国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 1071-1074.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.08.009

• 科研课题专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

食管测压联合食管24 h pH监测对胃食管反流相关性胸痛的诊断价值

海花  陈金金  鲁苏日古嘎   

  1. 通辽市医院消化内科,通辽 028000

  • 收稿日期:2022-12-11 出版日期:2023-04-15 发布日期:2023-05-01
  • 通讯作者: 海花,Email:haihua71123@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    内蒙古自治区医疗卫生科研计划项目(TKJ2012Y00026

Value of esophageal manometry combined with 24 h pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux associated chest pain

Hai Hua, Chen Jinjin, Lusuriguga   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Tongliao City Hospital, Tongliao 028000, China

  • Received:2022-12-11 Online:2023-04-15 Published:2023-05-01
  • Contact: Hai Hua, Email: haihua71123@126.com
  • Supported by:

    Project of Scientific Research Plan of Medicine and Health in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (TKJ2012Y00026)

摘要:

目的 探讨食管测压联合食管24 h pH监测对胃食管反流相关性胸痛的诊断价值。方法 选取通辽市医院20176月至202112月接收的疑似胃食管反流引起的相关性胸痛患者145例,男92例,女53例,采用食管测压联合食管24 h pH进行监测,以是否胃食管反流分为胃食管反流组与无反流组。收集两组患者的年龄、性别、蠕动收缩百分数、pH <4反流次数、最长反流持续时间等资料,采用tχ2检验进行统计比较,通过多因素logistic回归分析、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析上述指标与胃食管反流相关性胸痛的相关性。结果 145例疑似胃食管反流相关性胸痛患者,经诊断为胃食管返流36例,无返流109例。经多因素logistic回归分析发现,蠕动收缩百分数、pH<4反流次数、最长反流持续时间均是胃食管反流引起的相关性胸痛的影响因素[比值比(OR=3.1552.9983.459P=0.0030.0120.001]。经ROC分析,食管测压、pH <4反流次数、最长反流持续时间联合预测胃食管反流引起的相关性胸痛的灵敏度与曲线下面积(AUC)均高于各指标单独预测时(P=0.0010.0010.004),联合预测的特异度与各指标单独预测时差异无统计学意义(P=0.852)。结论 食管测压联合食管24 h pH监测对于胃食管反流引起的相关性胸痛的诊断、治疗具有重要意义,值得临床推广应用。

关键词:

食管测压, 食管24 h pH监测, 胃食管反流相关性胸痛, 诊断

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the value of esophageal manometry combined with 24 h pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux associated chest pain. Methods One hundred and forty-five patients with chest pain suspected to be caused by gastroesophageal reflux admitted to Tongliao City Hospital from June 2017 to December 2021 were selected for esophageal manometry and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring, including 92 males and 53 females. According to whether they had gastroesophageal reflux, they were divided into a gastroesophageal reflux group and a no reflux group. The data, such as age, gender, peristaltic contraction percentage, reflux times with pH<4, and longest reflux duration, in both groups were collected. The diagnostic results of the two groups were compared by t and χ2 tests. The correlations of chest pain caused by gastroesophageal reflux with the above indicators were anyazed by multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results Among the 145 patients, 36 ones were diagnosed as gastroesophageal reflux, and the rest 109 had no reflux. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the percentage of peristaltic contraction, the number of reflux with pH < 4, and the longest duration of reflux were the influencing factors of gastroesophageal reflux related chest pain (OR=3.155, 2.998, and 3.459; P=0.003, 0.012, and 0.001). According to the ROC analysis, the sensitivity and area under curve (AUC) of the combination of esophageal manometry, the number of reflux with pH < 4, and the longest duration of reflux in the prediction of gastroesophageal reflux related chest pain were higher than those predicted by each indicator alone (P=0.001, 0.001, and 0.004); the specificity of the combination had no statistical difference from that predicted by each indicator alone (P=0.852). Conclusion Esophageal manometry combined with 24 h pH monitoring is of great significance for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux related chest pain and is worthy of clinical application.

Key words:

Esophageal manometry, 24 h pH monitoring of esophagus, Gastroesophageal reflux related chest pain, Diagnosis