腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效比较

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.15.014

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (15): 2133-2136.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.15.014

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效比较

李云龙^1,2 曹峰² 靳猛³

¹济宁医学院，济宁　272067；²无锡市第二老年病医院普外科，无锡　214000；³济宁医学院附属医院疝与腹壁外科，济宁　272067

收稿日期:2023-03-28 出版日期:2023-08-01 发布日期:2023-08-28
通讯作者: 靳猛，Email：lyl5192589@163.com
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金（ZR2021QH131）

Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and open mesh repair for occult inguinal hernia

Li Yunlong^1,2, Cao Feng², Jin Meng³

¹Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China; ²General Surgery, Wuxi Second Geriatric Hospital, Wuxi 214000, China; ³Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China

Received:2023-03-28 Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-08-28
Contact: Jin Meng, Email: lyl5192589@163.com
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021QH131)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效。方法　选取2021年10月至2022年10月济宁医学院附属医院收治的96例隐匿性腹股沟疝患者，按照随机数字表法分为常规组48例、观察组48例。常规组年龄（63.85±5.65）岁，观察组年龄（64.85±5.87）岁。常规组给予开放补片修补术治疗，观察组给予腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗。对比两组术中出血量和住院时间，对比两组治疗前后疼痛感评分（于术前、术后12 h采用Prince-Henry疼痛评分评价疼痛程度），对比治疗前后两组尿动力学以及并发症发生率。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　观察组术中出血量（32.54±3.25）ml少于常规组（39.63±4.85）ml（t=8.414，P<0.001），住院时间（6.87±0.63）d短于常规组（8.25±1.12）d（t=7.440，P<0.001）。术前观察组、常规组患者Prince-Henry疼痛评分比较［（3.89±0.58）分比（3.85±0.52）分］，差异无统计学意义（t=0.356，P=0.723）；两组患者术后12 h Prince-Henry评分均降低，观察组术后12 h Prince-Henry评分低于常规组［（1.50±0.61）分比（2.96±1.42）分］（t=6.545，P<0.001）。治疗前，两组膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量对比差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05），治疗后两组患者膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量均升高（均P<0.05），且观察组膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量高于常规组（均P<0.05）。观察组并发症发生率低于常规组［6.25%（3/48）比20.85%（10/48）］（χ²=4.360，P=0.037）。结论　隐匿性腹股沟疝患者采用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗能够促进恢复，缓解疼痛，有利于改善患者的尿动力学，降低并发症发生率，值得在临床中推广与应用。

关键词:

隐匿性腹股沟疝, 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术, 开放补片修补术, 尿动力学, 急迫尿意时膀胱容量, 并发症

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the efficacies of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and open mesh repair in the treatment of occult inguinal hernia. Methods　A total of 96 patients with occult inguinal hernia admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from October 2021 to October 2022 were divided into a conventional group (48 cases) and an observation group (48 cases) according to the random number table method. The age of the conventional group was (63.85±5.65) years old, and that of the observation group was (64.85±5.87) years old. The conventional group was treated with open mesh repair, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. The intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups, the pain scores before and after treatment were compared between the two groups (Prince-Henry pain score was used to evaluate the degree of pain before and 12 h after treatment), and the urodynamics before and after treatment and complication rate were compared between the two groups. t test and χ² test were used. Results　The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the conventional group [(32.54±3.25) ml vs. (39.63±4.85) ml] (t=8.414, P<0.001), and the length of hospital stay was shorter than that in the conventional group [(6.87±0.63) d vs. (8.25±1.12) d] (t=7.440, P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the Prince-Henry pain score between the observation group and the conventional group before surgery [(3.89±0.58) points vs. (3.85±0.52) points] (t=0.356, P=0.723); the Prince-Henry scores of both groups were decreased 12 h after surgery, and the Prince-Henry score of the observation group was lower than that of the conventional group 12 h after surgery [(1.50±0.61) points vs. (2.96±1.42) points] (t=6.545, P<0.001). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the bladder compliance and bladder volume during urgent urination between the two groups (both P>0.05); after treatment, the bladder compliance and bladder volume during urgent urination were increased in both groups (all P<0.05), and the bladder compliance and bladder volume during urgent urination in the observation group were higher than those in the conventional group (both P<0.05). The incidence of complications of the observation group was lower than that of the conventional group [6.25% (3/48) vs. 20.85% (10/48)] (χ²=4.360, P=0.037). Conclusion　Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair can improve the recovery in patients with occult inguinal hernia, relieve the pain, improve the urodynamics, and reduce the incidence of complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Key words:

Occult inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair, Open mesh repair, Urodynamics, Bladder volume during urgent urination, Complications

李云龙曹峰靳猛.

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效比较 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(15): 2133-2136.

Li Yunlong, Cao Feng, Jin Meng.

Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and open mesh repair for occult inguinal hernia [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(15): 2133-2136.

参考文献

[1] Sayadi Shahraki M, Mahmoudieh M, Keleidari B, et al. The effect of internal mesh fixation and external fixation (inguinal hernia truss) on postoperative complications in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty[J]. Adv Biomed Res, 2022, 11:49. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_140_21.
[2] Johansen N, Miserez M, de Beaux A, et al. Surgical strategy for contralateral groin management in patients scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia repair: an International Web-Based Surveymonkey® Questionnaire: strategy for contralateral groin management during inguinal hernia repair[J]. Scand J Surg, 2021, 110(3):368-372. DOI: 10.1177/1457496920938600.
[3] Krauß M, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Krönung L, et al. Comparing large pore lightweight mesh versus small pore heavyweight mesh in open mesh plug repair of primary and recurrent unilateral inguinal hernia - a questionnaire study for a retrospective analysis of a cohort of elective groin hernia patients using propensity score matching[J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 75:93-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.130.
[4] Chmatal P, Keil R. Inguinal tumorous mass - an uncommon late manifestation of chronic organized hematoma after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: two cases report[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2020, 66:215-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.12.016.
[5] Vega L, Oh-Uiginn K, Carmona D, et al. Cyanoacrylate mesh fixation in lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Does it have advantages?[J]. Global Journal of Surgery, 2019, 7(1), 1-4. DOI: 10.12691/js-7-1-1.
[6] 高峰,汪春杰,杨德勇.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在无张力修补中的应用效果[J].安徽医专学报,2022,21(2):40-42. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0196.2022.02.016.
[7] 张旭,姚国忠,朱初明,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中斜疝疝囊横断术与剥离术对其术后并发症的影响[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(1):93-95. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.01.022.
[8] 中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J].中华外科杂志,2014,52(7):481-484. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2014.07.001.
[9] Kaundinya Kiran Bharatam. Laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair - are we overdoing it? A comprehensive study of 25 cases of TEP inguinal hernia repair done without the use of electrocautery and without any mesh fixation[J]. Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports, 2019, 5(8):147.
[10] 王丙阳.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人Ⅲ型阴囊疝效果分析[J].河南外科学杂志,2021,27(4):119-121. DOI:10.16193/j.cnki.hnwk.2021.04.050.
[11] 蒋维荣,孟勇,高明清,等.在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中不同补片固定方式效果比较的网状meta分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2023,30(2):204-213.
[12] 钱宏美,陈志永.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在成人腹股沟嵌顿疝中的应用[J].现代医学,2022,50(10):1302-1305. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7562.2022.10.014.
[13] 王祥东,付笑,刘松.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对成人复发性腹股沟疝的近远期疗效分析[J].河北医学,2022,28(9):1534-1537. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2022.09.026.
[14] 张利,蒲传航,方专玉,等.单孔与多孔腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术疗效比较[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2022,42(5):472-474. DOI:10.16424/j.cnki.cn32-1807/r.2022.05.019.
[15] 褚亮,周少波,陈红军,等.扶镜机器人在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用研究[J].中国医学装备,2022,19(9):98-101. DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2022.09.022.
[16] 殷响,陈岩,孔维元,等.针孔腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(1):108-110. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674- 392X.2022.01.026.
[17] 闵光富.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝的临床效果研究[J].河南外科学杂志,2021,27(4):111-112. DOI:10.16193/j.cnki.hnwk.2021.04.046.

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效比较

Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and open mesh repair for occult inguinal hernia

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	董顺军刘申. 下腔静脉滤器脱落移位至右心室1例 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(8): 1149-1151.
[2]	周亚丹. 围术期预见性护理对肝癌射频消融术患者的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(5): 708-713.
[3]	刘景云张莉任强. 超声引导定位在膝关节镜手术中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(4): 480-483.
[4]	石兰兰端木艳艳刘彦彦. 多学科协作式护理模式在新生儿持续肺动脉高压气管插管中的应用观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(3): 385-389.
[5]	汪晓云李心怡赵红阳. 微信群延续护理+同伴教育在小儿先天性马蹄足门诊治疗中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(2): 275-.
[6]	郭靖赵天增. 健侧肺不同流量持续给氧辅助肺癌胸腔镜根治术对患者炎性反应及术后并发症的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(16): 2259-2263.
[7]	石俊程时超. 腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患者的手术效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(15): 2140-2143.
[8]	李淼池琦张翠英. 虹膜劈裂症合并白内障1例 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(15): 2193-2196.
[9]	钟春燕许婉真. “人形图”护理模式在剖宫产产妇围生期的应用效果研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(12): 1768-1772.
[10]	张俊萍王奕妍庄绯菲李佳丛兰. 老年营养风险指数联合前清蛋白对老年肝癌患者术后并发症的预测价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(1): 83-.
[11]	苏彩虹, 黄丽秋, 李红艳, 雷莹, 杨椹, 张云芳. 腹膜透析患者规律性随访与发生并发症的相关性研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(8): 1057-1061.
[12]	池秀芳, 张永. 新生儿Ommaya囊置入术的临床特点及预后分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(6): 825-828.
[13]	张磊, 孙丹丽, 周雅娟, 彭星, 杨一君. 加速康复外科理念指导腹腔镜全子宫切除术对绝经后妇女术后镇痛及胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(4): 488-491.
[14]	刘静, 苏冰莲, 龚兰娟, 林万里, 范婷. 快速康复理念下多模式镇痛对食管癌患者术后疼痛控制效果的探讨[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(3): 341-344.
[15]	邓学灵聂仙娟莫星枝罗小威陈丽珍. 新生儿化脓性脑膜炎神经系统并发症的影响因素分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(24): 3526-.