免疫磁珠分离技术对白色念珠菌所致阴道炎的检测价值分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.14.008

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (14): 1958-1961.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.14.008

免疫磁珠分离技术对白色念珠菌所致阴道炎的检测价值分析

姚琼¹ 徐岷²

¹河南中医药大学第五临床附属医院郑州人民医院检验科，郑州　450000；²郑州大学第一附属医院检验科，郑州　450000

收稿日期:2023-02-09 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-07-31
通讯作者: 姚琼，Email：yaoqiongq@126.com
基金资助:
河南省医学科技攻关项目（LHGJ2021002215）

Value of immunomagnetic bead separation technology in detection of vaginitis caused by Candida albicans

Yao Qiong¹, Xu Min²

¹Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Clinical Hospital Affiliated to Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, China; ²Clinical Laboratory, First Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China

Received:2023-02-09 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-07-31
Contact: Yao Qiong, Email: yaoqiongq@126.com
Supported by:
Problem-tackling Project of Medical Science and Technology in Henan (LHGJ2021002215)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　分析免疫磁珠分离技术对白色念珠菌所致阴道炎的临床检测价值。方法　选取2021年6月至2023年1月于郑州人民医院接受阴道分泌物检查的190名女性作为研究对象，将102例白色念珠菌阴道炎患者列为病例组，其余88例行常规妇科检查的健康志愿者列为对照组。以阴道分泌物培养结果为金标准，采用湿片镜检法及免疫磁珠分离技术检测研究对象阴道分泌物，比较不同检测技术的检出情况及诊断效能。采用χ²检验。结果　免疫磁珠分离技术对于白色念珠菌所致阴道炎的检出率、诊断准确率、灵敏度、特异度均高于湿片镜检法［86.27%（88/102）比68.63%（70/102）、95.26%（181/190）比81.58%（155/190）、86.27%（88/102）比68.63%（70/102）、94.32%（83/88）比85.23%（75/88）；χ²=8.908、9.139、8.908、4.501，P=0.003、0.003、0.003、0.034］。结论　免疫磁珠分离技术可有效检测阴道炎患者感染类型，对提升白色念珠菌所致阴道炎的诊断准确率和指导临床治疗均有重要意义。

关键词:

白色念珠菌, 阴道炎, 湿片镜检法, 免疫磁珠分离技术, 检测价值

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the clinical value of immunomagnetic bead separation technology in the detection of vaginitis caused by Candida albicans. Methods　One hundred and ninety women who were took vaginal secretion examination at Zhengzhou People's Hospital from June 2021 to January 2023 were selected as the study objects; 102 patients with candida albicans vaginitis were included into the case group, and the rest 88 healthy volunteers who underwent routine gynecological examination were included into the control group. The vaginal secretions were detected by the wet film microscopy and immunomagnetic bead separation technology; the results of vaginal secretion culture were set as the gold standard. The detection and diagnostic efficacies of the two techniques were compared. χ² test was applied. Results　The detection rate of vaginitis caused by Candida albicans, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity by the immunomagnetic bead separation technology were higher than those by the wet film microscopy [86.27% (88/102) vs. 68.63% (70/102), 95.26% (181/190) vs. 81.58% (155/190), 86.27% (88/102) vs. 68.63% (70/102), and 94.32% (83/88) vs. 85.23% (75/88); χ²=8.908, 9.139, 8.908, and 4.501; P=0.003, 0.003, 0.003, and 0.034]. Conclusion　Immunomagnetic bead separation technology can effectively detect the infection type of vaginitis patients, and is of great significance in improving the diagnostic accuracy of vaginitis caused by Candida albicans and guiding clinical treatment.

Key words:

Candida albicans, Vaginitis, Wet film microscopy, Immunomagnetic bead separation technology, Detection value

姚琼徐岷.

免疫磁珠分离技术对白色念珠菌所致阴道炎的检测价值分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(14): 1958-1961.

Yao Qiong, Xu Min.

Value of immunomagnetic bead separation technology in detection of vaginitis caused by Candida albicans [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(14): 1958-1961.

参考文献

[1] Cheng R, Xu Q, Hu F, et al. Antifungal activity of MAF-1A peptide against Candida albicans [J]. Int Microbiol, 2021, 24(2): 233-242. DOI: 10.1007/s10123-021-00159-z.
[2] 岳庆阳. 不同微生物检验法对念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物的检验效果比较[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2022, 16(2): 91-93. DOI:10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2022.02.034.
[3] Kalia N, Singh J, Kaur M. Microbiota in vaginal health and pathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal infections: a critical review [J]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2020, 19(1):5. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-020-0347-4.
[4] 温美,彭红,张增萍,等. 凝集法与培养法及镜检法检验念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物分析[J]. 当代医学,2019,25(30):173-174. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2019.30.077.
[5] 岳庆阳. 不同微生物检验法对念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物的检验效果比较[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2022,16(2):91-93. DOI:10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2022.02.034.
[6] Chu PY, Hsieh CH, Wu MH. The combination of immunomagnetic bead-based cell isolation and optically induced dielectrophoresis (ODEP)-based microfluidic device for the negative selection-based isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) [J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8: 921. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00921.
[7] 王辰,王慧慧,李焕荣,等. «2018欧洲国际性病控制联盟/世界卫生组织关于阴道分泌物(阴道炎症)管理指南»解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2018,34(12):1360-1365. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2018120115.
[8] 孟秀春. 探究不同的微生物检验法对念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验的效果对比[J]. 当代医学,2022,28(4):141-143. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2022.04.051.
[9] 罗翔宇. 荧光定量PCR在念珠菌性阴道炎诊断中的应用价值[J]. 河南医学研究,2020,29(19):3589-3590. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2020.19.066.
[10] 吴碧云,李北坤,巫秀红,等. 阴道炎五联检测法与湿片镜检法在阴道分泌物检验中的应用比较[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志,2021,31(5):124-125. DOI:10.16458/j.cnki.1007- 0893.2021.05.054.
[11] 李清照,谭奎,刘玉霞,等. CD138免疫磁珠分选结合荧光原位杂交技术在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志,2022,30(5):1496-1500. DOI:10.19746/j.cnki.issn1009-2137.2022.05.029.
[12] 平洋,谭静,王晓瑞,等. 免疫磁珠技术分离检测熟制食品中的蜡样芽孢杆菌[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(20):6963-6967.
[13] 匡莹莹. 不同微生物检验方法对念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验的效果[J]. 医学食疗与健康,2021,19(15):187-188.
[14] 姚骅珊,陈悦科. 免疫磁珠分离联合荧光定量聚合酶链式反应快速检测阪崎肠杆菌的试验研究[J]. 江苏工程职业技术学院学报,2018,18(2):1-6. DOI:10.19315/j.issn.2096- 0425.2018.02.001.
[15] 李雪利,汪思源,翟征远,等.免疫磁珠——环介导等温扩增快速检测巴氏杀菌乳中蜡样芽孢杆菌的四环素耐药基因tetL[J].中国乳品工业,2022,50(4):52-56. DOI:10.19827/j.issn1001-2230.2022.04..011.

免疫磁珠分离技术对白色念珠菌所致阴道炎的检测价值分析

Value of immunomagnetic bead separation technology in detection of vaginitis caused by Candida albicans

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics