加速康复外科诊疗路径在踝关节骨折患者围术期的应用效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.03.012

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 345-348.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.03.012

加速康复外科诊疗路径在踝关节骨折患者围术期的应用效果

周业修韦仁杰黄大波韦杰合韦礼永黄娟娟蓝婉婕

河池市人民医院创伤骨科，河池　547000

收稿日期:2021-10-12 出版日期:2022-02-01 发布日期:2022-03-01
通讯作者: 周业修，Email：115240684@qq.com
基金资助:
河池市科技计划项目（河科AB193612）

Effect of diagnosis and treatment pathways based on enhanced recovery after surgery for patients with ankle fracture during perioperative period

Zhou Yexiu, Wei Renjie, Huang Dabo, Wei Jiehe, Wei Liyong, Huang Juanjuan, Lan Wanjie

Department of Trauma Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Hechi City, Hechi 547000, China

Received:2021-10-12 Online:2022-02-01 Published:2022-03-01
Contact: Zhou Yexiu, Email: 115240684@qq.com
Supported by:
Project of Plan of Science and Technology in Hechi City (No.AB193612)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨加速康复外科（enhanced recovery after surgery，ERAS）诊疗路径在踝关节骨折患者围术期的应用效果。方法　选取2019年6月至2020年6月河池市人民医院创伤骨科收治的100例踝关节骨折患者，随机数字表法将其分为ERAS组（50例）和对照组（50例）。对照组男性28例，女性22例，年龄（47.25±13.48）岁。ERAS组男性24例，女性26例，年龄（46.37±11.69）岁。对照组给予围术期常规干预，ERAS组制定踝关节骨折ERAS诊疗路径。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、骨折愈合时间、美国矫形足踝协会评分系统（AOFAS）评分、Baird-Jackson评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）及并发症发生率。计量资料采用独立样本t检验和配对t检验；计数资料采用χ²检验。结果　ERAS组手术时间（96.45±12.89）min、术中出血量（52.12±10.48）ml、术后住院时间（7.44±2.18）d及骨折愈合时间（12.05±1.33）周，均显著少于对照组的（108.62±15.01）min、（64.35±11.92）ml、（9.12±3.04）d、（13.84±2.12）周（t=4.898、7.725、5.562、5.873，均P<0.001）。术后3个月，ERAS组AOFAS评分（56.82±5.88）分、Baird-Jackson评分（88.05±9.32）分，均高于对照组的（51.34±4.92）分、（79.84±8.12）分，VAS评分（1.51±0.39）分，低于对照组的（2.39±0.54）分（t=3.375、3.289、8.272，均P<0.001）。ERAS组并发症发生率显著低于对照组［2%（1/50）比14%（7/50），χ²=4.891，P=0.027］。结论　ERAS诊疗路径在踝关节骨折患者围术期的应用，能明显减少术中出血，缩短手术时间及住院时间，促进踝关节功能恢复，降低并发症风险。

关键词: 加速康复外科, 踝关节骨折, 围术期

Abstract:

Objective　To evaluate the effect of diagnosis and treatment pathways based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients with ankle fracture during perioperative period. Methods　One hundred patients with ankle fracture admitted to Department of Trauma Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Hechi City from June 2019 to June 2020 were selected, and were divided into an ERAS group and a control group by the random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. There were 28 males and 22 females in the control group, and they were (47.25±13.48) years old. There were 24 males and 26 females in the ERAS group, and they were (46.37±11.69) years old. The control group was given routine perioperative intervention, and the observation group developed diagnosis and treatment pathways based on ERAS. The operation times, intraoperative bleeding volumes, postoperative hospital stays, fracture healing times, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, Baird-Jackson scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and incidences of complications were compared between the two groups.The measurement data were compared by independent-sample t test and paired t test, and the enumeration data by χ² test. Results　The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay, and fracture healing time were (96.45±12.89) min, (52.12±10.48) ml, (7.44±2.18) d, and (12.05±1.33) weeks in the ERAS group, and were (108.62±15.01) min, (64.35±11.92) ml, (9.12±3.04) d, and (13.84±2.12) weeks in the control group, with statistical differences (t=4.898, 7.725, 5.562, and 5.873; all P<0.001). Three months after the surgery, the scores of AOFAS, Baird-Jackson, and VAS were (56.82±5.88), (88.05±9.32), and (1.51±0.39) in the ERAS group, and were (51.34±4.92), (79.84±8.12), and (2.39±0.54) in the control group, with statistical differences (t=3.375, 3.289, and 8.272; all P<0.001). The incidence of complications in the ERAS group was lower than that in the control group [2% (1/50) vs. 14% (7/50); χ²=4.891, P=0.027]. Conclusion　Diagnosis and treatment pathways based on ERAS for patients with ankle fracture during perioperative period can significantly reduce intraoperative bleeding, shorten operation time and hospital stay, promote ankle function recovery, and reduce complications.

Key words: Enhanced recovery after surgery, Ankle fracture, Perioperative period

周业修, 韦仁杰, 黄大波, 韦杰合, 韦礼永, 黄娟娟, 蓝婉婕.

加速康复外科诊疗路径在踝关节骨折患者围术期的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(3): 345-348.

Zhou Yexiu, Wei Renjie, Huang Dabo, Wei Jiehe, Wei Liyong, Huang Juanjuan, Lan Wanjie.

Effect of diagnosis and treatment pathways based on enhanced recovery after surgery for patients with ankle fracture during perioperative period [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(3): 345-348.

参考文献

[1] 王海涛,余志平,孙炳龙,等.电磁导航下踝关节骨折闭合复位克氏针内固定的临床报道[J].国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(10):1367-1369. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2020.10.010.

[2] 肖鸿鹄,李庭,米萌,等.加速康复外科在创伤骨科无痛闭合整复桡骨远端骨折的前性队列研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(11):945-951. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671- 7600.2019.11.004.

[3] 杨路德,吴晓波,解品亮,等.快速康复外科在老年股骨转子间骨折围术期的运用效果[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(10):939-944. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2018. 10.014.

[4] 罗刚,倪卫东,郭世航,等.缝合锚修复三角韧带深层治疗混合型内侧损伤踝关节骨折疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2020,34(11):1387-1391. DOI:10.7507/1002-1892. 202004148.

[5] 范新.快速康复外科在老年踝关节骨折手术治疗中的应用效果[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2020,26(4):697-700. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2020.04.025.

[6] 白求恩公益基金会创伤骨科专业委员会,李庭,孙志坚,等.ERAS理念下踝关节骨折诊疗方案优化的专家共识[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2019,12(1):3-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2019.01.003.

[7] 喻翔卿,赵以松,陆季娟,等.超声引导下隐神经与坐骨神经联合置管阻滞应用于踝关节骨折术后镇痛[J].中国临床研究,2019,52(10):1389-1392. DOI:10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2019.10.021.

[8] 宁艳婷,丁俊琴,李春柳,等.骨折患者出院前发生下肢深静脉血栓26例回顾性分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2020,41(9):1033-1038. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205. 2020.09.010.

[9] 范峥睿,马剑雄,王颖,等.踝关节创伤性关节炎的治疗现状及其相关进展[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(4):360-364. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20190917-00318.

[10] 陈雪,张展榕,邓子翔,等.老年骨质疏松性踝关节骨折切开复位内固定的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志,2020,36(1):39-44. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2020.01.009.

加速康复外科诊疗路径在踝关节骨折患者围术期的应用效果

Effect of diagnosis and treatment pathways based on enhanced recovery after surgery for patients with ankle fracture during perioperative period

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张磊, 孙丹丽, 周雅娟, 彭星, 杨一君. 加速康复外科理念指导腹腔镜全子宫切除术对绝经后妇女术后镇痛及胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(4): 488-491.
[2]	洪耿德, 方楠, 邓颖, 高玲, 陈冬平, 黄瑜芳. 免疫营养在食管癌围术期应用的研究现状[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(3): 439-444.
[3]	刘紫微, 郭肖霞, 林思婷, 张政, 王姗姗. 医护人员加速康复外科认知及相关因素的研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2021, 27(6): 945-948.