球囊扩张治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的围术期护理效果评价

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.11.012

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 1529-1533.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.11.012

球囊扩张治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的围术期护理效果评价

钟莉萍罗杰苏妍妍苏彩虹汤嘉敏杨椹

南方医科大学附属花都医院广州市花都区人民医院肾病学科，广州　510800

收稿日期:2021-10-21 出版日期:2022-06-01 发布日期:2022-06-15
通讯作者: 杨椹，Email：13424028260@163.com
基金资助:
广州市医学重点学科建设项目（2021-2023年）

Perioperative nursing effect evaluation of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenosis

Zhong Liping, Luo Jie, Su Yanyan, Su Caihong, Tang Jiamin, Yang Shen

Department of Nephrology, Huadu District People's Hospital, Huadu Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510800, China

Received:2021-10-21 Online:2022-06-01 Published:2022-06-15
Contact: Yang Shen, Email: 13424028260@163.com
Supported by:
Guangzhou Medical Key Discipline Construction Project (2021-2023)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　评价球囊扩张治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的围术期护理效果。方法　选择2019年3月至2021年4月在广州市花都区人民医院行动静脉内瘘狭窄经皮腔内血管成形术（PTA）的64例维持性血液透析患者为研究对象，2019年3月至2020年3月行PTA治疗的32例患者作为对照组，2020年4月至2021年4月行PTA治疗的32例患者作为试验组。对照组男21例、女11例，年龄（59.72±13.22）岁；试验组男23例、女9例，年龄（58.41±14.16）岁。对照组患者采用常规护理方法，试验组患者在常规护理基础上采用更全面的围术期护理干预，随访6个月。观察两组患者PTA治疗前后的血管内径、血管自然血流量、穿刺针血流量及临床检验结果，统计两组患者并发症发生率及内瘘狭窄复发率。统计学方法采用独立样本t检验、配对t检验、χ²检验。结果　两组患者PTA治疗后的血管内径、血管内自然血流量、穿刺针血流量、血红蛋白、血白蛋白、尿素清除率、血磷均较手术前有改善，而且试验组改善均明显优于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。试验组患者透析并发症发生率为12.5%（4/32），明显低于对照组的37.5%（12/32），差异有统计学意义（χ²=5.333，P=0.021）；术后随访6个月，试验组患者无内瘘狭窄复发，对照组患者有6例（18.75%）内瘘狭窄复发，差异有统计学意义（P=0.024）。结论　对接受PTA治疗动静脉内瘘狭窄的血液透析患者进行围术期的护理干预，临床效果显著，值得推广。

关键词: 动静脉内瘘狭窄, 球囊扩张, 围术期护理干预

Abstract: Objective　To investigate the perioperative nursing effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. Methods　Sixty-four maintenance hemodialysis patients taking PTA for AVF stenosis in Huadu District People's Hospital from March 2019 to October 2021 were selected. The 32 patients treated from March 2019 to March 2020 were set as a control group, and the 32 ones from April 2020 to April 2021 as an experimental group. There were 21 males and 11 females in the control group, and they were (59.72±13.22) years old. There were 23 males and 9 females in the experimental group, and they were (58.41±14.16) years old. The control group were routinely cared; in addition, the experimental group took comprehensive perioperative nursing. Both groups were followed up for 6 months. The internal fistula vessel diameters, internal fistula natural blood flow volumes, puncture needle blood flow volumes, and clinical detection results before and after PTA were observed in both groups. The incidences of complications and the recurrence rates of AVF stenosis in both groups were calculated. The independent-sample t test, paired t test, and χ² test were applied. Results　After PTA, the vascular diameter, intravascular natural blood flow volume, puncture needle blood flow volume, hemoglobin (Hb), blood albumin (ALB), urea clearance rate (URR), and blood phosphorus (P) were better than those before PTA, and were significantly better in the experimental group than in the control group, with statistical differences (all P<0.05). The incidence of complications and recurrence rate of AVF stenosis in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group [12.5% (4/32) vs. 37.5% (12/32) and 0 vs. 18.75% (6/32) ], with statistical differences (χ²=5.333, P=0.021 and 0.024). Conclusion　Perioperative nursing intervention for hemodialysis patients with AVF stenosis treated by PTA has significant clinical effect and is worth being generalized.

Key words: Aneriovenous fistulas, PTA, Perioperative nursing intervention

钟莉萍, 罗杰, 苏妍妍, 苏彩虹, 汤嘉敏, 杨椹. 球囊扩张治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的围术期护理效果评价[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(11): 1529-1533.

Zhong Liping, Luo Jie, Su Yanyan, Su Caihong, Tang Jiamin, Yang Shen. Perioperative nursing effect evaluation of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenosis[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(11): 1529-1533.

参考文献

[1] 中国医院协会血液净化中心管理分会血液净化通路学组. 中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识(第1版)[J]. 中国血液净化,2014,13(8):549-558. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671- 4091. 2014.08.001.

[2] Steinman T.Economic isues in dialysis:Influence on dialysis-relateed complications in the managed-care//Complication of Dialysis[M].New York: Marcel Dekker,2000:737-752

[3] 叶朝阳.血管通路的功能评估[J].中国血液净化,2007(07):361-364. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2007.07.005

[4] 朱晓影,周美玲,吴靖. 球囊扩张治疗血透患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的效果观察及围手术期护理[J]. 中国现代医生,2017,55(2):146-149.

[5] 陈松,李晓颖,于黔,等. 尿毒症血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄超声引导下PTA术后的疗效观察[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2018,34(4):342-346. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002- 0101. 2018.04.019.

[6] 马衣拉·阿比提,热萨来提·亚森. 超声引导下腋路臂丛麻醉的临床应用价值[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2016(4):85-86. DOI:10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2016.04.063.

[7] 卫皓洁,高菊林,史珂慧. PTA治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的疗效观察及围手术期护理[J/CD]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2019,4(37):143,153.

[8] 郭焕开,李兰花,李杰.喜辽妥在减少动静脉瘘并发症中的作用[J].中国实用医药, 2010,5(20):157-158.DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2010.20.035.

[9] 林珣,吴宗壁,韩晓苇,等. PTA治疗维持性血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的护理[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2019,38(23):3998-4001. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2019. 23.046.

[10] 黎昱昱,林秀甜,蓝飞晓,等. 循证护理预防动静脉内瘘术后伤口感染的效果观察[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(23):3693-3695. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2020.23.041.

[11] 郝艳红. 低血压致血透患者动静脉内瘘功能不良的护理对策[J/CD]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2015(45):224-224. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3141.2015. 45.200.

[12] 王勇刚,王晓林,王林风,等. PTA治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的临床疗效[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志,2019,51(1):76-78. DOI:10.16096/J.cnki.nmgyxzz.2019.51.01.032.

[13] 姚玲玲. 球囊扩张治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的围术期全面护理总结[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2021,40(13):2423-2426. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200120- 00694.

[14] 孙雪峰,周希静. 经皮腔内血管成形术对血液透析患者内瘘阻塞的治疗[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志,1998,15(2):120. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:1001-7097.1998.02.015.

[15] 王璐. 142例血液透析病人内瘘狭窄后PTA术的护理[J]. 全科护理,2018,16(6):698-700. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674- 4748.2018.06.024.

[16] 吕霞,王浩宇,刘园园,等. 超声引导下经皮静脉球囊扩张术治疗动静脉内瘘狭窄的临床观察[J]. 广西医学,2017,39(9):1413-1415. DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2017.09.35.

[17] Cohen A, Korzets A, Neyman H, et al. Endovascular interventions of juxtaanastomotic stenoses and thromboses of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas [J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2009,20(1): 66-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.009.

[18] Tordoir JH, Bode As, Peppelenbosch N, et al. Surgical or endovascular repair of thrombosed dialysis vascular access: Is there any evidence?[J].J Vasc Surg, 2009, 50(4): 953-956 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.058.

[19] 胡旺敏.护理干预对血透患者预防动静脉内瘘并发症的效果观察[J/CD].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2017,1(7):111.

[20] 李春,夏丹,陈烁烁,等. 自体动静脉内瘘血管狭窄PTA术后初期护理干预[J]. 护士进修杂志,2019,34(10):930-932. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2019.10.018.

球囊扩张治疗血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄的围术期护理效果评价

Perioperative nursing effect evaluation of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenosis

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics