蜜芽罐特色疗法联合常规对症治疗对小儿外感发热的临床疗效

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.19.008

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (19): 2697-2701.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.19.008

蜜芽罐特色疗法联合常规对症治疗对小儿外感发热的临床疗效

张晓春陈莉郑珊珍陈凤王海燕李枝雅

广州中医药大学第二附属医院急诊科，广州　510120

收稿日期:2023-05-24 出版日期:2023-10-01 发布日期:2023-11-03
通讯作者: 李枝雅，Email：601372940@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省中医药局中医药科研项目（20212073）

Clinical effect of Miya cupping combined with conventional symptomatic treatment on children with exogenous fever

Zhang Xiaochun, Chen Li, Zheng Shanzhen, Chen Feng, Wang Haiyan, Li Zhiya

Emergency Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China

Received:2023-05-24 Online:2023-10-01 Published:2023-11-03
Contact: Li Zhiya, Email: 601372940@qq.com
Supported by:
Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Project of Guangdong Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine (20212073)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨蜜芽罐特色疗法联合常规对症治疗对小儿外感发热的临床疗效。方法　本研究为随机对照试验，选取2021年9月至2022年6月广州中医药大学第二附属医院发热门诊收治的208例外感发热患儿作为研究对象，其中男性120例，女性88例，年龄1.5～8.0岁。采用简单随机方法分为试验组和对照组，每组104例。对照组采用常规对症治疗，试验组在常规对症治疗的基础上联合蜜芽罐特色疗法。比较两组降温效果和中医证候积分情况。采用χ²检验、独立样本t检验、配对t检验、重复测量方差分析、秩和检验。结果　试验组和对照组各退出1例，最终两组各纳入103例进行分析。治疗前两组患儿的体温均高于正常，体温和中医证候积分组间比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。治疗后30 min、1 h、2 h、4 h、6 h，试验组的体温分别为（37.91±0.68）℃、（37.64±0.58）℃、（37.30±0.44）℃、（36.97±0.32）℃、（36.89±0.30）℃，对照组分别为（38.38±0.54）℃、（38.15±0.45）℃、（37.72±0.38）℃、（37.39±0.28）℃、（37.20±0.23）℃，重复测量方差分析显示两组体温差异有统计学意义（F=289.244，P<0.001）；治疗后6 h，试验组降温有效率为99.0%（102/103），对照组降温有效率为92.2%（95/103），两组比较差异均有统计学意义（χ²=5.693，P=0.017）。试验组的发热、恶寒、咽红、鼻塞、流涕、咳嗽、头痛和口渴证候积分均低于对照组（均P<0.05）。结论　常规对症处理联合蜜芽罐特色疗法治疗可有效改善外感发热患儿的发热、恶寒、咽红、鼻塞、流涕、咳嗽、头痛和口渴等症状，具有较好的安全性。

关键词:

外感发热, 小儿, 蜜芽罐, 特色疗法

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the clinical effect of Miya cupping combined with conventional symptomatic treatment in children with exogenous fever. Methods　This study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 208 children with exogenous fever admitted to the fever clinic of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from September 2021 to June 2022 were selected, including 120 boys and 88 girls, aged 1.5-8.0 years. The children were divided into an experimental group and a control group using a simple random method, with 104 cases in each group. The control group adopted conventional symptomatic treatment, and the experimental group was given Miya cupping on the basis of conventional symptomatic treatment. The cooling efficacy and traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome score of the two groups were compared. χ² test, independent sample t test, paired t test, repeated measure ANOVA, and rank sum test were used. Results　One case was withdrawn from each of the experimental group and the control group, and 103 cases were finally included in each group for analysis. Before treatment, the body temperatures of the two groups were higher than normal, and there were no statistically significant differences in the body temperature and TCM syndrome score between the two groups (all P>0.05). At 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after treatment, the body temperatures of the experimental groups were (37.91±0.68) ℃, (37.64±0.58) ℃, (37.30±0.44) ℃, (36.97±0.32) ℃, and (36.89±0.30) ℃, respectively, those of the control group were (38.38±0.54) ℃, (38.15±0.45) ℃, (37.72±0.38) ℃, (37.39±0.28) ℃, and (37.20±0.23) ℃, respectively, and repeated measurement ANOVA showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the body temperature between the two groups (F=289.244, P<0.001). At 6 h after treatment, the effective rate of cooling was 99.0% (102/103) in the experimental group and 92.2% (95/103) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ²=5.693, P=0.017). The scores of fever, chills, red pharynx, nasal congestion, runny nose, cough, headache, and thirst in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion　Conventional symptomatic treatment combined with Miya cupping in the treatment of children with exogenous fever can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of fever, chills, red pharynx, nasal congestion, runny nose, cough, headache, and thirst, which has good efficacy and safety.

Key words:

Exogenous fever, Children, Miya cupping, Characteristic therapy

张晓春陈莉郑珊珍陈凤王海燕李枝雅.

蜜芽罐特色疗法联合常规对症治疗对小儿外感发热的临床疗效 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(19): 2697-2701.

Zhang Xiaochun, Chen Li, Zheng Shanzhen, Chen Feng, Wang Haiyan, Li Zhiya.

Clinical effect of Miya cupping combined with conventional symptomatic treatment on children with exogenous fever [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(19): 2697-2701.

参考文献

[1] 温旭. 中医药治疗小儿外感发热概述[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育,2022,20(11):199-201. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2022.11.077.
[2] 赖敏,叶永带. 中医辨证施护联合小儿熏退散熏洗对小儿外感发热的干预效果[J]. 中外医学研究,2021,19(14):191-193. DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2021.14.067.
[3] 李海朋,陈争光,刘改萍,等. 岭南特色推拿治疗小儿外感发热60例临床疗效观察[J]. 四川中医,2020,38(4):211-214.
[4] 石立业,张静,马彩云,等. 中医辨证治疗对小儿发热咳喘止咳效果及血清CRP水平的影响[J]. 上海医药,2022,43(5):39-42. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1533.2022.05.010.
[5] 贾艳平,高树彬. 小儿发热的中西医治疗方法概述[J]. 中医儿科杂志,2012,8(5):57-59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673- 4297.2012.05.022.
[6] 徐炎,崔圣涛,白丽颖,等. 拔罐联合抗生素治疗儿童细菌性肺炎:随机对照研究[J]. 中国针灸,2021,41(3):283-287. DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20200804-k0004.
[7] 卢雪勇. 布洛芬混悬液治疗小儿发热的临床效果及不良反应分析[J]. 基层医学论坛,2019,23(17):2406-2407. DOI:10.19435/j.1672-1721.2019.17.024.
[8] 戴洁琛,张忠德. 外感发热中医外治法源流[J]. 中医学报,2019,34(5):1112-1116. DOI:10.16368/j.issn.1674-8999. 2019.05.264.
[9] 赵卫,李雪,祝斌野,等. 湘西刘氏小儿推拿治疗小儿外感发热的临床观察[J]. 中医药导报,2022,28(1):106-109.
[10] 王杰鹏,方芳,王浩,等. 中医外治法治疗小儿发热应用概况[J]. 河北中医,2019,41(1):146-151. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2619.2019.01.032.
[11] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 1994.
[12] 王卫平.儿科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013.
[13] 靳杨,姚静松,李艳平,等. 刺络拔罐肺俞穴对痰热壅肺型风温肺热病咳嗽的应用效果[J]. 淮海医药,2022,40(6):637-640. DOI:10.14126/j.cnki.1008-7044.2022.06.024.
[14] 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则:试行[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2002: 8-10.
[15] 郝欧美,王雪峰. 小儿肺炎的中医外治法研究进展[J]. 辽宁中医杂志,2016,43(4):883-885. DOI:10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2016.04.074.
[16] 欧竹君. 中医综合外治疗法对外感发热患者退热效果的影响[J]. 内蒙古中医药,2022,41(11):133-134. DOI:10.16040/j.cnki.cn15-1101.2022.11.034.
[17] 黄洋,戎伟鹏,谭发林. 穴位贴敷治疗社区患者肺部感染发热的效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(19):2736-2739. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.19.016.
[18] 裴莹,陈泽林,金颖,等. 刺络拔罐法对内毒素致热家兔血清细胞因子水平的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2019,37(6):1385-1388. DOI:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2019.06.026.
[19] Liu Y. Cupping therapy for 103 cases of high fever due to infection of the upper respiratory tract[J]. J Tradit Chin Med, 2002, 22(2): 124-125.
[20] 崔庆科,李华,冯晓纯,等. 负压吸痧法在儿科肺系疾病中的应用[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2021,36(1):541-543.
[21] 惠鑫, 米新, 王宽峰. 蜜芽太极罐吸痧佐治儿童社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国中西医结合儿科学, 2020, 12(1): 51-54.
[22] 蒙春雪,夏琳,蒋晟. 拔罐疗法在小儿肺系疾病中的临床应用[J]. 云南中医中药杂志,2015,36(10):107-108.

蜜芽罐特色疗法联合常规对症治疗对小儿外感发热的临床疗效

Clinical effect of Miya cupping combined with conventional symptomatic treatment on children with exogenous fever

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	汪晓云李心怡赵红阳. 微信群延续护理+同伴教育在小儿先天性马蹄足门诊治疗中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(2): 275-.
[2]	南慧冯艳亭周丽朱丹赵金霞. 多感官刺激联合重复经颅磁刺激在儿童语言发育迟缓/障碍中的应用研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(19): 2683-2687.
[3]	周冉冉蒲海波王媛. 无创吸痰结合乙酰半胱氨酸治疗小儿支气管肺炎的效果分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(19): 2688-2692.
[4]	彭鸿运黄育斌梁耀园廖婉琦. 超声与MSCT在小儿消化道重复畸形中的诊断价值对比 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(15): 2144-2148.
[5]	陈倩茜刘舒南. 血清PCT与NLR联合早期预警评分在小儿重症肺炎预后评估中的价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(10): 1417-1420.
[6]	王思琦陈熳妮林晓红林钰滢刘爱华熊述清. 中药贴敷配合推拿疗法治疗小儿便秘的疗效及安全性的meta分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(1): 22-.
[7]	张武, 李贻霞, 吴丽灵, 蒙丽婵, 霍保善, 詹锋, 杨凯, 胡旭东. 磷酸肌酸钠对体外循环下房室间隔缺损修补术患儿心肌能量代谢和心肺功能的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(5): 656-662.
[8]	孙丽芳. 金振口服液联合抗生素对小儿支原体肺炎的临床治疗效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(20): 2853-2857.
[9]	王晓平, 严小强. 超声检查对小儿阑尾炎的诊断和临床分型的应用价值[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(2): 241-243.
[10]	刘月梅汤昱张磊. 多模式肺康复计划对小儿哮喘中远期疗效的随机对照及纵向随访观察研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(16): 2303-2306.
[11]	阿力木江•阿布来孜, 王海亮, 艾克拜尔江•买买提, 秦世彪, 李思思, 郭凯凯, 加素尔•巴吐尔. 小儿下尿路结石的诊治分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(12): 1711-1714.
[12]	杨晓娟, 徐蕾, 王丽华. 中医推拿对小儿支气管哮喘患者PEF以及C-ACT评分的影响分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2021, 27(6): 844-847.