国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (24): 3490-.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.24.018

• 医学新视窗 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同消融方式对房颤患者的治疗现状

徐倩  刁树玲   

  1. 滨州医学院附属医院心血管内科,滨州 256603

  • 收稿日期:2022-04-30 出版日期:2022-12-15 发布日期:2022-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 刁树玲,Email:diaoshuling@163.com

Treatment status of atrial fibrillation patients by different ablation methods

Xu Qian, Diao Shuling   

  1. Cardiovascular Medicine Department, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou 256603, China

  • Received:2022-04-30 Online:2022-12-15 Published:2022-12-18
  • Contact: Diao Shuling, Email: diaoshuling@163.com

摘要: 近年来随着介入技术的不断发展,心房颤动(房颤)的治疗已逐步由药物治疗转向介入治疗,尤其对于药物治疗效果差和症状持续性房颤患者,介入治疗可作为首选。目前存在的治疗房颤的导管消融方式有射频消融术、冷冻消融术、脉冲场消融等。本文旨在对不同消融方式在房颤患者中的治疗现状作一概述。

关键词: 房颤, 射频消融, 冷冻消融, 脉冲场消融

Abstract:

In recent years, with the continuous development of interventional technology, the treatment of atrial fibrillation has gradually shifted from drug therapy to interventional therapy, especially for patients with poor drug treatment effect and persistent symptoms of atrial fibrillation, interventional therapy can be the first choice. At present, there are radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and pulse field ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this review is to review the clinical application of different ablation methods in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Key words: Atrial fibrillation, Radiofrequency ablation, Cryoablation, Pulsed field ablation