基于双相交流的健康宣教干预在ERCP患者围手术期护理中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.04.032

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨基于双相交流的健康宣教干预在经内镜逆行胆胰管成像（ERCP）患者围手术期护理中的应用效果。方法　选取2021年5月至2023年5月期间北京大学深圳医院收治的460例ERCP患者进行随机对照试验，通过随机数字表法将患者分为对照组与观察组，各230例。对照组男110例，女120例，年龄（52.49±6.27）岁，采用常规干预。观察组男115例，女115例，年龄（51.53±6.29）岁，采用基于双相交流的健康宣教干预。比较两组负性情绪评分、疾病知识掌握度与术后并发症发生情况。统计学方法采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　观察组干预后的焦虑自评量表（SAS）和抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分均低于对照组［（6.74±1.04）分比（8.37±1.03）分、（6.37±1.04）分比（8.69±1.18）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=16.889、22.369，均P<0.05）。观察组干预后疾病知识、心理咨询、药物指导、饮食运动掌握度均高于对照组［95.22%（219/230）比67.39%（155/230）、90.00%（207/230）比70.43%（162/230）、85.22%（196/230）比63.91%（147/230）、90.00%（207/230）比72.17%（166/230）］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=58.579、27.741、27.521、23.829，均P<0.05）。观察组患者的总并发症发生率低于对照组［3.04%（7/230）比12.17%（28/230）］，差异有统计学意义（χ²=13.638，P<0.05）。结论　基于双相交流的健康宣教应用于ERCP患者，具有缓解负性情绪、提高疾病知识掌握度、降低并发症发生率等优点，值得推广。

关键词:

经内镜逆行胆胰管成像, 围手术期, 双相交流, 健康宣教

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the application of health education intervention based on biphasic communication in perioperative nursing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) patients. Methods　A randomized controlled trial of 460 ERCP patients admitted to Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into a control group and an observation group by the random number table method with 230 cases in each group. In the control group, 110 males and 120 females, aged (52.49±6.27) years, were treated with routine intervention. In the observation group, 115 males and 115 females, aged (51.53±6.29) years, were treated with health education intervention based on biphasic communication. The negative emotion score, disease knowledge mastery, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Statistical methods used were t test and χ² test. Results　The scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) in the observation group after intervention were lower than those in the control group [(6.74±1.04) points vs. (8.37±1.03) points, (6.37±1.04) points vs. (8.69±1.18) points], with statistically significant differences (t=16.889 and 22.369, both P<0.05). After intervention, the mastery degrees of disease knowledge, psychological counseling, drug guidance, and diet and exercise of the observation group were higher than those of the control group [95.22% (219/230) vs. 67.39% (155/230), 90.00% (207/230) vs. 70.43% (162/230), 85.22% (196/230) vs. 63.91% (147/230), 90.00% (207/230) vs. 72.17% (166/230)], with statistically significant differences (χ²=58.579, 27.741, 27.521, and 23.829, all P<0.05). The total complication rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group [3.04% (7/230) vs. 12.17% (28/230)], with a statistically significant difference (χ²=13.638, P<0.05). Conclusion　The application of health education based on biphasic communication in ERCP patients has the advantages of alleviating the negative emotions, improving the mastery of disease knowledge, and reducing the incidence of complications, which is worth promoting.

Key words:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Perioperative period, Biphasic communication, Health education

甘喆李桂贤董寒星.

基于双相交流的健康宣教干预在ERCP患者围手术期护理中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(4): 670-673.

Gan Zhe, Li Guixian, Dong Hanxing.

Application of health education intervention based on biphasic communication in perioperative nursing of ERCP patients [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(4): 670-673.

