国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 258-261.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.02.028

• 护理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

焦虑自评量表在经尿道前列腺电切术后患者随访中的价值

江涛,丁亚岚,高静,陈雪莲,湛海伦   

  1. 中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科,广州 510000
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-17 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2022-03-09
  • 通讯作者: 湛海伦,Email:hailunzhan@aliyun.com

Application of Self-rating Anxiety Scale in the follow-up for patients after transurethral resection of the prostate

Jiang Tao, Ding Yalan, Gao Jing, Chen Xuelian, Zhan Hailun   

  1. Jiang Tao, Ding Yalan, Gao Jing, Chen Xuelian, Zhan Hailun Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Received:2021-08-17 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-03-09
  • Contact: Zhan Hailun, Email: hailunzhan@aliyun.com

摘要: 目的 利用焦虑自评量表(SAS)评估经尿道前列腺电切术后患者随访中的焦虑状态变化规律,为制定合理的心理干预措施提供依据。方法 采用前瞻性观察研究。选取 2020 年 1 月至 6月间在中山大学附属第三医院岭南医院泌尿外科收治的良性前列腺增生症患者为研究对象,对入组的32例接受经尿道前列腺电切术患者术前、出院时、出院后第1周、第2周、1个月时进行SAS评分, 同时采集国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和生活质量(QOL)评分。各评分量表在治疗前后的得分采用 方差分析进行统计分析,SAS评分与 IPSS、QOL评分之间的关系用 Pearson 相关性分析。结果 入组患者年龄为(60.0±1.6)岁,前列腺体积为(51.5±4.2)ml,膀胱残余尿量(PVR)为(93.6±50.1)ml。术后 1 个月 SAS、IPSS、QOL 评分均较术前明显降低[(29.3±3.3)分比(46.5±3.8)分、(7.5±3.0)分比(22.3± 1.9)分、(0.9±0.6)分比(4.0±0.6)分],差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。SAS评分的变化与 IPSS评分的变化呈明显的线性相关状态(r 2 =0.683,P<0.05)。结论 SAS能有效评估前列腺电切术后患者的焦虑心态变化规律,为科学合理的心理干预提供了科学依据。

关键词: 焦虑自评量表, 经尿道前列腺电切术, 国际前列腺症状评分

Abstract: Objective To assess the change of anxiety state of patients after transurethral resection of the prostate during the follow-up with the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and provide a basis for formulating reasonable psychological interventions. Methods This was a prospective observational research. Patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who were admitted to the Department of Urology of Lingnan Branch, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January to June 2020 were selected as the subjects, and 32 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate were subjected to SAS evaluation before surgery, at discharge, 1 week after discharge, 2 weeks after discharge, and 1 month after discharge. Additionally, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QOL) score were collected at the same time. The scores of each scale before and after treatment were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, and the relationships between SAS score, IPSS score, and QOL score were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Results The age of included patients was (60.0±1.6) years old, the prostate volume was (51.5±4.2) ml, and the post-voiding residual volume (PVR) was (93.6±50.1) ml. The SAS, IPSS, and QOL scores 1 month after operation were significantly lower than those before operation [(29.3±3.3) points vs. (46.5±3.8) points, (7.5±3.0) points vs. (22.3±1.9) points, (0.9±0.6) points vs. (4.0±0.6) points], with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). There was a significant linear correlation between SAS score and IPSS score (r 2 =0.683, P<0.05). Conclusion The SAS can effectively assess the change in the anxiety state of patients after transurethral resection of the prostate, and provides a scientific basis for reasonable psychological intervention.

Key words: Self-rating Anxiety Scale, Transurethral resection of the prostate; International Prostate Symptom Score