自动痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.15.016

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (15): 2140-2143.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.15.016

自动痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床效果

张传泽杨晓朝彭如一谢永灿邢专陈朴区

罗定市人民医院普外科，云浮　527200

收稿日期:2022-03-17 出版日期:2022-08-01 发布日期:2022-08-01
通讯作者: 张传泽，Email：13480369981@163.com
基金资助:
云浮市科技计划项目（210604105440338、20210302）

Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids combined with Milligan-Morgan in treatment of mixed hemorrhoids

Zhang Chuanze, Yang Xiaozhao, Peng Ruyi, Xie Yongcan, Xing Zhuan, Chen Puqu

Department of General Surgery, Luoding People's Hospital, Yunfu 527200, China

Received:2022-03-17 Online:2022-08-01 Published:2022-08-01
Contact: Zhang Chuanze, Email: 13480369981@163.com
Supported by:
Project of Plan of Science and Technology in Yunfu (210604105440338 and 20210302)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　探讨自动痔疮套扎术（Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids，RPH）联合外剥内扎术（Milligan-Morgan，M-M术）治疗混合痔的临床效果。方法　选择2016年1月1日至2020年3月1日期间罗定市人民医院普外科收治的Ⅲ～Ⅳ度混合痔患者145例，按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组。对照组70例，男30例，女40例，年龄（44.97±9.86）岁，给予传统的M-M术治疗；观察组75例，男32例，女43例，年龄（45.83±10.27）岁，采用RPH联合M-M术治疗，并比较两组治疗效果、围术期指标及不良反应发生率、痔疮复发率。采用独立样本t检验和χ²检验。结果　观察组手术时间及创面愈合时间均短于对照组（t=7.135、5.986，均P<0.05），术中出血量明显少于对照组（t=6.372，P<0.05）；观察组总有效率为100.00%（75/75），对照组为100.00%（70/70），差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；观察组术后随访3个月并发症发生率2.67%（2/75），6个月复发率1.33%（1/75），明显低于对照组的10.00%（7/70）、7.14%（5/70）（χ²=3.345、3.081，均P<0.05）。结论　RPH联合M-M术治疗混合痔疗效肯定，有效缩短了手术时间及创面愈合时间，减少了术中出血量，显著降低了并发症发生率及复发率。

关键词: 混合痔, 自动痔疮套扎术, 外剥内扎术

Abstract: Objective　To investigate the clinical effect of Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) combined with Milligan-Morgan (M-M procedure) in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids. Methods From January 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020, 145 patients with mixed hemorrhoids of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ who were admitted to Department of General Surgery, Luoding People's Hospital were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group by the random number table method. The control group had 70 cases, including 30 males and 40 females who were (44.97±9.86) years old, and were treated with M-M procedure. The observation group had 75 cases, including 32 males and 43 females who were (45.83±10.27) years old, and were treated with RPH and M-M procedure. The therapeutic effects, perioperative indicators, incidences of adverse reactions, and recurrence rates of hemorrhoids were compared between these two groups. The independent-sample t and χ² tests were applied. Results　The operation time and wound healing time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group (t=7.135 and 5.986, both P<0.05); the intraoperative bleeding volume of the observation group was significantly less than that of the control group (t=6.372, P<0.05). The total effective rate was 100.00% (75/75) in the observation group, and was 100.00% (70/70) in the control group, with no statitical difference (P>0.05). The incidence of complications during 3 months' follow up after the operation and the 6-month recurrence rate were 2.67% (2/75) and 1.33% (1/75) in the observation group, and were 10.00% (7/70) and 7.14% (5/70) in the control group, with statistical differences (χ²=3.345 and 3.081, both P<0.05). Conclusion　RPH combined with M-M procedure in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids is effective and can effectively shorten the operation time and wound healing time, and reduce intraoperative bleeding volume, complications, and recurrence.

Key words: Mixed hemorrhoids, Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids, Milligan-Morgan

张传泽杨晓朝彭如一谢永灿邢专陈朴区. 自动痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(15): 2140-2143.

Zhang Chuanze, Yang Xiaozhao, Peng Ruyi, Xie Yongcan, Xing Zhuan, Chen Puqu. Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids combined with Milligan-Morgan in treatment of mixed hemorrhoids[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(15): 2140-2143.

参考文献

[1] 马良欢,金黑鹰,王俊,等.环状混合痔的术式选择[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2021,10(03):232-236.
[2] Zhang G, Liang R, Wang J, et al. Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy and tissue-selecting therapy stapler in the treatment of grade III and IV internal hemorrhoids (Meta-analysis) [J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 74: 53-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.027.
[3] 李创,黄治国,叶斌. 自动痔疮套扎术、外痔切除术治疗老年人混合痔临床观察[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志,2021,31(7):131-133. DOI:10.16458/j.cnki.1007-0893.2021.07.064.
[4] 苏亮,贾小强,曹威巍,等. RPH与PPH治疗混合痔的有效率和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志,2019,39(3):19-24. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1174.2019.03.009.
[5] 梁天伟.自动痔疮套扎术治疗老年混合痔的疗效及安全性评价[J].中医临床研究,2020,12(20):118-120.
[6] 叶竹平. 自动弹力线痔疮套扎器联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床疗效分析[J]. 世界复合医学,2020,6(8):68-70. DOI:10.11966/j.issn.2095-994X.2020.06.08.23.
[7] 中华中医药学会.中医肛肠科常见疾病诊疗指南[M].北京:中国中医药出版社, 2012: 11-12.
[8] 国家中医药管理局.中华人民共和国中医药行业标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社, 1994: 132.
[9] 王梦媛,刘仍海,洪燕秋,等.穴位贴敷疗法治疗混合痔术后疼痛疗效观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2021,30(16):1766-1769.
[10] Vahabi S, Beiranvand S, Karimi A, et al. Comparative study of 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate ointment for pain reduction after hemorrhoidectomy surgery [J]. Surg J (N Y), 2019, 5(4):e192-e196. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400532.
[11] Zhang G, Liang R, Wang J, et al. Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy and tissue-selecting therapy stapler in the treatment of grade III and IV internal hemorrhoids (meta-analysis) [J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 74:53-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.027.
[12] Genova P, Damiano G, Monte AIL, et al. Transanal hemorrhoidaldearterialization versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in grade III/IV hemorrhoids[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2019, 90: 145-151.
[13] 陶国建,禹业廷. 自动痔疮套扎术联合剪口结扎术治疗Ⅲ～Ⅳ度痔68例临床分析[J]. 河南外科学杂志,2020,26(2):52-54.
[14] 黄启豪. 自动痔疮套扎术联合地奥司明在混合痔临床治疗中的应用[J]. 外科研究与新技术,2020,9(1):35-38. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2020.01.011.
[15] 沙巴义丁•吐尔逊,买尔旦•阿不都哈力克. 自动痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔临床观察[J]. 实用中医药杂志,2017,33(5):553-554. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2814. 2017.05.071.

自动痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床效果

Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids combined with Milligan-Morgan in treatment of mixed hemorrhoids

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	林爱丹, 林敏, 钟桂莲. 分级镇痛理念在Ⅲ～Ⅳ度混合痔切除术患者疼痛护理中的效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(3): 434-438.
[2]	黄秀凤廖萍张丽. 生大黄粉穴位敷贴干预混合痔术后便秘患者的护理效果分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(16): 2355-2358.