参考文献

[1] 刘祺,宋志红,张静,等. 高龄患者ERCP术前术后护理及实例分析[J]. 中国保健营养,2020,30(27):216.
[2] 王海珍,孟庆昀,郝俊莲,等. 老年患者ERCP静脉麻醉的护理体会探析[J/CD]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2020,7(82):108,125.
[3] 刘志,肖恒香,陈秋英,等. 人性化护理对高龄患者ERCP术前焦虑的影响[J/CD]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2020,20(40):204-205. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3141. 2020.40.137.
[4] 殷琪,郑晓,殷巧珍. ERCP治疗胆总管结石患者的术中配合及临床护理干预措施分析[J]. 基层医学论坛,2023,27(6):34-36. DOI:10.19435/j.1672-1721.2023.06.011.
[5] 李微微,马云武,刘亚峰,等. 快速康复外科护理在胆总管结石ERCP术后患者中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究,2022,19(24):3734-3738. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2022. 24.021.
[6] 武丽,王爱平. 康复护理技术在行ERCP的老年患者中的应用[J]. 饮食保健,2023(16):101-104. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8439.2023.16.026.
[7] 张秀萍,赖嘉文,麦金演. 循证护理在ERCP术后患者临床中的护理效果分析[J]. 广州医科大学学报,2023,51(1):70-72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9664.2023.01.014.
[8] 张刘敏,陈雅雅. 综合护理对ERCP患者并发症、负性情绪及护理满意度的影响[J]. 临床医学工程,2022,29(10):1421-1422. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2022.10.1421.
[9] 窦杰,刘桂玲,牟灵英,等. ERCP+EST患者加速康复临床护理路径落实单的制订及应用[J]. 当代护士(中旬刊),2022,29(4):138-143. DOI:10.19792/j.cnki.1006-6411.2022. 11.041.
[10] 温揽月,王亚楠,董丽丽. 多元化护理对经ERCP治疗的急性胆源性胰腺炎患者心理状态、胃肠道功能及并发症的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2023,42(7):1308-1311. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20210623-00324.
[11] 曾纯,刘舒棠,郑重. 预见性护理干预在ERCP患者围术期中的应用效果[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(6):64-67. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2023.06.021.
[12] 马晓镤,王苗,张玲,等. 针对性护理模式在不同体位患者ERCP术中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(12):85-87. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2023.12.028.
[13] 陈肖平,姚晓敏,祝斌,等. 老年患者行ERCP+EST术中配合应用及围手术期优质护理的效果[J]. 中华养生保健,2021,39(1):62-63.
[14] 曲琳琳,郭清,蒋春红. ERCP取石治疗老年胆总管结石患者的围手术期优质护理研究[J]. 保健文汇,2021,22(28):79-80.
[15] 崔晴. 综合护理干预在ERCP患者中的应用效果研究[J]. 基层医学论坛,2022,26(3):33-35. DOI:10.19435/j.1672- 1721.2022.03.011.
[16] 徐丽婧. 临床护理路径联合集束化护理在ERCP患者围术期中的应用[J]. 西藏医药,2022,43(1):114-116.
[17] 许仪虹. 预见性护理对胆总管结石ERCP患者生活质量的影响[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2022,43(1):96-98. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2022.01.022.
[18] 连丽凤,苏秀萍,张秀桔,等. 移动护理工作站多媒体模式在ERCP微创治疗患者术前健康宣教中的应用效果[J]. 保健医学研究与实践,2022,19(7):134-137. DOI:10.11986/j.issn.1673-873X.2022.07.034.
[19] 刘文祯,司水清,梁婷婷. 基于快速康复理念的集束化护理管理对胆总管结石行ERCP患者的干预效果[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(8):58-60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256. 2020.08.017.
[20] 张丽君,许文达,闫俊芬. 心理护理干预对ERCP手术患者情绪及治疗的影响分析[J]. 河北医药,2020,42(3):474-477. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2020.03.039.
[21] 杨红云. 恶性梗阻性黄疸患者ERCP术后并发急性胆囊炎的危险因素分析及护理干预[J]. 护理实践与研究,2020,17(8):64-66. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2020.08.023.