宫颈癌患者调强放疗中放疗设备间的系统误差探究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.02.001

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 150-153.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.02.001

• 科研课题专栏 • 下一篇

宫颈癌患者调强放疗中放疗设备间的系统误差探究

方涌文，刘镖水，肖亮杰，王宇留，姚文燕，林晓生，林承光，方键蓝

华南国家肿瘤实验室中山大学肿瘤防治中心放疗科，广州 510060

收稿日期:2021-12-13 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2022-03-07
通讯作者: 方键蓝，Email：fangjl@sysucc.org.cn
基金资助:
广东省医学科学技术研究基金（A2020621）

Exploring the systematic error of radiotherapy equipment in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer

Fang Yongwen, Liu Biaoshui, Xiao Liangjie, Wang Yuliu, Yao Wenyan, Lin Xiaosheng, Lin Chengguang, Fang Jianlan

Department of Radiotherapy, South China National Cancer Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China

Received:2021-12-13 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-03-07
Contact: Fang Jianlan, Email: fangjl@sysucc.org.cn
Supported by:
Medical Science and Technology Research Fund of Guangdong Province (A2020621)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析宫颈癌患者调强放疗（intensity-modulated radiotherapy，IMRT）中不同的治疗直线加速器存在的系统误差与随机误差。方法选择2019年10月至2021年11月在中山大学肿瘤防治中心 Varian Vital_Beam 加速器和 Elekta Versa_HD 加速器接受IMRT的宫颈癌患者 320 例，年龄 32~75岁。每例患者在放疗计划设计完成后，按照治疗计划的移床参数进行X线模拟定位机复位验证，治疗实施时，使用锥形束CT（cone beam CT，CBCT）进行体位验证，共 960次CBCT摆位误差数据。记录并观察 CBCT 校准后的体位误差数据并分别进行配对 t 检验分析。结果 Varian Vital_Beam 和 Elekta Versa_HD直线加速器在头脚SI、左右LR、前后AP平移方向的摆位误差分别为（0.00±0.32）cm、（0.00±0.25）cm、（0.04±0.24）cm和（0.08±0.40）cm、（0.02±0.33）cm、（0.04±0.25）cm，头脚SI与前后AP两个方向差异均有统计学意义（均 P<0.05），左右LR方向差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。 Varian Vital_Beam 和 Elekta Versa_HD 直线加速器在冠状 RTN、矢状 Pitch、横断 Roll 旋转方向的摆位误差分别为（-0.12±1.00）°、（0.81±1.33）°、（-0.32±0.64）°和（0.24±0.73）°、（0.28±1.64）°、（-0.01±0.80）°，差异均有统计学意义（均 P<0.05）。总的系统误差：Varian Vital_Beam 各方向为头脚 SI 0.29 cm、左右 LR 0.22 cm、前后AP 0.22 cm、冠状RTN 0.81°、矢状Pitch 1.46°、横断Roll 0.63°；Elekta Versa_HD各方向为头脚 SI 0.37 cm、左右 LR 0.30 cm、前后 AP 0.23 cm、冠状 RTN 0.69°、矢状 Pitch 1.44°、横断 Roll 0.72°。总的随机误差：Varian Vital_Beam 各方向为头脚 SI 0.23 cm、左右 LR 0.18 cm、前后 AP 0.14 cm、冠状 RTN 0.98°、矢状 Pitch 0.87°、横断 Roll 0.55°；Elekta Versa_HD 各方向为头脚 SI 0.28 cm、左右 LR 0.23 cm、前后 AP 0.15 cm、冠状 RTN 0.54°、矢状 Pitch 1.02°、横断 Roll 0.56°。结论不同放疗设备存在的系统误差有所差异，在头脚 SI、左右 LR、前后 AP、横断 Roll 方向的分析中，Varian Vital_Beam 的系统误差小于 Elekta Versa_HD 的系统误差；而冠状 RTN、矢状Pitch旋转方向的系统误差大于Elekta Versa_HD的系统误差。

关键词: 系统误差, 直线加速器, CBCT, 宫颈癌

Abstract: Objective To analyze the systematic and random errors of different treatment linear accelerators in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with cervical cancer. Methods From October 2019 to November 2021, 320 cervical cancer patients who were 32-75 years old and received IMRT with Varian Vital_Beam accelerator and Elekta Versa_HD accelerator in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were selected. After the design of the radiotherapy plan was completed, we performed the X-ray simulation positioning machine reset verification according to the bed moving parameters of the treatment plan for each patient, and used the cone beam CT (CBCT) for body position verification during the treatment, including 960 CBCT positioning error data. The body position error data after CBCT calibration were recorded and analyzed by paired t-test. Results The positioning errors of the Varian Vital_Beam and Elekta Versa_HD linear accelerators in the superior-inferior (SI), left-right (LR), and anterior-post (AP) translation directions were (0.00±0.32) cm, (0.00±0.25) cm, (0.04±0.24) cm and (0.08±0.40) cm, (0.02±0.33) cm, (0.04±0.25) cm; there were statistically significant differences in the SI and AP directions (both P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in the LR direction (P> 0.05). The positioning errors of the Varian Vital_Beam and Elekta Versa_HD linear accelerators in the RTN, Pitch, and Roll rotation directions were (0.12±1.00)°, (0.81±1.33)°, (0.32±0.64)° and (0.24± 0.73)°, (0.28±1.64)°, (0.01±0.80)°; there were statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The total systematic error errors of Varian Vital_Beam linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP, RTN, Pitch, and Roll directions were 0.29 cm, 0.22 cm, 0.22 cm, 0.81°, 1.46°, and 0.63°; the total systematic error errors of Elekta Versa_HD linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP, RTN, Pitch, and Roll directions were 0.37 cm, 0.30 cm, 0.23 cm, 0.69°, 1.44°, and 0.72°. The total random errors of Varian Vital_Beam linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP, RTN, Pitch, and Roll directions were 0.23 cm, 0.18 cm, 0.14 cm, 0.98°, 0.87°, and 0.55°; the total random errors of Elekta Versa_HD linear accelerator in the SI, LR, AP, RTN, Pitch, and Roll directions were 0.28 cm, 0.23 cm, 0.15 cm, 0.54°, 1.02°, and 0.56°. Conclusions The systematic errors of different radiotherapy equipment are different. In the SI, LR, AP, and Roll directions, the systematic error of Varian Vital_Beam is smaller than that of Elekta Versa_HD; while in the RTN and Pitch directions, the systematic error of Varian Vital_Beam is greater than that of Elekta Versa_HD.

Key words: Systematic error, Linear accelerator, CBCT, Cervical cancer

方涌文, 刘镖水, 肖亮杰, 王宇留, 姚文燕, 林晓生, 林承光, 方键蓝. 宫颈癌患者调强放疗中放疗设备间的系统误差探究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(2): 150-153.

Fang Yongwen, Liu Biaoshui, Xiao Liangjie, Wang Yuliu, Yao Wenyan, Lin Xiaosheng, Lin Chengguang, Fang Jianlan. Exploring the systematic error of radiotherapy equipment in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(2): 150-153.

参考文献

[1] 胡胜文,郭瑞锋,王泽辉,等. 医科达Precise医用直线加速器系统误差的分布特征[J]. 医疗装备,2021,34(19):23-26. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2021.19.007.

[2] 王鑫,胡超苏,应红梅,等 .摆位系统误差对鼻咽癌放疗剂量分布的影响[J]. 中国癌症杂志,2008,18(8):620-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3639.2008.08.013.

[3] 潘建基,潘才住,陈传本,等 .摆位系统误差对鼻咽癌调强放疗剂量的影响 [J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志 , 2007, 16(5): 394-396. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:1004-4221.2007.05.018.

[4] 郑佳俊,翟振宇,孙丽 . 瓦里安高分辨率多叶准直器叶片位置误差对肺肿瘤立体定向放疗剂量学影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志 , 2021, 30(9): 930-935. DOI: 10.3760/cma. j. cn113030-20210417-00189.

[5] 曾汝园.黄芪注射液联合紫杉醇、顺铂化疗方案对中晚期宫颈癌患者化疗疗效及血清肿瘤因子的影响[J].按摩与康复医学 , 2021, 12(23): 46-47, 51. DOI: 10.19787/j. issn.1008-1879.2021.23.014.

[6] 张丙新,付东山 .锥形束 CT 临床应用中的主要问题对策研究现状[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2021,30(10):1099-1104. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20201023-00509.

[7] 王如芹,兰卫光.图像引导放射治疗技术对腹部肿瘤放射治疗精度的影响分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(15): 102-103. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2021.15.044.

[8] 黄成剑,李勇,杨金鑫,等.CBCT不同扫描参数在椎体图像引导调强放疗中的应用研究[J]. 中国医疗设备,2021,36(7): 60-63. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2021.07.013.

[9] 许峰,王瑾,柏森,等.应用锥形束CT分析肿瘤放疗中分次间及分次内摆位误差[J].癌症,2008,27(10):1111-1116. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-467X.2008.10.017.

[10] 许新明,蔡亚磊,高灵灵,等.CBCT图像引导下宫颈癌摆位误差及其对靶区外放边界影响[J]. 社区医学杂志, 2021, 19(18):1119-1122. DOI:10.19790/j.cnki.JCM.2021.18.08.

[11] 张彦新,郇福奎,耿松松,等 .乳腺癌改良根治术后放疗两种固定方式在锁骨上下区摆位误差的比较[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志 , 2021, 45(6): 348-356. DOI: 10.3760/cma. j. cn121381-202005050-00068.

[12] 潘险峰 . 血液净化治疗尿毒症患者抗生素脑病 30 例临床分析[J]. 医疗卫生装备,2011,32(6):70-71. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1003-8868.2011.06.028.

[13] 王甜,成肇杰,梁卫学,等 .宫颈癌容积旋转调强放疗中患者腹围变化对摆位误差的影响[J].医疗卫生装备,2019,40(3): 45-48. DOI:10.19745/j.1003-8868.2019064.

[14] 郭伟,毛荣虎,李兵,等 .基于 AAPM-TG218 报告对调强放疗计划剂量验证容差和干预限值的初步研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志 , 2021, 30(8): 817-821. DOI: 10.3760/cma. j. cn113030-20200330-00146.

[15] 李毅,唐丰文,张晓智.基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志,2016, 33(9): 892-897. DOI: 10.3969/j. issn. 1005- 202X.2016.09.005.

宫颈癌患者调强放疗中放疗设备间的系统误差探究

Exploring the systematic error of radiotherapy equipment in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics