粤澳教师共建妇产科案例混合式教学模式的应用研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.08.022

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8): 1130-1134.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.08.022

粤澳教师共建妇产科案例混合式教学模式的应用研究

章雪玲¹ 黄美凌² 刘春玲³ 孙卓然³

¹广州医科大学附属第三医院产科三区，广州　510150；
²广州医科大学附属第三医院护理部，广州　510150；
³广州医科大学护理学院，广州　510180

收稿日期:2022-02-10 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-05-09
通讯作者: 黄美凌，Email：hmlgysy@126.com
基金资助:
广州医科大学教育科学规划课题项目［120204903，广医大发（2019）178号］

Application of a mixed teaching mode of gynecological and obstetric cases co-built by teachers from Guangdong and Macao

Zhang Xueling¹, Huang Meiling², Liu Chunling³, Sun Zhuoran³

¹No.3 Department of Obstetrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China;
²Department of Nursing, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China;
³School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China

Received:2022-02-10 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-05-09
Contact: Huang Meiling, Email: hmlgysy@126.com
Supported by:
Educational Science Planning Project of Guangzhou Medical University [120204903, (2019)178]

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　联合粤澳两地区高校和临床实践基地，通过妇产科临床案例驱动，共建“线上+线下”混合式教学模式，探索改革模式在妇产科实习护生临床护理教学中的应用效果。方法　选取2019年至2020年在广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科实习的182名护生为研究对象。采用非同期对照，2019年6月至12月实习护生90名为对照组，其中男9名、女81名，年龄（21.77±1.14）岁，采取临床护理常规教学法；2020年6月至12月实习护生92名为观察组，其中男7名、女85名，年龄（21.74±1.05）岁，采取“线上+线下”混合式教学模式。对比两组护生的自我导向学习能力和临床决策能力。计量资料采用独立样本t检验，计数资料采用卡方检验。结果　观察组护生的自我导向学习能力评分、临床决策能力评分分别为（257.92±37.70）分、（144.68±22.92）分，均高于对照组的（234.68±23.04）分、（133.21±13.35）分，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论　粤澳共建妇产科案例混合式教学模式有助于提升实习护生的自我导向学习能力和临床决策能力。但该改革模式需要学生主动参与，对护理学生的临床敏锐度和思维活跃度有一定要求，且本研究仅选取一间医院的临床护理实习生，今后研究样本范围有待进一步扩展。

关键词: 混合式教学模式, 自我导向学习, 临床决策能力, 护理实习生, 妇产科

Abstract:

Objective　To cooperate with universities and clinical practice bases in Guangdong and Macao and explore the application effect of reform mode in clinical nursing teaching of nursing students in gynecological and obstetric practice through the combination of "online + offline" teaching mode driven by clinical cases in obstetrics. Methods　A total of 182 nursing students who practiced gynecology and obstetrics in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from 2019 to 2020 were selected as the subjects. A non-synchronous control was adopted. Ninety nursing students from June to December 2019 were selected as a control group, including 9 males and 81 females, aged (21.77±1.14) years, and conventional clinical nursing teaching method was adopted; 92 nursing students from June to December 2020 were selected as an observation group, including 7 males and 85 females, aged (21.74±1.05) years, and the "online + offline" mixed teaching mode was adopted. The self-directed learning abilities and clinical decision-making abilities of the two groups were compared. Independent sample t test was used for the measurement data and Chi-square test was used for the count data. Results　The scores of self-directed learning ability and clinical decision-making ability in the observation group were (257.92±37.70) points and (144.68±22.92) points, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group [(234.68±23.04) points and (133.21±13.35) points], with statistically significant differences (both P<0.05). Conclusions　The mixed teaching mode of obstetric cases co-built by Guangdong and Macao nursing teachers can improve the self-directed learning ability and clinical decision-making ability in nursing students. However, this reform mode requires the students' active participation, and has certain requirements on the nursing students' clinical acuity and thinking activity. Moreover, this study only has selected clinical nursing interns from a hospital, and the sample range of future research needs to be further expanded.

Key words:

"> Mixed teaching mode, Self-directed learning, Clinical decision-making ability, Nursing interns, Gynecology , and , obstetrics

章雪玲, 黄美凌, 刘春玲, 孙卓然. 粤澳教师共建妇产科案例混合式教学模式的应用研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(8): 1130-1134.

Zhang Xueling, Huang Meiling, Liu Chunling, Sun Zhuoran. Application of a mixed teaching mode of gynecological and obstetric cases co-built by teachers from Guangdong and Macao[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(8): 1130-1134.

参考文献

[1] 中共中央新华社.国务院印发«粤港澳大湾区发展规划纲要»[EB/OL].(2019-02-18)[2022-01-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-02/18/content_5366593.htm#1.

[2] 石若瑾.香港护理教育概况与启示[J]. 当代教育实践与教学研究,2015,3(5):238.

[3] 陈琰晗, 周建荣, Wehrwein Teresa, 等.护理人才培养国际合作新模式的探索与实践[J]. 中华护理教育,2013,10(4):150-152. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2013.04.002.

[4] 刘明,殷磊. 澳门护理教学中的质量与安全教育[J]. 中国护理管理,2015,15(8):902-904. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672- 1756.2015.08.003.

[5] 李亚敏,宋丽莉,韩翠存,等. 助产士临床决策意识现状及其影响因素的研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2018,53(12):1482-1487. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.12.015.

[6] Trimble M, Hamilton P. The thinking doctor: clinical decision making in contemporary medicine[J].Clin Med (Lond),2016,16(4):343-346. DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine. 16-4-343.

[7] Lee DS, Abdullah KL, Subramanian P, et al. An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision-making in nursing[J].J Clin Nurs,2017,26(23-24):4065-4079. DOI:10.1111/jocn.13901.

[8] 李艳艳,刘丙进,陈翠萍,等. 基于任务导向的体验式教学对提高护生护理临床决策能力的实践[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2019,35(6):457-461. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088. 2019.06.013.

[9] 沈王琴,胡雁. 中文版自我导向学习评定量表的信度与效度[J]. 中华护理杂志,2011,46(12):1211-1213. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2011.12.024.

[10] Jenkins HM. Clinical decision making in nursing scale//Waltz CF, Jenkins IS. Measurement of nursing outcomes. volume 1: measuring nursing performance in practice, education, and research[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2001:33-40.

[11] 袁浩斌. 澳门护理本科生感知临床决策力的调查[J]. 护理学杂志,2016,31(10):82-85. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001- 4152.2016.10.082.

[12] 李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:58-59.

[13] 卢晓中. 推动粤港澳大湾区教育合作发展的思考[J]. 中国高教研究,2019,35(5):54-57. DOI:10.16298/j.cnki.1004- 3667.2019.05.09.

[14] Chair SY, Chan CWH, Yu DSF, et al. Changes in nursing education in Hong Kong - progressive or regressive?[J].Nurse Educ Today,2018,64:150-152. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.016.

[15] 周英,罗艳华,李桃,等. 基于地方医科院校特色的应用型护理学本科人才培养模式的改革及实践[J]. 广东职业技术教育与研究,2014,5(1):22-25.

[16] Halabi JO, Majali S, Carlsson L, et al. A model for international nursing collaboration[J].J Contin Educ Nurs,2011,42(4):154-165. DOI:10.3928/00220124- 20101001-01.

[17] Devi B, Khandelwal B, Das M. Comparison of the effectiveness of video-assisted teaching program and traditional demonstration on nursing students learning skills of performing obstetrical palpation[J].Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res,2019,24(2):118-123. DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_35_18.

[18] Weideman Y, Culleiton AL. A virtual pregnancy for pre-licensure nursing students: nine months up and close[J]. Nursing Education Perspectives,2014,35(6):410-413. DOI:10.5480/11-601.1.

[19] 吴学华,唐丹红,何燕,等. 互联网+翻转课堂护士培训模式对低年资护士学习态度的影响[J]. 重庆医学,2017,46(10):1427-1429. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.10.045.

[20] 朱婷,高远,张珍琪,等. 护生临床决策能力现状及研究进展[J]. 全科护理,2019,17(11):1315-1317. DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2019.11.011.

[21] 蓝静,戴利,陈银娟. 翻转课堂联合教练式教学在护生实习岗前培训中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志,2018,33(16):69-71. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.16.069.

[22] 贾淑云. 翻转课堂结合案例教学法在护理管理学中的应用[J]. 继续医学教育,2020,34(7):15-17. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.07.009.

[23] 王益兰. "微课+翻转课堂"在手术室实习护生带教中应用的现状分析与实践研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学,2018.

[24] Betihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R,et al. The evidence for 'flipping out': a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education[J].Nurse Educ Today,2016,38:15-21. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010.

粤澳教师共建妇产科案例混合式教学模式的应用研究

Application of a mixed teaching mode of gynecological and obstetric cases co-built by teachers from Guangdong and Macao

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics