老年糖尿病足患者术中应用“领结征”髂筋膜多点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞的效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241119-14015

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (14): 2360-2365.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241119-14015

老年糖尿病足患者术中应用“领结征”髂筋膜多点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞的效果

吴文斌¹ 王琴² 曾自三³

¹铜川市人民医院麻醉科，铜川 727100；²铜川市人民医院重症医学科，铜川 727100；³广西医科大学第一附属医院放射科，南宁 510120

收稿日期:2024-11-19 出版日期:2025-07-01 发布日期:2025-08-05
通讯作者: 王琴，Email：405858498@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81660287）

Effect of "bow tie sign" iliofascial multipoint block combined with sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa during operation for elderly patients with diabetic feet

Wu Wenbin¹, Wang Qin², Zeng Zisan³

¹Department of Anesthesia, Tongchuan People's Hospital, Tongchuan 727100, China; ²Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tongchuan People's Hospital, Tongchuan 727100, China; ³Department of Radiology, First Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 510120, China

Received:2024-11-19 Online:2025-07-01 Published:2025-08-05
Contact: Wang Qin, Email: 405858498@qq.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation (81660287)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　分析“领结征”髂筋膜多点阻滞与单点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞在老年糖尿病足（diabetic foot，DF）患者术中的麻醉效果。方法　选取2021年4月至2024年2月铜川市人民医院收治的95例行DF手术治疗的老年患者为研究对象。按不同麻醉方法将其分为对照组46例和观察组49例。对照组男29例，女17例，年龄（70.15±3.96）岁，糖尿病病程（13.02±2.98）年，DF病程（2.43±0.34）年；美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）分级Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级各23例。观察组男25例，女24例，年龄（69.52±3.45）岁，糖尿病病程（12.42±2.74）年，DF病程（2.30±0.31）年；ASA分级Ⅰ级26例，Ⅱ级23例。对照组进行“领结征”髂筋膜单点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞，观察组进行“领结征”髂筋膜多点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞。比较两组麻醉前（T₀）、麻醉完成后10 min（T₁）、术后20 min（T₂）血流动力学指标、应激指标、感觉和运动神经阻滞起效和维持时间、疼痛程度、舒适程度及不良反应。采用χ²检验、t检验和方差分析进行统计分析。结果　T₁、T₂时，观察组平均动脉压（mean arterial pressure，MAP）［（84.25±3.69）mmHg（1 mmHg=0.133 kPa）比（75.41±2.69）mmHg、（85.26±3.89）mmHg比（79.41±3.08）mmHg、心率（heart rate，HR）［（70.23±3.26）次/min比（68.17±3.67）次/min、（71.05±3.54）次/min比（72.36±3.78）次/min］、血氧饱和度（blood oxygen saturation，SpO₂）［（87.62±4.05）%比（84.19±4.59）%、（89.47±4.87）%比（82.05±4.99）%］均优于对照组（均P<0.05）。T₁、T₂时，观察组皮质醇（cortisol，Cor）［（280.36±26.74）μg/L比（295.16±25.74）μg/L、（272.20±24.96）μg/L比（286.78±25.11）μg/L］、内皮素（endothelin，ET）［（77.56±8.24）ng/L比（83.47±9.74）ng/L、（71.29±7.15）ng/L比（76.96±8.14）ng/L］、丙二醛（malondialdehyde，MDA）［（67.52±3.54）μmol/L比（72.96±4.05）μmol/L、（61.47±3.28）μmol/L比（64.89±3.84）μmol/L］水平均优于对照组（均P<0.05）。观察组运动神经阻滞、感觉神经阻滞维持时间均长于对照组［（356.24±19.57）min比（286.95±17.25）min、（382.41±23.62）min比（327.18±21.05）min，均P<0.05］。术后12 h，观察组疼痛评分、舒适度状态量表（Bruggman Comfort Scale，BCS）评分均低于对照组［（2.63±0.41）分比（3.89±0.64）分、（1.85±0.32）分比（2.63±0.38）分，均P<0.05］。两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论　DF手术患者进行“领结征”髂筋膜多点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞可有效稳定其血流动力学，降低其应激反应，缓解其术后疼痛，不增加不良反应。

关键词: 多点阻滞, 单点阻滞, “领结征”髂筋膜, 腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞, 糖尿病足手术

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the anesthetic effects of "bow tie sign" iliofascial multipoint block and single point block combined with upper popliteal sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa during operation for elderly patients with diabetic feet. Methods　Ninety-five elderly patients undergoing DF operation in Tongchuan People's Hospital from April 2021 to February 2024 were divided into a control group (46 cases) and an observation group (49 cases) according to the anesthesia methods. In the control group, there were 29 males and 17 females; they were (70.15±3.96) years old; the duration of DM was (13.02±2.98) years; the duration of DF was (2.43±0.34) years; there were 23 cases of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade Ⅰ and 23 cases of grade Ⅱ. In the observation group, there were 25 males and 24 females; they were (69.52±3.45) years old; the duration of DM was (12.42±2.74) years; the duration of DF was (2.30±0.31) years; there were 26 cases of ASA grade Ⅰ and 23 cases of grade Ⅱ. The control group took "bow tie sign" iliofascial single point block and sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa. The observation group took "bow tie sign" iliofascial multipoint block and sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa. The hemodynamic indicators and stress indicators before anesthesia (T₀), 10 min after anesthesia (T₁), and 20 min after operation (T₂), sensation and motor nerve block onset and maintenance times, pain degrees, comfort degrees, and incidence rates of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. χ² test, t test, and analysis of variance were used for the statistical analysis. Results　At T₁ and T₂, the mean arterial pressures (MAP) [(84.25±3.69) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. (75.41±2.69) mmHg and (85.26±3.89) mmHg vs. (79.41±3.08) mmHg, heart rates (HR) [(70.23±3.26) beats/min vs. (68.17±3.67) beats /min and (71.05±3.54) beats/min vs. (72.36±3.78) beats/min], and blood oxygen saturation (SpO₂) [(87.62±4.05)% vs. (84.19±4.59)% and (89.47±4.87)% vs. (82.05±4.99)%] in the observation group were better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). At T₁ and T₂, the levels of cortisol (Cor) [(280.36±26.74) μg/L vs. (295.16±25.74) μg/L and (272.20±24.96) μg/L vs. (286.78±25.11) μg/L], endothelin (ET) [(77.56±8.24) ng/L vs. (83.47±9.74) ng/L and (71.29±7.15) ng/L vs. (76.96±8.14) ng/L], and malondialdehyde (MDA) [(67.52±3.54) μmol/L vs. (72.96±4.05) μmol/L and (61.47±3.28) μmol/L vs. (64.89±3.84) μmol/L] in the observation group were better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The motor and sensory nerve block maintenance times in the observation group were longer than those in the control group [(356.24±19.57) min vs. (286.95±17.25) min and (382.41±23.62) min vs. (327.18±21.05) min; both P<0.05]. Twelve hours after surgery, the pain score and score of Bruggman Comfort Scale (BCS) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (2.63±0.41 vs. 3.89±0.64 and 1.85±0.32 vs. 2.63±0.38; both P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion　"Bow tie sign" iliofascial multipoint block combined with sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa can effectively stabilize hemodynamics, reduce stress response, relieve postoperative pain, and do not increase adverse reactions in DF patients.

Key words: Multipoint block, , Single point block, , "Bow tie sign" iliac fascia, , Sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa, , Diabetic foot surgery

吴文斌王琴曾自三.

老年糖尿病足患者术中应用“领结征”髂筋膜多点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(14): 2360-2365.

Wu Wenbin, Wang Qin, Zeng Zisan.

Effect of "bow tie sign" iliofascial multipoint block combined with sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa during operation for elderly patients with diabetic feet [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(14): 2360-2365.

参考文献

[1]张贺成,魏苏.老年2型糖尿病病人血清铁蛋白水平与糖尿病足发生的相关性[J].实用老年医学, 2023, 37(11): 1111-1114,1119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.11.008.

[2]刘宇彪,周花玩,鞠上. HOX13与糖尿病足患者临床特征的相关性及对细胞增殖、凋亡及炎症的影响[J].西部医学, 2023, 35(10): 1425-1432. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.2023.10.004.

[3]王会月,李倩瑜,刘嘉运,等. "沙漏征"髂筋膜间隙阻滞联合腘窝坐骨神经阻滞在老年患者糖尿病足手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(4): 439-441. DOI:10.12089/jca.2023.04.021

[4]黄新利,孙志超,刘巍,等.髂筋膜间隙联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞用于糖尿病足膝下截肢术抗凝患者的镇痛及康复效果[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2023, 30(1): 75-78. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2023.01.016.

[5]单国法,夏焱志,郭明仁.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因实施"领结征"髂筋膜阻滞对髋部骨折患者围术期的镇痛效果[J].海军医学杂志, 2023, 44(5): 497-500. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2023.05.016.

[6]中华医学会糖尿病学分会糖尿病足与周围血管病学组.中国糖尿病足诊治临床路径(2023版)[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2023, 39(2): 93-102. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn311282-20221014-00583.

[7]Nacif A, de Abreu GE, Bessa Junior J, et al. Agreement between the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the dysfunctional voiding scoring system (DVSS) in the post-treatment evaluation of electrical nerve stimulation in children and adolescents with overactive bladder[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2022, 18(6): 740. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.07.032.

[8]Leoni FG, Magnano San Lio P, De Molo C, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS): a challenging diagnosis not to be overlooked-single center report and pictorial essay[J]. J Ultrasound, 2023 , 26(1): 249-254. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-022-00723-x.

[9]徐艳,华豪.罗哌卡因收肌管隐神经阻滞联合坐骨神经阻滞在中老年糖尿病足患者手术中的应用效果[J].广西医学, 2023, 45(9): 1028-1033. DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2023.09.04.

[10]Sha JY, Chen KC, Liu ZB, et al. Ginseng-DF ameliorates intestinal mucosal barrier injury and enhances immunity in immunosuppressed mice by regulating MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathways[J]. Eur J Nutr, 2024, 63(5): 1487-1500. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-024-03378-y.

[11]Shi H, Yuan X, Fan W, et al. Stem cell therapy for diabetic foot: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses[J]. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2024 , 13(5): 201-216. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2023.0136.

[12]尹鹭华.超声引导腘窝处坐骨神经联合隐神经阻滞在糖尿病足手术中的麻醉效果分析[J].糖尿病新世界, 2022, 25(20): 175-178. DOI:10.16658/j.cnki.1672-4062.2022.20.175.

[13]马永花.腰丛联合坐骨神经阻滞麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉在糖尿病足患者截肢术中的应用比较[J].实用糖尿病杂志, 2020, 16(3): 52-53.

[14]李咸鹏,郑煜丽,高晓曼,等.连续髋关节囊周围神经阻滞与连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞对老年全髋关节置换术患者围术期镇痛效果影响的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(3): 254-259. DOI:10.12089/jca.2023.03.006.

[15]徐艳,华豪.罗哌卡因收肌管隐神经阻滞联合坐骨神经阻滞在中老年糖尿病足患者手术中的应用效果[J].广西医学, 2023, 45(9): 1028-1033. DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2023.09.04.

[16]刘鹏程,韩妤妤,公金燕,等.髂腰肌平面阻滞与腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜间隙阻滞对髋部骨折早期镇痛效果的比较[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2024(4): 366-371. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20230922-01011.

[17]王鑫,陶晶,唐永冬,等.术前早期功能锻炼联合术后髂筋膜间隙阻滞在老年全膝关节置换患者中的疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2024, 39(2): 185-187. DOI:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2024.02.017.

[18]吴晓凡,陆遥,章蔚,等.不同入路腹股沟上髂筋膜间隙阻滞在高龄患者直接前方入路全髋关节置换术中的应用[J].中国临床保健杂志, 2022, 25(6): 805-810. DOI:10.3969/J.issn.1672-6790.2022.06.019.

[19]黄新利,孙志超,刘巍,等.髂筋膜间隙联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞用于糖尿病足膝下截肢术抗凝患者的镇痛及康复效果[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2023, 30(1): 75-78. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2023.01.016.

[20]方凯凯,王国军.糖尿病足手术中行超声联合神经刺激仪引导下前入路坐骨神经及股神经阻滞的临床应用价值[J].生物医学工程与临床, 2022, 26(2): 205-211. DOI:10.13339/j.cnki.sglc.20220218.002.

老年糖尿病足患者术中应用“领结征”髂筋膜多点阻滞联合腘窝上角坐骨神经阻滞的效果

Effect of "bow tie sign" iliofascial multipoint block combined with sciatic nerve block in upper popliteal fossa during operation for elderly patients with diabetic feet

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics