of dolasetron in the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting after radical resection of lung cancer and explore its mechanism. Methods　It was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 125 patients with lung cancer who received radical surgery in The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City from May 2019 to August 2021 were selected as subjects, and were randomly divided into a treatment group (63 cases) and a conventional group (62 cases) by drawing lots. In the treatment group, 40 males and 23 females, aged (55.25±5.15) years, were treated with dolasetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. In the conventional group, 42 males and 20 females, aged (55.46±5.23) years, were treated with conventional antiemetic measures. The frequencies of vomiting, Index of Nausea and Vomiting and Retching (INVR) scores, and Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) scores 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, and severity of vomiting symptoms were compared between the two groups. Long-term follow-up was conducted for 1 year after surgery to compare the survival of the two groups. χ² test and t test were used. Results　Six, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, the frequencies of vomiting [3.17% (2/63), 4.76% (3/63), 3.17% (2/63), and 0.00% (0/63)] and INVR scores [(20.25±5.41) points, (17.24±3.31) points, (15.25±2.33) points, and (13.11±1.25) points] in the treatment group were lower than that in the conventional group [16.13% (10/62), 17.74% (11/62), 14.52% (9/62), 8.06% (5/62), (23.58±5.86) points, (20.55±3.81) points, (16.83±2.88) points, and (14.92±1.86) points], while the GCQ scores [(73.85±5.83) points, (75.72±3.82) points, (80.75±2.81) points, and (85.88±1.86) points] were higher than those in the conventional group [(70.52±5.31) points, (72.41±3.16) points, (79.39±2.25) points, and (81.52±1.32) points], with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The rate of nausea and vomiting in the treatment group was lower than that in the conventional group [11.11% (7/63) vs. 53.23% (33/62)], with a statistically significant difference (χ²=25.470, P<0.001). During the follow-up period, the KPS score [(73.35±5.17) points] and QOL score [(43.71±5.85) points] in the treatment group were higher than those in the conventional group [(70.66±5.28) points and (40.25±5.62) points], while the ZPS score [(2.55±0.33) points] was lower than that of the conventional group [(2.92±0.85) points], with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Conclusions　Using dolasetron to pretreat lung cancer patients before anesthesia induction during radical surgery can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and has a positive effect on improving postoperative symptoms and improving patients' comfort and long-term quality of life. The mechanism of action is reflected in the central and peripheral vagal neurotransmitter receptor blocking.

Key words:

Radical resection of lung cancer, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Dolasetron, Control effect, Quality of life

刘运慧杨秋敏林春丽.

多拉司琼对肺癌根治术后恶心呕吐的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(7): 940-943.

Liu Yunhui, Yang Qiumin, Lin Chunli.

Effect of dolasetron in the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting after radical resection of lung cancer [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(7): 940-943.

参考文献

[1] Nakai A, Nakada T, Okamoto S, et al. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting after thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection: pitfalls of an increased fentanyl dose[J].J Thorac Dis,2021,13(6):3489-3496.DOI:10.21037/jtd-21-296.
[2] 陈乙婕,费毅,陈献珊,等. 肺癌根治术后并发症危险因素分析及其生活质量变化研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2021,21(17):3315-3319,3345.DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2021.17.025.
[3] 陈锋,庞增粉,张千坤,等. 吴茱萸穴位贴敷联合热敷在预防肺癌术后患者恶心呕吐中的应用效果[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(14):4-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021. 14.002.
[4] 黄华. 多拉司琼联合小剂量地塞米松预防术后恶心呕吐的临床研究[J]. 中国医药指南,2020,18(3):13.DOI:10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2020.03.011.
[5] 宁晔,谢冬,佘云浪,等. 2020版NCCN肺癌筛查指南解读[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2020,27(3):251-254.DOI:10.7507/1007-4848.201912038.
[6] Juartika W, Harmi PK, Fatmadona R. Gambaran Skor INVR (Index of Nausea, Vomiting and Retching) pada CINV (Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting) Kanker Payudara di RSUP M Djamil Padang[J]. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas,2020,8(4):209-211.DOI:10.25077/jka.v8i4.1142.
[7] 刘茹,杨艳明,樊丽萍. 红外线局部照射对肺癌癌性疼痛患者疼痛介质及Kolcaba舒适度评分的影响[J]. 安徽医学,2022,43(8):945-948.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399. 2022.08.017.
[8] 贾雅丽,单彬彬,石樱桃,等. 晚期肺癌患者生命质量及其影响因素分析[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床,2020,32(11):786-789.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20200326-00156.
[9] 潘锋. 降低肺癌发病率和死亡率需要综合管理 ——访北京协和医院胸外科主任李单青教授[J]. 中国医药导报,2021,18(20):1-3.
[10] 赵梓佳,陈碧贤,赵丹,等. 腹腔镜术后恶心呕吐预防和管理的循证护理实践[J]. 循证护理,2022,8(16):2174-2180.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.2095-8668.2022.16.008.
[11] 潘丽娜. 多药联合预防肺癌术后辅助化学治疗中恶心呕吐的临床效果观察[J]. 实用医技杂志,2021,28(5):652-654. DOI:10.19522/j.cnki.1671-5098.2021.05.035.
[12] Barnes J. Postoperative nausea and vomiting[J].Br J Hosp Med (Lond),2020,81(6):1-3.DOI:10.12968/hmed.2019. 0249.
[13] 高健,徐细明,陈嘉羽. 阿瑞匹坦联合地塞米松及多拉司琼治疗肺小细胞癌EP方案化疗致恶心呕吐的效果[J]. 中国医药导报,2021,18(5):88-92,108.
[14] 陶婷,齐龙华. 多拉司琼对胃肠手术后患者恶心呕吐的预防效果观察[J]. 医学理论与实践,2020,33(1):89-90.DOI:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2020.01.045.
[15] 何盈蓉,许陶,余静娟,等. 中医技术护理在缓解肺癌化疗期间患者恶心呕吐反应中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(3):92-94. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2022.03.028.
[16] 黄怀焕. 甲磺酸多拉司琼与盐酸格拉司琼预防化疗性呕吐的临床对比研究[J]. 临床医学工程,2021,28(2):203-204.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2021.02.0203.
[17] 王静,吴开花,李立波,等. 多拉司琼对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后恶心呕吐的预防和疗效观察[J/CD]. 临床检验杂志(电子版),2017,6(4):772-773.
[18] 赵军博,姜丽华,杨波. 多拉司琼与托烷司琼用于预防子宫收缩剂引发的剖宫产产妇恶心呕吐的效果比较[J]. 数理医药学杂志,2020,33(7):1013-1015. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4337.2020.07.030.
[19] 白圆圆. 盐酸纳美芬联合多拉司琼预防老年下肢骨折手术椎管内麻醉前镇痛诱发恶心呕吐的临床观察[J]. 吉林医学,2022,43(1):196-198. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0412. 2022.01.076.
[20] 秦榕,苏纲,张宇,等. 右美托咪定联合甲磺酸多拉司琼对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者血浆胃动素及术后恶心呕吐的影响[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2023,44(2):156-160. DOI:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230215.

多拉司琼对肺癌根治术后恶心呕吐的效果

Effect of dolasetron in the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting after radical resection of lung cancer

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics