显微手术夹闭治疗前循环破裂动脉瘤的预后影响因素

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.15.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨影响显微手术夹闭治疗前循环破裂动脉瘤预后的因素。方法　回顾性选取2018年1月至2023年6月揭阳市人民医院收治的80例前循环破裂动脉瘤患者，男38例、女42例，年龄（53.28±2.81）岁，入院至手术时间（1.96±0.52）d，临床表现：剧烈头痛48例，轻度头痛31例，意识障碍26例。所有患者均行显微手术夹闭治疗，根据预后分为预后良好组与预后不良组，术后随访6个月，分析其临床资料，应用格拉斯哥预后量表（GOS）对患者预后进行评估，采用χ²检验，以logistic回归方程分析影响预后的相关因素。结果　80例患者均随访成功，其中预后良好59例（73.75%），预后不良21例（26.25%）；两组年龄、性别、动脉瘤长径、手术时间、出血次数、入院至手术时间比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；logistic分析结果显示，术前Hunt-Hess分级、格拉斯哥昏迷量表（GCS）评分、术后脑血管并发症、术后颅内感染、Fisher分级为影响前循环破裂动脉瘤患者预后的危险因素（均P<0.05）。结论　影响显微手术夹闭治疗前循环破裂动脉瘤患者预后的因素较多，主要与术前Hunt-Hess分级、GCS评分、术后颅内感染等密切相关。

关键词:

前循环破裂动脉瘤, 显微手术夹闭, 预后, 影响因素

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the factors affecting the prognosis of patients with anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms treated by microsurgical clamping. Methods　Eighty patients with anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms admitted to Jieyang People^,s Hospital from January 2018 to June 2023 were selected, including 38 males and 42 females. They were (53.28±2.81) years old. The time from admission to surgery was (1.96±0.52) days. Clinical manifestations: 48 cases had severe headache, 31 cases mild headache, and 26 cases consciousness disorders. All the patients were treated by microsurgical clamping. They were followed up for 6 months after the surgery. The patients were divided to a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group according to their prognosis. Their clinical data were analyzed. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to evaluate their prognosis. The logistic regression equations were used to analyze the relevant factors affecting their prognosis. Results　All the 80 patients were successfully followed up, including 59 cases (73.75%) with good prognosis and 21 cases (26.25%) with poor prognosis. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in age, gender, aneurysm diameter, operation time, number of bleedings, and time from admission to operation (all P>0.05); there were statistical differences in the rest factors between the two groups (all P<0.05). The logistic analysis results showed that preoperative Hunt-Hess classification, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, postoperative cerebrovascular complications, postoperative intracranial infection, and Fisher classification were risk factors affecting the patients' prognosis (all P<0.05). Conclusion　There are many factors affecting the prognosis of patients with anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms. Their prognosis is mainly closely related to preoperative Hunt-Hess grading, GCS score, postoperative intracranial infection, etc.

Key words:

Anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms, Microsurgical clamping, Prognosis, Influencing factors

陈泽鑫王育胜林楚纯蔡跃豪袁军.

显微手术夹闭治疗前循环破裂动脉瘤的预后影响因素 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(15): 2506-2510.

Chen Zexin, Wang Yusheng, Lin Chuchun, Cai Yuehao, Yuan Jun.

Prognostic factors of anterior circulation ruptured aneurysms treated by microsurgical clamping [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(15): 2506-2510.

参考文献

[1] Yang Y, Wang B, Ge X, et al. Natural course of ruptured but untreated intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter 2-year follow-up study[J]. Stroke, 2023,54(8):2087-2095. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042530.
[2] 中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会,中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组. 中国颅内破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2021,18(8):546-574. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1672-5921.2021.08.007.
[3] 王二威,董津鹏,李创忠,等. 不同方式治疗前循环破裂动脉瘤临床疗效及预后不良危险因素分析[J]. 临床军医杂志,2021,49(4):460-462. DOI:10.16680/j.1671-3826. 2021.04.40.
[4] 刘峥,黄银兴,魏梁锋,等. 显微手术夹闭与血管内治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的疗效分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2021,37(8):805-809. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20210125- 00053.
[5] Gunnarut I, Sahasoonthorn K.Subarachnoid hemorrhage: the incidence and correlation of CT pattern and the location of cerebral aneurysm[J].J Med Assoc Thai, 2021.DOI:10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.01.11431.
[6] 中国医师协会神经外科医师分会神经重症专家委员会,中华医学会神经外科学分会脑血管病学组,中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会,等. 重症动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血管理专家共识(2023)[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2023,20(2):126-144,封3. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921. 2023.02.009.
[7] Entezami P, Dalfino JC, Boulos AS, et al. Use of intravenous cangrelor in the treatment of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms: an updated single-center analysis and pooled analysis of current studies[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2023,15(7):669-673. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg- 2022-018986.
[8] Urasyanandana K, Withayasuk P, Songsaeng D, et al. Ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: an evaluation of prognostic factors of treatment outcome[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2017,23(3):240-248. DOI: 10.1177/1591019917691252.
[9] Chen J, Li M, Zhu X, et al. Anterior communicating artery aneurysms: anatomical considerations and microsurgical strategies[J]. Front Neurol, 2020,11:1020. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01020.
[10] Zhao J, Lin H, Summers R, et a. Current treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysms: an overview[J]. Angiology, 2018,69(1):17-30. DOI: 10.1177/0003319717700503.
[11] 沈育. 外科手术夹闭治疗已破裂前循环动脉瘤患者预后影响因素分析[J]. 新乡医学院学报,2017,34(4):310-312. DOI:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.04.017.
[12] Goertz L, Hamisch C, Telentschak S, et al. Impact of aneurysm shape on intraoperative rupture during clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018,118: e806-e812. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.058.
[13] 王涛,陈节,文立利,等. 不同方式治疗破裂动脉瘤的临床疗效及预后不良危险因素分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2022,21(18):1974-1978. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695. 2022.18.020.
[14] 吕斌,王君,杜志华,等. 80岁以上高龄颅内动脉瘤破裂患者神经介入治疗体会[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2021,23(6):625-628. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126. 2021.06.018.
[15] 吴珂,杨晓滨,李德康,等. 早期不同时机显微夹闭手术治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 生物医学工程与临床,2021,25(6):702-708. DOI:10.13339/j.cnki.sglc. 20211022.009.
[16] 张昌伟,王朝华,徐丁. 老年颅内破裂性动脉瘤介入术后继发脑血管痉挛危险因素分析及防治对策[J]. 临床误诊误治,2017,30(7):70-75. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429. 2017.07.022.
[17] 程魏,张杰,宋照明,等. 未破裂颅内动脉瘤接受开颅夹闭和血管内介入治疗的预后危险因素分析[J]. 临床神经外科杂志,2022,19(3):278-283,288. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1672-7770.2022.03.008.
[18] 费文静,陈阳,石丹,等. 76例Hunt-Hess分级Ⅳ-Ⅴ级颅内动脉瘤破裂急性期的管理经验[J]. 临床神经外科杂志,2022,19(2):202-205,209. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7770. 2022.02.016.
[19] 孙振武,谢满意,王强,等. 开颅动脉瘤夹闭术治疗老年颅内破裂动脉瘤预后不良因素分析[J]. 局解手术学杂志,2021,30(4):316-320. DOI:10.11659/jjssx.10E020063.
[20] 包庆泉,张小兵,黄超,等. 破裂颅内动脉瘤介入治疗的预后因素分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2020,30(6):85-89. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2020.06.016.
[21] 徐苑源,李建明,沈洪波. Hunt-Hess分级Ⅲ～Ⅳ级颅内动脉瘤的手术时机选择及预后分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,23(6):410-412. DOI:10.13798/j.issn.1009- 153X. 2018.06.009.
[22] 朱媛萍. 颅内动脉瘤破裂老年病人介入治疗预后危险因素分析[J]. 护理研究,2021,35(4):740-742. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.04.039.
[23] 中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会,中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组. 颅内动脉瘤影像学判读专家共识[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2021,18(7):492-504. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1672-5921.2021.07.011.
[24] 梁建乐,冯飞,袁知东.头颈部血管病变诊断中64排螺旋CT血管成像技术与磁共振成像技术的应用分析[J].影像研究与医学应用,2021,5(5):79-80.DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 2096-3807.2021.05.038.
[25] Nawata K. An Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting Cerebrovascular Disease[J].Health (English), 2022, 15(8):14-15.
[26] 郭立梅. 颅内动脉瘤术后合并颅内感染的病原菌分布和危险因素分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(16):2619-2622. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2021.16.049.
[27] 任楠,李耀妍,王璐. 脑动脉瘤患者夹闭术后颅内感染的病原菌及危险因素[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2024,34(9):1349-1352. DOI:10.11816/cn.ni.2024-231425.
[28] 黄蔚文,赵岳峰. 血管内介入栓塞术治疗前循环破裂颅内动脉瘤临床疗效及预后危险因素分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2020,49(4):446-449,457. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377. 2020.04.015.
[29] 彭怀玉,孙继虎,刘顺帆,等. 血管内介入栓塞治疗老年颅内动脉瘤的疗效评价及影响预后的相关因素分析[J]. 中国药物与临床,2020,20(19):3284-3286. DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2020.19.055.
[30] 苏俊,黄豪,辛元君,等. 颅内动脉瘤夹闭术后迟发性脑梗死危险因素分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2021,43(7):635-639. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.202011256.