基于患者角色体验的体位管理对体位摆放评分及手术效率的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.17.029

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (17): 2499-2502.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.17.029

基于患者角色体验的体位管理对体位摆放评分及手术效率的影响

赵燕崔思秋许珍珍

南阳市第一人民医院麻醉科手术室，南阳　473000

收稿日期:2023-02-01 出版日期:2023-09-01 发布日期:2023-09-21
通讯作者: 赵燕，Email：zhaoyan1988100@163.com
基金资助:
河南省医学科技攻关计划研究项目（LHGJ20210973）

Effects of position management based on patient role experience on position placement score and surgical efficiency

Zhao Yan, Cui Siqiu, Xu Zhenzhen

Anesthesiology Operation Room, Nanyang First People's Hospital, Nanyang 473000, China

Received:2023-02-01 Online:2023-09-01 Published:2023-09-21
Contact: Zhao Yan, Email: zhaoyan1988100@163.com
Supported by:
Medical Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Province (LHGJ20210973)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探究基于患者角色体验的体位管理对体位摆放评分及手术效率的影响。方法　选取2018年1月至2021年12月期间于南阳市第一人民医院进行手术的82例患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为两组，各41例。研究组男20例、女21例，年龄（41.25±5.68）岁，进行基于患者角色体验的体位管理；常规组男23例、女18例，年龄（43.52±6.74）岁，进行常规体位护理。评估两组患者体位摆放评分、疼痛［视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分］、焦虑情绪［汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）评分］，记录患者手术治疗过程中及术后出血量及手术时间。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　研究组呼吸循环［（22.85±3.58）分］、保护患者的隐私［（20.52±3.42）分］、体位用物的选择［（23.85±4.12）分］、术野暴露面积评分［（25.32±4.25）分］均高于常规组［（18.25±3.01）分、（17.52±2.85）分、（19.25±3.11）分、（22.25±3.50）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=6.297、4.315、5.706、3.570，均P<0.001）。研究组HAMA评分［（16.98±3.11）分］、VAS评分［（3.06±0.48）分］均低于常规组［（19.98±3.87）分、（5.52±0.59）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.869、9.994，均P<0.001）。研究组术中出血量［（112.58±16.58）ml］、术后出血量［（35.24±5.25）ml］均少于常规组［（123.52±17.51）ml、（40.36±6.14）ml］，手术时间［（1.02±0.14）h］短于常规组［（1.35±0.21）h］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.905、4.058、8.372，均P<0.001）。结论　基于患者角色体验的体位管理有利于提高患者体位摆放评分，缓解疼痛，改善不良情绪，提高手术效率，值得推广。

关键词:

视觉模拟评分法, 汉密尔顿焦虑量表, 角色体验, 体位管理, 不良情绪

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effects of position management based on patient role experience on position placement score and surgical efficiency. Methods　A total of 82 patients who underwent surgery in Nanyang First People's Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were selected and were divided into 2 groups by the random number table method, with 41 patients in each group. In the study group, there were 20 males and 21 females, aged (41.25±5.68) years. In the routine group, there were 23 males and 18 females, aged (43.52±6.74) years. The study group performed position management based on patient role experience, while the routine group performed routine position nursing. The position placement scores, pain [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score], and anxiety [Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score] of the two groups were evaluated, and the amounts of blood loss during and after surgery and the operation time of the two groups were recorded. t test and χ² test were used. Results　The scores of respiratory circulation [(22.85±3.58) points], protection of patient privacy [(20.52±3.42) points], selection of body positions [(23.85±4.12) points], and surgical field exposure [(25.32±4.25) points] in the study group were higher than those in the routine group [(18.25±3.01) points, (17.52±2.85) points, (19.25±3.11) points, and (22.25±3.50) points], with statistically significant differences (t=6.297, 4.315, 5.706, and 3.570; all P<0.001). The HAMA score [(16.98±3.11) points] and VAS score [(3.06±0.48) points] of the study group were lower than those of the routine group [(19.98±3.87) points and (5.52±0.59) points], with statistically significant differences (t=3.869 and 9.994, both P<0.001). The amount of intraoperative blood loss [(112.58±16.58) ml] and postoperative blood loss [(35.24±5.25) ml] in the study group were less than those in the routine group [(123.52±17.51) ml and (40.36±6.14) ml], and the operation time [(1.02±0.14) h] was shorter than that in the routine group [(1.35±0.21) h], with statistically significant differences (t=2.905, 4.058, and 8.372, all P<0.001). Conclusion　Position management based on patient role experience is beneficial to improve the position placement score, relieve the pain, and improve the adverse moods and surgical efficiency, which is worth promoting.

Key words:

Visual Analogue Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Role experience, Position management, Adverse moods

赵燕崔思秋许珍珍.

基于患者角色体验的体位管理对体位摆放评分及手术效率的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(17): 2499-2502.

Zhao Yan, Cui Siqiu, Xu Zhenzhen.

Effects of position management based on patient role experience on position placement score and surgical efficiency [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(17): 2499-2502.

参考文献

[1] 沈海琴,王枢. 改良体位专项管理对妇科患者腔镜手术的安全性及舒适度的影响[J]. 医学理论与实践,2022,35(14):2480-2483.DOI:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2022.14.059.
[2] 郭婉颖. 非营养性吸吮联合体位管理在早产儿喂养中的应用效果[J]. 现代实用医学,2022,34(6):805-806,822.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2022.06.044.
[3] 黄贤好. 体位管理联合全程陪伴式导乐分娩对初产妇产程时间及分娩结局的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药,2022,35(3):730-733.DOI:10.14035/j.cnki.hljyy.2022.03.091.
[4] 张芹芹,郭澍,李沪生,等. 体位管理对机器人辅助前列腺切除术的临床效果分析[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2022,3(5):428-433.DOI:10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721. 2022.05.010.
[5] Paleg G, Livingstone R. Evidence-informed clinical perspectives on postural management for hip health in children and adults with non-ambulant cerebral palsy[J]. J Pediatr Rehabil Med,2022,15(1):39-48.DOI:10.3233/PRM-220002.
[6] Shinmura H, Matsushima T, Okuda N, et al. Cephalic version by postural management in the lateral position without the knee-chest position for primiparous breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2022,48(3):703-708.DOI:10.1111/jog.15149.
[7] Carolyn E, Miranda B, Del RKA, et al. A review of the tolerance and adequacy of enteral nutrition administered in the prone position in critically Ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation[J]. Current Developments in Nutrition,2021,5(2):216. DOI:10.1093/cdn/nzab029_017.
[8] Stinson M, Crawford S, Madden E. Current clinical practice in 24-hour postural management and the impact on carers and service users with severe neurodisability[J].Br J Occup Ther,2021,84(6):355-365.DOI:10.1177/0308022620944739.
[9] Yang L, Yi T, Zhou M, et al. Clinical effectiveness of position management and manual rotation of the fetal position with a U-shaped birth stool for vaginal delivery of a fetus in a persistent occiput posterior position[J]. J Int Med Res,2020,48(6):300060520924275.DOI:10.1177/0300060520924275.
[10] 王纯,楚艳民,张亚林,等.汉密尔顿焦虑量表的因素结构研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2011,21(5):299-301.
[11] 杨蕊,朱雪泉,肖乐,等. 视觉模拟评定量表与抑郁症状快速评估量表的一致性研究[J]. 中国医刊,2018,53(8):918-921.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2018.08.023.
[12] Oh SA, Yea JW, Kim SK, et al. Optimal gating window for respiratory-gated radiotherapy with real-time position management and respiration guiding system for liver cancer treatment[J]. Sci Rep,2019,9(1):4384.DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-40858-2.
[13] Gmelig Meyling C, Ketelaar M, Kuijper MA, et al. Effects of postural management on hip migration in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review[J]. Pediatr Phys Ther,2018,30(2):82-91.DOI:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000488.
[14] Zipp GP, OʼConnell L. Commentary on "effects of postural management on hip migration in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review"[J]. Pediatr Phys Ther,2018,30(2):92.DOI:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000493.
[15] Goodwin J, Lecouturier J, Crombie S, et al. Understanding frames: a qualitative study of young people's experiences of using standing frames as part of postural management for cerebral palsy[J]. Child Care Health Dev,2018,44(2):203-211.DOI:10.1111/cch.12540.
[16] Hosking J. A pilot study comparing custom contoured and planar support surfaces for pressure ulcer risk over the heels for night time postural management using interface pressure mapping and discomfort scores[J]. J Tissue Viability,2017,26(3):189-195.DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2017. 04.004.
[17] Kwon KT, Kim JS, Sim HS, et al. Evaluation of accuracy about 2D vs 3D real-time position management system based on couch rotation when non-coplanar respiratory gated radiation therapy[J]. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology,2016.DOI:10.17946/JRST.2016.39.4.16.
[18] Humphreys G, Pountney T. The development and implementation of an integrated care pathway for 24-hour postural management: a study of the views of staff and carers[J]. Physiotherapy,2006,92(4):233-239. DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2006.06.002.
[19] Patrick JH. Book review: the chailey approach to postural management: an explanation of the theoretical aspects of posture management and their practical application through treatment and equipment[J]. Prosthet Orthot Int,2001,25(2):160.DOI:10.1080/03093640108726592.
[20] Aguilera-Martín Á, Gálvez-Lara M, Blanco-Ruiz M, et al. Psychological, educational, and alternative interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women: a systematic review[J]. J Clin Psychol,2021,77(3):525-555.DOI:10.1002/jclp.23071.
[21] Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, et al. The hamilton anxiety scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders[J]. J Affect Disord,1988,14(1):61-68.DOI:10.1016/0165-0327(88)90072-9.
[22] Shakarami A, Mirghafourvand M, Abdolalipour S, et al. Comparison of fear, anxiety and self-efficacy of childbirth among primiparous and multiparous women[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2021,21(1):642.DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-04114-8.
[23] Smith V, Gallagher L, Carroll M, et al. Antenatal and intrapartum interventions for reducing caesarean section, promoting vaginal birth, and reducing fear of childbirth: an overview of systematic reviews[J]. PLoS One,2019,14(10):e0224313.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0224313.
[24] 刘利娟,杨菲,郭瑞娟,等. 改良体位管理结合升温毯对前列腺电切术患者术中体温、凝血状态及不良事件发生率的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(10):143-145.DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202310041.
[25] 刘春燕,吴诗萍. 改良腰麻侧卧位为主的体位管理对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇分娩结局的影响[J]. 中外医学研究,2023,21(5):153-157.DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2023.05.039.
[26] 何婉嫕,程晨,商思懿,等. 以颅内压为目标导向的颅脑损伤体位管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 全科护理,2023,21(4):526-530.DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2023.04.023.
[27] 陈丽珠,陈小玲,颜惠萍,等. 体位管理+体位辅助在极低或超低出生体质量早产儿中的应用价值[J].中国医药指南,2023,21(3):69-72.DOI:10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2023. 03.008.
[28] 张冬艳,高菲菲,马荣荣. 聚集解决护理模式联合体位管理在急性心力衰竭辅助机械通气患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(1):69-73.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256. 2023.01.021.

基于患者角色体验的体位管理对体位摆放评分及手术效率的影响

Effects of position management based on patient role experience on position placement score and surgical efficiency

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics