经会阴四维超声成像技术在初产妇产后早期压力性尿失禁诊断中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.16.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨经会阴四维超声成像技术在初产妇产后早期压力性尿失禁（SUl）中的诊断价值。方法　采用回顾性分析，选取2021年8月至2022年10月在揭阳市人民医院经阴道分娩、并于产后6～10周接受经会阴四维超声检查的初产妇108例为研究对象。其中，58例发生SUI者为病例组，年龄（29.00±3.88）岁；50例未发生SUI者为对照组，年龄（28.28±4.37）岁。两组产妇均接受会阴四维超声检查，比较两组产妇在静息、缩肛和最大Valsalva状态下肛提肌结构参数，绘制受试者工作特征曲线（ROC），评估各参数在SUI中的诊断效能。采用t检验、非参数检验。结果　两组产妇在静息状态下的肛提肌裂孔面积、肛提肌裂孔周长与肛提肌在肛门括约肌水平的厚度、肛提肌面积比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。两组产妇在缩肛状态下的肛提肌裂孔面积、肛提肌裂孔周长差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；病例组在缩肛状态下的肛门括约肌水平肛提肌的厚度、肛提肌面积分别为7.5（7.0，7.9）mm、（10.98±1.79）cm²，对照组分别为8.4（8.0，8.6）mm、（11.90±2.22）cm²，差异均有统计学意义（Z=-6.064、t=-2.341，均P<0.05）。两组产妇在最大Valsalva动作下的肛提肌裂孔周长差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；病例组在最大Valsalva动作下的肛提肌裂孔面积大于对照组［23（20，28）cm²比17（15，20）cm²］，差异有统计学意义（Z=-6.005，P<0.05）；病例组在最大Valsalva动作下肛门括约肌水平肛提肌的厚度、肛提肌面积均低于对照组［6.2（5.9，6.4）mm比6.5（6.3，6.7）mm，（10.14±3.21）cm²比（12.02±2.80）cm²］，差异均有统计学意义（Z=-4.264、t=-3.218，均P<0.05）。最大Valsalva状态下肛提肌裂孔面积>19.5 cm²、肛提肌的厚度<6.0 mm、肛提肌面积<8.5 cm²及缩肛状态下肛提肌的厚度<7.5 mm、肛提肌面积<12.5 cm²灵敏度分别为82.8%、82.8%、37.9%、79.3%、79.3%，特异度分别为72.0%、54.0%、90.0%、78.0%、46.0%。5种参数的曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.835、0.738、0.673、0.839、0.625，以上5种参数联合分析时AUC为0.924，灵敏度为91.4%，特异度为80.0%。结论　经会阴四维超声在初产妇产后早期SUI的诊断中具有较高应用价值，多个超声参数联合分析能明显提高SUI的诊断效能。

关键词:

压力性尿失禁, 产后, 初产妇, 盆底超声, 肛提肌

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the value of transperineal 4-dimensional ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of early postpartum stress urinary incontinence (SUl) in primiparous women. Methods A total of 110 primiparous women who had vaginal delivery and underwent transperineal 4-dimensional ultrasound 6-10 weeks after delivery at Jieyang People's Hospital were selected for the retrospective analysis. Among them, the 58 cases with SUI were set as a case group (SUI group) who were (29.00±3.88) years old, and the rest 50 cases without SUI as a control group (non-SUI group) who were (28.28±4.37) years old. Both groups underwent perineal 4-dimensional ultrasound examination. The structural parameters of the anal raphe were compared between the two groups at rest, retraction, and maximal Valsalva. The receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn to assess the diagnostic efficacy of each parameter for SUI. t test and non-parametric test were used. Results In the resting state, there were no statistical differences in the area and circumference of the anal raphe fissure, the thickness of the anal raphe at the level of the anal sphincter, and area of the anal raphe between the two groups (all P>0.05). In the contracted state, there were no statistical differences in the area and circumference of the anal raphe fissure between the two groups (both P>0.05). The thickness of the anal raphe at the level of the anal sphincter and area of the anal raphe in the case group were lower than those in the control group [7.5 (7.0, 7.9) mm vs. 8.4 8.0, 8.6) mm and (10.98±1.79) cm² vs. (11.90±2.22) cm²], with statistical differences (Z=-6.064 and t=-2.341; both P<0.05). Under the maximal Valsalva manoeuvre, there was no statistical difference in the anal raphe fissure circumference between the two groups (P>0.05); the anal raphe fissure area in the case group was bigger than that in the control group [23 (20, 28) cm² vs. 17 (15, 20) cm²], with a statistical difference (Z=-6.005, P<0.05); the thickness of the anal raphe at the level of the anal sphincter and area of the anal raphe in the case group were less than those in the control group [6.2 (5.9, 6.4) mm vs. 6.5 (6.3, 6.7) mm and (10.14±3.21) cm² vs. (12.02±2.80) cm²], with statistical differences (Z=-4.264 and t=-3.218; both P< 0.05). The sensitivities of the fissure area of the anal raphe >19.5 cm², the thickness of the anal raphe <6.0 mm, and the area of the anal raphe <8.5 cm² under the maximal Valsalva maneuver and the thickness of the anal raphe <7.5 mm, and the area of the anal raphe <12.5 cm² under the contracted state were 82.8%, 82.8%, 37.9%, 79.3%, and 79.3%, respectively; the specificities were 72.0%, 54.0%, 90.0%, 78.0%, and 46.0%, respectively; the areas under their curves (AUC) were 0.835, 0.738, 0.673, 0.839, and 0.625, respectively; the AUC for the combined analysis of the above five parameters was 0.924, with a sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 80.0%. Conclusions Transperineal 4-dimensional ultrasound has high application value in the diagnosis of early postpartum SUI in primiparous women. The combined analysis of multiple ultrasound parameters can significantly improve the diagnostic efficacy of SUI.

Key words:

Stress urinary incontinence, Postpartum, Primiparous women, Pelvic floor ultrasound, Levator ani muscle

江岸云郑宝群陈少瑜谢海鹏.

经会阴四维超声成像技术在初产妇产后早期压力性尿失禁诊断中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(16): 2297-2301.

Jiang Anyun, Zheng Baoqun, Chen Shaoyu, Xie Haipeng.

Transperineal 4-dimensional ultrasound imaging in diagnosis of early postpartum stress urinary incontinence in primiparous women [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(16): 2297-2301.

参考文献

[1] Strinić T, Buković D, Roje D, et al. Epidemiology of pelvic floor disorders between urban and rural female inhabitants[J]. Coll Antropol, 2007,31(2):483-487.
[2] 林丽莎,黄吴健,宋岩峰,等.分娩方式对产妇早期盆底功能障碍的影响分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012,28(9):785-788.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2012.09.028.
[3] Chang SR, Lin WA, Chang TC, et al. Risk factors for stress and urge urinary incontinence during pregnancy and the first year postpartum: a prospective longitudinal study[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2021,32(9):2455-2464. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04788-w.
[4] 肖汀,张新玲,杨丽新,等.超声测量肛提肌裂孔面积在女性压力性尿失禁诊断中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2016,32(9):1419-1422.DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289. 2016.09.026.
[5] Hansen BB, Svare J, Viktrup L, et al. Urinary incontinence during pregnancy and 1 year after delivery in primiparous women compared with a control group of nulliparous women[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2012,31(4):475-480. DOI: 10.1002/nau.21221.
[6] 肖汀,张新玲,杨丽新,等.超声观察尿道旋转角在女性压力性尿失禁中的应用[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2017,28(5):374-375.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1062.2017.05.018.
[7] 李金辉,王海申,张树荣,等.盆底超声和磁共振成像对盆底功能障碍性疾病产妇产后发生盆腔器官脱垂的评估[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(11):82-85.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN. 1672-8270.2020.11.020.
[8] Naranjo-Ortiz C, Shek KL, Martin AJ, et al. What is normal bladder neck anatomy?[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016,27(6):945-950. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2916-1.
[9] 肖汀,张新玲,毛永江,等.盆底超声在压力性尿失禁诊断中的应用研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2017,26(7):618-622.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.07.014.
[10] Huang IS, Fan YH, Lin AT, et al. Correlation between bladder neck mobility and voiding phase urodynamic parameters in female patients with stress urinary incontinence[J]. Low Urin Tract Symptoms, 2016,8(1):44-48. DOI: 10.1111/luts.12076.
[11] Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004,23(6):615-625. DOI: 10.1002/uog.1072.
[12] 黄淑卿,张新玲,郑志娟,等.盆底超声在产后早期压力性尿失禁中的应用[J].中国超声医学杂志,2015,31(5):433-435.
[13] 徐娆,史铁梅,林琳,等.超声评价女性压力性尿失禁患者盆膈裂孔形态[J].中国医学影像技术,2015,31(11):1728-1731.DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2015.11.033.
[14] DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, et al. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2003,101(1):46-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02465-1.
[15] 蒋吉鹏,王琨,肖莎,等.经会阴三维超声对盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断价值[J].山东医药,2012,52(19):63-64.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2012.19.027.
[16] 肖汀,张新玲,毛永江,等.盆底超声在压力性尿失禁诊断中的应用研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2017,26(7):618-622.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.07.014.