基于互联网平台的5A护理模式在妊娠糖尿病患者中的应用效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.04.035

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探究基于互联网平台的5A护理模式在妊娠糖尿病（GDM）患者中的应用效果。方法　选取2019年7月至2022年2月在滨州市中心医院进行产检的115例GDM患者进行前瞻性研究，采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和研究组。对照组58例，年龄22～33岁，予以临床常规护理干预；研究组57例，年龄22～35岁，予以常规护理增加基于互联网平台的5A护理模式干预。比较两组患者血糖［空腹血糖（FBG）、糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）］控制情况、自我效能感［糖尿病管理自我效能量表（DMSES）、一般自我效能感量表（GSES）］、心理状态［妊娠相关焦虑量表（PAQ）、焦虑自评量表（SAS）、抑郁自评量表（SDS）］、自我管理能力［改良版糖尿病自我管理行为量表（SDSCA）］及妊娠结局情况。统计学方法采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　护理后，研究组FBG、HbA1c水平均低于对照组［（5.11±1.02）mmol/L比（5.62±1.12）mmol/L、（5.21±1.04）%比（5.74±1.15）%］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.55、2.59，均P<0.05）；研究组DMSES、GSES评分均高于对照组［（168.47±18.72）分比（154.32±17.15）分、（35.27±3.92）分比（31.48±3.51）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=4.23、5.46，均P<0.05）；研究组PAQ、SAS、SDS评分均低于对照组［（18.51±3.70）分比（21.42±4.28）分、（41.32±6.88）分比（45.51±7.58）分、（42.33±7.05）分比（45.62±7.61）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.90、3.10、2.40，均P<0.05）；研究组SDSCA中饮食、运动、血糖监测、足部护理评分均高于对照组［（22.15±3.69）分比（20.41±3.40）分、（10.87±2.17）分比（9.43±1.89）分、（11.12±2.22）分比（10.21±2.04）分、（11.45±2.29）分比（10.31±2.06）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.63、3.80、2.29、2.81，均P<0.05）。研究组羊水过多、巨大儿发生率均低于对照组［5.26%（3/57）比18.97%（11/58）、7.02%（4/57）比24.13%（14/58）］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=5.05、6.38，均P<0.05）。结论　对GDM患者应用基于互联网平台的5A护理模式干预，孕期血糖水平得到明显控制，且自我效能感、心理状态及自我管理能力均有改善，有较好妊娠结局。

关键词:

妊娠糖尿病, 孕妇, 5A护理模式, 互联网平台, 自我管理

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the application effect of 5A nursing model based on Internet platform in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods　A total of one hundred and fifteen pregnant women with GDM who underwent birth examination in Binzhou Central Hospital between July 2019 and February 2022 were prospectively selected as subjects in this study, and were divided into control and study groups by the random number table method. Fifty-eight patients in the control group, aged 22-33 years, were given clinical routine care intervention, and 57 patients in the study group, aged 22-35 years, were given 5A nursing model based on Internet platform based on routine care. The control of blood glucose [fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)], self-efficacy [Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES) and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)], psychological status [Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Questionnaire (PAQ), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS)], self-management ability [modified version of Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities (SDSCA)], and pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared. Statistical methods used were t test and χ² test. Results　After nursing, the levels of FBG and HbA1c in the study group were lower than those in the control group [(5.11±1.02) mmol/L vs. (5.62±1.12) mmol/L, (5.21±1.04)% vs. (5.74±1.15)%], with statistically significant differences (t=2.55 and 2.59, both P<0.05). The DMSES and GSES scores of the study group were higher than those of the control group [(168.47±18.72) points vs. (154.32±17.15) points, (35.27±3.92) points vs. (31.48±3.51) points], with statistically significant differences (t=4.23 and 5.46, both P<0.05). The scores of PAQ, SAS, and SDS in the study group were lower than those in the control group [(18.51±3.70) points vs. (21.42±4.28) points, (41.32±6.88) points vs. (45.51±7.58) points, (42.33±7.05) points vs. (45.62±7.61) points], with statistically significant differences (t=3.90, 3.10, and 2.40, all P<0.05). The scores of diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care of the SDSCA in the study group were higher than those in the control group [(22.15±3.69) points vs. (20.41±3.40) points, (10.87±2.17) points vs. (9.43±1.89) points, (11.12±2.22) points vs. (10.21±2.04) points, (11.45±2.29) points vs. (10.31±2.06) points], with statistically significant differences (t=2.63, 3.80, 2.29, and 2.81, all P<0.05). The incidences of polyhydramnios and macrosomia in the study group were lower than those in the control group [5.26% (3/57) vs. 18.97% (11/58), 7.02% (4/57) vs. 24.13% (14/58)], with statistically significant differences (χ²=5.05 and 6.38, both P<0.05). Conclusion　The 5A nursing model intervention based on Internet platform was applied to GDM patients, the blood glucose level during pregnancy was obviously controlled, and the self-efficacy, psychological status, and self-management ability were significantly improved, with good pregnancy outcomes.

Key words:

Gestational diabetes mellitus, Pregnant woman, 5A nursing model, Internet platform, Self-management

刘玉芹李宁石凡英寇明捷樊学英.

基于互联网平台的5A护理模式在妊娠糖尿病患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 682-687.

Liu Yuqin, Li Ning, Shi Fanying, Kou Mingjie, Fan Xueying.

Application effect of 5A nursing model based on Internet platform in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(4): 682-687.

参考文献

[1] 马向飞,钟诚,李文,等. ADOPT模式护理干预在妊娠糖尿病患者中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志,2020,35(18):29-32. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.18.029.
[2] 邹玉姣,魏丽丽,张艳,等. 妊娠糖尿病高危孕妇基于跨理论模型的护理干预[J]. 护理学杂志,2022,37(4):20-23. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.04.020.
[3] Meloncelli N, Barnett A, de Jersey S. An implementation science approach for developing and implementing a dietitian-led model of care for gestational diabetes: a pre-post study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020 ,20(1):661. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03352-6.
[4] Basu A, Feng D, Planinic P, et al. Dietary blueberry and soluble fiber supplementation reduces risk of gestational diabetes in women with obesity in a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Nutr, 2021 ,151(5):1128-1138. DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa435.
[5] 吴凤金,李全颖,李妹,等. 互联网依托式自我管理导向型5A护理模式对维持性血透患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(7):52-54. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2019. 07.016.
[6] 陈洁,孟庆童,麦爱欢,等. 基于5A策略的延续护理对急性心肌梗死患者出院后自我管理能力的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(11):1644-1647. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn. 1007-1245.2021.11.016.
[7] 马琴,周松,余茴香,等. 移动互联网平台在骨科患者延续护理康复中应用的效果[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(24):3119-3123. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019. 24.019.
[8] 杨秋玲,孙爱莲,吕卫娜,等. 互联网+医疗管理模式对妊娠糖尿病孕妇妊娠结局的影响[J]. 河北医药,2020,42(20):3102-3105. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2020.20.014.
[9] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018,10(1):4-67. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.01.003.
[10] 中国营养学会糖尿病营养工作组. «中国2型糖尿病膳食指南»及解读[J]. 营养学报,2017,39(6):521-529. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0512-7955.2017.06.002.
[11] 唐晓梅,刘敏,夏风华. 同伴教育对妊娠糖尿病患者血糖、血红蛋白水平和自我效能的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(17):54-56. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2018. 17.017.
[12] 王才康,胡中锋,刘勇. 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007.
[13] 肖丽敏.妊娠特有焦虑问卷的编制及孕早期妊娠特有焦虑状况研究[D].合肥:安徽医科大学,2010.
[14] 佘燕芬. 孕妇操联合认知干预对妊娠糖尿病孕妇心理状态、血糖控制及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究,2018,15(18):81-82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2018. 18.036.
[15] 黎静,陈伟菊,黄东喜,等. 93例孕28周前妊娠糖尿病患者自我管理现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报,2018,25(6):37-40. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.06.037.
[16] 陈利,黄美凌,李映桃,等. 妊娠糖尿病患者基于O2O的医护志愿者联动健康教育的实施[J]. 护理学杂志,2019,34(9):80-83. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.09.080.
[17] 范婷婷,冯素文,金颖,等. 妊娠糖尿病产妇分娩的新生儿出生后24小时内血糖变化规律与护理对策[J]. 中华护理杂志,2020,55(10):1490-1496. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254- 1769.2020.10.008.
[18] Gupta S, Takkar N, Goel P. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients of gestational diabetes mellitus on metformin therapy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2019 ,69(6):490-494. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-019-01216-4.
[19] 邹玉姣,魏丽丽,王静远,等. 妊娠糖尿病高危孕妇膳食模式现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 护理研究,2022,36(9):1579-1583. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2022.09.013.
[20] Anastasiou E, Farmakidis G, Gerede A, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on diabetes mellitus and pregnancy: Ⅱ. Gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Hormones (Athens), 2020 ,19(4):601-607. DOI: 10.1007/s42000-020-00193-y.
[21] Rosik J, Szostak B, Machaj F, et al. The role of genetics and epigenetics in the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Ann Hum Genet, 2020 ,84(2):114-124. DOI: 10.1111/ahg.12356.
[22] He M, Tong L, Zou Y, et al. Effect of 5A nursing mode combined with fine nursing management on perioperative self-efficacy and living quality of hysteromyoma[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021 ,13(9):10737- 10743.
[23] Zhang X, Lai M, Wu D, et al. The effect of 5A nursing intervention on living quality and self-care efficacy of patients undergoing chemotherapy after hepatocellular carcinoma surgery[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021 ,13(6):6638-6645.
[24] 吴杏尧,曹慧娇,刘明慧,等. 互联网平台下护理服务对新发肿瘤患者自我效能及依从性的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2022,28(28):3959-3963. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682- 20220614-02854.
[25] 龚红霞,张琳. 互联网+线上个体化营养干预对妊娠糖尿病孕妇妊娠结局的改善作用[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(16):2939-2942. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020. 16.002.
[26] 刘小琳,傅玲,刘雅琴. 以自我管理为导向的5A护理模式对妊娠糖尿病患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(15):1-4. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2020.15.001.
[27] 度娟,马慧珍,窦丽亚. "互联网+"下自我管理为导向的5A护理模式对2型糖尿病患者生活质量的影响[J]. 中国数字医学,2020,15(2):124-126. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7571. 2020.02.043.
[28] 张文琪,李敏. 基于互联网平台的同伴支持教育对妊娠糖尿病合并生殖道感染病人妊娠结局的影响[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报,2022,47(11):1597-1601. DOI:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2022.11.030.