坐式八段锦对AECOPD气管插管患者撤机的应用研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.14.022

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (14): 2018-2021.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.14.022

• 专题：慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的护理干预 • 上一篇下一篇

坐式八段锦对AECOPD气管插管患者撤机的应用研究

陈洁雅石海霞何薇

广州医科大学附属第一医院广州呼吸健康研究院，广州　510120

收稿日期:2023-02-13 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-07-31
通讯作者: 陈洁雅，Email： yayalychen@163.com
基金资助:
广东省中医药局科研项目（20202114）

Application of sitting Baduanjin in ventilator withdrawal of patients with AECOPD taking endotracheal intubation

Chen Jieya, Shi Haixia, He Wei

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Respiratory Health Research Institute, Guangzhou 510120, China

Received:2023-02-13 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-07-31
Contact: Chen Jieya, Email: yayalychen@163.com
Supported by:
Scientific Research Project of Guangdong Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine (20202114)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨坐式八段锦对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）气管插管患者撤机的应用效果。方法　本研究为前瞻性对照研究，选择2021年6月至2022年5月在广州医科大学附属第一医院住院治疗的AECOPD患者80例，通过随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组。排除在干预过程中由于自身原因退出研究的患者，最终观察组37例，对照组38例。对照组女12例、男26例，年龄（68.76±14.86）岁，采用常规的气管插管护理；观察组女12例、男25例，年龄（64.97±13.42）岁，在观察组基础上采用坐式八段锦进行干预。收集并比较两组患者在撤机相关指标和舒适度方面的差异。统计学方法采用χ²检验、秩和检验、t检验。结果　观察组患者机械通气时间、住院天数均少于对照组［（7.84±2.82）d比（9.18±2.60）d、（16.32±4.08）d比（19.37±3.64）d］，差异均有统计学意义（t=-2.147、-3.404，均P<0.05）；观察组无不适、轻度不适、中度不适、重度不适情况均优于对照组［3例（8.1%）比1例（2.6%）、14例（37.8%）比6例（15.8%）、18例（48.6%）比23例（60.5%）、2例（5.4%）比8例（21.1%）］，两组舒适度差异有统计学意义（Z=-2.870，P<0.05）。结论　坐式八段锦有利于缩短AECOPD气管插管患者机械通气时间和住院天数，提升患者插管舒适度。

关键词:

慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期, 经口气管插管, 坐式八段锦, 呼吸机

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effect applying sitting Baduanjin in the ventilator withdrawal of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) taking endotracheal intubation. Methods　This study was a prospective controlled study. Eighty patients with AECOPD taking endotracheal intubation at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from June 2021 to May 2022 were divided into an observation group and a control group by the random number table method. The patients dropped out of the study because of their own reasons during the intervention were excluded; at last, there were 37 cases in the observation group and 38 cases in the control group. There were 12 females and 26 males in the control group; they were (68.76±14.86) years old. There were 12 females and 25 males in the observation group; they were (64.97±13.42) years old. The control group took routine tracheal intubation nursing; in addition, the observation group were intervened by sitting Baduanjin. The ventilator withdrawal indicators and comfort degrees were compared between the two groups. χ², rank sum, and t tests were applied. Results　The mechanical ventilation time and hospitalization days in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(7.84±2.82) d vs. (9.18±2.60) d and (16.32±4.08) d vs. (19.37±3.64) d], with statistical difference (t=-2.147 and -3.404; both P<0.05). The numbers of cases of no discomfort, mild discomfort, moderate discomfort, and severe discomfort in the observation group were better than those in the control group [3 (8.1%) vs. 1 (2.6%), 14 (37.8%) vs. 6 (15.8%), 18 (48.6%) vs. 23 (60.5%), 2 (5.4%) vs. 8 (21.1%)], with a statistical difference (Z=-2.870, P<0.05). Conclusion　Sitting Baduanjin is conducive to shorten the mechanical ventilation time and hospitalization days of patients with AECOPD taking endotracheal intubation, and can also improve the comfort of endotracheal intubation.

Key words:

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Oral endotracheal intubation, Sitting Baduanjin, Ventilator

陈洁雅石海霞何薇.

坐式八段锦对AECOPD气管插管患者撤机的应用研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(14): 2018-2021.

Chen Jieya, Shi Haixia, He Wei.

Application of sitting Baduanjin in ventilator withdrawal of patients with AECOPD taking endotracheal intubation [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(14): 2018-2021.

参考文献

[1] 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治专家组.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治中国专家共识(草案)[J/CD].中华哮喘杂志(电子版),2013,7(1):1-13.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3911.2013.01.001.
[2] 李娜,霍建民.AECOPD预后影响因素研究进展[J].临床肺科杂志,2018,23(7):1329-1333.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009- 6663.2018.07.045.
[3] 吉王琦,邓小龙.早期机械通气对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性发作合并重度呼吸衰竭患者的效果及预后的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(3):98-100.DOI:10.7619/jcmp. 201603030.
[4] 夏姗姗,丁亚平,周红琴,等.机械通气患儿呼吸道管理的研究进展[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2021,2(6):553-556.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.2096-7446.2021.06.014.
[5] 邓艳芳,陈锦秀.八段锦单举式对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者康复效果的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2015,50(12):1458-1463.DOI:10376/j.issn.0254-1796.2015.12.009.
[6] 薛广伟,冯淬灵,姚小芹,等.健身气功八段锦在慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期肺康复中的疗效评价[J].北京中医药大学学报,2015,38(2):139-144.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157. 2015.02.015.
[7] 李涛,胡蓉,陈子,等.八段锦治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的价值及其应用[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2018,40(2):158-160.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2018.02.022.
[8] 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治专家组.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)诊治中国专家共识(2017年更新版)[J].国际呼吸杂志,2017,37(14):1041-1057.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673- 436X. 2017.14.001.
[9] 陈名桂.坐式八段锦对脓毒症机械通气患者早期康复的临床研究[D].广东:广州中医药大学,2019.
[10] 朱正刚,陈燕.坐式八段锦锻炼对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者活动耐力和生活质量的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(9):2265-2266.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2016.09.104.
[11] 陈怡雷,李霞,程念开,等.护士主导的坐式八段锦在急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(19):35-37.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256. 2021.19.010.
[12] 唐静萍,皮红英.ICU清醒患者气管插管期间舒适感受访谈分析[J].军医进修学院学报,2012,33(4):379-381.
[13] 李莉.基于eCASH理念的镇静、镇痛护理在ICU机械通气病人中的应用[J].护理研究,2021,35(16):2895-2899.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.16.014.

坐式八段锦对AECOPD气管插管患者撤机的应用研究

Application of sitting Baduanjin in ventilator withdrawal of patients with AECOPD taking endotracheal intubation

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics