Robocare全流程护理模式对肿瘤患者的护理效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241118-14034

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (14): 2460-2464.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241118-14034

• 护理研究 • 上一篇

Robocare全流程护理模式对肿瘤患者的护理效果

马楠¹ 韩蒙蒙¹ 周菁² 王培³ 张静⁴

¹陕西省肿瘤医院手术室，西安 710061；²陕西省肿瘤医院内六科，西安 710061；³陕西省肿瘤医院麻醉科，西安 710061；⁴西安医学院第二附属医院心血管内科，西安 710038

收稿日期:2024-11-18 出版日期:2025-07-01 发布日期:2025-08-06
通讯作者: 张静，Email：2418625553@qq.com
基金资助:
陕西省中医药管理局委托办事经费任务书（2021-ZZ-JC039）

Nursing effect of Robocare whole-process nursing mode for patients with tumors

Ma Nan¹, Han Mengmeng¹, Zhou Jing², Wang Pei³, Zhang Jing⁴

¹Operating Room, Shaanxi Cancer Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China; ²Sixth Department of Internal Medicine, Shaanxi Cancer Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China; ³Department of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Cancer Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China; ⁴Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical College, Xi'an 710038, China

Received:2024-11-18 Online:2025-07-01 Published:2025-08-06
Contact: Zhang Jing, Email: 2418625553@qq.com
Supported by:
Delegate-based Service Funding Task of Shaanxi Administration Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2021-ZZ-JC039)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨Robocare全流程护理模式对肿瘤患者的护理效果。方法　选取2023年1月至12月陕西省肿瘤医院收治的98例消化道和泌尿系恶性肿瘤患者进行随机对照试验。其中，男55例，女43例，年龄39～76岁；消化道肿瘤患者60例，泌尿系肿瘤患者38例。采用随机数字表法将其分成试验组和对照组，各49例。试验组建立Robocare护理团队，并根据Robocare全流程护理模式，对患者从入院至出院实施全过程护理。对照组采用传统护理方法。比较两组术后1周生存质量、术后疼痛程度、住院时间、并发症发生率及护理满意度。采用χ²检验、ｔ检验、F检验、非参数秩和检验进行统计分析。结果　术后1周，试验组生活质量评分均优于对照组（均P<0.05）。术后1、3、7 d，试验组疼痛评分均低于对照组（均P<0.05）。对照组住院时间11.0（10.5，13.0）d，试验组8.0（6.5，9.5）d，差异有统计学意义（Z=7.338，P<0.001）。试验组术后并发症发生率低于对照组（P<0.05）。对照组护理满意度评分（87.74±3.46）分，试验组（95.56±3.55）分，差异有统计学意义（t=6.507，P<0.001）。结论　Robocare全流程护理模式可改善肿瘤患者生存质量，减轻患者痛苦，减少并发症的发生和住院时间，提高护理满意度。

关键词: 肿瘤, Robocare全流程护理, 手术机器人, 腹腔镜手术, 传统护理

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the nursing effect of Robocare whole-process nursing mode for patients with tumors. Methods　Ninety-eight patients with malignant tumors of digestive tract and urinary system treated at Shaanxi Cancer Hospital from January to December 2023 were selected for the randomized controlled trial. There were 55 males and 43 females; they were 39-76 years old; there were 60 cases of digestive tract tumors and 38 cases of urinary system tumors. The patients were divided into an experimental group and a control group by the random number table method, with 49 cases in each group. The observation group established a Robocare nursing team, and implemented the whole-process nursing from admission to discharge according to the Robocare whole-process nursing mode. The life quality 1 week after the operation, postoperative pain degrees, hospitalization times, incidence rates of complications, and nursing satisfaction degrees were compared between the two groups by χ², ｔ, F, and non-parameter rank sum tests. Results　One week after the operation, the scores of life quality in the experimental group were better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The pain scores 1, 3, and 7 d after the operation in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The hospitalization time in the control group was 11.0 (10.5, 13.0) d, and that in the experimental group 8.0 (6.5, 9.5) d, with a statistical difference (Z=7.338; P<0.001). The incidence rates of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction degree in the control group was 87.74±3.46, and that in the experimental group 95.56±3.55, with a statistical difference (t=6.507; P<0.001). Conclusion　Robocare whole-process nursing mode for patients with tumors can improve their life quality, relieve their pain, reduce the incidence of complications and hospitalization time, and increase the nursing satisfaction degree.

Key words: Tumors, , Robocare whole-process nursing, , Surgical robot, , Laparoscopic surgery, , Traditional nursing

马楠韩蒙蒙周菁王培张静.

Robocare全流程护理模式对肿瘤患者的护理效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(14): 2460-2464.

Ma Nan, Han Mengmeng, Zhou Jing, Wang Pei, Zhang Jing.

Nursing effect of Robocare whole-process nursing mode for patients with tumors [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(14): 2460-2464.

参考文献

[1]Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, et al. The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2020, 14: 155-165. DOI: 10. 1007/s11701-019-00956-9.

[2]戴军,何威,孙福康,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗复杂肾上腺肿瘤的手术效果比较[J].第二军医大学学报, 2020, 41(7): 721-724. DOI:10.16781/j.0258-879x.2020.07.0721.

[3]Hu Yinin, Strong Vivian E. Robotic surgery and oncologic outcomes[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2020, 6(10): 1537-1539. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2996.

[4]Terada M, Nakamura K, Martinelli F, et al. Results from a 1-day workshop on the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients: a joint initiative of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2020, 50(11): 1333-1341. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa119.

[5]郭晓斐,喻达.健康中国战略背景下对癌症防控策略的思考与探究[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2021,13(4): 339-343. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2021.04.02.

[6]庞园,陈慧,庄君龙. Robocare全程干预模式应用于机器人辅助下前列腺癌根治术中的效果[J].中国医药导报, 2020, 17(22): 156-159.

[7]徐静华.Robocare护理干预在内镜下治疗肝硬化合并消化道出血患者中应用分析[J].基层医学论坛, 2021, 25(21): 3002-3004. DOI: 10.19435/j.1672-1721.2021.21.022.

[8]荣智琨,王惠子,汪萍. Robocare护理模式在机器人辅助下胸腔镜手术患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27(10): 19-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.10.006.

[9]周红芳,李幼莲. Robocare全程护理干预策略对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的效果[J].中外医学研究, 2021, 19(32): 101-103. DOI: 10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2021.32.028.

[10]唐水连,范天丽,朱素勤,等. Robocare护理模式在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27(22): 121-124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.22.047.

[11]卢惠明,刘喜媛,陈小萍,等. Robocare临床护理路径在前列腺癌根治术患者尿控管理中的应用[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2020, 5(18): 168.

[12]柴蕴珠,徐宏蕊. Robocare护理模式对内镜下治疗肝硬化合并消化道出血患者心理及生活质量的影响[J].临床研究, 2020, 28(1): 193-195.

[13]刘银明,丘丽玉,梁玉琨,等.改良Robocare护理对达芬奇机器人子宫内膜癌手术患者心理状况的影响[J].妇幼护理, 2024, 4(20): 4799-4801,4804. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0838.2024.20.004.

[14]Wang JJ, Chen XR, Tang QJ. Implementation of the robocare nursing model for patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1): 405-405. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02159-3.

[15]李艳玲,李秋莲,袁菁,等.Robocare护理模式在机器人辅助妇科恶性肿瘤根治术围手术期患者中的应用效果[J].医疗装备, 2023, 36(23): 108-109. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2023.23.036.

[16]王婧,郭秀珍,吴燕珍,等.Robocare护理模式用于达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜下癌症根治术全程护理效果评价[J].中国药业, 2021, 30(S01): 127-128.

[17]Ren G, Wang J, Guo X, et al. Evaluating of the clinical eff ect of the robocare nursing model in Da Vinci robot-assisted radical cancer surgery [J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(8): 3220-3221. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.03.014.

[18]王彤,李娟,张红菊,等. Robocare护理模式在达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术全程护理中的应用[J].机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2024, 5(3): 360-365. DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2024.03.009.

[19]丘燕敏,林月双,陆媛媛,等.改良Robocare管理模式在达芬奇机器人子宫内膜癌手术患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(5): 738-742. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2023.05.022.

[20]Wang J, Guo X, Wu Y, et al. The application of robocare nursing model in the whole nursing care of Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cancer surgery[J]. Asian Journal of Surgery, 2021, 44(4): 667-669. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.01.016.

[21]张洋,李旭. Robocare护理模式应用于腹腔镜下RARP的可行性和有效性分析[J].饮食保健,2024(7):101-104.

[22]张娇娇,郭丽娜,王文婷,等. Robocare全程护理干预在腹腔镜下根治前列腺切除术治疗膀胱癌患者中的应用研究[J].当代护士, 2023, 30(5): 77-81. DOI:10.19792/j.cnki.1006-6411.2023.14.022.

[23]于文娟. Robocare护理模式在机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术患者中的应用效果分析[J].现代诊断与治疗, 2022, 33(15): 2344-2347.

[24]张园园.医护一体化的快速康复护理结合Robocare护理对子宫肌瘤剔除术患者应对能力和心理韧性的影响[J].肿瘤基础与临床, 2024, 37(5): 592-594. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5412.2024.05.026.

[25]王颖. Robocare护理对子宫肌瘤剔除术患者应对方式、心理韧性及自我护理能力的影响[J].临床研究, 2023, 31(2): 181-184. DOI:10.12385/j.issn.2096-1278(2023)02-0181-04.

Robocare全流程护理模式对肿瘤患者的护理效果

Nursing effect of Robocare whole-process nursing mode for patients with tumors

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	何苑洵张凌烟黄君. 原发性乳腺血管肉瘤合并卵巢血管肉瘤的超声诊断1例并文献复习 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(8): 1250-1253.
[2]	洪金全黄震宇黄惠炆黄豪博. 胸苷酸合成酶基因在肿瘤发生发展中的研究进展 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(8): 1260-1265.
[3]	于明英李媛燕普. 3D和2D腹腔镜手术治疗胃肠道癌症患者的短期预后比较 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(6): 900-907.
[4]	赵金鹏高呈飞吕晓东. 浸润性非小细胞肺癌患者水平裂分化情况及肿瘤边缘-水平裂距离与预后的关系 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(5): 761-765.
[5]	刘珍珍刘谩贾永庆杨美菊. miR-6884-5p在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及与肿瘤标志物的相关性 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(5): 766-770.
[6]	曾雅燕陈旭娜林彤彤谢漫郑智强蔡莹莹. 动机保护理论的健康教育模式在癌性疼痛患者疼痛全程管理中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(5): 860-864.
[7]	黄宇陆雪柔杨国海李永强. 基于BOPPPS的线上线下混合教学模式在消化肿瘤内科临床带教中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(4): 543-546.
[8]	刘文亮李忠陈辉苏珊刘志辉李丽林继红阮少欢庞惠丹. 粤西某二级甲等综合医院2020—2023年肿瘤患者情况分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(3): 473-477.
[9]	刘帅妹侯彦强. PAI-1在膀胱癌中的功能和机制的研究进展 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(14): 2310-2313.
[10]	罗璇仪李静尹迎春曹彰. 肿瘤异常蛋白联合荧光原位杂交技术对尿路上皮癌的诊断价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(13): 2127-2131.
[11]	曾云云蔡京伦黄智昊黄惠怡刘嘉淇苏珊. 穴位贴敷减轻肿瘤合并肺结核患者消化道不良反应的疗效 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(12): 2017-2021.
[12]	任传薇李会颖沈艳婷. 持续质量改进在老年癌痛患者管理中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(12): 2083-2088.
[13]	邓小英梁皓温柔张永刚. 腰方肌区域神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在老年妇科腹腔镜手术患者中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(10): 1604-1609.
[14]	黄美凌李菲. 女性肿瘤患者生育力保存的伦理思考 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(1): 1-4.
[15]	王文斌郭小花郑兆华郭曼孙力. 帕博利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇与卡培他滨方案治疗进展期胃癌患者的疗效评估 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(9): 1430-1434.