银离子抗菌功能性敷料联合NPWT治疗慢性感染性创面的效果分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.14.010

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (14): 1967-1971.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.14.010

银离子抗菌功能性敷料联合NPWT治疗慢性感染性创面的效果分析

吴石兵¹ 孟庆叶¹ 陈婷¹ 郭峰²

¹南京中医药大学连云港附属医院烧伤外科，连云港　222004；²上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院整形外科，上海　200233

收稿日期:2023-02-23 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-07-31
通讯作者: 郭峰，Email：guofengburn_aliyun@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（81772078）

Effect of silver ion antibacterial functional dressing combined with NPWT for patients with chronic infectious wounds

Wu Shibing¹, Meng Qingye¹, Chen Ting¹, Guo Feng²

¹Burn Department, Lianyungang Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lianyungang 222004, China; ²Department of Plastic Surgery, Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China

Received:2023-02-23 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-07-31
Contact: Guo Feng, Email: guofengburn_aliyun@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation (81772078)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　研究分析慢性感染性创面患者应用银离子抗菌功能性敷料联合负压创面治疗技术（NPWT）治疗的临床效果。方法　选取2017年10月至2022年10月在南京中医药大学连云港附属医院治疗的慢性感染性创面患者114例为研究对象，根据随机抽签法将患者分为对照组与研究组，每组57例。对照组中，女27例，男30例，年龄（57.12±3.76）岁，病程（30.24±4.52）d，给予NPWT治疗；研究组中，女26例，男31例，年龄（56.85±3.91）岁，病程（30.01±4.29）d，给予NPWT与银离子抗菌功能性敷料联合治疗。观察两组患者临床疗效、炎性因子［超敏-C反应蛋白（hs-CRP）、降钙素原（PCT）、纤维蛋白原（FIB）］水平、换药次数、创面愈合时间、疼痛程度、创面闭合指数，采用χ²、t检验对两组观察数据进行统计分析。结果　研究组临床总有效率为98.25%（56/57），对照组为85.96%（49/57），差异有统计学意义（χ²=4.343，P<0.05）。治疗后，研究组hs-CRP、PCT、FIB分别为（8.41±0.85）mg/L、（0.33±0.10）μg/L、（3.94±0.61）g/L，均低于对照组［（9.25±0.89）mg/L、（0.40±0.11）μg/L、（4.42±0.66）g/L］，差异均有统计学意义（t=5.153、3.555、4.032，均P<0.05）。研究组换药次数（9.78±3.54）次，创面愈合时间（19.43±5.13）d，疼痛程度（3.89±1.34）分，对照组分别为（15.34±4.34）次、（25.67±5.51）d、（4.76±1.51）分，两组比较差异均有统计学意义（t=7.495、6.258、3.254，均P<0.05）。研究组治疗7 d、14 d、21 d、28 d后创面闭合指数分别为（39.54±4.46）分、（56.34±3.74）分、（80.24±5.85）分、（96.03±3.24）分，均高于对照组［（36.40±4.38）分、（54.25±3.35）分、（70.46±5.18）分、（87.65±4.32）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.792、3.143、9.450、11.716，均P<0.05）。结论　慢性感染性创面患者应用银离子抗菌功能性敷料联合NPWT治疗的效果更确切，能够进一步减轻患者炎性反应、疼痛程度，减少换药次数，加快创面愈合，值得临床应用与推广。

关键词:

慢性创面, 感染, 银离子抗菌功能性敷料, 负压创面治疗技术, 临床疗效

Abstract:

Objective　To study and analyze the clinical effect of silver ion antibacterial functional dressing combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for patients with chronic infectious wounds. Methods　One hundred and fourteen patients with chronic infectious wounds who were treated in Lianyungang Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2017 to October 2022 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into a control group and a study group by lottery, with 57 cases in each group. There were 27 women and 30 men in the control group; they were (57.12±3.76) years old; their course of disease was (30.24±4.52) d. There were 26 women and 31 men in the study group; they were (56.85±3.91) years old; their course of disease was (30.01±4.29) d. The control group were treated with NPWT, and the study group with NPWT and silver ionomer antibacterial functional dressing. The clinical efficacies, levels of inflammatory factors [hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CPR), procalcitonin (PCT), and fibrinogen (FIB)], dressing change times, wound healing times, pain degrees, and wound closure indexes of the two groups were observed. The data were statistically analyzed by χ² and t tests. Results　The total clinical effective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group [98.25% (56/57) vs. 85.96% (49/57)], with a statistical difference (χ²=4.343, P<0.05). After the treatment, the levels of hs-CRP, PCT, and FIB in the study group were lower than those in the control group [(8.41±0.85) mg/L vs. (9.25±0.89) mg/L, (0.33±0.10) μg/L vs. (0.40±0.11) μg/L, and (3.94±0.61)g/L vs. (4.42±0.66) g/L], with statistical differences (t=5.153, 3.555, and 4.032; P<0.05). The dressing change times, wound healing time, and pain degree in the study group were lower than those in the control group [(9.78±3.54) times vs. (15.34±4.34) times, (19.43±5.13)d vs. (25.67±5.51)d, and (3.89±1.34) vs. (4.76±1.51)], with statistical differences (t=7.495, 6.258, and 3.254; P<0.05). The wound closure indexes 7, 14, 21, and 28 d after the treatment in the study group were higher than those in the control group [(39.54±4.46) vs. (36.40±4.38), (56.34±3.74) vs. (54.25±3.35), (80.24±5.85) vs. (70.46±5.18), and (96.03±3.24) vs. (87.65±4.32)], with statistical differences (t=3.792, 3.143, 9.450, and 11.716; P<0.05). Conclusion　Silver ion antibacterial functional dressing combined with NPWT in the treatment of patients with chronic infectious wounds is effective, and can further reduce their inflammatory reaction, dressing changes, and pain degree, and accelerate their wound healing, so it is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Key words:

Chronic wounds, Infectioun, Silver ion antibacterial functional dressing, Negative pressure wound treatment technology, Clinical efficacy

吴石兵孟庆叶陈婷郭峰.

银离子抗菌功能性敷料联合NPWT治疗慢性感染性创面的效果分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(14): 1967-1971.

Wu Shibing, Meng Qingye, Chen Ting, Guo Feng.

Effect of silver ion antibacterial functional dressing combined with NPWT for patients with chronic infectious wounds [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(14): 1967-1971.

参考文献

[1] Clinton A, Carter T. Chronic wound biofilms: pathogenesis and potential therapies[J]. Lab Med, 2015,46(4):277-284. DOI: 10.1309/LMBNSWKUI4JPN7SO.
[2] 黄幼玲,李宁静,张莎,等. 皮肤牵张器联合创面负压治疗技术应用于慢性创面的疗效研究[J]. 华南国防医学杂志,2022,36(6):436-439. DOI:10.13730/j.issn.1009-2595. 2022.06.006.
[3] 付丹妹,孙诚,陈建民. 负压创面治疗联合富血小板血浆治疗慢性难愈性创面的研究进展[J]. 医学研究生学报,2022,35(2):196-201. DOI:10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199. 2022.02.016.
[4] 郭科委,朱勋兵,袁伶俐,等. 负压封闭引流技术联合银离子敷料治疗骨科感染性创面的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志,2022,30(2):189-192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483. 2022.02.027.
[5] 胡思科. 封闭负压引流术联合银离子冲洗治疗感染创面的实验室指标及临床分析[J]. 临床输血与检验,2019,21(2):211-214. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2019.02.029.
[6] 陈花花,陈雷,齐爱琴,等. NPWT联合银离子水凝胶敷料治疗糖尿病足溃疡疗效观察[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报,2019,44(9):1213-1216. DOI:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200. 2019.09.019.
[7] 王莎,王超. 银离子敷料在慢性难愈性创面愈合中的抗菌作用及促进创面愈合疗效[J]. 中华实验外科杂志,2021,38(12):2476-2479. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421213- 20210506- 01141.
[8] 中华医学会创伤学分会,中华医学会组织修复写再生分会.中国创面诊疗指南(2015版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2016:241-245.
[9] 陈巧红,蓝丽玲. 藻酸盐银离子敷料与凡士林纱布敷料对慢性感染伤口愈合效果的影响比较[J]. 吉林医学,2022,43(4):1120-1122. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0412.2022.04.101.
[10] Madrigal P, Moshal T, Bernabe R, et al. A comparison of negative pressure wound therapy modalities, VAC versus non-commercial NPWT alternatives: a systematic review of RCTs/CCTs[J]. J Tissue Viability, 2022,31(4):630-636. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.10.002.
[11] Park JH, Park JU. Flap monitoring with incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in diabetic foot patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2022,12(1):15684. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20088-9.
[12] 黄馥桦,陈文专,廖莉莉,等. 负压创面治疗技术治疗慢性创面效果的meta分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(1):70-74. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021.01.018.
[13] Probst S, Saini C, Skinner MB. Comparison of sterile polyacrylate wound dressing with activated carbon cloth and a standard non-adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing with silver: a randomised controlled trial protocol[J]. J Wound Care, 2019,28(11):722-728. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.11.722.
[14] Collier M, Di Santolo C, Leger P, et al. Addressing the challenges of open wounds with single-use NPWT[J]. J Wound Care, 2022,31 Sup2a:S1-S28. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup2a.S1.
[15] Malviya VK, Goyal S, Bansal V, et al. Clinical uses of NPWT with irrigation of normal saline in diabetic foot ulcer: outcome assessed by DEPA score[J]. J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 2022,15(1):58-64. DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_227_20.
[16] 李移朋,韩甜甜,陈路路. 中药灌洗负压联合银离子水凝胶敷料对糖尿病足患者创面面积的影响[J]. 中国疗养医学,2020,29(12):1338-1340. DOI:10.13517/j.cnki.ccm. 2020.12.041.
[17] 欧翰杰. 持续封闭式负压引流联合银离子敷料治疗慢性难愈性创面修复的效果分析[J]. 黑龙江医药,2020,33(2):407-409. DOI:10.14035/j.cnki.hljyy.2020.02.080.
[18] 罗瑞兴. 银离子抗菌敷料和负压封闭引流技术治疗烧伤后创面感染的效果研究[J]. 当代医药论丛,2020,18(19):65-66. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-7629.2020.19.043.
[19] 宋晓楠. 持续封闭式负压引流联合银离子敷料在慢性难愈性创面中的效果及护理[J]. 中国伤残医学,2020,28(6):81-82. DOI:10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2020.06.058.
[20] 孙艳杰,胡丹华,宁静,等. 封闭负压引流联合银离子敷料在老年患者慢性难愈性创面修复中的应用效果[J]. 中国实用医刊,2021,48(22):8-10. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115689- 20210811-02635.
[21] 唐天生,邓朝,赵强,等. 封闭负压引流技术联合银离子冲洗在治疗感染创面中的临床应用[J]. 中国社区医师,2021,37(18):50-51,54. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x. 2021.18.024.
[22] Campos D, Perez V, Merkel M, et al.EE576 potential budget impact of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus conventional wound treatment in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), surgical and trauma for selected countries in Latin America[J].Value in HealthVolume,2022,25(12):169. DOI: 10.1016/J.JVAL. 2022.09.816.

银离子抗菌功能性敷料联合NPWT治疗慢性感染性创面的效果分析

Effect of silver ion antibacterial functional dressing combined with NPWT for patients with chronic infectious wounds

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	温诗瑜温炬冯颖君李慕锦秦思. 生物制剂在银屑病中的临床应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(9): 1185-1188.
[2]	侯静静郝蕊杨秋敏. 头孢他啶注射液辅助肺癌化疗对肺部感染的防治效果分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(9): 1249-1253.
[3]	蔡栋昊灿华李晓君谭雪秋江锦鸿谭俊青. 某中医院糖尿病足感染患者伤口病原菌分布及其耐药性分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(8): 1086-1089.
[4]	曾爱华刘天福莫婉青陈奕江. 电动牙刷按摩肺俞穴在出生后感染性肺炎新生儿护理中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(5): 714-716.
[5]	陈政桑飞姜磊刘青柏. 经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折的临床疗效 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(4): 484-487.
[6]	曾丽娟徐桂彬汪慧丹谢清灵黄奕桥苏郑明. 整体护理干预对髓质海绵肾肾结石合并感染患者行经皮肾镜取石术的效果观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(3): 381-384.
[7]	顾家博王俊张春霞金黑鹰. 肛周外伤后合并肛周和背部坏死性筋膜炎1例 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(2): 269-.
[8]	麦东媚钟嘉城谭俊青. 1 852株肺炎克雷伯菌的临床分布和耐药及感染影响因素研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(15): 2110-2116.
[9]	王启飞孙明张卫平. 平均动脉压水平与EICU感染性休克患者肾功能关系的回顾性分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(14): 1974-1979.
[10]	谢聪零小妹袁宝莉王志坚任广立. 两种儿童呼吸道病原检测方法比较及炎症指标相关性研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(12): 1649-1652.
[11]	刘宁郑学燕董敏孙宝莲. 银杏叶滴丸联合缬沙坦胶囊治疗老年高血压患者的效果观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(12): 1674-1677.
[12]	梁宁李鹏张佑健王会杰李妍张洁孙明洁. 神经重症程序集束化管理对医院感染的控制效果及预后分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(12): 1719-1723.
[13]	戴小丽, 杨翌翔. 上海市松江区新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情前后呼吸道病原体抗体IgM检测分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(9): 1260-1263.
[14]	程鹏, 张晴晴, 马亚军. 膀胱癌术后尿路感染的病原菌类型及药敏分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(8): 1062-1065.
[15]	周蓓, 樊利春. 非哺乳期乳腺炎患者病原菌分布和免疫指标的相关性分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(7): 975-978.